Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Increasing evidence suggests that accurate prediction of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) symptom onset requires more than amyloid- and tau-centric biomarkers such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40, total tau and p-tau181 and plasma p-tau217. Autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), caused by pathogenic PSEN1, PSEN2 and APP mutations with predictable age at symptom onset, presents a unique opportunity to characterize the chronological changes in proteins beyond amyloid and tau and clarify them as early biomarkers of disease onset or as biomarkers related to disease staging and progression monitoring. METHODS We measured 972 CSF samples corresponding to 484 participants of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease Network (DIAN) using the NULISASeq 120 CNS Disease Panel. We first benchmarked the technology against gold-standard measurements followed by the identification of proteins that were differentially abundant in relation to mutation status and symptomatology. Next, we determined the chronological emergence of protein changes in relation to the estimated years to onset (EYO). Finally, we assessed whether specific protein measures improved the prediction of EYO in the ADAD. FINDINGS NULISA measurements were comparable to those previously published. We demonstrated that known early alterations in CSF amyloid and tau were followed by inflammatory and neurodegenerative responses suggesting that clinical manifestation of AD happens before the inflammatory processes is fully developed. Finally, we found a multi-protein composite approach for predicting EYO that outperformed single biomarker values. INTERPRETATION Our results suggest that the main CSF proteomic landscape changes in ADAD are due to the presence of a pathogenic mutation and occur prior to symptom onset. Improved performance of multi-protein composite to predict EYO compared to single biomarker values highlights the added value of multiplex proteomic signatures for biomarker panel development. FUNDING National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer’s Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea, Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III.

Abstract Background Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), an adverse event associated with Alzheimer's disease anti‐amyloid immunotherapies, occur in the form of edema or sulcal effusion (ARIA‐E) and microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis (ARIA‐H). Conventional teaching is that ARIA‐H is permanent hemosiderin staining of the brain. In clinical trials we have noticed that some ARIA‐H microhemorrhages that occur with regional ARIA‐E appear to later resolve. The goal of this study is to illustrate that, opposed to current understanding, some ARIA‐H microhemorrhages may resolve. Methods We identified participants from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network Trial Unit (DIAN‐TU) and open label extension (OLE) gantenerumab studies that had ARIA‐E and at least one ARIA‐H microhemorrhage. The T2* GRE sequence from all available MRI exams in a patient were co‐registered and reviewed by a board‐certified neuroradiologist. Individual microhemorrhages were tracked over the serial exams. We defined disappearing/resolving microhemorrhages as those appeared with or following ARIA‐E, were visualized on at least 2 MRI exams, and were subsequently not visualized on at least 2 MRI exams. Results A total of 12 patients met inclusion criteria of which 5 (41%) had microhemorrhages that resolved over 10‐40 months follow‐up after the incident ARIA. These microhemorrhages occurred in clusters in the region of ARIA‐E, and only some of the regional microhemorrhages resolved over follow‐up. Examples are shown in Figures 1‐3. Conclusions The disappearance (resolution) of ARIA‐H microhemorrhages is relevant to the management and continued dosing of patients receiving anti‐amyloid immunotherapies as this is guided by the presence of ARIA (including cumulative treatment emergent microhemorrhages) as well as clinical symptoms. A microhemorrhage number alone may not be indicative of the potentially dynamic nature of ARIA‐H.