Keyhanian, Kianoosh

This cohort study evaluates the reduction in risk of high-grade serous carcinoma among women undergoing opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Canada.

Abstract Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), a procedure that aims to remove only the fallopian tubes of general population risk women, for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer. Currently, the method of prevention for individuals at high risk of ovarian cancer involves a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), a procedure that removes both the fallopian tubes and ovaries. However, this procedure is not recommended for individuals of the general population, who make up about 80% of ovarian cancers, due to negative health implications to the cardiovascular and skeletal systems because of surgically induced menopause. The effectiveness of the OS in preventing ovarian cancers and how the procedure impacts the histotype distribution of ovarian cancers remains unknown. Study Methods: This study uses a population-based approach and a case-based approach to determine the effectiveness of OS and its impact on histotype distribution, respectively. For the population-based analysis, we will search through clinical databases to acquire cases of individuals who have had an OS and a tumor. A control population who have their fallopian tubes in-tact will also be acquired. A cox-proportional hazard analysis will be performed to determine the effectiveness of the procedure. Using pathological records, the case-based ascertainment of tumors from individuals who have had an OS will be selected and reviewed for histotype confirmation. Fallopian tubes of these patients will also be reviewed for precursor lesions. This cohort will be compared to a historical histotype distribution of ovarian cancers. Results: For the population-based approach, we have to date, identified less than five serous ovarian cancers in individuals who have had an OS (n=40, 477). A comparator surgery was used as a control and showed 21 cancers. For the case-based approach, we have partnered with 23 collaborating institutions from around the world to identify tumors in individuals who have had an OS. We have identified 26 epithelial ovarian cancers, with the most lethal gynecological histotype, high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), accounting for 23.1% of the total proportion of epithelial ovarian cancer cases (n=6/26). This is significantly less than the historical histotype distribution of HGSC, which is 69.3% (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001). One HGSC case had a precursor lesion called a serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) while reviewing fallopian tubes of this individual. TP53 mutation analysis on one HGSC tumor sample showed a frameshift mutation in TP53 (c229fs) with the tumor and the corresponding STIC staining negative for p53 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: This evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancer and shows a histotype distribution shift, with the most lethal gynecological malignancy having a significant reduction in cases following the procedure. Citation Format: Ramlogan Sowamber, Alice J. Mei, Paramdeep Kaur, Julianne McLeod, Emily McKay, Alex Lukey, Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Natalia Buza, Paul Cohen, Kyle Devins, Rhonda Farrell, Christine Garcia, Blake Gilks, Ellen Goode, Anjelica Hodgson, Brooke Howitt, Pei Hui, Jutta Huvila, Anthony Karnezis, Kianoosh Keyhanian, Mary Kinloch, Martin Köbel, Felix KF. Kommoss, Lawrence Kushi, Janice S. Kwon, Kara Long-Roche, Anais Malpica, Jessica N. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, Esther Oliva, Andrea Palicelli, Aleksandra Paliga, Carlos Parra-Herran, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Sharnel Perera, Jurgen M. Piek, Haiyan Qiu, Joseph Rabban, Robert Rome, Miranda Steenbeek, Rebecca Stone, Aline Talhouk, Kristin M. Tischer, Britton Trabert, Penelope M. Webb, John R. Zalcberg, Gillian E. Hanley, David G. Huntsman. Evaluating the effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B045.

Wolffian tumor and its nosologic relative, the recently defined STK11 adnexal tumor are rare neoplasms thought to arise from mesonephric remnants. These tumors typically arise in the broad ligament, fallopian tube, and ovarian hilum and although most are associated with a good prognosis, up to 50% of STK11 adnexal tumors demonstrate aggressive clinical behavior. The chief differential diagnoses include endometrioid adenocarcinoma and sex cord stromal tumors. However, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of these tumors exhibit considerable overlap with peritoneal mesothelioma. To fully characterize their immunophenotypic signature, we examined a total of 21 cases (18 Wolffian and 3 STK11 adnexal tumors) with standard markers used in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) features were reviewed and additional IHC performed for cases with available material. Patient age ranged from 25 to 73 (mean: 51) years. Sites included adnexa/broad ligament (6, 28%), paratubal (5, 24%), ovary/paraovarian (5, 24%), tubal (intraluminal) (2, 9.5%), pelvis (2, 9.5%), and liver (1, 5%). The mean tumor size was 9.3 cm (range: 0.2 to 22 cm). The histomorphology in most cases (14/21, 66%) consisted of tubular to solid sheets of neoplastic cells lined by columnar to cuboidal cells containing uniform round to oval nuclei. Compressed tubules with slit-like lumens and sieve-like pattern were also seen in at least 7 (33%) cases. Three cases demonstrated interanastomosing cords and trabeculae of epithelioid cells with cribriform and microacinar patterns growing within prominent myxoid stroma as described in STK11 adnexal tumors. In the cases with available IHC for 3 mesothelial markers (calretinin, WT1, D2-40), 55.5% (5 of 9) showed reactivity with all 3 markers. In cases with at least 2 available mesothelial markers, 69% (11/16) were positive for 2 markers (mostly calretinin and WT1). Claudin-4, MOC31, and BER-EP4 were negative in most cases tested (78% [7/9], 71.4% [5/7], and 100% [6/6], respectively). Given the resemblance to mesothelioma, there was initial strong consideration and/or actual misdiagnosis of mesothelioma in 3 cases (14%). In summary, the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of Wolffian tumor and its recently defined relative, STK11 adnexal tumor, can lead to misdiagnosis of mesothelioma, particularly when encountered in the disseminated or metastatic setting. Wolffian tumor and STK11 adnexal tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of all pelvic and peritoneal mesotheliomas.