Back to Authors

Dwyer, Terry

0000-0002-2091-7663

Mayo Clinic

The George Institute for Global Health

Citations 2

Abstract 1016: Variants in autophagy related genes and clinical characteristics in melanoma: a population-based study
White, Kirsten A. , Thompson, Todd A., Torres, Salina , Hu, Chien‐An Andy , Thomas, Nancy E. , Gruber, Stephen B. , From, Lynn, Busam, Klaus J. , Marrett, Lorraine D., Gallagher, Richard P. , Zanetti, Roberto , Rosso, Stefano , Dwyer, Terry , Cust, Anne Ε. , Venn, Allison, Begg, Colin B. , Lillyquist, Jenna, Luo, Li , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Orlow, Irene , Kanetsky, Peter A. , Berwick, Marianne

Cancer Research | July 26, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 14_Supplement | Pages: 1016-1016

10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-1016 Get It

Abstract Autophagy has been linked with melanoma, but no polymorphisms in autophagy related (ATG) genes have been investigated for association with melanoma prognostic indicators and survival. We examined 5 ATG gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a large international multicenter population-based case-control study of melanoma. DNA from 911 melanoma patients was genotyped for five SNPs with a known or suspected impact on autophagic flux. While we did not identify an association with survival, a significant association was identified between the minor allele for an ATG16L polymorphism (rs2241880) and a decrease in Breslow thickness (p = 0.03), earlier tumor stage at diagnosis (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81, p = 0.02) and younger age at diagnosis (p = 0.02). In addition, two SNPs in ATG5 (rs2245214 and rs510432) were found to be significantly associated with increased tumor stage of melanoma (OR 1.84 95% CI 1.12-3.02, p = 0.05; OR 1.47 95% CI 1.11-1.94, p = 0.03). Finally, we identified inverse associations between the minor allele of rs2245214 and melanomas on the scalp or neck (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.86, p = 0.03); rs1864182 (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.88, p = 0.02) and brisk TILs, and rs510432 (OR 0.55 95% CI 0.34-0.87, p = 0.01) with non-brisk TILs, although they were not globally significant. In summary, our data suggests that ATG SNPs, while not associated with survival, may be associated with Breslow thickness, tumor stage, age at diagnosis, and aggressive histopathological factors. These associations could contribute to our current understanding of the significant role of autophagy in melanoma progression. Citation Format: Kirsten A. m. White, Li Luo, Todd A. Thompson, Salina Torres, Chien-An A. Hu, Nancy E. Thomas, Hoda Anton-Culver, Stephen B. Gruber, Lynn From, Klaus J. Busam, Irene Orlow, Peter A. Kanetsky, Lorraine D. Marrett, Richard P. Gallagher, Roberto Zanetti, Stefano Rosso, Terry Dwyer, Anne E. Cust, Allison Venn, Colin B. Begg, Marianne Berwick, Jenna Lillyquist. Variants in autophagy related genes and clinical characteristics in melanoma: a population-based study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1016.
Risk Analysis of Prostate Cancer in PRACTICAL, a Multinational Consortium, Using 25 Known Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Loci
Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Giles, Graham G. , Severi, Gianluca , Neal, David E. , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Donovan, Jenny , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Henderson, Brian E., Haiman, Christopher A. , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Pashayan, Nora , Ostrander, Elaine A. , Stanford, Janet L. , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith A. , Chambers, Suzanne K. , Weischer, Maren , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Sørensen, Karina D. , Ørntoft, Torben F., Maier, Christiane, Doerk, Thilo, Dickinson, Joanne L. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Brenner, Hermann , Habuchi, Tomonori , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Chappuis, Pierre O. , Hutter, Pierre, Kaneva, Radka , Foulkes, William D. , Lu, Yong‐Jie , Zhang, Hongwei , Stephenson, Robert A., Cox, Angela , Southey, Melissa C. , FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Leongamornlert, Daniel , Saunders, Edward J. , Tymrakiewicz, Malgorzata, Guy, Michelle, Little, Sarah J., Govindasami, Koveela, Sawyer, Emma, Wilkinson, Rosemary, Herkommer, Kathleen , Hopper, John L. , Lophatonanon, Aritaya, Rinckleb, Antje E., Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Dörk, Thilo , Aitken, Joanne F. , Borre, Michael , Lose, Felicity , Srinivasan, Srilakshmi , Tilley, Wayne D. , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Goranova, Teodora , Catto, James W.F. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ingles, Sue A. , Park, Jong Y. , Cybulski, Cezary , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M , Zeegers, Maurice Petrus , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Dadaev, Tokhir , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Dwyer, Terry , Dörk, Thilo , Giles, Graham G , Foulkes, William D , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Pashayan, Nora , Cannon-Albright, Lisa A , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Severi, Gianluca , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | April 3, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1121-1129

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0317 Get It

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genetic variants associated with prostate cancer risk which explain a substantial proportion of familial relative risk. These variants can be used to stratify individuals by their risk of prostate cancer. Methods: We genotyped 25 prostate cancer susceptibility loci in 40,414 individuals and derived a polygenic risk score (PRS). We estimated empirical odds ratios (OR) for prostate cancer associated with different risk strata defined by PRS and derived age-specific absolute risks of developing prostate cancer by PRS stratum and family history. Results: The prostate cancer risk for men in the top 1% of the PRS distribution was 30.6 (95% CI, 16.4–57.3) fold compared with men in the bottom 1%, and 4.2 (95% CI, 3.2–5.5) fold compared with the median risk. The absolute risk of prostate cancer by age of 85 years was 65.8% for a man with family history in the top 1% of the PRS distribution, compared with 3.7% for a man in the bottom 1%. The PRS was only weakly correlated with serum PSA level (correlation = 0.09). Conclusions: Risk profiling can identify men at substantially increased or reduced risk of prostate cancer. The effect size, measured by OR per unit PRS, was higher in men at younger ages and in men with family history of prostate cancer. Incorporating additional newly identified loci into a PRS should improve the predictive value of risk profiles. Impact: We demonstrate that the risk profiling based on SNPs can identify men at substantially increased or reduced risk that could have useful implications for targeted prevention and screening programs. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(7); 1121–9. ©2015 AACR.