Scott, Aaron J.

Abstract Endocytosis regulates receptor trafficking and signaling, yet its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We analyzed transcriptomic data from 15,025 CRC tumors to evaluate gene expression in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway. Pathway-level signatures were compared across consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and examined in relation to oncogenic signaling programs, while individual endocytosis-related genes were evaluated for associations with clinical outcomes in an independent randomized trial cohort. Expression of CME and ESCRT pathways varied by CMS, with the highest expression in CMS4 and the lowest in CMS3. Endocytosis signatures correlated with multiple oncogenic signaling pathways, including MAPK, TGF-β, WNT, PI3K, NOTCH, and angiogenesis, suggesting broad links between endocytic activity and tumor biology. In the randomized phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial, low expression of AP2M1 —a core adaptor in the CME complex—was significantly associated with longer overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with anti-EGFR agents, but not in those receiving anti-VEGF agents. These findings suggest that endocytic trafficking may be associated with oncogenic signaling and differential therapeutic benefit in patients with metastatic CRC. The endocytosis pathway reflects biologically relevant heterogeneity in CRC and may help guide therapeutic stratification.

Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome that increases risk for colorectal and other cancers. We hypothesize that vaccines against tumor-associated antigens CEA, MUC1, and brachyury, simultaneously delivered in an adenovirus serotype-5 vector (Tri-Ad5) combined with the immune-enhancing IL-15 receptor superagonist nogapendekin-alfa-inbakicept (NAI) will reduce the incidence of colorectal neoplasms in LS carriers. Methods In this ongoing phase IIB double-blind placebo-controlled trial, two open-label safety phases (SPs) assessed safety of Tri-Ad5 alone (SP1, n=10) and with added NAI (SP2, n=10). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) follows the SPs. After baseline colonoscopy, vaccine dosing occurs at weeks 0, 4 and 8; Tri-Ad5 alone in SP1 and Tri-Ad5 plus NAI in SP2, with identical boosters at Week 52. The RCT phase participants (n=138) were randomized to receive Tri-Ad5 plus NAI or placebo. All participants complete colonoscopy at Weeks 52 and 104 for assessment of the primary endpoint: cumulative colorectal neoplasm incidence. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Results All 20 SP participants (median age 57.5 (range 42–75), 70% female, 15% minority) received all prime and booster series. SP1 participants reported 139 adverse events (AEs) and SP2 participants reported 178. AEs were predominantly grade 1; no treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. The most common treatment-related AEs were reactogenic events including grade 3 rash (without skin necrosis or breakdown) at NAI injection site (100% of SP2 participants). The RCT phase (n=138) recently completed accrual. Discussion In LS carriers without active cancer, the combination of Tri-Ad5 + NAI was well-tolerated; the RCT phase is ongoing. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/ , identifier NCT05419011.

Abstract Background Surgical resection without visible or residual microscopic disease (R0 resection) is known as the optimal path to cure localized pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used to improve R0 resection rates; however, the optimal regimen is unclear. We assessed the safety and efficacy of peri-operative gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEM/NAB) and pre-operative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with resectable (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable PDAC (BR-PDAC). Patients and Methods This was a prospective, multicenter single arm phase 2 study in patients with R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. Patients received three cycles of GEM/NAB prior to SBRT followed by surgery and three cycles of adjuvant GEM/NAB. Primary endpoint was R0 surgical resection rate in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). Results Eighty-six patients consented and following radiologic screening, 49 were enrolled into two cohorts: R-PDAC (n = 20) and BR-PDAC (n = 29) between June 2016 and April 2021. Seventy percent of R-PDAC (14/20) and 55.2% of BR-PDAC patients (16/29) completed all NAT. Eleven R-PDAC (55.0%) and 11 BR-PDAC patients (37.9%) underwent surgical resection. Nine R-PDAC (45.0%) and 9 BR-PDAC patients (31.0%) had R0 resections. The median OS for R-PDAC and BR-PDAC patients with R0 resections was 22 months (95% CI: 17.7 months-NA) and 39 months (95%CI: 13.21 months-NA), respectively. Conclusion While the trial failed to meet one of its primary objectives as only 45% of R-PDAC patients had an R0 resection, the objective of 30% R0 resection for the BR-PDAC group was met. NAT should be part of current therapeutic strategies for BR-PDAC; however, our trial does not answer what is the best NAT for BR-PDAC. Trial Registration NCT02723331

PURPOSE SWOG S1815 was a randomized, open label phase III trial, evaluating gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), were randomly assigned 2:1 to either GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS Among 452 randomly assigned participants, 441 were eligible and analyzable, 67% with ICC, 16% with GBC, and 17% with ECC. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between GAP versus GC. Median OS with GAP was 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.1) and 13.6 months with GC (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.6); hazard ratio (HR), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.14); P = .41. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups with median PFS for GAP being 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5) versus 6.3 months for GC (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.2); HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.12); P = .32. In exploratory subset analyses, the OS and PFS benefits of GAP versus GC treatment were greater in locally advanced disease compared with metastatic disease, although not statistically significant (interaction P = .14 for OS and P = .17 for PFS). Moreover, GAP versus GC showed greater improvement in PFS among participants with GBC than those with ICC or ECC (interaction P = .01), but not OS (interaction P = .28). CONCLUSION The addition of a taxane in the GAP regimen to the standard gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen did not improve OS in newly diagnosed BTC. More toxicity was encountered with GAP versus GC.

PURPOSE The outcomes of anti–PD-1 agents plus fluoropyrimidine/platinum in frontline advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (aGEAs) remain poor. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and activity of fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab with the DKK1-neutralizing antibody DKN-01 in aGEAs in a phase IIa open-label study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative aGEAs, RECIST v1.1 measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients received intravenous DKN-01 300 mg once every 2 weeks, tislelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 once every 3 weeks, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-15 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by RECISTv1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between September 18, 2020, and April 8, 2021, 25 patients were enrolled. All patients who received at least one dose of DKN-01 were included in the safety analysis. Most patients had gastroesophageal junction tumors, median age was 61 years, 76% were male, and 55% were ECOG of 0. All patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The ORR was 73% (95% CI, 49.8 to 89.3), with a disease control rate of 95%. The ORR was 90% (95% CI, 55.5 to 99.7) in the DKK1-high tumor patients and 67% (95% CI, 29.9 to 92.5) in the DKK1-low tumor patients. The median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 12.0) and the 12-month PFS rate was 33%. The median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 15.2 to 24.4) with a 12-month OS rate of 76% and an 18-month OS rate of 55%. CONCLUSION DKN-01 can be safely combined with frontline fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin and tislelizumab and demonstrates encouraging activity independent of PD-L1 expression levels. A randomized phase II trial is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04363801 ).

4175 Background: Patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who are candidates for surgery are anatomically segregated into two groups: those with resectable tumors (R-PDAC), and those with borderline resectable tumors (BR-PDAC). For each group, complete surgical resection with no visible or microscopic disease left behind (R0 resection) is generally accepted as the path to cure. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been used to improve the R0 resection rate. However, the optimal role and type of NAT that will improve R0 resection rate and overall survival (OS) remains controversial. The Academic Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium (AGICC) evaluated a perioperative strategy with combination chemotherapy and preoperative stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) to improve the R0 resection rate. Methods: This prospective, multicenter open label, single arm phase 2 clinical trial conducted among 5 member AGICC institutions enrolled pts with R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. Treatment included 3 cycles of gemcitabine (1000mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) (GEM/NAB) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle prior to SBRT (33Gy: 6.6Gy daily x 5) followed by surgery and 3 cycles of adjuvant GEM/NAB. Accrual goal was 20 R-PDAC and 30 BR-PDAC pts selected by central radiology review. Primary objective was to estimate the R0 resection rate for each cohort. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant treatment and OS. Results: Eighty-six pts signed consent and after radiologic screening, 20 R-PDAC patients and 29 BR-PDAC patients were found eligible to begin treatment. One R-PDAC and two BR-PDAC pts did not initiate therapy. 14 (70%) and 19 (66%) R-PDAC and BR-PDAC pts, respectively, completed all neoadjuvant chemotherapy.14 R-PDAC (70%) and 17 BR-PDAC (59%) pts completed SBRT. 11 R-PDAC pts (55%) and 11 (38%) BR-PDAC, underwent surgery. 8 R-PDAC pts (40%) had an R0 resection. One R-PDAC pt had a complete pathologic response (pCR). 8 BR-PDAC pts (28%) had an R0 resection. 19% (3/16) pts undergoing an R0 resection are alive (47-73+ mos). 16 pts (32%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE); 25 patients (51%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 hematologic AE. 8 pts, 4 R-PDAC and 4 BR-PDAC were hospitalized prior to surgery. One pt (2%) died during NAT. There were no deaths due to surgery. Conclusions: R0 resection rates and survival in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC were low despite a perioperative approach of systemic therapy and SBRT. The lack of survival benefit of GEM/NAB as an adjuvant regimen, as well as SBRT pre-operatively (both shown in studies subsequent to this one) may explain the disappointing results. While an R0 resection for localized PDAC is recognized as essential, our results demonstrate that an R0 resection is not sufficient to cure the majority of PDAC pts who receive NAT with GEM/NAB + SBRT. Future NAT therapy trials should aim to markedly improve the pCR rates associated with R0 resection. Clinical trial information: NCT02723331 .

LBA490 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with a dismal prognosis. Gemcitabine-based regimens are the standard of care in advanced disease, but median overall survival (OS) is roughly 12 months. The addition of albumin-bound paclitaxel to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GAP) demonstrated promising efficacy in a 60 patient, single-arm phase II study (Shroff et al, JAMA Oncol 2019), with observed median OS of 19.2 months. Methods: SWOG 1815 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial comparing GAP to gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC). The study included newly diagnosed advanced BTC patients (pts), randomized 2:1 to GAP vs. GC. GAP included gemcitabine at 800 mg/m2, cisplatin at 25 mg/m2 and albumin-bound paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. GC included standard dosing of gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Pts were treated until progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with a target hazard ratio of 0.7 with 90% power and a 1-sided alpha of 0.025; randomization was stratified by disease site (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [CCA] vs gallbladder adenocarcinoma [GBC] vs extrahepatic CCA), disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic), and Zubrod PS 0 vs 1. Results: Of 441 eligible pts randomized, 55% were female. 67% of patients had intrahepatic CCA, 16% had GBC and 17% had extrahepatic CCA. Most pts had metastases (73%). Median OS with GAP vs. GC was 14 vs. 12.7 mo respectively (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.74-1.19, p=0.58), ORR (confirmed and unconfirmed) 34% vs 25% (p=0.11) and median PFS 8.2 vs 6.4 mo (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72-1.16, p=0.47), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥10% of pts for GAP and GC were anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. GAP had more ≥ grade 3 hematologic AEs compared to the GC arm (60% vs. 45%, p=0.003). Discontinuation due to toxicity was at 24% vs 19% (p=0.26) with GAP vs GC. In exploratory subset analyses, GAP vs GC improved OS in pts with locally advanced disease (medians 19.2 vs 13.7 mo; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42-1.06, p=0.09) and in GBC pts (medians 17.0 vs 9.3 mo; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.35, p=0.33). ORR for GAP vs GC in GBC was 50% vs 24% (p=0.09) and for locally advanced disease 28 vs 21% p=0.74. Conclusions: SWOG 1815 did not result in a statistically significant improvement in median OS with GAP vs. GC. The GAP regimen had higher rates of TRAEs without a statistically significant difference in discontinuation rates. Pts with locally advanced disease and GBC may benefit from the use of GAP. Further analyses are ongoing to understand potential benefit of GAP in subsets of BTC pts. Funding: NIH/National Cancer Institute grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180820, CA180821, and CA180868; and in part by Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ (subsidiary of Bristol Myer Squibb). Clinical trial information: NCT#03768414 .

4027 Background: DKN-01 is an anti-DKK1 mAb which has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced GEA with low tumor PD-L1 expression, a subset with very limited therapeutic options. DKN-01 has immunomodulatory activity, stimulates a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, and upregulates PD-L1 levels. Here we present 2-year survival data for 1L advanced GEA patients who received combination treatment with DKN-01, the Fc-optimized anti-PD-1 tislelizumab, and CAPOX chemotherapy. The ORR was previously reported (68% in ITT and 79% in PD-L1-low populations). Methods: This Phase 2, multi-center, single arm Part A of the DisTinGuish (NCT04363801) study investigated DKN-01 + tislelizumab + CAPOX as 1L therapy in advanced HER2(-) GEA, regardless of DKK1 and PD-L1 expression levels. Tumor DKK1 and PD-L1 were assessed by central laboratories. The primary endpoint was ORR in a modified intent to treat population (>1 dose DKN-01); secondary endpoints included PFS and OS in the ITT population. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled from September 2020 to April 2021. As of 23 January 2023: Median age was 61 years (22, 80); 17 patients had GEJ adenocarcinoma; 8 had gastric cancer. Twenty-one patients had tumors with evaluable DKK1 expression. Twenty-two patients had tumors with evaluable PD-L1 expression; the majority (73%) were low expressors (vCPS <5%). Median (m) duration on treatment is 11.3 months (mo). Seven patients remain on study, with 4 on-treatment beyond 2 years. The mPFS is 11.3 mo in the overall ITT population and 10.7 mo in patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression. The mOS is 19.5 mo in the overall ITT population and 18.7 mo in the patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression. Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were mild with most G1/2. The most common AEs related to the study drug regimen were nausea (72%), diarrhea (64%) and fatigue (60%). Five patients experienced G3 DKN-01-TRAEs including decreased neutrophil count (1), diarrhea (1), vomiting (1), hypophosphatemia (2), and pulmonary embolism (1). Conclusions: At 2-years of follow-up, 1L treatment of advanced GEA patients with DKN-01 in combination with tislelizumab and CAPOX resulted in a prolongation of PFS and OS compared with the modern SOC regimen of nivolumab plus chemotherapy, both in the overall population (mPFS 11.3 vs 7.7 mo; mOS 19.5 vs 13.8 mo) and in the PD-L1 low subgroup (mPFS 10.7 vs 7.5 mo; mOS 18.7 vs 12.4 mo), alongside a manageable safety profile. The prolonged PFS and OS observed in the current study are notable, especially in our trial population dominated by patients with tumors of low PD-L1 expression, where the known benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy is limited. The ongoing Part C of this study is evaluating mFOLFOX6/CAPOX plus tislelizumab with or without DKN-01 in the same 1L GEA patient population. Further evaluation of biomarkers is also ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801 .

512 Background: The tumor microenvironment in PDA is heterogeneous and immunosuppressive given the presence of regulatory T cells and exhausted effector T cells. Despite the upsurge of effective immunotherapeutic agents (IA) in other tumor types, the role in PDA remains unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis of IA in PDA. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Elsevier/Embase, Wiley/Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles were selected per the following criteria: (1) Study participants had a diagnosis of PDA; (2) An IA was used in the trial. Titles, abstracts and full text articles were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third. Data extraction and analysis were performed by 3 independent reviewers. Descriptive analysis, mean, median, confidence interval and forest plots were used for statistical analysis. Results: We found 20,792 studies through the database, 16,105 remained after duplicates were removed and 15,889 were excluded due to irrelevance. Strict inclusion criteria were applied to the full text of 216 articles. The most common reason for exclusion were conference abstracts (44%) and ongoing trials (16%). Fifty-four trials (39 metastatic (met), 12 adjuvant (Ad) and 3 neoadjuvant (nAd) met criteria for further analysis. Age range was 27-86 (median 61) and 52.3% were males. IA included cytokine therapy (33%), peptide vaccines (22%), dendritic cell vaccine (13%), oncolytic viruses (9%), CTLA-4 inhibitors (2%) and others. IA in met-PDA had a median overall survival (mOS) of 8.1 months (ms) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 55.4% (95% CI, 51.85-58.95). There was no statistical difference in DCR among IA subtypes (range 49-60%) (p = 0.22). The mOS of Ad-PDA trials was 25 ms (historically comparable to gemcitabine, p = 0.75) and 18 ms for nAd-PDA. The most common Gr1/2 toxicities were skin reactions, fever, and chills and Gr3/4 were cytopenias, diarrhea, and mucositis. One death occurred due to neutropenic sepsis. Conclusions: IA demonstrates modest efficacy in the treatment of met-PDA albeit exhibits a favorable toxicity profile. Many trial results are available only in abstract format and some are ongoing.