Budd, G. Thomas

BACKGROUNDBreast cancer patients in the MA.27 trial had similar outcomes with steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane and nonsteroidal anastrozole. AIs increase the risk of osteoporosis. This study examined the effects of self‐reported osteoporosis and osteoporosis therapy (OPT) on outcomes.METHODSThe MA.27 phase 3 adjuvant trial enrolled 7576 postmenopausal women. The primary outcome was event‐free survival (EFS), and the secondary outcome was distant disease–free survival (DDFS). Patients were permitted bisphosphonates to prevent or treat osteopenia/osteoporosis. In a multivariate, stratified Cox regression, factors were significant with a 2‐sided Wald test P value ≤ .05.RESULTSOsteoporosis was reported at the baseline by 654 of the 7576 women (8.6%) and in total by 1294 patients. Oral OPT was received at the baseline by 815 of the 7576 women (10.8%) and in total by 2711 patients (36%). With a median follow‐up of 4.1 years, 693 EFS events (9.15%) and 321 DDFS events (4.2%) occurred. Osteoporosis was not associated with EFS or DDFS. Few EFS events occurred before the initiation of OPT, with no substantive evidence of a time‐differing effect on outcomes (nonproportional hazards). OPT (yes vs no) was significantly associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR] for yes vs no, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57‐0.80; P < .001) and DDFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44‐0.73; P <. 001). Time‐differing (time‐dependent) OPT was not (EFS; P = .45). OPT did not alter the incidence of visceral‐only metastasis (P = .31).CONCLUSIONSOral OPT, administered to postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant AI therapy, was associated with improved EFS and DDFS; the time of OPT initiation (a time‐dependent effect) did not affect the outcome. OPT did not alter the risk of visceral metastasis. Cancer 2017;123:2444–51. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

CRA1008 Background: S0221 is a SWOG-coordinated phase III adjuvant chemotherapy intergroup trial in node-positive and high-risk node-negative operable breast cancer which hypothesized that 1) the weekly AC+G regimen is superior to ddAC x 6 and 2) 12 weeks of weekly paclitaxel (wP) is superior to q 2 week paclitaxel x 6 (ddP). Methods: Between December 2003 and November 2010, 2,716 patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to 1) AC+G vs ddAC and 2) P 80 mg/m2/week x 12 vs P 175 mg/m2 q 2 weeks x 6. If there was no significant interaction between the factors, the trial was powered to find a disease-free survival hazard ratio (HR) ≤ 0.82 for weekly vs q 2 week for each factor. At the first interim analysis, the AC randomization was halted for futility, and S0221 was closed to accrual 10 November 2010. S0221 reopened 15 December 2010, after which time all patients received 4 cycles of ddAC and randomization to P weekly x 12 and ddP x 6 continued. Accrual halted at a total of 3,294 in January 2012. Results: By September 7, 2012, 487 events and 340 deaths had occurred, prompting the third planned interim analysis. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended reporting the results since the futility boundary was crossed. A Cox model adjusting for the AC arms had a HR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.90-1.28; p=0.42), with the 99.5% CI excluding the original alternative hypothesis that the HR=0.82. There was no significant interaction of the two factors. Estimated 5-year progression-free survivals were 82% for weekly P and 81% for ddP. Toxicity data were available for 1,385 patients treated with ddP and 1,367 treated with weekly P. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 4 patients on ddP and 2 on weekly P. Percent grade 3-4 toxicity per arm are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Either ddPx6 or weekly P x 12 are acceptable schedules of P administration. The differences in leukopenia likely reflect ascertainment bias against weekly P. If this is accepted, weekly P x 12 produces less overall toxicity than 6 cycles of ddP. Support: NCI grants CA32102, CA38926, CA21115, CA21076, CA77597, CA25224, CA77202, CCSRI15469, and Amgen, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00070564. [Table: see text]

Abstract Introduction. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of paclitaxel treatment. There is conflicting data on the benefits and harms of supplement use for the treatment and prevention of CIPN. We examined dietary supplement use before diagnosis and during treatment in relation to CIPN among breast cancer patients registered to a clinical trial (SWOG 0221; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00070564) before diagnosis and during treatment in relation to CIPN. Methods. At trial registration (baseline), breast cancer patients (n = 1,225) completed questionnaires to capture use before and at diagnosis of multivitamins and other dietary supplements. Of these patients, 1,068 completed a 6-month follow-up questionnaire to capture use during treatment. We examined the use of multivitamins, vitamins C, D, E, B6, and B12, folic acid, iron, calcium, glucosamine, and combined fish oil, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), omega-3, flaxseed and cod liver oil at these timepoints in relation to CIPN. CIPN was assessed via the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) subscale. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed using unconditional logistic regression. Results. Multivitamin use before diagnosis was associated with reduced symptoms of CIPN (CTCAE adjusted OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.42-0.87; FACT/GOG-Ntx adjusted OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61-1.00). Although in a similar direction as use prior to diagnosis, multivitamin use during treatment was less strongly associated with CIPN (CTCAE adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.49-1.08; FACT/GOG-Ntx 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60-0.99). Other supplement use, either before diagnosis or during treatment, was not associated with CIPN. Conclusions. Our results indicate that supplement use during treatment may not appreciably affect experience of CIPN symptoms. Future analyses of the relationships between supplement use and survival outcomes will better inform patient decision making. Acknowledgments: supported by R01 CA116395 (CBA); S0221 supported, in part, by National Cancer Institute/Division of Cancer Prevention SWOG NCORP Research Base grant 5UG1CA189974-02; National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN): CA180888, CA180819; and in part by Amgen, Inc. Citation Format: Gary R. Zirpoli, Susan E. McCann, Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell, Dawn L. Hershman, Gregory Ciupak, Warren Davis, Joseph M. Unger, Halle C.F. Moore, James A. Stewart, Claudine Isaacs, Timothy J. Hobday, Muhammad Salim, Robert B. Livingston, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Julie R. Gralow, Daniel F. Hayes, G. Thomas Budd, Kathy S. Albain, Christine B. Ambrosone. Supplement use and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated on SWOG study S0221. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3413.

Abstract Introduction: The use of multi-drug regimens, including taxanes (T), has increased survival for breast cancer patients. However, T-induced neuropathy, one of the most common side effects, cannot be predicted, prevented or effectively treated. Using genome wide analyses (GWA), we sought to identify common genetic variants that infer susceptibility to clinical and self-reported neuropathy. Methods: Women with high risk breast cancer were enrolled in SWOG 0221, a trial of dosing schedules for AC and T. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina 1M chip and SNPs examined in relation to CTCAE grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity and self-reported symptoms (FACT-TAXANE) among women providing blood samples. Significant associations were tested for replication in CALGB40101. Results: Among 1269 European Americans (EA) and 139 African Americans (AA) in S0221, there were 147 and 31 grade 3+ neuropathies, respectively. In CALGB40101, grade 3 toxicity was less frequent (59/855 EA and 15/117 AA). In S0221 EA patients, loci on chromosomes 7, 10, 16 and 17 showed associations with grades 3 and 4 neuropathy at p&lt;5×10e-06, with the most significant genetic association on chromosome 17, rs910920, p = 6.8×10e-08, odds ratio (OR) = 0.44 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.61); this SNP is a cis eQTL, thought likely to affect transcription factor binding and linked to expression of VPS53 in lymphoblastoid cell lines. While the rs910920 association was specific to EA, the A allele in rs1858826 on chromosome 7 was associated with reduced odds of neuropathy in both EA (p = 7×10e-07) and AA (p = .02) groups. The S0221 associations at p&lt;5×10e-06 did not replicate in CALGB40101. A subset of patients (n = 677 EA and n = 42 AA) completed the FACT-TAXANE. The most significant associations with this neuropathy phenotype (p&lt;5×10e-07) were on chromosomes 2 (rs4267555 and rs4443044) and 3 (rs2421468). Of the 168 SNPs tested for association with neuropathy in previous studies, rs1695 in GSTP1 (p = 0.0009) and rs228591 in ATM (p = 0.0006), showed some evidence of association with FACT-TAXANE scores; the latter SNP was significant at p = .005 in ordinal regression analysis of neuropathy grades 0-4 in CALGB40101. None of these SNPs were significantly associated with grade 3 CTCAE neuropathy at p&lt;.05, nor were the top CTCAE associations in relation to FACT-TAXANE scores. Replication of the most significant S0221 FACT-TAXANE findings in CALGB40101 is ongoing. Conclusions: Failure to replicate S0221 in CALGB40101, and the lack of coherence between self-report and clinical grade in S0221 could be attributable to differences in trial designs as well as differences in defining a complex phenotype. Larger homogeneous trials with similar dosing and criteria for defining neuropathy are needed to assess the relationship of genetics and the neuropathy symptom spectrum. Citation Format: Lara Sucheston-Campbell, Alyssa Clay, William E. Barlow, G Thomas Budd, Dan Stram, Chris Haiman, Li Yan, Gary Zirpoli, Song Yao, Dawn Hershman, Kathy S. Albain, Daniel F. Hayes, Halle Moore, Timothy J. Hobday, James A. Stewart, Claudine Isaacs, Muhammad Salim, Julie R. Gralow, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Robert B. Livingston, Xin Sheng, Deanna L. Kroetz, Christine B. Ambrosone. A genome-wide association study identifies novel loci associated with taxane-related sensory neuropathy in breast cancer patients enrolled in a cooperative group clinical trial (SWOG S0221). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5489. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5489

Abstract Background: ASP is hypothesized to decrease the risk of breast cancer (BRCA) and BRCA recurrences. Thus we performed an exploratory analysis of ASP and CC use within the NCIC CTG MA.27 adjuvant trial comparing exemestane (E;N=3789) to anastrozole (A; N=3787) with a factorial second randomization to CC or placebo (P). Neither A or E was superior in breast cancer outcomes. Baseline low-dose ASP use is an accepted surrogate of cardiovascular risk factors and was used as a stratification factor across all 4 arms. Randomization to CC-P was discontinued after 18 months (n = 1622) due to concerns of cardiac toxicity. Methods: Patients taking &gt;81mg of ASP daily at baseline were ineligible for randomization and use of &gt;81mg of ASP daily was not allowed. Women enrolled during CC randomization were included in the comparison of E and A, stratified by whether they had been randomized to CC [yes, no;N=1622] and concomitant low-dose ASP [≤81 mg/day (yes, no); N=2209]. Other stratification factors included: lymph-nodes (negative, positive, or unknown); prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes, no). The primary endpoint, event-free-survival (EFS), was defined as time from randomization to time of locoregional or distant disease recurrence, new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) defined as time from randomization to time of death from any cause and distant disease-free-survival (DDFS), defined as time from randomization to time of distant disease recurrence. Univariate (uni) assessment of CC and ASP use was assessed with stratified log-rank test, adjusting for lymph-node status and adjuvant chemotherapy and applied by intention-to-treat. Exploratory multivariate (multi) analyses (N = 1622) had forced inclusion of treatment and used step-wise forward stratified Cox modeling to examine the effects of CC, ASP use and baseline patient characteristics on outcomes; a factor was added with Wald test statistic p ≤ 0.05. Results: At median follow-up of 4.1 years, 186/1622 (11%) patients had an EFS event; 125 (8%) had died from any cause, and 80 (5%) had distant BRCA relapse. CC did not have significant uni association with outcomes: EFS p-value=0.92; OS p-value p = 0.56; DDFS p-value=0.55. ASP use was associated with worse EFS [p = 0.006, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.12–1.96)], worse OS [p = 0.0002, HR 1.87 (95% CI (1.35–2.61)], and non-significant difference in DDFS (p = 0.72). CC had no multi association with EFS, OS or DDFS. ASP use had no multi association with EFS and DDFS (p &gt; 0.05). However, ASP use had multi prognostic association with worse OS [p = 0.01; HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.13–2.49)]. Conclusions: Users of either CC or low dose ASP had similar DDFS to non-users in MA.27. As expected, low-dose ASP users (with presumptive cardiovascular risk factors) had worse OS than non-users. Inadequate numbers of patients randomized to CC and lack of randomization to aspirin leaves inadequate evidence from MA.27 to determine whether anti-inflammatories influence breast cancer outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.

Abstract Background: The non-steroidal reversible aromatase inhibitor (AI), anastrozole (A) is approved as adjuvant monotherapy in hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (EBC). The steroidal irreversible AI exemestane (E) is approved in sequence after an initial 2-3 years of tamoxifen. MA27 tested the hypothesis that exemestane would have greater efficacy and better end-organ safety than anastrozole for several reasons: E is an irreversible and more potent AI than A; unlike A, E does not induce intra-tumoral aromatase and; through its mild androgenic activity E may exert a second anti-tumor effect and a more favorable bone and lipid metabolism profile than A. Initially the study also tested the role of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, used in combination with an AI. However, celecoxib was discontinued early in MA27 following identification of cardiovascular toxicity with COX-2 inhibitors. Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive primary breast cancer were randomized after adequate local treatment to 5 years of adjuvant A (1mg/day) or E (25mg/day) with or without celecoxib/placebo (400mg/plac twice daily for 3 years). The primary objective is the comparison of event free survival (EFS) between women treated with A or E. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), distant recurrence (DDFS), incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and safety. Quality of Life in a subset of women has been evaluated, and a very extensive tissue bank created. Stratification included: prior chemotherapy; lymph node status, celecoxib (during use), aspirin use (during randomization to celecoxib), and trastuzumab use (since November 2005). The primary endpoint (EFS) will look for an improvement from 87.5% to 89.9%; HR 0.80, 2-sided 5% level and 80% power, with 644 events required. Results: 7576 women were randomized between June 2003 and July 2008. Celecoxib/placebo, was discontinued 2 years into the trial in December 2004 after 1635 patients had received celecoxib. The number of events required for final analysis was reached April 2010. Patient characteristics were balanced for age (median 64.1yrs); race; ECOG PS; mastectomy; TNM staging and; prior adjuvant chemotherapy. EFS, OS, DDFS, and CBC as well as clinical fractures, cardiovascular events and adverse events will be presented by arm in the final analysis. Conclusions: NCIC CTG MA.27 is the first definitive EBC trial comparing a non-steroidal and steroidal AI as initial adjuvant therapy. Exemestane is not currently approved as initial adjuvant treatment and superiority or equivalence will lead to its inclusion as a first-line option for EBC in postmenopausal HR positive breast cancer. Efficacy, clinical fractures, cardiovascular events and AI related symptoms will help to define the cost-benefit ratios of these two AIs. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S1-1.