McCann, Susan E.

Abstract Background Although physical activity has been consistently associated with reduced breast cancer mortality, evidence is largely based on data collected at one occasion. We examined how pre- and postdiagnosis physical activity was associated with survival outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods Included were 1340 patients enrolled in the Diet, Exercise, Lifestyle and Cancer Prognosis (DELCaP) Study, a prospective study of lifestyle and prognosis ancillary to a SWOG clinical trial (S0221). Activity before diagnosis, during treatment, and at 1- and 2-year intervals after enrollment was collected. Patients were categorized according to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans as meeting the minimum guidelines (yes/no) and incrementally as inactive, low active, moderately active (meeting the guidelines), or high active. Results In joint-exposure analyses, patients meeting the guidelines before and 1 year after diagnosis experienced statistically significant reductions in hazards of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42 to 0.82) and mortality (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.34–0.77); associations were stronger at 2-year follow-up for recurrence (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.65) and mortality (HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.52). In time-dependent analyses, factoring in activity from all time points, we observed striking associations with mortality for low- (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.68), moderate- (HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.76), and high-active patients (HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.53). Conclusions Meeting the minimum guidelines for physical activity both before diagnosis and after treatment appears to be associated with statistically significantly reduced hazards of recurrence and mortality among breast cancer patients. When considering activity from all time points, including during treatment, lower volumes of regular activity were associated with similar overall survival advantages as meeting and exceeding the guidelines.

PURPOSE Despite reported widespread use of dietary supplements during cancer treatment, few empirical data with regard to their safety or efficacy exist. Because of concerns that some supplements, particularly antioxidants, could reduce the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy, we conducted a prospective study ancillary to a therapeutic trial to evaluate associations between supplement use and breast cancer outcomes. METHODS Patients with breast cancer randomly assigned to an intergroup metronomic trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel were queried on their use of supplements at registration and during treatment (n =1,134). Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for clinical and lifestyle variables was used. Recurrence and survival were indexed at 6 months after enrollment using a landmark approach. RESULTS There were indications that use of any antioxidant supplement (vitamins A, C, and E; carotenoids; coenzyme Q10) both before and during treatment was associated with an increased hazard of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR], 1.41; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.04; P = .06) and, to a lesser extent, death (adjHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.90 to 2.18; P = .14). Relationships with individual antioxidants were weaker perhaps because of small numbers. For nonantioxidants, vitamin B12 use both before and during chemotherapy was significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival (adjHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.92; P < .01) and overall survival (adjHR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.40; P < .01). Use of iron during chemotherapy was significantly associated with recurrence (adjHR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.67; P < .01) as was use both before and during treatment (adjHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.70; P = .06). Results were similar for overall survival. Multivitamin use was not associated with survival outcomes. CONCLUSION Associations between survival outcomes and use of antioxidant and other dietary supplements both before and during chemotherapy are consistent with recommendations for caution among patients when considering the use of supplements, other than a multivitamin, during chemotherapy.

Abstract Introduction. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of paclitaxel treatment. There is conflicting data on the benefits and harms of supplement use for the treatment and prevention of CIPN. We examined dietary supplement use before diagnosis and during treatment in relation to CIPN among breast cancer patients registered to a clinical trial (SWOG 0221; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00070564) before diagnosis and during treatment in relation to CIPN. Methods. At trial registration (baseline), breast cancer patients (n = 1,225) completed questionnaires to capture use before and at diagnosis of multivitamins and other dietary supplements. Of these patients, 1,068 completed a 6-month follow-up questionnaire to capture use during treatment. We examined the use of multivitamins, vitamins C, D, E, B6, and B12, folic acid, iron, calcium, glucosamine, and combined fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), omega-3, flaxseed and cod liver oil at these timepoints in relation to CIPN. CIPN was assessed via the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) subscale. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed using unconditional logistic regression. Results. Multivitamin use before diagnosis was associated with reduced symptoms of CIPN (CTCAE adjusted OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87; FACT/GOG-Ntx adjusted OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61-1.00). Although in a similar direction as use prior to diagnosis, multivitamin use during treatment was less strongly associated with CIPN (CTCAE adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.49-1.08; FACT/GOG-Ntx 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.99). Other supplement use, either before diagnosis or during treatment, was not associated with CIPN. Conclusions. Our results indicate that supplement use during treatment may not appreciably affect experience of CIPN symptoms. Future analyses of the relationships between supplement use and survival outcomes will better inform patient decision making. Acknowledgments: supported by R01 CA116395 (CBA); S0221 supported, in part, by National Cancer Institute/Division of Cancer Prevention SWOG NCORP Research Base grant 5UG1CA189974-02; National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN): CA180888, CA180819; and in part by Amgen, Inc. Citation Format: Gary R. Zirpoli, Susan E. McCann, Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell, Dawn L. Hershman, Gregory Ciupak, Warren Davis, Joseph M. Unger, Halle C.F. Moore, James A. Stewart, Claudine Isaacs, Timothy J. Hobday, Muhammad Salim, Robert B. Livingston, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Julie R. Gralow, Daniel F. Hayes, G. Thomas Budd, Kathy S. Albain, Christine B. Ambrosone. Supplement use and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated on SWOG study S0221. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3413.

Abstract Background: Nulliparity is an established endometrial cancer risk factor, but whether this association is related to infertility is unclear. Although there are many underlying causes of infertility, few studies have assessed risk relationships according to specific causes. Despite concerns that most treatments induce ovulation and that the endometrium is highly hormonally-responsive, previous studies have provided conflicting results on treatment associations. Methods: To address these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of 8,151 cases and12,471 controls from 2 cohort and 12 case-control studies conducted in 1982 to 2009 (N. America, Europe, Australia, Asia). All studies provided self-reported infertility, causes and treatments, except for 1 study that relied on data from national registries. Study-specific exposures and covariate data were harmonized across studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for study, age, interview year, race, parity, oral contraceptive and menopausal hormone use, and body mass index. If data were not reported for a particular variable, that study was excluded from the variable-specific analysis. Results: Nulliparous women had an elevated endometrial cancer risk compared with parous women (adjusted OR=1.73; 95% CI: 1.58-1.90).Women with self-reported infertility also had an increased risk (adjusted OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.13-1.32) compared with those without infertility issues, even after adjusting for parity; the strongest associations was seen among studies that defined infertility as unsuccessfully trying to conceive for 2+ years (adjusted OR=1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.60). Infertility was associated with similar risks among nulliparous (1.22; 1.10-1.48) and parous (1.22; 1.12-1.34) women, although there was no increased risk associated with infertility among those who had given birth to 3+ children. Two infertility causes associated with risk elevation were endometriosis (adjusted OR=2.08; 95% CI: 1.46-2.95 compared with women no infertility problems) and anovulation (adjusted OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.16-1.70). Based on relatively small numbers, none of the individual treatments (in vitro fertilization, selective estrogen response modulators, gonatropins, progestins, estrogens) were substantially related to risk. Conclusion: Based on mainly self-reported infertility data, we found that parity and infertility independently contribute to endometrial cancer risk, with parity seemingly being the predominant risk predictor. Understanding residual endometrial cancer relationships related to causes of infertility and infertility treatment may benefit from documented medical information on causes of infertility and treatment parameters. Citation Format: Hannah P. Yang, Linda S. Cook, Elisabete Weiderpass, Hans-Olov Adami, Kristin E. Anderson, Hui Cai, James R. Cerhan, Tess Clendenen, Ashley S. Felix, Christine Friedenreich, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Marc T. Goodman, Xiaolin Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Lingeng Lu, Anthony M. Magliocco, Susan E. McCann, Kristen B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Malcolm C. Pike, Silvia Polidoro, Fulvio Ricceri, Harvey Risch, Carlotta Sacerdote, V. Wendy Setiawan, Xiao Ou Shu, Amanda B. Spurdle, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, Nicolas Wentzensen, Yong-Bing Xiang, Youming Xu, Herbert Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Louise A. Brinton. Infertility and risk of incident endometrial carcinoma: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2167. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2167

Abstract Some studies show that childbearing at older age is associated with lower risk of endometrial cancer, but whether the association is independent of number of children or other factors still requires clarification. We pooled individual-level data from epidemiologic studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2). Data on age at last birth and/or last pregnancy were available from 14 studies: 11 case-control studies and 3 cohort studies; the latter were analyzed using a nested case-control design. A total of 9,613 endometrial cancer cases and 17,112 controls were included in the analysis. The majority of women were White (82%) and older than 55 years (69%). We estimated the effects of age at last birth using data from 12 studies and age at last pregnancy using data from 10 studies on the risk of endometrial cancer by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using logistic regression models. Potential confounders included in the analysis were race, body mass index, parity, age at menarche, age at first birth, oral contraceptive use, postmenopausal hormone use, smoking status, and report of diabetes. After adjusting for potential confounders, a reduction in endometrial cancer risk was observed in women with increasing age at last birth (P trend &lt;0.0001) and age at last pregnancy (P trend &lt;0.0001). The OR per five-year increase in age at last birth and age at last pregnancy was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86, 0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95), respectively. Women who had their last child at an age &gt;40 years were at a 34% decreased risk compared with women who had their last child at an age &lt;25 years (95% CI: 0.52, 0.82). Compared to women with age at last pregnancy &lt;25 years, those with age at last pregnancy &gt;40 years had a 30% decreased risk of endometrial cancer (95%CI: 0.57, 0.86). Inverse associations were observed for Whites and Asians in race-specific analysis and also in analysis restricted to women with at least 2 births. In this large pooled analysis, we show that late age at last birth or last pregnancy is a strong and independent protective factor for endometrial cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1900. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1900

Abstract Because numerous chemotherapeutic agents exert their cytotoxic effects through generation of reactive oxygen species, the use of antioxidant supplements during treatment is controversial. There are published recommendations to suspend antioxidant supplement use during treatment, despite lack of empirical data from clinical studies; however, it is unclear if patients follow these recommendations. We examined use of multivitamins and vitamin supplements (MV/SP) during treatment for breast cancer, particularly in relation to physician recommendations. High-risk breast cancer patients (n=855) were queried regarding physician recommendations and use of MV/SP via self-administered questionnaires in an ancillary study embedded in a phase III trial of dose-dense compared to metronomic administration of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide + paclitaxel (SWOG S0221). Of the 658 patients who reported discussing use of supplements during treatment with their physicians, 390 (59%) received no counseling regarding MV/SP use, 85 (13%) received recommendations not to take MV/SP, and 183 (28%) received recommendations to use MV/SP. MV/SP use during treatment was compared to use prior to diagnosis in relation to physician recommendations, with the reference group comprised of those receiving no recommendations. Of those using MV ≥ once/week before diagnosis, recommendations not to take MV/SP were associated with a tenfold reduction in MV use to &lt; once/week during treatment. (OR=10.0, 95% CI=3.7-27.0). MV use was less likely to decrease among patients receiving recommendations to use MV/SP (OR=0.23, 95% CI=0.12-0.44). Similar findings were observed among patients who reported use of vitamin C and vitamin E supplements ≥ once/week before diagnosis, with patients who were advised to take no supplements other than a MV more than 5 times as likely to decrease use of antioxidant supplements. MV use during treatment among previous non-users increased almost sixfold among those whose physicians recommended MV/SP use during treatment (OR=5.92, 95% CI=3.29-10.6). For those reporting vitamin C or vitamin E use &lt; once/week before diagnosis, patients whose physicians recommended MV/SP during treatment were more likely to increase their use of vitamin C (OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.00-4.19) and vitamin E (OR=5.28, 95% CI=2.24-12.4). In this study, physician recommendations were strongly associated with patient use of MV/SP during chemotherapy, regardless of the patient's frequency of use prior to diagnosis. These findings highlight the critical need to better understand the mechanisms by which antioxidants may influence chemotherapeutic outcomes, and to determine if supplement use affects toxicity and/or recurrence. Yearly follow-up in this ongoing study will allow us to assess the impact of MV/SP use treatment outcomes, providing a basis for physician recommendations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4681. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4681