Lawlor, Elizabeth R.

Abstract Introduction: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a FET::ETS family member-driven primary bone cancer demonstrating vast heterogeneity. Between a patient’s primary diagnosis and disease progression, tumor cell state adaptation, microenvironment changes, and the landscape of evolving therapeutic vulnerabilities remain poorly understood. To address these gaps, the Sean Karl Cohort was established in 2025 to conduct the largest single-cell transcriptomic analysis of retrospective paired tumor samples from patients with EwS. Here, we present data from the five analytic teams, and through shared SOPs now expand this cohort to Europe. Methods: Common sample processing SOPs were established to isolate cells from FFPE material from paired patient EwS samples. Single-cell (sc) RNAseq was generated using the GEM-X Flex Gene Expression protocol (10x Genomics). Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF) Data Lab established a common data processing and integration pipeline with an EwS-specific cell annotation workflow to create a harmonized dataset for downstream analyses. Analytic teams were created to define tumor cell subpopulations and their therapeutic vulnerabilities and to characterize the tumor microenvironment. Data: We demonstrate the feasibility of generating high-quality scRNAseq profiles from retrospective FFPE-preserved EwS tumors. To date, 116 samples have yielded ∼800,000 cells. Integrated analysis reveals reproducible EwS tumor cell states shared across patients with regulatory network analyses nominating candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities. The scale of this international cohort enables saturation analysis for rare cell populations. Paired and longitudinal samples further allow correlation of emergent cell states with therapy resistance and metastatic progression. For example, immune-focused analyses show increases in T cell and macrophage populations in post-therapy samples. A novel, standardized EwS-specific cell annotation workflow has been developed to harmonize analyses and findings. These data will be openly shared with the community through the ALSF Single-cell Pediatric Cancer Atlas Portal. Conclusion: Large-scale international collaborative sample sharing, standardized processing pipelines, and harmonized EwS-specific annotations now enable deep single-cell analyses to characterize tumor heterogeneity in this rare pediatric and adolescent cancer. An in vivo expansion of the Sean Karl Cohort is underway to assess conservation of EwS tumor cell states and regulatory vulnerabilities identified in human tumors pre- and post-therapy in preclinical models, further supporting translation of these findings toward therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Abbe Pannucci, Elina Mukherjee, Jessica D. Daley, Shireen Sita Ganapathi, Elissa Boguslawski, Lea Surrey, Lauren Gutstein, Patrick Azar, Emily Stockfisch, Azfar Neyaz, Ivy John, Jennifer Picarsic, Yutaro Tanaka, Byron Butaney, Riaz Gillani, Brian D. Crompton, Katherine A. Janeway, Jaclyln Taroni, Jessica Davis, Damon Reed, Adam Shlien, Theodore W. Laetsch, Rajen Mody, Clémence Henon, Thomas G. Grünewald, Elizabeth R. Lawlor, Filemon Dela Cruz, Patrick J. Grohar, Jovana Pavisic, Ally Hawkins, Anthony R. Cillo, Kelly M. Bailey. The Sean Karl Cohort: An international single-cell RNAseq study of paired patient Ewing sarcoma specimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 643.

Trends in diagnostic biopsy sample collection approaches for primary bone sarcomas have shifted in the past 2 decades. Although open/incisional biopsies used to be the predominant approach to obtain diagnostic material for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, image-guided core needle biopsies have increased in frequency and are safe for patients. These procedures are less invasive and reduce recovery times but have potential limitations. The quantity and quality of tissue obtained through these procedures vary between institutions. Acquired viable tissue volumes can be low, limiting the conduct of downstream expanded clinical workup, molecular analyses, and research. Patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma continue to have overall poor outcomes despite dose-intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy. The biology of treatment resistance is not currently well understood, partly due to limited availability of relevant tissue to study. There is a need for access to quality tumor specimens for molecular and other analyses to identify high-risk tumor subsets and drive discovery to improve patient outcomes. Given broad variability in bone tumor tissue procurement and processing across member institutions, the Children’s Oncology Group Bone Tumor Committee convened a multidisciplinary group of experts to outline the current and near-future tissue needs for optimal clinical care and access to research platforms. The goal of this working group was to provide high-level guidance on biopsy practices that safely meet these evolving needs. Harmonizing tissue collection practices is paramount to improving the care of children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma.

AbstractBackgroundThe prognostic significance of having extraskeletal (EES) versus skeletal Ewing sarcoma (ES) in the setting of modern chemotherapy protocols is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, biologic features, and outcomes for patients with EES and skeletal ES.MethodsPatients had localized ES and were treated on two consecutive protocols using five‐drug chemotherapy (INT‐0154 and AEWS0031). Patients were analyzed based on having an extraskeletal (n = 213) or skeletal (n = 826) site of tumor origin. Event‐free survival (EFS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, compared using the log‐rank test, and modeled using Cox multivariate regression.ResultsPatients with extraskeletal ES (EES) were more likely to have axial tumors (72% vs. 55%; P < 0.001), less likely to have tumors >8 cm (9% vs. 17%; P < 0.01), and less likely to be white (81% vs. 87%; P < 0.001) compared to patients with skeletal ES. There was no difference in key genomic features (type of EWSR1 translocation, TP53 mutation, CDKN2A mutation/loss) between groups. After controlling for age, race, and primary site, EES was associated with superior EFS (hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.95; P = 0.02). Among patients with EES, age ≥18, nonwhite race, and elevated baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate were independently associated with inferior EFS.ConclusionClinical characteristics, but not key tumor genomic features, differ between EES and skeletal ES. Extraskeletal origin is a favorable prognostic factor, independent of age, race, and primary site.