Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION The ECHELON-2 trial for newly diagnosed CD30+ peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) demonstrated superior overall survival with brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy (BV-CHP) compared to CHOP. However, total enrollment was restricted to only 30% of patients with non-anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) histologies and was not powered to analyze survival benefits in this cohort. Thus, the benefit of BV-CHP in non-ALCL patients remains less clear. Adding to this uncertainty, CHOP plus etoposide (CHOEP) remains a standard regimen for many non-ALCL PTCL histologies for patients <60 years of age. Which of these three regimens offers superior outcomes for patients with CD30+ non-ALCL PTCL remains to be determined, is a critical knowledge gap in this area, and could meaningfully inform the management of these patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of chemotherapy-naïve CD30+ (≥1%) PTCL from 7 centers in the United States. Histologies were limited to PTCL-NOS and PTCL with a T follicular helper phenotype (PTCL-TFH). Frontline regimens were defined as BV-based (BV-CHP), etoposide-based (CHOEP/EPOCH), novel-CHOP (CHOP/CHOEP + novel drug on a clinical trial), or CHOP. CD30 was considered positive if any expression was reported, and when available, stratified as ≥10% or <10% of the total lymphocyte population. RESULTS The CD30+ PTCL cohort consisted of 194 patients with a median age of 68 years at diagnosis and a male (65%) predominance. Nodal PTCL-TFH (65%) was the most common histology. Most had stage III-IV disease (89%) with a high-intermediate to high-risk IPI score of 3-5 (54%). 18% had an ECOG of ≥2, 45% had ≥2 extranodal sites, and 43% had bone marrow involvement, although biopsies were not performed in all patients. CD30 expression in ≥10% of malignant T cells was observed in 55% of all quantitatively reported cases. Frontline therapy consisted of BV-based (36%), etoposide-based (30%), CHOP (27%), and novel-CHOP (7%). Baseline characteristics and CD30 expression were similar between treatment groups. The ORR was 72% (64% CR, 8% PR), with no differences observed by treatment or histology. On multivariate analysis (MVA), a high LDH was associated with lower CR (OR 2.84, p=0.003). For the patients who demonstrated a CR to frontline therapy, 61% underwent ASCT. With a median follow-up of 26.1 months (IQR 12.3-51.6), the median PFS and OS were 11.4 (9.8-14.2) and 47 (32-60.3) months, respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS were 34.9% (28.1-41.7) and 62% (54.5-68.6), respectively. PFS and OS were similar for PTCL-NOS compared to PTCL-TFH, and AITL fared similarly to non-AITL PTCL-TFH. By treatment, novel-CHOP demonstrated the most favorable PFS (median 41.9 months) and OS (median 68.1 months). Survival curves overlapped continuously with all other treatment regimens and was not statistically significant. For patients <60, PFS and OS were equivocal with BV-based (n=17) compared to etoposide-based (n=26) regimens. On MVA, stage III/IV disease conferred an inferior PFS (HR 2.00, p=0.018) as did an IPI score of 3-5 for OS (HR 2.15, p=0.001). Neither histology nor frontline treatment impacted PFS or OS. The chosen frontline treatment also had no survival impact in key subgroup analyses including patients <60 (n=56) or with CD30-expression ≥10% (n=43). For patients with CR to frontline therapy, ASCT demonstrated a significant PFS benefit (HR 0.59, p=0.028) but no statistically significant difference in OS benefit (HR 0.58, p=0.073). CONCLUSION These data provide valuable insight into the lesser-represented patient population from the pivotal ECHELON-2 trial. In this cohort of CD30+ (≥1%) non-ALCL PTCL, there was no clearly superior standard frontline regimen. The number of patients with quantitively reported CD30 expression was too small for definitive conclusions in the ≥10% CD30+ cohort and retrospective pathology review is ongoing. ASCT for patients in CR offered superior outcomes, supporting this strategy regardless of the frontline regimen, recognizing the limitations of non-randomized, retrospective analyses. Novel-CHOP regimens demonstrated encouraging survival, and clinical trials should maintain priority over standard regimens for patients with CD30+ (1-10%) PTCL-NOS and PTCL-TFH.

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Abstract Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted T cell engagers (TCEs) have emerged as a highly potent immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, both primary and acquired resistance significantly limit the durability of responses. Antigen escape and development of dysfunctional T cell responses are a significant driver of relapse post-therapy. Here, we preclinically interrogate if continual versus intermittent/response-adapted dosing differently affects development of resistance, the translatability to clinical resistance mechanisms, and how tumor-intrinsic or microenvironmental factors shape the development of resistance to BCMA-TCEs. Methods: We utilized a syngeneic transplantable Vk*MYC MM model which permits clonal tracking through unique immunoglobulin rearrangements. Two cohorts of tumor-bearing mice were treated with a murine surrogate BCMA-TCE using distinct strategies: (1) continuous weekly dosing until disease progression, and (2) an “ intermittent/response-adapted” strategy, where treatment was paused after initial response and resumed upon detection of M-spike. At time of relapse on therapy, RNA-seq was performed on isolated tumor cells to investigate mutations in- or loss of Tnfrsf17/BCMA. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was also performed on 189,025 cells isolated from bone marrow and extramedullary sites. Results: Both continuous and intermittent treatment regimens resulted in similar overall survival. BCMA-TCE treatment induced a distinctive pattern of disease progression, with para- and extra-medullary dissemination observed in 31% (17/54) of treated mice—regardless of treatment schedule. Given this treatment-induced dissemination hasn't been historically observed in our model, we further profiled BCMA expression and infiltrating immune cells to understand relapse mechanisms at these sites. Furthermore, we noted lower BCMA expression in tumors from continuously treated mice compared to untreated or stop-and-go cohorts. Importantly, reduced BCMA expression occurred without loss of plasma cell identity indicating that lineage switching may not be occurring as observed in other hematological malignancies treated similarly (Ruella, 2023, Nat Rev Drug Discov); malignant cells retained high expression of canonical plasma cell markers Irf4, Prdm1, Xbp1, Sdc1. We identified three mechanisms of acquired resistance:Genomic BCMA loss: Complete and irreversible loss of BCMA due to retrotransposition of IAP particles into the first intron of Tnfrsf17, disrupting transcription of downstream exons. This represented a genomic mechanism of antigen escape occurring with continual and prolonged TCE dosing, disrupting transcription and eliminating surface BCMA.Transient BCMA downregulation: Transient downregulation of BCMA expression associated with rapid disease relapse under continuous treatment. Tumors exhibited low BCMA levels and widespread dissemination in paramedullary sites. However, re-transplantation into naïve hosts led to restoration of BCMA expression and re-sensitization to TCE, indicating antigen loss was not permanent.Resistance without antigen loss: In the intermittent dosing regimen, several cases achieved complete remission after two doses, relapsed after treatment pause, and were not controlled after subsequent retreatment. Despite preserved BCMA expression and absence of BCMA mutations or deletions, tumors were refractory to retreatment, suggesting a tumor extrinsic mechanism of resistance. scRNA-seq analysis of the tumor microenvironment is ongoing and the role of uniquely identified immune infiltrates, like NK-like lymphocytes and distinct macrophages, in shaping the cell responses is under consideration. Conclusion: Resistance to BCMA-TCE therapy in the Vk*MYC model of MM arises through multiple mechanisms including genomic antigen loss and transient antigen downregulation. Continuous therapy drives selective pressure leading to target loss via genomic or epigenetic routes, while intermittent dosing preserves antigen but permits resistance to TCE, potentially through immune escape mediated by microenvironmental changes. These insights underscore the translatability of the Vk*MYC model for evaluating rational combination therapies to mitigate these resistance mechanisms. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by an IACUC or through an ethical review process.

Abstract Background Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by uncontrolled terminal complement activation leading to intravascular hemolysis (IVH), thrombosis, and premature mortality. The complement C5 inhibitor (C5i) ravulizumab provides immediate, complete, and sustained inhibition of terminal complement activity through an 8-weekly weight-based dosing interval, resulting in control of IVH, reduced morbidity (thrombosis rate) and mortality (improved survival). Pivotal trials of ravulizumab have shown durable efficacy and safety (Kulasekararaj et al. Ann Hematol 2025). While real-world evidence supporting its use is accumulating, further data are needed to more comprehensively characterize its effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice.Aims To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of ravulizumab among US patients with PNH over 1 year, based on physician chart review data. Methods Medical chart data from 127 US patients with PNH who started ravulizumab between June 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023 were randomly selected and abstracted by 50 hematologists/oncologists from academic (n=25) or community (n=25) settings. Included patients were aged ≥18 years on the date of ravulizumab initiation (index), had ≥12 months of medical data pre- and post-index, and continued ravulizumab for ≥12 months, unless the patient died. Complement inhibitor (Ci)-experienced patients had previous eculizumab or pegcetacoplan use pre-index; Ci-naive patients had no previous use of any Ci pre-index. Outcomes included changes in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin (Hb), and absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) up to 12 months post-index. Breakthrough IVH (BT-IVH) events (defined as LDH ≥2 × upper limit of normal [ULN; 246 U/L] and ≥1 of the following: anemia, dyspnea, hemoglobinuria, or fatigue) were assessed from index to earliest of death, loss to follow-up, ravulizumab discontinuation, or chart abstraction. Event rate was calculated per 10 person-years (PY).Results The sample included 69 Ci-naive (mean [standard deviation; SD] age: 51.4 [14.1] years; 59.4% male) and 58 Ci-experienced patients (mean [SD] age: 45.0 [14.7] years; 51.7% male; previous eculizumab: n=52; previous pegcetacoplan: n=6). In both respective cohorts, ravulizumab was associated with significant reductions in mean (SD) LDH level at month 12 (−348 [424] U/L and −20 [75] U/L; p<0.001 and p<0.05), with improvements observed from 1-month post-index. Similarly, mean (SD) Hb levels significantly increased over 12 months (2.2 [1.8] g/dL and 1.3 [1.5] g/dL, respectively; p<0.001 for both), with improvements seen as early as 1-month post-index. Significant reductions in mean (SD) ARC were observed 1-month post-index and were maintained for up to 12 months in Ci-naive patients (−45 [52] × 103/μL; p<0.001). This effect was not observed in Ci-experienced patients (−7 [85] × 103/μL; p=0.536). Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years (Ci-naive) and 1.6 years (Ci-experienced), 4 BT-IVH events occurred in 4 Ci-naive patients (5.8%; event rate: 0.30 per 10 PY), and 7 events occurred in 5 Ci-experienced patients (8.6%; event rate: 0.69 per 10 PY). All events were resolved without transfusion, dose modification, or discontinuation of ravulizumab, and no events resulted in thrombosis. Summary/Conclusion These real-world data from US adults with PNH showed that ravulizumab was associated with early and sustained significant and clinically meaningful improvements in hematological markers for PNH, in both Ci-naive patients and those with prior eculizumab or pegcetacoplan use. Ravulizumab treatment was associated with a low incidence of BT-IVH events, and all events were resolved without the need for transfusion, dose adjustment, or treatment discontinuation. Importantly, no thrombotic events occurred during these events. Despite the known differences in data collection between clinical trial and real-world populations, these findings align with an analysis of long-term clinical trial data from Kulasekararaj et al. (2025), which reported BT-IVH in 14.8% of C5i-naive (event rate: 1.0 per 10 PY) and 7.8% of eculizumab-experienced patients (event rate: 0.33 per 10 PY) with PNH over a follow-up period of up to 6 years (median: 3.9 and 2.7 years, respectively). Overall, this analysis supports the use of ravulizumab, with only 6–7 infusions per year, as an effective treatment for patients with PNH in the real-world setting.

Abstract Introduction: Despite remarkable advances in treatment, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) continue to suffer relapse. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies is required. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, especially its core ATPase subunits SMARCA2/4, is essential for super-enhancer function and MM cell survival. Furthermore, NSD2, which is overexpressed in t(4;14)-positive MM, has been reported to interact with SMARCA2/4, suggesting differential sensitivity to SMARCA2/4 inhibition. While ATPase inhibitors and PROTAC degraders targeting SMARCA2/4 have demonstrated promising preclinical efficacy in MM and other malignancies, their broader therapeutic relevance remains to be clarified. Methods: To support the clinical development of mSWI/SNF antagonists for MM, we first performed PRISM-based profiling of the anti-proliferative effects of both an mSWI/SNF ATPase PROTAC degrader and a catalytic inhibitor across a panel of 888 cancer cell lines from diverse lineages. Lineage enrichment analysis identified plasma cell myeloma as one of the most sensitive malignancies, with the PROTAC degrader demonstrating particularly potent effects. These were followed by in-depth studies in 35 human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) using FHD-286 (SMARCA2/4 ATPase inhibitor), AU-24118 (CRBN-based degrader), and AU-15330 (VHL-based degrader). Cell viability was assessed after 5-day treatment by flow cytometry with Annexin V and Live/Dead staining. Additional assays were performed in hCRBN-engineered murine plasmacytoma cell lines and Vk*MYChCRBN MM mouse models. Chromatin profiling employed CUT&Tag with SMARCA2/4 and IKZF1/3 antibodies. Results: FHD-286 and AU-24118 showed potent anti-myeloma activity across most cell lines (median IC₅₀: 4.5 nM and 5.9 nM, respectively). HMCLs with t(4;14), as compared to those without, were more sensitive to FHD-286 (p= 0.0064), with a similar trend for AU-24118 (p=0.09). AU-24118 log2 IC₅₀ values correlated with those of FHD-286 (r=0.62, p=0.0002) and with pomalidomide (r=0.61, p=0.0002), suggesting a shared biology. Indeed, CUT&Tag analysis for SMARCA2/4 and the pomalidomide targets IKZF1/3 showed these factors co-localized at most sites throughout the genome in MM.1S cells, including at DUSP22/IRF4, POU2AF1, and IgH super-enhancers. Treatment with AU-15330, depleted SMARCA2/4 off chromatin at >80% of sites within 8 hours (FDR <0.01), and somewhat surprisingly also depleted IKZF1/3 off chromatin at 70% of bound regions, indicating IKZF1/3 function is dependent upon SWI/SNF. Resultantly, combination studies of SWI/SNF targeting agents and pomalidomide showed a lack of synergy and in some cases antagonism, highlighting the importance of careful evaluation when considering combination with pomalidomide. We and others have demonstrated that murine cells are IMiDs resistant due to species-specific differences in CRBN. Using three distinct mouse plasmacytoma cell lines (+/-hCRBN), hCRBN-expressing cells showed a 100-fold greater sensitivity to AU-24118 compared hCRBN- cell lines. In vivo safety testing of AU-24118 using hCRBN transgenic mice exhibited early mortality within 7 days at doses ≥1.875 mpk and within 3 days at doses ≥7.5 mpk, accompanied by rapid body weight loss. In contrast, a preliminary efficacy study using de novo Vk*MYChCRBN mice, AU-24118 administered at 1 mpk three times per week was well tolerated and led to approximately 40% reduction in serum M-protein within 2 weeks (p<0.05), with no notable weight loss, demonstrating a therapeutic window. Conclusions: Broad PRISM profiling confirms lineage-specific vulnerability of MM to SWI/SNF inhibition, with in vitro and in vivo validation supporting selective efficacy in high-risk t(4;14)-positive subtypes. FHD-286, AU-15330, and AU-24118 demonstrated strong in vitro activity, particularly in t(4;14)-positive HMCLs. This activity was due, in part, to chromatin compaction and decommissioning of lineage and oncogenic enhancers as well as eviction of IKZF1/3 off chromatin. AU-24118 showed high selectivity, with picomolar range IC₅₀ in sensitive HMCLs. Due to species-specific CRBN differences, accurate toxicity evaluation of AU-24118 requires hCRBN-expressing models, and preliminary data indicate in vivo efficacy in the highly predictive Vk*MYChCRBN model. These findings support the potential of SMARCA2/4 targeting agents, especially AU-24118, as promising therapies for MM, particularly in high-risk t(4;14)-positive cases.

Abstract Introduction: MyeloMATCH (mM), is an National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored precision medicine initiative for newly diagnosed AML/MDS. It consists of an initial screening study (Master Screening and Reassessment Protocol, or MSRP) that involves centralized testing of bone marrow/whole blood, leading to assignment into several genetically driven treatment subprotocols within the mM portfolio. MSRP employs karyotype, 8-15 probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and NCI-myeloid (NMAv2) assays to determine ploidy, translocations and mutational status needed for accurate disease subclassification, risk stratification as well as for theragnostic determination. NMAv2, a rapid next generation sequencing assay (TAT<48 hrs), interrogates 45 DNA and 35 RNA fusion driver genes to report 1661 hotspot DNA mutations and 779 targeted RNA fusions, including all relevant fusions in AML except Inv3/t(3;3)/MECOM rearrangement (Yeung et al, 2025). The initial mM MSRP workflow relied on karyotype and FISH assay results to identify fusion positive AML/MDS as per the current testing guidelines/ recommendations as well as to abide by the FDA's requirements under the investigational device exemption (IDE). Here we present concordance analysis between karyotype, FISH and NMAv2 assay to identify relevant fusions in AML/MDS. Methods: First 400 participants enrolled in the mM MSRP were included in this analysis. We examined the results from karyotype analysis analyzing 20 metaphase cells, 8-15 probe FISH analyzing 500 nuclei per probe, and NMAv2 curating fusion read counts greater than 100, performed at the mM labs to determine the prevalence of fusions in this cohort. Concordance analysis was performed to determine clinical utility of the NMAv2 assay to report relevant fusions at the time of initial diagnosis. The concordance analysis excluded biomarkers including Inv3/t(3;3)/MECOM rearrangement, KMT2A-PTD and other rare fusions that are beyond the scope of detection by NMAv2 and/or FISH assay. Results: Of the 400 patients analyzed in this cohort (median age 64, [range 20-95]; 43% female; 15.5% non-white; 9.5% Hispanic), translocations/fusions were reported in 67, 73 and 95 patients by karyotype, 8-15 probe FISH and NMAv2, respectively. The karyotypic analysis reported inv(16)/t(16;16) [15], t(11q23) [13], t(9;22) [10], inv3/t(3;3) [9], t(8;21) [6], t(15;17) [5], t(6;9) [4], t(21q22) [3], t(9q34) [1] and t(10;11) [1]. The FISH reported inv(16)/t(16;16) CBFB::MYH11 [15], t(11q23) KMT2A rearrangement [14], t(9;22) BCR::ABL1[10], inv3/t(3;3) MECOM rearrangement [10], t(8;21) RUNX1::RUNX1T1 [7], t(15;17) PML::RARA [5], t(6;9) DEK::NUP214 [5], t(21q22) RUNX1 rearrangement [3], t(11p15.4) NUP98 rearrangement [3], and t(9q34) ABL1 rearrangement [1]. The NMAv2 reported KMT2A-PTD [26], CBFB::MYH11 [15], KMT2A fusion [14], BCR::ABL1[12], RUNX1::RUNX1T1 [8], PML::RARA [5], DEK::NUP214 [5], RUNX1 fusion [4], NUP98 fusion[3], t(9q34) ABL1 fusion [1], PICALM::MLLT10 [1] and ETV6::MECOM [1]. The concordance analysis between NMAv2 and karyotype assay demonstrated positive percent agreement(PPA) of 100%, negative percent agreement(NPA) of 96.81% and overall agreement (OA) of 97.25% when using karyotype as reference. The concordance analysis between NMAv2 and FISH assay demonstrated PPA of 100%, NPA of 98.81% and OA of 99% when using FISH as reference. Of the 12 cases with discrepant results, 7 were due to presence of cryptic translocations missed by karyotype assay, 3 had suboptimal specimen submitted for karyotype/FISH analysis, 1 had false positive BCR::ABL1 fusion reported by NMAv2 due to low level contamination and 1 had minor subclonal population of leukemic blast with BCR::ABL1 fusion detected only by NMAv2. Conclusion: NMAv2 shows high concordance with karyotype and FISH assays which are the most commonly utilized assays to identify fusions/translocations in AML/MDS. NMAv2 is a faster, relatively cheaper and sample conserving method to identify fusions and is less prone to false negative results than karyotype/FISH assay from suboptimal specimen acquisition and testing. Based on the results above, mM MSRP workflow has been amended with FDA concurrence such that a combination of NMAv2, karyotype and MECOM breakapart FISH assay will be used to identify relevant fusion variants in all patients enrolled in mM, whereas additional specific FISH assay will be limited to cases where discrepant results between karyotype and NMAv2 are reported.

Abstract Introduction: T-PLL is a rare, aggressive leukemia with poor prognosis and limited therapies. Previous studies on T-PLL patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are limited by small numbers with limited data on disease and transplant characteristics. Further, recent data from our large national cohort of patients demonstrated significant survival difference between TCL1A+ and TCL1A- T-PLL, and CD8+ T-PLL vs CD8- T-PLL. In this large multi-center series, utilizing comprehensive disease subtype and alloSCT clinical data, we evaluated prognostic and survival therapeutic outcomes in T-PLL patients that had an alloSCT with a particular focus on T-PLL disease subtypes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 572 diagnosed with T-PLL at 21 academic cancer centers throughout the USA between 2000-2023, of which we performed a further evaluation on the169 that proceeded with alloSCT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among n=169 alloSCT recipients with T-PLL, the median follow-up time was 20.9 months post-alloSCT (range: 0.2-182.9), the median age at transplant was 59 years (range: 35-77) and 52% were male. In evaluated patients (n=109), TCL1A was positive by cytogenetics or FISH in 69%. As our recent analysis demonstrated significant differences in survival among specific subtypes of T-PLL, we evaluated outcomes in patients with CD4+CD8- T-PLL (n=90, 53%), CD4-CD8+ (n=17, 10%) T-PLL, and CD4+CD8+ T-PLL (n=52, 31%). 53% (87/164) had known nodal involvement at diagnosis identified by PET or CT scan and 45% (43/96) of known patients had minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of transplant [defined as <5% T-PLL in marrow by flow, or +cytogenetics (e.g. TCL1A)] prior to alloSCT. At the time of alloSCT, 136 (80%) patients were in CR and 23 (14%) patients were in PR. Forty-nine (30%) had a myeloablative (MAC)conditioning regimen and 114 (70%) had a reduced intensity chemotherapy (RIC) conditioning regimen. Eighty (49%) patients had TBI as part of their regimen. The most common regimens were fludarabine (flu)/melphalan based regimens (n=44; 26.0%), flu/cyclophosphamide (cy) based regimens (n=33; 19.5%), flu/busulfan based regimens (n=22; 13.0%), flu/total body irradiation (TBI) (n=8; 4.7%), and cy/TBI (n=4; 2.4%). Across the whole cohort, the median OS and PFS post-alloSCT was 32.6 months (95% CI: 21.0-41.9) and 20.8 months (95% CI: 14.4-30.5) months while the 1-year cumulative incidences (CI) of NRM and relapse were 17% and 20%, respectively. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD and cGVHD were 19% and 23%. There was no difference between patients with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (n=49, 29%) when compared to patients that received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) (n=114, 67%) in OS (33.1 vs 29.2; p=0.68) and PFS (20.2 vs 20.8; p=0.97). Patients that were MRD+ (n=31) had worse OS (22.2 vs 48.6; p=0.1) and PFS (14.1 vs 32.5; p=0.04) and higher rates of relapse (1-year relapse 20% vs 8%; p=0.08) than patients that were MRD- (n=50). PFS was improved in those who received alloSCT though only trended towards significance due to low numbers (HR 0.76, p=0.09). In subtype analysis, TCL1A+ T-PLL had significantly worse outcomes compared to TCL1A negative T-PLL. TCL1A+ disease had significantly worse OS (21.6 vs 63.1; p=0.01) and PFS (12.4 vs 50.7; p=0.01) compared to TCL1A-. Additionally, in TCL1A+ disease CI of NRM (24% vs 3%; p=0.02) and relapse (25% vs 12%; p=0.86) was higher vs TCL1A- PLL. CD4+CD8-, CD4-CD8+, and CD4+CD8+ disease had no difference in survival via either OS (28.0 vs 34.4 vs 21.0; p=0.17) or PFS (29.4 vs 23.5 vs 13.6; p=0.09) as well as no difference 1-year CI of NRM ( 11.6 vs 23.5 vs 26.2; p=0.35) and relapse (18.5 vs 23.5 vs 20.0; p=0.67).Conclusions: AlloSCT significantly improved outcomes for patients with T-PLL compared to those who did not proceed to alloSCT and remains he only curative therapy for those with T-PLL. OS, PFS, and CI relapse were significantly worse for patients with TCL1A+ subtype of T-PLL, or those with MRD positivity or PR prior to alloSCT. Novel strategies to decrease relapse such as post-alloSCT maintenance therapy to improve outcomes are urgently needed in these patients.

Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN)+obinutuzumab (VO) is an effective therapy for CLL/SLL requiring regular monitoring for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during VEN ramp-up. The CLL14 trial of VO reported no TLS during VEN ramp-up; however, there are limited real-world data on monitoring practices and TLS outcomes for different dose levels and monitoring timepoints. This study assessed VEN initiation prophylaxis and monitoring outcomes for patients (pts) with CLL/SLL starting VO in first line (1L) in an outpatient, real-world setting. Methods This interim analysis relied onretrospective observational data from 4 US sites of the CLL Collaborative Study of Real-World Evidence (CORE). Adult pts with CLL/SLL were eligible if they: (1) started VO per-label outside of a clinical trial in 1L, or immediately after exposure in 1L to agents with different mechanisms of action (i.e., BTKi, anti-CD20 only) of <30 days; (2) prior to VEN start, had either (i) low physician-determined tumor burden (TB) (i.e., all lymph nodes [LN] <5 cm and ALC <25 x 109/L), or (ii) medium physician-determined TB (i.e., any LN ≥5-<10 cm or ALC ≥25 x 109/L) with creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min; (3) had no strong CYP3A inhibitors or prophylactic rasburicase from 3 days prior to VEN start until end of VEN ramp-up; and (4) had VEN ramp-up in an outpatient setting. TB-related labs/imaging was assessed from 2 months prior to obinutuzumab initiation (i.e., index date) until VEN start. VEN characteristics (i.e., dosing, duration), prophylaxis measures (i.e., antihyperuricemics and IV hydration), and TLS-related monitoring and management (i.e., lab results and interventions received) were collected per ramp-up week and TLS monitoring timepoint. Results Of 128 pts in CORE who initiated VO in any line, 72 pts met inclusion criteria (low TB: 57 [79.2%]; medium TB: 15 [20.8%]). Median (IQR) age was 62 (56.0, 68.5) years, 58.3% were male, and 81.9% had ECOG grade ≤1. Among pts tested, 7/68 (10.3%) had del(17p)/TP53 mutation and 43/66 (65.2%) had unmutated IGHV. Median (IQR) time from index to VEN start was 23.0 (22.0, 30.0) days. Most pts completed ramp-up (98.6% [71/72]) and followed a per-label regular dosing schedule (93.1% [67/72]). Prior to VEN ramp-up, all pts received prophylactic antihyperuricemics (allopurinol: 71 [98.6%]; febuxostat: 2 [2.8%]) and prophylactic hydration. In the 2 days prior to a dose escalation for at least 1 week of ramp-up, prophylactic IV hydration was reported for 27 (37.5%) pts based on physician determination. One pt stopped VEN after week 2 due to neutropenia (grade 3+). During ramp-up (median [IQR] of 9 [8, 12] blood tests per pt), no lab or clinical TLS was reported. Of 21 (29.2%) pts who received an intervention following a lab assessment, most had low TB at VEN start (16 [76.2%]). All interventions were either prophylactic or non-TLS-related. Following a lab assessment for at least 1 week of ramp-up, prophylactic IV or escalated oral hydration intervention was reported in 17/21 pts (81.0%) based on physician determination (e.g., to manage impaired baseline renal function in those with low TB, patient request, or institutional practice) (IV hydration: 15 pts; escalated oral hydration: 2 pts). By per-label monitoring timepoints, hydration intervention was given prophylactically following pre-dose lab tests for 7 pts (across weeks 1-5), 6-8 hours post-dose for 5 pts (weeks 1-2), and 24 hours post-dose for 10 pts (weeks 1-2). By per-label monitoring timepoints, other non-TLS-related interventions (i.e., blood transfusion for anemia, insulin for hyperglycemia, and potassium for non-TLS-related hypokalemia) were given following pre-dose lab tests for 2 pts (weeks 1-5) and 24 hours post-dose for 4 pts (weeks 1-2). Conclusion Consistent with the CLL14 trial, no TLS was reported in this real-world, interim analysis of pts with mostly low TB and good renal function at 1L VO initation. All interventions during VEN ramp-up were prophylactic or non-TLS-related, with prophylactic hydration commonly given based on physician preference. These results suggest that VO initiation is manageable in an outpatient setting. Consideration should be given for simplified monitoring requirements including potential removal of 6-8 hour post-dose lab in this population and be further explored in prospective studies. Data collection for this study is ongoing to further contextualize real-world VEN initiation prophylaxis and monitoring outcomes in a larger cohort.

Abstract Background: Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by cleavage of gasdermin (GSDM) family proteins that form pores in the plasma membrane, cell rupture, and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Its pro-inflammatory potential has garnered significant research attention in recent years but has not been studied in lymphoma. Patients and Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry for cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) in two large cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with multiplex fluorescent IHC (mfIHC) data, and analyzed for prognostic and immune impact. Results: Cleaved GSDMD was frequently expressed in DLBCL, and only the cytoplasmic (versus nuclear) form of expression correlated with significantly better patient survival in two DLBCL cohorts. To understand the expression at the single-cell level, we examined mfIHC results, which revealed that GSDMD+cells were tumor or immune cells, and varied in Ki-67, BCL2, and MYC expression. Cases with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression had higher mean and median levels of CD38+ (activated) M1 macrophages in two cohorts and lower PD-1/PD-L1 expression, as well as phenotypes of cognate interactions between live activated M1 macrophages, DLBCL cells, and T cells in spatially resolved immune landscape by mfIHC. In contrast, phagocytosis of pyroptotic lymphoma cells by M2 macrophages and cell death of T cells were observed in cases with predominantly nuclear form of cleaved GSDMD expression. Bulk gene expression profiling analysis identified a large proportion of RNA genes upregulated in DLBCLs with cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression, and deconvolution analysis found decreased frequency of the “Inflammatory” lymphoma microenvironment (LME) subtype, increased frequency of cell states and ecotypes with favorable prognostic associations, and decreased frequency of T cell exhaustion states. Summary: Analysis of pyroptosis-inducing cleaved GSDMD (n-terminal) expression in a large number of DLBCL patients revealed dinstinctive cytoplasmic and nuclear expression patterns in live and pyroptotic cells associated with different prognostic and immune effects. Cytoplasmic cleaved GSDMD expression is a marker of cognate interactions between live cells (e.g., activated M1 macrophages) associated with adaptive responses and favorable prognostic effects, whereas nuclear cleaved GSDMD expression is associated with immunosuppressive mechanisms, including T cell death and phagocytosis by M2 macrophages.

Abstract Introduction High disease burden has been associated with reduced efficacy and resistance to BCMA CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (van de Donk, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021; Martin, J Clin Oncol, 2023). While CAR-T cells can still induce remissions in these patients, outcomes are often worse compared to those with a lower tumor load. In addition to tumor debulking, novel strategies are needed to improve responses and durability of CAR-T cells in these patients. We previously demonstrated that immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) improve in vivo responses to T cell engagers (TCE) in high tumor burden setting by boosting T cell activation (Meermeier, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021; Meermeier, Blood, in press). IMiDs have also been shown to promote CAR-T cell antitumor activity in moderate to low tumor burden conditions (E:T ratios ≥1:1) (Yan, J Transl Med, 2024; Wang, Clin Cancer Res, 2018). We hypothesized that combining CAR-T with an IMiD may improve CAR-T function in high tumor burden setting. Methods We generated murine anti-BCMA.CD28 CAR-T cells by transducing Con-A stimulated T lymphocytes extracted from hCRBN+ mice, expanded with IL-7 and IL-15 to express a memory phenotype. We then tested CAR-T, or untransduced T cells, ability to kill in vitro IMiD resistant, hCRBN-, Vk*MYC myeloma cells in low (E:T 1:1) and high (E:T 1:≥5) tumor burden, with and without pomalidomide (POM) and IL-2. Tumor killing and T cell phenotype were assessed by flow cytometry at 24-72 hours. This controlled system allowed us to focus on putative CAR-T cell intrinsic impact of IMiDs. Results In low tumor burden setting, CAR-T effectively killed tumor at all timepoints, with or without POM; addition of POM increased T cell number, confirming that IMiDs support CAR-T expansion. Unexpectedly, in high tumor burden (E:T 1:≥5), adding POM diminished CAR-T mediated killing over time and hindered CAR-T expansion. Moreover, combination with POM decreased granzyme B, while increased expression of exhaustion marker TOX, ultimately leading to CAR-T apoptosis. This phenotype was further intensified by increasing concentrations of IL-2 in the co-culture, resulting in increased expression of CAR-T expressing LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT, suggesting that CAR-T cells may be overactivated by POM and IL-2. Our manufacturing protocol preferentially expands memory CAR-T cells, favored for their durability, proliferative capacity, and considered to rapidly expand upon encounter with antigen. We reasoned that CAR-T are already sufficiently activated by CAR/CD3z stimulation, especially with a CD28 co-stimulatory domain (versus 4-1BB), known promote rapid, effector memory expansion upon activation (Kawalekar, Immunity, 2016). Activation is intensified by high tumor burden where antigen is highly abundant. We hypothesize under intense, sustained antigen exposure in high tumor burden, the addition of POM paradoxically triggers activation induced cell death (AICD). Conclusion Although it is well accepted that POM can boost T cell function and proliferation, we demonstrate that in high tumor burden, POM drives memory CAR-T to increase exhaustion markers and apoptotic cell death by overactivation, further exacerbated by exogenous IL-2. Interestingly, we have shown opposite effects of preclinically combining POM with TCE therapy in high tumor burden, based on dosing schedule. Concomitant administration transiently boosted T cell activation improving response rates but rapidly led to T cell exhaustion (Meermeier, Blood Cancer Discov, 2021). In contrast, IMiD pretreatment in the context of step-up dosing TCE administration improved T cell fitness and longevity (Meermeier, Blood, in press).The effect of IMiDs on T cells transcriptional program is likely to differ depending on differentiation stage and mode of T cell activation. Memory cells have more sensitive TCR signaling (Kumar, Immunity, 2011) and can be hyperactivated, leading to AICD. Thus, timing of IMiD administration, when tumor burden is low, may be a critical consideration as different T cell subsets require different levels of activation. Conversely, TCE provide only initial activation via TCR signaling, therefore POM may help in providing necessary co-stimulation in this setting. Future studies will evaluate different co-stimulatory domains and test in vivo effects of POM on CAR-T expansion and persistence, particularly as CAR-T cells diminish over time as tumor burden increases.