Citations

Abstract Background Few studies have assessed the burden of chronic medical conditions in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. This study estimated the risk of these conditions among AYA survivors compared to a matched cohort without cancer. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 2‐year survivors ( n = 14,917) of 11 common AYA (15–39 years) cancers diagnosed at the integrated health care organizations of Kaiser Permanente (KP) Southern and Northern California during 2006–2020. A comparison cohort ( n = 149,164) without cancer (matched 10:1 by age, sex, calendar year, and KP site) was included. Cumulative incidence (CMI) accounting for death as a competing risk was calculated. Poisson regression estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of each condition in cancer survivors versus the matched cohort, adjusting for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Results The 5‐year CMI was highest for thyroid (17.4%), respiratory (6.6%), cardiovascular (5.0%), and liver (4.8%) diseases. At 10 years, the CMI of any condition was 39% in survivors versus 26% in the matched cohort. Survivors had a 2‐fold increased risk of being diagnosed with any medical condition (IRR, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–2.0) as well as two or more conditions (IRR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.2–2.5). Risk was highest among survivors of hematologic cancers and those diagnosed with distant stage disease. Elevated risks were observed within all sociodemographic groups of this insured population. Conclusion AYAs with cancer had a higher risk of chronic medical conditions compared to those without cancer. Long‐term surveillance, risk mitigation through lifestyle modifications and effective disease management are crucial to reduce premature mortality.

Abstract Objective This study aimed to understand the factors limiting access to medications for the preventive treatment of migraine and to improve access to evidence‐based preventive care. Background For decades, the effective use of medication for the preventive treatment of migraine was limited by slow onset, slow and complex dose titration schedules, modest benefits, drug interactions, frequent side effects, and very low long‐term adherence. The calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) targeted preventive medications mitigate some of these limitations and demonstrated substantial therapeutic benefits in a significant proportion of adults with migraine. The American Headache Society considers these medications among the first‐line options for migraine prevention, although access to them remains limited. The American Migraine Foundation hosted a single‐day, multidisciplinary expert panel discussion to identify barriers to optimal preventive care and developed recommendations to address them. Methods Participants identified and prioritized barriers and used a modified nominal group technique to achieve consensus on them. A series of moderated discussions in plenary and breakout sessions was used to create possible solutions. Modified nominal group technique was also employed to achieve consensus on the priorities among these barriers and to achieve whole‐group consensus on the recommendations. Ethical issues that inform access were discussed. Results Participants included eight neurologists and board‐certified headache specialists, six representatives of reimbursement decision‐makers, six employees of life sciences companies, four patient advocates with lived experience with migraine, and a medical ethicist. Among those who have consulted healthcare professionals and received a diagnosis of migraine, we identified four main barriers to accessing preventive treatment: restrictive prior authorization requirements, the perceived lack of real‐world evidence and treatment guidelines, the need for clinician education, and the need for patient education. Consensus recommendations for eliminating barriers centered on using new evidence to evaluate policies that restrict the selection of first‐line therapies, initiating/improving collaboration among stakeholders, sharing of data and best practices, and increased training. Participants agreed to explore novel definitions of the value of preventive treatment and to establish the Migraine Prevention Network to facilitate ongoing cooperation and collective action. However, due to financial limitations, staffing changes, and time constraints, post‐meeting discussions led to a shift from establishing a broad Migraine Prevention Network to forming smaller task forces focused on the top‐priority barriers (real‐world evidence and The Patient Playbook ) identified through collaborative voting among American Headache Society, American Migraine Foundation, and industry stakeholders. Conclusions Adults with migraine face multiple barriers in accessing novel migraine‐specific, CGRP‐targeted preventive treatment. Stakeholders in the delivery of care, including clinicians, reimbursement decision‐makers, life sciences companies, and patient and clinician advocates, may be able to overcome many of these barriers and improve access by working with and on behalf of patients.

Abstract INTRODUCTION In multicenter Alzheimer's disease studies, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) visual reads are typically performed centrally by a few experts. Incorporating a broader reader network enhances scalability and generalizability. METHODS Ten neuroimaging experts from eight Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) visually read 180 amyloid PET scans (30 scans and 15 duplicate scans for each of four tracers, imaged across a wide variety of scanners), using preferred reading software without anatomical imaging or quantitation. Scans were classified as elevated or non‐elevated per tracer‐specific criteria. Inter‐ and intra‐rater agreement was assessed. RESULTS Inter‐rater agreement was substantial (Fleiss’ κ = 0.78), with full consensus on 69% of scans. Inter‐rater reliability was substantial to perfect across tracers (Fleiss’ κ = 0.70–0.87). Intra‐rater agreement was substantial to perfect (Cohen's κ = 0.79‐1). Scans with intermediate (10–40 Centiloid) quantitation had lower reader agreement. DISCUSSION A multicenter expert network achieved substantial agreement classifying amyloid PET scans. These scans provide a standard for reader training and reliability assurance in future studies. Highlights Calibration methods ensure reliable amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) visual reads across multiple raters. Substantial agreement is possible across readers using their preferred tools. Agreement is also substantial regardless of the amyloid PET tracer used. Scans with intermediate (10–40 Centiloid) quantitation have lower reader agreement. The calibration set will become a training tool for amyloid PET visual read studies.

Abstract Introduction The lower urinary tract injury, although often not life-threatening, can result in devastating long-term morbidity and, in some cases, permanent disability. Male genital trauma adversely affects male sexual function. Aim This 5th International Consultation on Sexual Medicine guideline on male genitalia trauma evaluates urologic trauma literature to guide clinicians in the best-evidenced management with specific emphasis on preservation and optimization of male sexual function. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant English-language publications and contemporary guidelines using the PubMed database (search dates January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2024) on the following terms: “trauma,” “penis,” “urethra,” “testis,” and “scrotum.” The available literature was discussed, and selected articles with the highest evidence available were used to create consensus guideline statements, categorized based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information was provided as a Clinical Principle or Expert Opinion. Results Fourteen recommendations are provided with corresponding levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Conclusions Treating clinicians should be mindful that both the male genitalia trauma itself and treatment outcomes invariably affect various male sexual functions. Optimal treatment of male genitalia trauma is essential and should incorporate patient tolerances, needs, and preferences to minimize long-term sexual dysfunction.

Abstract Background Surgical resection without visible or residual microscopic disease (R0 resection) is known as the optimal path to cure localized pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used to improve R0 resection rates; however, the optimal regimen is unclear. We assessed the safety and efficacy of peri-operative gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEM/NAB) and pre-operative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with resectable (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC). Patients and Methods This was a prospective, multicenter single arm phase 2 study in patients with R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. Patients received three cycles of GEM/NAB prior to SBRT followed by surgery and three cycles of adjuvant GEM/NAB. Primary endpoint was R0 surgical resection rate in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). Results Eighty-six patients consented and following radiologic screening, 49 were enrolled into two cohorts: R-PDAC (n = 20) and BR-PDAC (n = 29) between June 2016 and April 2021. Seventy percent of R-PDAC (14/20) and 55.2% of BR-PDAC patients (16/29) completed all NAT. Eleven R-PDAC (55.0%) and 11 BR-PDAC patients (37.9%) underwent surgical resection. Nine R-PDAC (45.0%) and 9 BR-PDAC patients (31.0%) had R0 resections. The median OS for R-PDAC and BR-PDAC patients with R0 resections was 22 months (95% CI: 17.7 months-NA) and 39 months (95%CI: 13.21 months-NA), respectively. Conclusion While the trial failed to meet one of its primary objectives as only 45% of R-PDAC patients had an R0 resection, the objective of 30% R0 resection for the BR-PDAC group was met. NAT should be part of current therapeutic strategies for BR-PDAC; however, our trial does not answer what is the best NAT for BR-PDAC. Trial Registration NCT02723331

Abstract Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), a procedure that aims to remove only the fallopian tubes of general population risk women, for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer. Currently, the method of prevention for individuals at high risk of ovarian cancer involves a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), a procedure that removes both the fallopian tubes and ovaries. However, this procedure is not recommended for individuals of the general population, who make up about 80% of ovarian cancers, due to negative health implications to the cardiovascular and skeletal systems because of surgically induced menopause. The effectiveness of the OS in preventing ovarian cancers and how the procedure impacts the histotype distribution of ovarian cancers remains unknown. Study Methods: This study uses a population-based approach and a case-based approach to determine the effectiveness of OS and its impact on histotype distribution, respectively. For the population-based analysis, we will search through clinical databases to acquire cases of individuals who have had an OS and a tumor. A control population who have their fallopian tubes in-tact will also be acquired. A cox-proportional hazard analysis will be performed to determine the effectiveness of the procedure. Using pathological records, the case-based ascertainment of tumors from individuals who have had an OS will be selected and reviewed for histotype confirmation. Fallopian tubes of these patients will also be reviewed for precursor lesions. This cohort will be compared to a historical histotype distribution of ovarian cancers. Results: For the population-based approach, we have to date, identified less than five serous ovarian cancers in individuals who have had an OS (n=40, 477). A comparator surgery was used as a control and showed 21 cancers. For the case-based approach, we have partnered with 23 collaborating institutions from around the world to identify tumors in individuals who have had an OS. We have identified 26 epithelial ovarian cancers, with the most lethal gynecological histotype, high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), accounting for 23.1% of the total proportion of epithelial ovarian cancer cases (n=6/26). This is significantly less than the historical histotype distribution of HGSC, which is 69.3% (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001). One HGSC case had a precursor lesion called a serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) while reviewing fallopian tubes of this individual. TP53 mutation analysis on one HGSC tumor sample showed a frameshift mutation in TP53 (c229fs) with the tumor and the corresponding STIC staining negative for p53 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: This evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer and shows a histotype distribution shift, with the most lethal gynecological malignancy having a significant reduction in cases following the procedure. Citation Format: Ramlogan Sowamber, Alice J. Mei, Paramdeep Kaur, Julianne McLeod, Emily McKay, Alex Lukey, Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Natalia Buza, Paul Cohen, Kyle Devins, Rhonda Farrell, Christine Garcia, Blake Gilks, Ellen Goode, Anjelica Hodgson, Brooke Howitt, Pei Hui, Jutta Huvila, Anthony Karnezis, Kianoosh Keyhanian, Mary Kinloch, Martin Köbel, Felix KF. Kommoss, Lawrence Kushi, Janice S. Kwon, Kara Long-Roche, Anais Malpica, Jessica N. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, Esther Oliva, Andrea Palicelli, Aleksandra Paliga, Carlos Parra-Herran, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Sharnel Perera, Jurgen M. Piek, Haiyan Qiu, Joseph Rabban, Robert Rome, Miranda Steenbeek, Rebecca Stone, Aline Talhouk, Kristin M. Tischer, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, John R. Zalcberg, Gillian E. Hanley, David G. Huntsman. Evaluating the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B045.

Abstract Objective This study aims to better characterize the long‐term neurological quality of life (QOL) outcomes (using the Neuro‐QOL scale) in survivors of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and provide guidance for psychological and social support strategies. Methods Utilizing data from a multicenter prospective study of NORSE/FIRES led by Yale University, we enrolled patients who completed the validated, patient‐reported Neuro‐QOL scale at least once at 3–6 months ( n = 37), 12 months ( n = 29), 24 months ( n = 23), or ≥36 months ( n = 9) following discharge. The Neuro‐QOL scale assesses physical, mental, and social health in patients with neurological disorders. QOL impairment (QOL‐I) scores were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. T ‐scores enabled comparisons with reference populations. Results In adults, median QOL‐I improved from 44.1% at 3–6 months to 37.6% at 36+ months. Paired analysis showed significant improvement in QOL‐I between 3–6 and 24 months ( p = .016), with specific improvements in communication, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, and mobility. Greater improvement was also observed for participation in social roles (5.5‐point T ‐score gain) compared to the reference population, suggesting meaningful change. A gradual improvement in overall QOL‐I scores was also observed in pediatric participants, despite a modest sample size ( n = 5 with data at 3–6 and 12 months). Measures of fatigue and anxiety persisted in adults, and cognitive difficulties persisted in both adults and children. In adults, longer status epilepticus duration and intensive care unit stay were associated with poorer QOL. Additionally, a higher number of antiseizure medications was associated with more depression, cognitive impairments, and perceived stigma. Significance These findings highlight the potential for recovery following an acute episode of NORSE, although many patients continue to face challenges requiring ongoing support, and the clinical meaning of the reported QOL improvement remains unclear. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of strategic multidisciplinary support systems in the years following discharge.

The NCCN Guidelines for Biliary Tract Cancers (BTCs) provide recommendations for the evaluation and comprehensive care of patients with gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The multidisciplinary panel of experts is convened at least once annually to review requests from internal and external entities as well as to evaluate new data on current and emerging therapies. This manuscript focuses on the adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation treatment options for BTCs as well as the systemic treatment recommendations for patients with advanced BTCs.

PURPOSE Patients with advanced, well-differentiated extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (epNETs) have limited systemic treatment options. Pazopanib, an oral multikinase inhibitor with activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 and -3, PDGFR-alpha and-beta, and c-Kit, was tested for efficacy in epNET. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II study of pazopanib (800 mg once daily) versus placebo in low- to intermediate-grade epNET with radiologic progressive disease (PD) within 12 months of study entry. Previous somatostatin analog (SSA) was required for midgut tumors, and concurrent SSA was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Unblinding and crossover were allowed if PD was confirmed by central review. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one patients (97 pazopanib and 74 placebo) were randomly assigned between September 2013 and October 2015. The majority had a midgut primary site (75%) and previous SSA treatment (93%). About half (49%) of the patients had functional tumors. The median follow-up was 61 months (95% CI, 60 to 63). Median PFS was 11.8 versus 7.6 months in pazopanib versus placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79]; P < .001); 49 placebo patients crossed over to pazopanib. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms. Rates of grade 3 or greater adverse events (regardless of attribution) were higher in pazopanib versus placebo (84% v 47%; P < .001), as were grade 5 death events (8% v 0%, P = .017). CONCLUSION Pazopanib compared with placebo significantly improves PFS in patients with progressive epNET, confirming that the VEGF signaling pathway is a valid target for therapy in epNET. However, after integrating the associated risks relative to the benefits, further development of pazopanib in this clinical context is not planned.