Chinniah, Siven

Abstract INTRODUCTION The ECHELON-2 trial for newly diagnosed CD30+ peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) demonstrated superior overall survival with brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy (BV-CHP) compared to CHOP. However, total enrollment was restricted to only 30% of patients with non-anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) histologies and was not powered to analyze survival benefits in this cohort. Thus, the benefit of BV-CHP in non-ALCL patients remains less clear. Adding to this uncertainty, CHOP plus etoposide (CHOEP) remains a standard regimen for many non-ALCL PTCL histologies for patients <60 years of age. Which of these three regimens offers superior outcomes for patients with CD30+ non-ALCL PTCL remains to be determined, is a critical knowledge gap in this area, and could meaningfully inform the management of these patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of chemotherapy-naïve CD30+ (≥1%) PTCL from 7 centers in the United States. Histologies were limited to PTCL-NOS and PTCL with a T follicular helper phenotype (PTCL-TFH). Frontline regimens were defined as BV-based (BV-CHP), etoposide-based (CHOEP/EPOCH), novel-CHOP (CHOP/CHOEP + novel drug on a clinical trial), or CHOP. CD30 was considered positive if any expression was reported, and when available, stratified as ≥10% or <10% of the total lymphocyte population. RESULTS The CD30+ PTCL cohort consisted of 194 patients with a median age of 68 years at diagnosis and a male (65%) predominance. Nodal PTCL-TFH (65%) was the most common histology. Most had stage III-IV disease (89%) with a high-intermediate to high-risk IPI score of 3-5 (54%). 18% had an ECOG of ≥2, 45% had ≥2 extranodal sites, and 43% had bone marrow involvement, although biopsies were not performed in all patients. CD30 expression in ≥10% of malignant T cells was observed in 55% of all quantitatively reported cases. Frontline therapy consisted of BV-based (36%), etoposide-based (30%), CHOP (27%), and novel-CHOP (7%). Baseline characteristics and CD30 expression were similar between treatment groups. The ORR was 72% (64% CR, 8% PR), with no differences observed by treatment or histology. On multivariate analysis (MVA), a high LDH was associated with lower CR (OR 2.84, p=0.003). For the patients who demonstrated a CR to frontline therapy, 61% underwent ASCT. With a median follow-up of 26.1 months (IQR 12.3-51.6), the median PFS and OS were 11.4 (9.8-14.2) and 47 (32-60.3) months, respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS were 34.9% (28.1-41.7) and 62% (54.5-68.6), respectively. PFS and OS were similar for PTCL-NOS compared to PTCL-TFH, and AITL fared similarly to non-AITL PTCL-TFH. By treatment, novel-CHOP demonstrated the most favorable PFS (median 41.9 months) and OS (median 68.1 months). Survival curves overlapped continuously with all other treatment regimens and was not statistically significant. For patients <60, PFS and OS were equivocal with BV-based (n=17) compared to etoposide-based (n=26) regimens. On MVA, stage III/IV disease conferred an inferior PFS (HR 2.00, p=0.018) as did an IPI score of 3-5 for OS (HR 2.15, p=0.001). Neither histology nor frontline treatment impacted PFS or OS. The chosen frontline treatment also had no survival impact in key subgroup analyses including patients <60 (n=56) or with CD30-expression ≥10% (n=43). For patients with CR to frontline therapy, ASCT demonstrated a significant PFS benefit (HR 0.59, p=0.028) but no statistically significant difference in OS benefit (HR 0.58, p=0.073). CONCLUSION These data provide valuable insight into the lesser-represented patient population from the pivotal ECHELON-2 trial. In this cohort of CD30+ (≥1%) non-ALCL PTCL, there was no clearly superior standard frontline regimen. The number of patients with quantitively reported CD30 expression was too small for definitive conclusions in the ≥10% CD30+ cohort and retrospective pathology review is ongoing. ASCT for patients in CR offered superior outcomes, supporting this strategy regardless of the frontline regimen, recognizing the limitations of non-randomized, retrospective analyses. Novel-CHOP regimens demonstrated encouraging survival, and clinical trials should maintain priority over standard regimens for patients with CD30+ (1-10%) PTCL-NOS and PTCL-TFH.

Objectives: Deaths from an unknown cause are difficult to adjudicate and oncologic studies of comparative effectiveness often demonstrate inconsistencies in incorporating these deaths and competing events (eg, heart disease and stroke) in their analyses. In this study, we identify cancer patients most at risk for death of an unknown cause. Methods: This retrospective, population-based study used cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1992-2015). The absolute rate of unknown causes of death (COD) cases stratified by sex, marital status, race, treatment, and cancer site were calculated and a multivariable logistic regression model was applied to obtain adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs. Results: Out of 7,154,779 cancer patients across 22 cancer subtypes extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 3,448,927 died during follow-up and 276,068 (7.4%) of these deaths were from unknown causes. Patients with an unknown COD had a shorter mean survival time compared with patients with known COD (36.3 vs 65.7 mo, P < 0.001). The contribution of unknown COD to total mortality was highest in patients with more indolent cancers (eg, prostate [12.7%], thyroid [12.3%], breast [10.7%]) and longer follow-up (eg, >5 to 10 y). One, 3, and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) calculations including unknown COD were significantly decreased compared with CSS estimates excluding cancer patients with unknown COD. Conclusion: Of the patients, 7.4% died of unknown causes during follow-up and the proportion of death was higher with longer follow-up and among more indolent cancers. The attribution of high percentages of unknown COD to cancer or non-cancer causes could impact population-based cancer registry studies or clinical trial outcomes with respect to measures involving CSS and mortality.

Purpose: This study evaluates beam angles used to generate highly individualized proton therapy treatment plans for patients eligible for carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Methods and Materials: We retrospectively evaluated patients treated with pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy from 2015 to 2020 who had indications for CIRT. Patients were treated with a 190° rotating gantry with a robotic patient positioning system. Treatment plans were individualized to provide maximal prescription dose delivery to the tumor target volume while sparing organs at risk. The utilized beam angles were grouped, and anatomic sites with at least 10 different beam angles were sorted into histograms. Results: A total of 467 patients with 484 plans and 1196 unique beam angles were evaluated and characterized by anatomic treatment site and the number of beam angles utilized. The most common beam angles used were 0° and 180°. A wide range of beam angles were used in treating almost all anatomic sites. Only esophageal cancers had a predominantly unimodal grouping of beam angles. Pancreas cancers showed a modest grouping of beam angles. Conclusions: The wide distribution of beam angles used to treat CIRT-eligible patients suggests that a rotating gantry is optimal to provide highly individualized beam arrangements.

Abstract Background Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC) defined by presence of both epithelial and mesenchymal components. Most are triple negative but are often chemo-refractory and associated with poor survival outcomes compared to non-metaplastic triple negative BC. Advances in therapy have led to improvements in survival outcomes of patients (pts) with BC over the last decade. Our multicenter retrospective study aims to assess (1) progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (2) factors predictive of survival outcomes in MBC pts Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with MBC from 1997-2021 at Mayo Clinic (Florida, Arizona and Rochester) under IRB approval. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS at 1, 3 and 5 years. Cox regression models were used to examine the association between risk factors and survival outcomes. All tests were two-sided with p value &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant Results We evaluated 158 pts with MBC. Median age and tumor size was 61 (range: 20-91) years and 2.8 (range: 0.5-21) cm, respectively, with 80% of pts being postmenopausal. At diagnosis, 14.6% of pts had clinical T3/T4 disease, 16.4% were clinically node-positive, and 6.3% (10 pts) had distant metastases (DM). Spindle cell histology was seen in 36 pts. Most MBC pts were triple-negative (68.3%), high grade (77.2%) and high Ki-67 (36/47; 76.5%). Of the 61 pts tested for germline mutation, 8 (13.1%) were positive, with BRCA1/2, PTEN, NBN, CHEK2, and BARD1 mutations. Most pts had lumpectomy (53.8%), followed by simple mastectomy (38.5), and modified radical mastectomy (7.7%). Majority of pts had sentinel lymph node biopsy (71.8%). Adjuvant radiation therapy was performed in 65.6% of pts. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was noted in 4/38 (10.5%) evaluable pts who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Residual cancer burden (RCB) scores of 2 and 3 were seen in 76.2% of evaluable pts. Median follow-up time was 2.2 years (range: 6 days-24.6 years). Overall, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 93.3%, 81.7%, and 76.0%, while PFS was 80.8%, 67.9%, and 60.9%, respectively. The presence of DM at diagnosis [HR 38.55 (11.18, 132.93), p &lt; 0.001] and spindle cell histology (SC) [HR 2.57 (1.19, 5.53), p = 0.02] predicted worse OS in multivariable analysis. Inferior PFS was predicted by DM [HR 18.84 (6.53, 54.35), p &lt; 0.001], SC [HR 2.46 (1.25, 4.86), p = 0.009], and node-positivity at diagnosis [HR 3.65 (1.5, 8.89), p = 0.004]. The 5-year OS and PFS were 22.2% and 0% for DM pts versus 80.0% and 65.6% for non-DM pts. The 5-year OS and PFS were 71.5% and 54.7% for SC pts versus 81% and 66.6% for non-SC pts. 5-year OS and PFS for NACT pts was 67.3% and 52.6% for NACT pts versus 78.2% and 62.8% for non-NACT pts. Age at diagnosis, menopausal status, family history of BC, grade, stage, tumor size, hormone-receptor and HER2 status, and use of NACT were not found to be significantly associated with OS or PFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion This study is one of the largest and most recent review of institutional experiences with MBC. Overall, OS at 5 years was improved compared to prior older studies of MBC but still remains very low for those with DM, representing an area of unmet clinical need. SC and DM correlated with worse outcomes for both PFS and OS. Additionally, node positivity at diagnosis was a predictor of worse PFS. In contrast, no association was seen between survival and tumor size, stage, hormone receptor-positivity, HER2 receptor-positivity. The low pCR rates following NACT in our study are consistent with reported literature. Further, use of NACT does not impact survival, suggesting pts with resectable disease should proceed with surgery first. Citation Format: Siven Chinniah, Raza Zarrar, Zhuo Li, Kostandinos Sideras, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Saranya Chumsri, Rohit Rao, Sarah McLaughlin, James Jakub, Emmanuel Gabriel, Sanjay Bagaria, Laura Vallow, Santo Maimone, Pooja Advani. Clinical Factors associated with Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metaplastic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-25.

Abstract NRG-1 signals through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family members. Despite promising preclinical data, HER2 blockade in prostate cancer has failed to improve outcomes in clinical trials.1-4 We have discovered a novel complex systemic role of NRG-1 that drives sensitivity and resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in castration-sensitive (CSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), respectively. Significantly, sensitivity to ADT can be restored in CRPC by manipulating NRG-1 signaling. Our data posit NRG-1 as a systemic “switch” in prostate cancer. Plasma NRG-1 is elevated in our cohort of patients with metastatic CRPC (mean 4.9ng/ml) versus healthy controls (mean 3.2ng/ml, p&lt;0.0001) or metastatic CSPC (mean 3.4ng/ml, p&lt;0.0001). Paradoxically, high systemic NRG-1 predicted superior OS and PFS in CSPC but inferior clinical outcomes in CRPC. Consistently, opposite cell survival between LNCaP (CSPC) vs Du145 & PC3 (CRPC) was observed with recombinant human NRG-1 and enzalutamide (ENZ). ENZ combined with increasing NRG-1 concentration induced LNCaP cell death in an additive manner, but NRG-1 rescued Du145 & PC3 from ENZ-induced death in a dose-dependent manner. We next hypothesized that differential NRG-1 downstream signaling is mediated by engagement with distinct EGFR receptor dimers. While HER2 expression is similar, LNCaP express higher HER3 than Du145 & PC3. High ratio of HER2 to HER3 in Du145 & PC3 mirrors clinical reports of HER2 upregulation in CRPC5,6 and also predicts patient survival in the Stand Up to Cancer cohort.7 Significantly, we recapitulated the CRPC phenotype in LNCaP by inducing HER2 overexpression, HER3 suppression, and chemically-mediated HER2/HER3 dimerization. Conversely, HER2 knockdown sensitized Du145 cells to ENZ. Next, we queried composite single-cell whole human8 and CRPC9 transcriptomes for NRG-1 expression and discovered that the source of NRG-1 is the patients’ own mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Bone-derived MSC outgrowth cells produced copious NRG-1, which was increased substantially by coincubation with prostate cancer cell supernatants. Importantly, we were able to manipulate MSCs to reduce their NRG-1 production as a possible clinical translation. Similarly, patients treated with these compounds showed significant reduction in plasma NRG-1 levels after treatment. Additional clinical studies are pending. Together, our observations confirm that NRG-1 has differential signaling: HER3 homodimerization leads to prostate cancer cell death, whereas heterodimerization of HER3 with HER2 leads to prostate cancer cell survival via ADT resistance in a plasma NRG-1 dependent manner. Consequently, HER2 and HER3 receptor availability determine the molecular switch of NRG-1 in prostate cancer. Therefore, NRG-1 can be both a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in CRPC, and multiple clinical trials are pending. Citation Format: Jacob Orme, Roman Thaler, Dejie Wang, Siven Chinniah, Jacob Hirdler, Fernando Quevedo, Lance Pagliaro, Kwon Eugene, Alan Bryce, Brian Costello, Haojie Huang, Sean Park. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived systemic NRG-1 mediates a targetable molecular switch in metastatic prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 397.