Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1899 citation(s) found for "Núñez, Sara".

Abstract 274: Occupational exposure to agricultural pesticides and CLL risk
Hallberg, Emily J., Achenbach, Sara J., Call, Timothy G. , Allmer, Cristine, Liebow, Mark , Rabe, Kari G. , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Kay, Neil E. , Cerhan, James R. , Slager, Susan L.

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 274-274

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-274 Get It

Abstract Background Previous literature regarding the association between occupational exposure to agricultural pesticides and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk has been inconsistent, particularly when looking at specific lymphoma subtypes. Most recently, a large European case-control study showed an elevated risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) among those ever exposed to inorganic and organic pesticides with the strongest association among those exposed to organophosphates. However, when restricting the analysis to subjects with high confidence of exposure, these associations were attenuated (Cocco P., 2013). We used case-control data from the Mayo Clinic to evaluate whether there is an increased risk of CLL among individuals with known occupational exposure to agricultural pesticides. Methods We evaluated pesticide exposure and CLL risk in a clinic-based study of newly diagnosed CLL cases and frequency-matched controls enrolled at the Mayo Clinic from 2002-2012. 200 CLL cases and 474 controls returned a detailed farming and pesticide exposure questionnaire that was modeled after the Agricultural Health Study, where exposure was based on pesticide-specific application. Unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex, was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated the effect of each pesticide individually, by chemical class of pesticides, and by an aggregate of multiple pesticide exposure on CLL risk. Results Among those participants with detailed farming data, the mean age of CLL diagnosis was 66 years and 76% were male; for controls, the mean age at enrollment was 65 years and 66% were male. Risk of CLL was mildly elevated, but not significant, amongst those with application of any pesticide (OR 1.39; 95% C.I. 0.92-2.10). When broken down by chemical class, risk of CLL was also mildly elevated, but not significant, for application of organophosphates and carbamates (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.84-1.73; OR 1.21; 95% 0.85-1.73, respectively). Organochlorines, phenoxy compounds, pyrethriods and triazines showed no evidence of an elevated risk, nor did we see evidence of a trend that CLL risk increases with number of pesticides applied. Discussion Our preliminary results provide inconclusive support for the role of pesticide exposure as a possible risk factor for CLL. However our sample size was small. Additional data will be incorporated, including confidence of exposure measures, as well as other modifying factors, to further evaluate these results. Citation Format: Emily J. Hallberg, Sara J. Achenbach, Kari G. Rabe, Timothy G. Call, Cristine Allmer, Tait D. Shanafelt, Mark Liebow, Neil E. Kay, James R. Cerhan, Susan L. Slager. Occupational exposure to agricultural pesticides and CLL risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 274. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-274
Abstract PD3-3: Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clonal composition of breast cancer
Barrett, Michael T. , McLaughlin, Sarah A., Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Moyer, Ann M. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Gray, Richard J. , Barman, Poulami , Vedell, Peter T. , Dockter, Travis , Jones, Katie, Felten, Sara J., Conners, Amy Lynn , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Sicotte, Hughes, Yu, Jia , Visscher, Daniel W., Wieben, Eric D. , Schultz, Cloann G. , Liu, Minetta C. , Wang, Liewei , Weinshilboum, R., Goetz, Matthew P. , Kalari, Krishna R. , Suman, Vera J. , Sinnwell, Jason P. , Mahoney, Douglas W. , Tang, Xiaojia , Thompson, Kevin J. , Hart, Steven N. , Ingle, James N. , Boughey, Judy C.

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: PD3-3-PD3-3

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-pd3-3 Get It

Abstract Background Cancer genomic investigations have identified recurrent genomic aberrations critical for cancer initiation, progression, and metastases. However, these investigations are typically performed in isolation, and the effects of treatment on the clonal selection of tumor cells are mostly unknown. We hypothesized that molecular profiling of residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) would identify new drug targets/pathways in patients at high risk for disease recurrence. To better identify clonal populations of resistant breast cancer cells, we utilized DNA content-based flow sorting of nuclei to identify and isolate clonal populations for aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) both before and after NAC. Methods The Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY) (NCT 02022202) is a prospective study of patients with high-risk breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant 12 weekly paclitaxel (T) +/- trastuzumab followed by 4 cycles of anthracycline based chemotherapy. Tumor tissue from baseline, residual disease from surgery, distant metastases, and patient derived xenografts (PDX) are obtained for cell sorting by DNA ploidy, aCGH, RNA and exome sequencing. Results: 140 patients have been enrolled, 104 have completed surgery and 30 unique PDX have been established corresponding to 26 patients prior to chemotherapy and 4 from residual disease at surgery. Baseline exome and RNA sequencing is complete in 140. Currently, genomic analyses of flow sorted matched baseline, surgical, PDX, and distant disease samples are available in 6 patients. Substantial genomic variation was observed in the surgical sample compared to the primary tumor including gain of oncogenic drivers (EGFR) and loss of negative regulators (ATG5) (Table). The PDX recapitulated these events with excellent fidelity compared to the corresponding human tumor. In patients with TNBC, RNA seq obained from matched samples demonstrated changes in immune related pathways. Evaluation of drug targets/pathways identified in the resistant tumors are ongoing using the PDX and sequencing of the remaining matched baseline/surgical disease will be reported. Clonal changes occurring over time in patients with residual disease or disease recurrence after NACTumor SubtypeResidual Cancer BurdenDisease StatusClonal Aberration Changes (baseline and post NAC)TNBC (AR subtype)3Contralateral lymph node recurrence at 150 days2p25.2 - p25.1 amplicon lost at recurrence; 6p21.32 -p21.31 amplicon lost at recurrenceTNBC (BL 1)3Bone/liver/lymph node recurrence at 135 days5q11.2 amplicon gained at surgery; 12p13.33 - p13.2 amplicon gained at surgeryTNBC (BL 1)3Disease-free at day 1506q21 amplicon lost at sugeryTNBC (BL 2)0Brain recurrence at 390 daysChr 2 chromothripsis at surgeryLuminal B3Progression during chemotherapy7p12.1 - p11.2 amplicon gained at surgeryLuminal HER23Disease-free at day 3609q33.2 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q13.1 - q13.3 amplicon lost at surgery; 15q22.2 - q24.1 amplicon lost at surgery Conclusions: We observed substantial evolutionary changes in residual breast tumors remaining after NAC. Our findings suggest that a comprehensive assessment of the mutational landscape that has evolved during NAC can inform drug development in high risk breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Matthew P Goetz, Michael T Barrett, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Sarah A McLaughlin, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Ann M Moyer, Donald W Northfelt, Richard J Gray, Jason Sinnwell, Douglas Mahoney, Poulami Barman, Peter Vedell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Travis Dockter, Katie Jones, Sara J Felten, Amy Conners, Jeanette Eckel-Passow, Hughes Sicotte, Steven N Hart, Jia Yu, Daniel W Visscher, Eric D Wieben, Cloann Schultz, Minetta C Liu, James N Ingle, Liewei Wang, Richard W Weinshilboum, Judy C Boughey. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clonal composition of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-3.
Abstract 2214: Genome-wide gene-diabetes and gene-obesity interaction scan in the pancreatic cancer case control consortium
Tang, Hongwei, Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. Bas, Gallinger, Steven , Holly, Elizabeth A., Petersen, Gloria M. , Bracci, Paige M. , Ríboli, Elio , Trichopoulos, Dimitrios, Peeters, Petra H., Li, Donghui , Duell, Eric J. , Risch, Harvey A. , Olson, Sara H. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Jenab, Mazda , Tjønneland, Anne , Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine , Kaaks, Rudolf , Panico, Salvatore , Sund, Malin , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Amos, Christopher I. , Wei, Peng , Riboli, Elio

Cancer Research | May 1, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 2214-2214

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2214 Get It

Abstract Introduction Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy due to late diagnosis and aggressiveness of the tumor. Characterization of high-risk populations for monitoring, intervention and early detection remains challenging. Obesity and diabetes are potentially modifiable contributors to pancreatic cancer. Genetic factors modifying the risk of obesity- and diabetes-induced pancreatic cancer have previously not been fully investigated at the genome-wide level. Hypothesis There are potential genetic factors modifying the associations between obesity/diabetes and pancreatic cancer. Methods Integrating genotype with risk factor data from a GWAS for the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium, we performed a genome-wide gene-environment interaction (G x E) scan for 457,688 SNPs in a discovery study of 2,028 cases and 2,109 controls using state-of-the-art methods including case-only (CO), case-control (CC), Empirical Hierarchical Bayes (EHB), Empirical-Bayes test (EB) and three 2-step approaches (DG2, EG2, DGEG2). Results We detected a genome-wide significant (P < 1.09 x 10-7 ) interaction of diabetes with rs13061928 (in CNTN4) in CO (P = 8.8 x 10-8 ), which was independent of diabetes in control group (P = 0.08). The minor allele was in a synergism with diabetes on the cancer risk: diabetics carrying GA/AA genotype had a 3.39-fold (95% CI: 2.47-4.65) increased disease risk compared with non-diabetics carrying GG genotype. Consistently, the SNP-diabetes interaction had a high ranking statistic in EHB (No.1) and high p-value ranks for EG2 and DGEG2 methods (No.1, P= 5.44 x 10-5). Conclusions These observations, once validated/confirmed, may help define at-risk subpopulation and initiate targeted intervention and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Genome-wide G x E analysis requires larger sample size than genetic main effects scan; combining the CO method with alternative methods may be the optimal scheme for genome-wide G x E analysis. Citation Format: Hongwei Tang, Eric J. Duell, Harvey A. Risch Risch, Sara H. Olson, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Steven Gallinger, Elizabeth A. Holly, Gloria M. Petersen, Paige M. Bracci, Robert R. McWilliams, Mazda Jenab, Elio Riboli, Anne Tjønneland, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Rudolf Kaaks, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Salvatore Panico, Malin Sund, Petra H. M Peeters, Kay-Tee Khaw, Christopher I Amos, Donghui Li, Peng Wei. Genome-wide gene-diabetes and gene-obesity interaction scan in the pancreatic cancer case control consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2214. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2214
Abstract 2167: Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium
Weiderpass, Elisabete , Adami, Hans‐Olov , Anderson, Kristin E. , Cai, Hui , Clendenen, Tess V. , Felix, Ashley S. , Goodman, Marc T. , Liang, Xiaolin , Lissowska, Jolanta , Magliocco, Anthony M., McCann, Susan E. , Moysich, Kristen B., Pike, Malcolm C. , Shu, Xiao Ou , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Anne , Brinton, Louise A. , Yang, Hannah , Cook, Linda S. , Cerhan, James R. , Friedenreich, Christine M , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Lu, Lingeng , Olson, Sara H. , Polidoro, Silvia , Ricceri, Fulvio , Risch, Harvey A. , Sacerdote, Carlotta , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Trabert, Britton , Webb, Penelope M. , Xiang, Yong‐Bing , Xu, Y. , Yu, Kai , Weiderpass, Elisabete , Lissowska, Jolanta , Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Research | May 1, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 2167-2167

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2167 Get It

Abstract Background: Nulliparity is an established endometrial cancer risk factor, but whether this association is related to infertility is unclear. Although there are many underlying causes of infertility, few studies have assessed risk relationships according to specific causes. Despite concerns that most treatments induce ovulation and that the endometrium is highly hormonally-responsive, previous studies have provided conflicting results on treatment associations. Methods: To address these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of 8,151 cases and12,471 controls from 2 cohort and 12 case-control studies conducted in 1982 to 2009 (N. America, Europe, Australia, Asia). All studies provided self-reported infertility, causes and treatments, except for 1 study that relied on data from national registries. Study-specific exposures and covariate data were harmonized across studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for study, age, interview year, race, parity, oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone use, and body mass index. If data were not reported for a particular variable, that study was excluded from the variable-specific analysis. Results: Nulliparous women had an elevated endometrial cancer risk compared with parous women (adjusted OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.58-1.90).Women with self-reported infertility also had an increased risk (adjusted OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.13-1.32) compared with those without infertility issues, even after adjusting for parity; the strongest associations was seen among studies that defined infertility as unsuccessfully trying to conceive for 2+ years (adjusted OR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). Infertility was associated with similar risks among nulliparous (1.22; 1.10-1.48) and parous (1.22; 1.12-1.34) women, although there was no increased risk associated with infertility among those who had given birth to 3+ children. Two infertility causes associated with risk elevation were endometriosis (adjusted OR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.46-2.95 compared with women no infertility problems) and anovulation (adjusted OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.16-1.70). Based on relatively small numbers, none of the individual treatments (in vitro fertilization, selective estrogen response modulators, gonatropins, progestins, estrogens) were substantially related to risk. Conclusion: Based on mainly self-reported infertility data, we found that parity and infertility independently contribute to endometrial cancer risk, with parity seemingly being the predominant risk predictor. Understanding residual endometrial cancer relationships related to causes of infertility and infertility treatment may benefit from documented medical information on causes of infertility and treatment parameters. Citation Format: Hannah P. Yang, Linda S. Cook, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans-Olov Adami, Kristin E. Anderson, Hui Cai, James R. Cerhan, Tess Clendenen, Ashley S. Felix, Christine Friedenreich, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Marc T. Goodman, Xiaolin Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Lingeng Lu, Anthony M. Magliocco, Susan E. McCann, Kristen B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Malcolm C. Pike, Silvia Polidoro, Fulvio Ricceri, Harvey Risch, Carlotta Sacerdote, V. Wendy Setiawan, Xiao Ou Shu, Amanda B. Spurdle, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Youming Xu, Herbert Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Louise A. Brinton. Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2167. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2167
The Gap in Big Data: Getting to Wellbeing, Strengths, and a Whole-person Perspective
Monsen, Karen A. , Schlesner, Sara, Vanderboom, Catherine E., Holland, Diane E. , Peters, Judith Carolien

Global Advances in Health and Medicine | April 30, 2015 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 31-39

10.7453/gahmj.2015.040 | PMID 25984416 Get It

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a clinical view of patient health. EHR data are becoming available in large data sets and enabling research that will transform the landscape of healthcare research. Methods are needed to incorporate wellbeing dimensions and strengths in large data sets. The purpose of this study was to examine the potential alignment of the Wellbeing Model with a clinical interface terminology standard, the Omaha System, for documenting wellbeing assessments. Objective: To map the Omaha System and Wellbeing Model for use in a clinical EHR wellbeing assessment and to evaluate the feasibility of describing strengths and needs of seniors generated through this assessment. Methods: The Wellbeing Model and Omaha System were mapped using concept mapping techniques. Based on this mapping, a wellbeing assessment was developed and implemented within a clinical EHR. Strengths indicators and signs/symptoms data for 5 seniors living in a residential community were abstracted from wellbeing assessments and analyzed using standard descriptive statistics and pattern visualization techniques. Results: Initial mapping agreement was 93.5%, with differences resolved by consensus. Wellbeing data analysis showed seniors had an average of 34.8 (range=22–49) strengths indicators for 22.8 concepts. They had an average of 6.4 (range=4–8) signs/symptoms for an average of 3.2 (range=2–5) concepts. The ratio of strengths indicators to signs/symptoms was 6:1 (range 2.8–9.6). Problem concepts with more signs/symptoms had fewer strengths. Conclusion: Together, the Wellbeing Model and the Omaha System have potential to enable a whole-person perspective and enhance the potential for a wellbeing perspective in big data research in healthcare.
Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures
Stone, Jennifer , Thompson, Deborah J. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Lindström, Sara , Hazra, Aditi , Li, Jingmei , Eriksson, Louise , Jensen, Matt , Cunningham, Julie M. , Purrington, Kristen S. , Brown, Judith, Leyland, Jean, Warren, Ruth , Luben, Robert , Smith, Paula , Jud, Sebastian M. , Heusinger, Katharina, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Douglas, Julie A. , Shah, Kaanan P., Chan, Heang‐Ping , Helvie, Mark A. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Woolcott, Christy , Haiman, Christopher A. , Giles, Graham G. , Baglietto, Laura , Krishnan, Kavitha , Southey, Melissa C. , Apicella, Carmel, Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Ursin, Giske , Alnæs, Grethe I.G., Kristensen, Vessela N. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Fasching, Peter A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Durocher, Francine , Cunningham, Julie, Scott, Christopher G. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Kraft, Peter , Czene, Kamila , Hall, Per N , Olson, Janet E. , Couch, Fergus J. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Wareham, Nicholas J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Maskarinec, Gertraud , Gram, Inger Torhild , Dennis, Joe , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Hopper, John L. , Vachon, Celine M. , Luben, Robert N , Giles, Graham G , Southey, Melissa C , Dunning, Alison M , Li, Jingmei , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Baglietto, Laura , Purrington, Kristen S , Chan, Heang-Ping

Cancer Research | April 10, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2457-2467

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2012 | PMID 25862352 Get It

Abstract Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10−5). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk. Cancer Res; 75(12); 2457–67. ©2015 AACR.
Simulation Training in Brain Death Determination
Hocker, Sara E. , Hocker, Sara, Wijdicks, Eelco F. M.

Seminars in Neurology | April 3, 2015 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 180-188

10.1055/s-0035-1547535 | PMID 25839728 Get It

Risk Analysis of Prostate Cancer in PRACTICAL, a Multinational Consortium, Using 25 Known Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Loci
Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Giles, Graham G. , Severi, Gianluca , Neal, David E. , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Donovan, Jenny , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Henderson, Brian E., Haiman, Christopher A. , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Pashayan, Nora , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Stanford, Janet L. , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith A. , Chambers, Suzanne K. , Weischer, Maren , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Sørensen, Karina D. , Ørntoft, Torben F., Maier, Christiane, Doerk, Thilo, Dickinson, Joanne L. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Brenner, Hermann , Habuchi, Tomonori , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Chappuis, Pierre O. , Hutter, Pierre, Kaneva, Radka , Foulkes, William D. , Lu, Yong‐Jie , Zhang, Hongwei , Stephenson, Robert A., Cox, Angela , Southey, Melissa C. , FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Leongamornlert, Daniel , Saunders, Edward J. , Tymrakiewicz, Malgorzata, Guy, Michelle, Little, Sarah J., Govindasami, Koveela, Sawyer, Emma, Wilkinson, Rosemary, Herkommer, Kathleen , Hopper, John L. , Lophatonanon, Aritaya, Rinckleb, Antje E., Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Dörk, Thilo , Aitken, Joanne F. , Borre, Michael , Lose, Felicity , Srinivasan, Srilakshmi , Tilley, Wayne D. , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Goranova, Teodora , Catto, James W.F. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ingles, Sue A. , Park, Jong Y. , Cybulski, Cezary , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M , Zeegers, Maurice Petrus , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Dadaev, Tokhir , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Dwyer, Terry , Dörk, Thilo , Giles, Graham G , Foulkes, William D , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Pashayan, Nora , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Severi, Gianluca , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | April 3, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1121-1129

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0317 | PMID 25837820 Get It

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genetic variants associated with prostate cancer risk which explain a substantial proportion of familial relative risk. These variants can be used to stratify individuals by their risk of prostate cancer. Methods: We genotyped 25 prostate cancer susceptibility loci in 40,414 individuals and derived a polygenic risk score (PRS). We estimated empirical odds ratios (OR) for prostate cancer associated with different risk strata defined by PRS and derived age-specific absolute risks of developing prostate cancer by PRS stratum and family history. Results: The prostate cancer risk for men in the top 1% of the PRS distribution was 30.6 (95% CI, 16.4–57.3) fold compared with men in the bottom 1%, and 4.2 (95% CI, 3.2–5.5) fold compared with the median risk. The absolute risk of prostate cancer by age of 85 years was 65.8% for a man with family history in the top 1% of the PRS distribution, compared with 3.7% for a man in the bottom 1%. The PRS was only weakly correlated with serum PSA level (correlation = 0.09). Conclusions: Risk profiling can identify men at substantially increased or reduced risk of prostate cancer. The effect size, measured by OR per unit PRS, was higher in men at younger ages and in men with family history of prostate cancer. Incorporating additional newly identified loci into a PRS should improve the predictive value of risk profiles. Impact: We demonstrate that the risk profiling based on SNPs can identify men at substantially increased or reduced risk that could have useful implications for targeted prevention and screening programs. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(7); 1121–9. ©2015 AACR.
Late Onset Ipilimumab-Induced Pericarditis and Pericardial Effusion: A Rare but Life Threatening Complication
Mansour, Iyad , Hariri, Dana , Motamed, Sara , Yun, Seongseok , Vincelette, Nicole D. , Yun, Seongseok

Case Reports in Oncological Medicine | March 31, 2015 | Volume: 2015 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-5

10.1155/2015/794842 | PMID 25918658 Get It

Metastatic cutaneous melanoma has poor prognosis with 2-year survival rate of 10–20%. Melanoma cells express various antigens including gp100, melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1), and tyrosinase, which can induce immune-mediated anticancer response via T cell activation. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an immune check point molecule that negatively regulates T cell activation and proliferation. Accordingly, recent phase III clinical trials demonstrated significant survival benefit with ipilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody (IgG1) that blocks the interaction of CTLA-4 with its ligands. Since the efficacy of ipilimumab depends on T cell activation, it is associated with substantial risk of immune mediated adverse reactions such as colitis, hepatitis, thyroiditis, and hypophysitis. We report the first case of late onset pericarditis and cardiac tamponade associated with ipilimumab treatment in patient with metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cell-type-specific enrichment of risk-associated regulatory elements at ovarian cancer susceptibility loci
Coetzee, Simon G. , Shen, Howard C., Hazelett, Dennis J. , Lawrenson, Kate , Kuchenbaecker, Karoline , Rhie, Suhn K. , Levanon, Keren , Karst, Alison M., Drapkin, Ronny , Ramus, Susan J. , Offit, Kenneth, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Freedman, Matthew L., Coetzee, Gerhard A. , Gayther, Simon A. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisogna, Maria, Bogdanova, Natalia , Brinton, Louise A. , Bruinsma, Fiona , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Chen, Ann , Chen, Zhihua , Cunningham, Julie M. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Dicks, Ed , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana , Easton, Douglas F. , Edwards, Robert P., Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B. , Fasching, Peter A. , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Goode, Ellen L. , Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp , Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Claus , Hosono, Satoyo , Iversen, Edwin S., Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Jensen, Allan , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L., Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Krakstad, Camilla , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D. , Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen, Lubiński, Jan , Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McGuire, Valerie , McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Ian, Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B., Narod, Steven A., Nedergaard, Lotte , Ness, Roberta B., Azmi, Mat Adenan Noor, Odunsi, Kunle , Oršulić, Sandra , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pelttari, Liisa M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C., Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B., Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Salvesen, Helga B., Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schwaab, Ira, Sellers, Thomas A. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou, Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Southey, Melissa C. , Sucheston, Lara, Tangen, Ingvild L. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thompson, Pamela J., Timorek, Agnieszka, Tworoger, Shelley S. , Altena, Anne M. van , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Walsh, Christine , Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Xifeng , Wu, Anna H. , Lu, Karen H. , McNeish, Iain A. , Lambrechts, Diether , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Couch, Fergus J. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Noushmehr, Houtan , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Baker, Helen H. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Bützow, Ralf C. , Campbell, Ian , Carty, Karen , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Cybulski, Cezary , Dennis, Joe , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Dürst, Matthias , Fridley, Brooke L. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Goodman, Marc T. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lester, Jenny, Liang, Dong , Lu, Karen, McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Ian, Modugno, Francesmary , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Risch, Harvey A. , Rosen, Barry P. , Rudolph, Anja , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Terry, Kathryn L. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Zheng, Wei , Ziogas, Argyrios , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , James, Paul , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Hazelett, Dennis J , Coetzee, Simon G , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Lissowska, Jolanta , Southey, Melissa C , Glasspool, Rosalind , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Drapkin, Ronny , Høgdall, Claus K , Lubinski, Jan

Human Molecular Genetics | March 24, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 3595-3607

10.1093/hmg/ddv101 | PMID 25804953 Get It