Gonzalez, Stevan A

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations. Results: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p =0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p =0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p =0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement. Conclusions: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparative real-world effectiveness of terlipressin vs midodrine plus octreotide (MO) for hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) in the United Kingdom and the United States is limited. METHODS: Using individual-level chart review data for patients across the United Kingdom (2013–2017) and the United States (2016–2019), an indirect treatment comparison was conducted comparing the efficacy of terlipressin (UK cohort) with MO (US cohort). Covariate balancing propensity scoring matched the cohorts on baseline serum creatinine (SCr), presence of encephalopathy and/or ascites, albumin use and duration, age, and sex. The primary endpoint was HRS reversal, defined as achieving SCr ≤1.5 mg/dL by the last day of treatment. RESULTS: At treatment initiation, 90.2% of UK patients received terlipressin (194/215), while 89.2% of US patients received MO (140/157). Concomitant albumin was administered in 67.9% of UK and 98.7% of US patients. In a covariate balancing propensity score-adjusted cohort, HRS reversal was achieved in 53.2% of terlipressin-treated patients (the United Kingdom, weighted effective sample size of 75) compared with 16.9% of MO-treated patients (the United States, n = 89) (adjusted mean difference (95% CI) 36.3% (22.4, 50.2), P < 0.0001). In adjusted analysis, individuals treated with terlipressin experienced an overall reduction in SCr at completion of treatment (SCr decrease 1.00 mg/dL vs increase of 0.08 mg/dL for MO-treated patients, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: HRS-AKI treatment and outcomes differ between the United Kingdom and the United States, attributed to the historical standard of care MO in the United States. In adjusted analyses, real-world use of terlipressin was more effective than MO at improving kidney function and achieving HRS-AKI reversal.

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While liver transplantation is the definitive treatment, continuous terlipressin infusion for HRS-AKI may provide benefit and, as such, was assessed in a population composed of candidates for liver transplant (LT). Fifty hospitalized LT-eligible patients with HRS-AKI received a single bolus followed by continuous terlipressin infusion. Acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3, serum creatinine (SCr)>5.0 mg/dL, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥35 were exclusions. Fifty hospitalized patients who received midodrine and octreotide or norepinephrine for HRS-AKI served as a historical comparator cohort. Complete response (CR) was defined as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with end-of-treatment (EOT) SCr≤1.5, partial response as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with EOT SCr>1.5, and nonresponse as a <30% decrease in SCr. CR rate was significantly higher in the terlipressin cohort compared to the historical cohort (64% vs. 16%, p<0.001). Survival, while numerically higher in those who received terlipressin, was statistically similar (D30: 94% vs. 82%, p=0.12; D90: 78% vs. 68%, p=0.37). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was more common among terlipressin NR than CR and PR (70% vs. 3% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). EOT MELD and SCr were significantly lower within terlipressin cohort (MELD: 19 vs. 25, SCr: 1.4 vs. 2.1 mg/dL, p<0.001). Sixteen of 40 terlipressin-treated patients received LT-alone (terlipressin CR in 10/16). One patient on terlipressin had a hypoxic respiratory failure that responded to diuretics; one possibly had drug-related rash. With continuous terlipressin infusion, a CR rate of 64% was observed with a favorable safety profile. Terlipressin use was associated with lower EOT MELD and SCr than the historical midodrine and octreotide/norepinephrine cohort; LT-alone was accomplished in a high proportion of complete terlipressin responders.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on the comparison of treatments for hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) in a US population is limited. An indirect comparison of terlipressin plus albumin vs midodrine and octreotide plus albumin (MO) may provide further insight into treatment efficacy. METHODS: Cohorts of patients treated for HRS-AKI characterized by inclusion of patients with serum creatinine (SCr) <5 mg/dL and baseline acute-on-chronic liver failure grades 0–2 and exclusion of patients listed for transplant if model for end-stage liver disease scores ≥35 were pooled from (i) the CONFIRM and REVERSE randomized controlled trials (N = 159 meeting eligibility criteria from N = 216 overall, treated with terlipressin) and (ii) a retrospective review of medical records from 10 US tertiary hospitals (2016–2019; N = 55 treated with MO meeting eligibility criteria from N = 200 overall). The primary end point comparing the 2 cohorts was HRS reversal defined as achieving SCr ≤1.5 mg/dL at least once during the treatment. Covariate balancing propensity scoring was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: HRS-AKI reversal was achieved in 52.35% of terlipressin-treated patients compared with 20% of MO-treated patients (adjusted mean difference 32.35%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.40–47.30, P < 0.0001). Terlipressin-treated patients had increased overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.93, P = 0.02) but similar transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.53–1.17, P = 0.24). Achievement of HRS-AKI reversal was associated with increased OS and TFS regardless of treatment ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Consistent with prior reports, terlipressin plus albumin is more effective in improving kidney function and achieving HRS-AKI reversal than MO plus albumin based on indirect comparison in a US population.

Key Points Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1) is an often fatal, but potentially reversible, kidney failure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment with terlipressin in patients with HRS-1 is associated with a reduction in the need for RRT. Background Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1)—also known as hepatorenal syndrome-AKI (HRS-AKI)—is a rapidly progressing and usually fatal, but potentially reversible, kidney failure occurring in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. A large proportion of patients with HRS-1 require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Terlipressin demonstrated efficacy in reversing HRS and improving renal function in patients with HRS-1 in three phase III, randomized, clinical trials (RCTs; i.e. , OT-0401, REVERSE, and CONFIRM). However, these RCTs were not designed to evaluate the effect of terlipressin on the requirement of RRT. In this study, the effect of terlipressin on RRT requirements in the pooled phase III patient population was assessed. Methods For this retrospective analysis, data from patients who participated in the OT-0401, REVERSE, and CONFIRM studies were integrated in the largest-to-date randomized database ( N =608). Results The need for RRT was significantly decreased in patients in the terlipressin group versus the placebo group by day 30 (28.1% versus 35.9%, respectively; P = 0.040) and day 60 (30.1% versus 37.9%, respectively; P = 0.045) in the pooled population and also postliver transplantation (LT) at day 60 (20.5% versus 40.3%, respectively; P = 0.008) and day 90 (25.3% versus 43.1%, respectively; P = 0.018). More patients were alive and RRT-free by day 90 in the overall population (36.9% versus 28.5%; P = 0.030) and among patients who received an LT (60.0% versus 39.7%; P = 0.010). Random assignment to receive terlipressin was an independent positive predictor of avoidance of RRT ( P = 0.042); while higher baseline serum creatinine (sCr) level and Child-Pugh scores were negatively associated with RRT avoidance ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.040, respectively). Conclusions Terlipressin decreased the requirement of RRT compared with placebo among patients with HRS-1, including those receiving LT. A lower sCr level at the beginning of therapy was associated with avoidance of RRT.

Liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol associated hepatitis (AH) remains controversial. We convened a consensus conference to examine various aspects of LT for AH. The goal was not to unequivocally endorse LT for AH; instead, it was to propose recommendations for programs that perform or plan to perform LT for AH. Criteria were established to determine candidacy for LT in the setting of AH and included the following: (1) AH patients presenting for the first time with decompensated liver disease that are nonresponders to medical therapy without severe medical or psychiatric comorbidities; (2) a fixed period of abstinence prior to transplantation is not required; and (3) assessment with a multidisciplinary psychosocial team, including a social worker and an addiction specialist/mental health professional with addiction and transplantation expertise. Supporting factors included lack of repeated unsuccessful attempts at addiction rehabilitation, lack of other substance use/dependency, acceptance of diagnosis/insight with a commitment of the patient/family to sobriety, and formalized agreement to adhere to total alcohol abstinence and counseling. LT should be avoided in AH patients who are likely to spontaneously recover. Short‐term and longterm survival comparable to other indications for LT must be achieved. There should not be further disparity in LT either by indication, geography, or other sociodemographic factors. Treatment of alcohol‐use disorders should be incorporated into pre‐ and post‐LT care. The restrictive and focused evaluation process described in the initial LT experience for AH worldwide may not endure as this indication gains wider acceptance at more LT programs. Transparency in the selection process is crucial and requires the collection of objective data to assess outcomes and minimize center variation in listing. Oversight of program adherence is important to harmonize listing practices and outcomes.