Sorger, Joel

PURPOSE The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib is US Food and Drug Administration approved for NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors that lack a satisfactory alternative or have progressed after treatment but has not been systematically studied as a frontline therapy with a defined duration of treatment. ADVL1823 evaluated larotrectinib in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors with response-adapted duration of therapy and local control. METHODS Patients received larotrectinib twice daily in 28-day cycles for a predefined duration of treatment, ranging from 6 to 26 cycles depending on response to therapy and surgical resectability. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) within six cycles in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS); patients with other histologic diagnoses were analyzed in a separate cohort. Secondary objectives included event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled: 18 with IFS and 15 with other solid tumors. The ORR within six cycles was 94% (17/18; 95% adjusted CI, 72.7 to 98.6) among children with IFS and 60% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3 to 83.7) among children with other solid tumors. Six percent (2/33; 95% CI, 0.7 to 22.2) patients developed progressive disease while on therapy. Two-year EFS and OS among these groups were 82.2% (95% CI, 54.3 to 93.9) and 93.8% (95% CI, 63.2 to 99.1) for IFS and 80% (95% CI, 50.0 to 93.1) and 93.3% (95% CI, 61.3 to 99.0) for other solid tumors, respectively. Patients undergoing surgical resection of their tumor had prolonged EFS, with only 1 of 16 such patients experiencing disease progression. Four of 33 patients had dose-limiting toxicities. CONCLUSION Larotrectinib is highly active in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Larotrectinib should be a frontline option for patients with IFS and other NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Local control with surgical resection remains important in the treatment of patients with IFS.

10008 Background: NTRK1/2/3 gene fusions (TRK fusions) occur in a range of pediatric cancers and are the canonical molecular alterations in IFS. Larotrectinib is a highly selective TRK inhibitor that is FDA-approved for TRK fusion solid tumors in patients with no satisfactory alternative treatments or whose cancer has progressed following initial treatment. ADVL1823 (NCT03834961) evaluated larotrectinib in children with newly diagnosed TRK fusion positive solid tumors in two histology-based cohorts. Cohort A enrolled patients with IFS and is the focus of this analysis. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients ≤30 years old with unresectable or metastatic IFS and a locally identified NTRK gene fusion were eligible for Cohort A utilizing a Simon 2-stage design. Patients received larotrectinib at a dose of 100 mg/m2/dose BID (max of 100 mg/dose) continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, the tumor becoming surgically resectable following a minimum of 6 cycles of therapy, or completion of 12 cycles (for those with CR) or 26 cycles (for those with PR) of therapy. The primary endpoint was the centrally confirmed objective response rate within 6 cycles according to RECIST 1.1; response assessment occurred every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles. The data cutoff was December 31, 2022. Results: Between October 2019 and May 2022, 18 patients with IFS were enrolled from 14 centers. The median age was 2 months (range <1 month to 4.6 years). NTRK fusions included presumed/confirmed ETV6: NTRK3, n=15, NTRK3 (partner unconfirmed), TMP3: NTRK1 and DCTN1: NTRK1, n=1 each, and were identified by FISH (n=8), NGS (n=7), and PCR (n=3). 17 of 18 patients (94%) demonstrated confirmed objective responses (16 PR and 1 CR,) resulting in closure to enrollment after meeting the pre-specified efficacy threshold. The only patient without confirmed response demonstrated 79% tumor reduction after cycle 2, but no confirmatory scan was obtained within the first 6 cycles. No patient discontinued therapy within the first 6 cycles due to disease progression or toxicity. Four (22%) patients had dose limiting toxicities: 2 neutropenia (both CTCAE V5 grade (G)4) and 1 each G3 AST increase and G3 weight loss. All patients resumed therapy following a dose reduction. Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 7 patients, most commonly neutropenia (n=5, 3 G3, 2 G4). Conclusions: Larotrectinib is highly active and well tolerated in newly diagnosed patients with IFS. Enrollment of this very rare molecularly defined patient population was feasible within the COG. Ongoing follow-up will evaluate durability of response after treatment discontinuation at protocol specified response-adapted timepoints with or without surgical resection of tumor. Clinical trial information: NCT03834961 .

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThe impact upon wound healing of targeted molecular therapies, when incorporated into neoadjuvant therapy of soft tissue sarcoma, is largely unknown. Here, we describe wound complications following addition of pazopanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) +/− chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma.MethodsWound complications were evaluated on dose‐finding and randomized arms of ARST1321, a phase II/III study incorporating neoadjuvant RT, +/− pazopanib, +/− ifosfamide/doxorubicin (ID) for sarcoma therapy.ResultsOf 85 evaluable patients, 35 (41%) experienced postoperative wound complications. Most (57%) were grade III. Randomization to pazopanib + RT + ID carried a 50% wound complication rate (17/34, with 47% grade III), compared to 22% (5/23) with ID + RT alone. In nonchemotherapy study arms, pazopanib + RT resulted in a 59% wound complication rate versus 25% for those receiving RT alone. Grade III wound complications occurred among 26% (15/58) of all patients receiving pazopanib. Wound complications occurred a median of 35 days postoperatively. Some occurred following diagnostic biopsies and at remote surgical sites.ConclusionThe addition of pazopanib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT resulted in a higher wound complication rate following therapy of soft tissue sarcoma. The rate of grade III complications remained comparable to that reported in contemporary literature.

TPS10560 Background: In children, fusions of the NTRK1/2/3 genes (TRK fusions) occur in soft tissue sarcomas, including infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS), congenital mesoblastic nephroma, high- and low-grade gliomas, secretory breast carcinoma, and papillary thyroid cancer. Rarely, TRK fusions also occur in Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Larotrectinib is a selective TRK inhibitor FDA-approved for the treatment of TRK fusion solid tumors in patients with no satisfactory alternative treatments or whose cancer has progressed following initial treatment. In children, larotrectinib demonstrated a 94% overall response rate (ORR) with a 12-month progression free survival rate of 75% (1). Methods: Patients <30 years with any newly diagnosed unresectable solid tumor or relapsed/refractory acute leukemia with TRK fusions are eligible. TRK fusions must be locally identified in a CLIA/CAP laboratory and are confirmed centrally using a targeted RNA sequencing panel. Patients with high-grade gliomas are excluded. Patients receive larotrectinib 100 mg/m2/dose BID (max of 100 mg/dose) continuously in 28-day cycles. Patients with solid tumors who achieve CR will discontinue larotrectinib at the completion of at least 12 total cycles of therapy and 6 cycles after achieving CR. Those whose tumors become surgically resectable may undergo on study resection and discontinue therapy if an R0/R1 (IFS) or R0 (other tumors) resection is obtained. All other patients will receive 26 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. The primary endpoint is the ORR to larotrectinib according to RECIST 1.1 in children with IFS. The study uses a Simon 2-stage minimax design, and the regimen will be considered of sufficient interest if 16 of 21 (76%) patients with IFS demonstrate response. Patients with other solid tumors and leukemias will be analyzed in separate cohorts as secondary objectives. Correlative studies include serial sampling of circulating tumor DNA and neurocognitive assessments. This is the first Children’s Oncology Group study to assign frontline therapy based on the presence of a molecular marker independent of histology, and the first clinical trial to evaluate larotrectinib for the treatment of leukemia. Enrollment began in October 2019 (NCT03834961). 1. Tilburg CMv, DuBois SG, Albert CM, et al: Larotrectinib efficacy and safety in pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37:10010-10010, 2019 Clinical trial information: NCT03834961.

11002 Background: Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in advanced soft tissue sarcoma. ARST1321 is a phase II study designed to compare the near complete pathologic response rate (≥ 90% necrosis) of preoperative chemoradiation +/- pazopanib in children and adults with intermediate/high risk chemotherapy-sensitive NRSTS. Methods: ARST1321 is a jointly designed COG and NRG Oncology study opened to enrollment in July 2014. Eligible adult (≥18 years) and pediatric ( < 18 years) patients with unresected, newly diagnosed truncal/extremity NRSTS were enrolled into the Chemotherapy Cohort ( > 5 cm, grade 2/3, protocol-designated chemotherapy-sensitive histology). Following a dose-finding phase, patients were randomized to receive (Regimen A) or not receive (Regimen B) pazopanib ( < 18 years: 350 mg/m2/day; ≥ 18 years: 600 mg/day) in combination with ifosfamide (7.5 gm/m2/cycle) and doxorubicin (75 mg/m2/cycle) + 45 Gy preoperative RT followed by primary resection at week 13, then adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: As of June 30, 2018, 81 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized. Week 13 response is available for 42 patients (60% of expected information). The rate of ≥ 90% pathologic necrosis was 58.3% for Regimen A and 22.2% for Regimen B. Based on the significance level of 0.081 (for the second efficacy analysis with overall one-sided significance level of 0.20, power of 0.80, and O’Brien-Fleming-type cumulative error spending function), the 83.8% confidence interval for the difference was between 16.5% and 55.8%. At this predetermined interim analysis, the efficacy bound was crossed indicating that Regimen A is more efficacious than Regimen B. Given these findings, enrollment was stopped. Grade 3/4 toxicities were 73.8% for Regimen A and 29% for Regimen B with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia being the most common toxicities. Conclusions: The rate of near complete pathologic response was significantly greater with the addition of pazopanib to preoperative chemoradiation in children and adults with intermediate/high risk NRSTS. The comparison of survival outcomes requires longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT02180867.

AbstractBackgroundThe prognostic significance of having extraskeletal (EES) versus skeletal Ewing sarcoma (ES) in the setting of modern chemotherapy protocols is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, biologic features, and outcomes for patients with EES and skeletal ES.MethodsPatients had localized ES and were treated on two consecutive protocols using five‐drug chemotherapy (INT‐0154 and AEWS0031). Patients were analyzed based on having an extraskeletal (n = 213) or skeletal (n = 826) site of tumor origin. Event‐free survival (EFS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, compared using the log‐rank test, and modeled using Cox multivariate regression.ResultsPatients with extraskeletal ES (EES) were more likely to have axial tumors (72% vs. 55%; P < 0.001), less likely to have tumors >8 cm (9% vs. 17%; P < 0.01), and less likely to be white (81% vs. 87%; P < 0.001) compared to patients with skeletal ES. There was no difference in key genomic features (type of EWSR1 translocation, TP53 mutation, CDKN2A mutation/loss) between groups. After controlling for age, race, and primary site, EES was associated with superior EFS (hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.95; P = 0.02). Among patients with EES, age ≥18, nonwhite race, and elevated baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate were independently associated with inferior EFS.ConclusionClinical characteristics, but not key tumor genomic features, differ between EES and skeletal ES. Extraskeletal origin is a favorable prognostic factor, independent of age, race, and primary site.