Back to Authors

Bonagura, Anthony

Mayo Clinic

Optum North Wales Pennsylvania

Citations 3

Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Study 1102 heralds a new era in hematopoietic cell transplantation in high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Challenges and opportunities in implementation
Warlick, Erica D. , Üstün, Celalettin , Andreescu, Astrid C. M., Bonagura, Anthony, Brunner, Andrew M. , Foran, James M. , Kindwall‐Keller, Tamila L. , Klimek, Virginia M., Pease, Daniel F. , Waldman, Bryce, Horowitz, Mary M. , Burns, Linda J. , Khera, Nandita , Foran, James M , Khera, Nandita , Chandra, Abhinav Binod , Juckett, Mark , Steensma, David P.

Cancer | August 10, 2021 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 4339-4347

10.1002/cncr.33826 Get It

Lay Summary People who have advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) may live longer if they get a bone marrow transplant (BMT) instead of other therapies. However, only 15% of people with MDS actually get BMT. Experts say community physicians and transplant physicians should team up with insurance companies and patient advocacy groups to 1) spread this news about lifesaving advances in BMT, 2) ensure that everyone can afford health care, 3) provide emotional support for patients and families, 4) help patients and families get transportation and housing if they need to travel for transplant, and 5) improve care for people of under‐represented racial and ethnic backgrounds.
Meeting Report: The Dallas Consensus Conference on Liver Transplantation for Alcohol Associated Hepatitis
Asrani, Sumeet K. , Trotter, James F. , Lake, Jack, Bonagura, Anthony, Cameron, Andrew M. , DiMartini, Andrea F. , Martin, Paul , Mathurin, Philippe , Mellinger, Jessica L. , Rice, John P. , Shah, Vijay H. , Winder, Scott, Klintmalm, Göran B. , DiMartini, Andrea , Im, Gene , Shah, Vijay H , Terrault, Norah , Winder, Scott , Asrani, Sumeet K , Lake, Jack, Ahmed, Aijaz , Gonzalez, Stevan A , Martin, Paul, Terrault, Norah A. , Wall, Anji

Liver Transplantation | November 19, 2019 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 127-140

10.1002/lt.25681 Get It

Liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol associated hepatitis (AH) remains controversial. We convened a consensus conference to examine various aspects of LT for AH. The goal was not to unequivocally endorse LT for AH; instead, it was to propose recommendations for programs that perform or plan to perform LT for AH. Criteria were established to determine candidacy for LT in the setting of AH and included the following: (1) AH patients presenting for the first time with decompensated liver disease that are nonresponders to medical therapy without severe medical or psychiatric comorbidities; (2) a fixed period of abstinence prior to transplantation is not required; and (3) assessment with a multidisciplinary psychosocial team, including a social worker and an addiction specialist/mental health professional with addiction and transplantation expertise. Supporting factors included lack of repeated unsuccessful attempts at addiction rehabilitation, lack of other substance use/dependency, acceptance of diagnosis/insight with a commitment of the patient/family to sobriety, and formalized agreement to adhere to total alcohol abstinence and counseling. LT should be avoided in AH patients who are likely to spontaneously recover. Short‐term and longterm survival comparable to other indications for LT must be achieved. There should not be further disparity in LT either by indication, geography, or other sociodemographic factors. Treatment of alcohol‐use disorders should be incorporated into pre‐ and post‐LT care. The restrictive and focused evaluation process described in the initial LT experience for AH worldwide may not endure as this indication gains wider acceptance at more LT programs. Transparency in the selection process is crucial and requires the collection of objective data to assess outcomes and minimize center variation in listing. Oversight of program adherence is important to harmonize listing practices and outcomes.
Patient-centered care coordination in hematopoietic cell transplantation
Khera, Nandita , Martín, Patricia, Edsall, Kristen C. , Bonagura, Anthony, Burns, Linda J. , LeMaistre, C. Frederick, Majhail, Navneet S. , Majhail, Navneet S , Juckett, Mark , King, Olivia

Blood Advances | August 23, 2017 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 1617-1627

10.1182/bloodadvances.2017008789 Get It

Abstract Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an expensive, resource-intensive, and medically complicated modality for treatment of many hematologic disorders. A well-defined care coordination model through the continuum can help improve health care delivery for this high-cost, high-risk medical technology. In addition to the patients and their families, key stakeholders include not only the transplantation physicians and care teams (including subspecialists), but also hematologists/oncologists in private and academic-affiliated practices. Initial diagnosis and care, education regarding treatment options including HCT, timely referral to the transplantation center, and management of relapse and late medical or psychosocial complications after HCT are areas where the referring hematologists/oncologists play a significant role. Payers and advocacy and community organizations are additional stakeholders in this complex care continuum. In this article, we describe a care coordination framework for patients treated with HCT within the context of coordination issues in care delivery and stakeholders involved. We outline the challenges in implementing such a model and describe a simplified approach at the level of the individual practice or center. This article also highlights ongoing efforts from physicians, medical directors, payer representatives, and patient advocates to help raise awareness of and develop access to adequate tools and resources for the oncology community to deliver well-coordinated care to patients treated with HCT. Lastly, we set the stage for policy changes around appropriate reimbursement to cover all aspects of care coordination and generate successful buy-in from all stakeholders.