Brown, Jennifer R.

Abstract Introduction Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have changed the treatment algorithm for patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Efficacy was demonstrated for zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients in the ALPINE (NCT03734016) trial, for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in the ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696) trial, and for acalabrutinib in the ASCEND (NCT00135226) trial. While there is limited head-to-head comparative trial data of all covalent BTKis in the treatment of high-risk R/R CLL, a previously published network meta-analysis (NMA) used data from the ALPINE, ELEVATE-RR, and ASCEND trials, and reported that zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly improved relative efficacy compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL (Shadman 2025). Within this NMA, high-risk R/R CLL populations were defined based on the prespecified definitions within each trial, including patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations in the ALPINE and ASCEND trials, and del(17p)/del(11q) in the ELEVATE-RR trial. This study aimed to compare zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one progression or death. Methods A model was developed to evaluate the NNT among high-risk R/R CLL patients to avoid a progression or death. Progression free survival (PFS) data for zanubrutinib in high-risk patients were extracted from the ALPINE trial. PFS values for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were derived from the previously published NMA study. PFS for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were calculated by applying PFS hazard ratio from the NMA results to the zanubrutinib PFS value for the high-risk population in the ALPINE trial. 24-month PFS (72.6% for zanubrutinib, 52.0% for ibrutinib, and 55.9% for acalabrutinib) were used for the base case analysis of the model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the impact of alternative PFS inputs for ibrutinib, derived directly from the high-risk populations in ALPINE trial (unadjusted). Results The base case results from the NNT model indicate that for the treatment of patients with high-risk R/R CLL over 24-months, every five patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of ibrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death and every six patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of acalabrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death. Applying the model result to a hypothetical scenario of 100 patients with high-risk R/R CLL treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for two years finds approximately 20 patients will avoid disease progression events or deaths. Treating the same population with zanubrutinib versus acalabrutinib for two years will result in the avoidance of 17 disease progression events or death. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent NNT results.Conclusions The NNT analysis suggests that among high-risk R/R CLL patients, zanubrutinib is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. Over 24 months, zanubrutinib demonstrated a NNT of five to prevent one disease progression or death compared to ibrutinib, and an NNT of six compared to acalabrutinib, in high-risk R/R CLL patients. Study findings should be interpreted based on modeling assumptions and potential patient population differences across trials.

Abstract BACKGROUND Whilst the broad clonal architecture of naturally progressing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been described, a comprehensive picture of how chemotherapy and targeted agents reshape that landscape is lacking. Here we integrate clone-specific growth kinetics with mutational profiles, transcriptomic subtypes, and CpG-methylation-based epigenetic classes to capture the multidimensional evolutionary responses of CLL under native conditions and during treatment. METHODS We previously reported a systematic whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis of 417 leukemia–germline pairs from 169 treatment-naïve patients ≥ 65 y (Karisani et al., Blood 2024). The treatment arm comprised 83 patients who received ibrutinib and 39 who received chlorambucil in the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487). Forty-seven age-matched “watch-and-wait” patients from the CLL Research Consortium served as untreated controls. Peripheral-blood samples were collected at baseline and again ~300 d and ~600 d after therapy initiation (or diagnosis in the watch-and-wait cohort), enabling longitudinal clonal tracking. WES data were processed with PhylogicNDT to reconstruct clonal architectures, define phylogenies, and identify significant clonal shifts. MutSig tools identified mutations enriched in expanding or contracting clones. Pretreatment RNA-sequencing profiles were grouped into transcriptional subtypes by consensus clustering based on the Louvain algorithm. Differentially methylated regions plus epitypes were called from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing data. RESULTS Across the 169 patients with WES, we resolved 579 subclonal clusters. Significant clonal shifts (defined as a distribution shift of cancer cell fraction in a subclone of >95% between two timepoints) were uncommon during watch-and-wait (36%) but markedly higher after therapy — chlorambucil 67% (q = 0.01), and ibrutinib 77% (q < 10-4). In ibrutinib-treated CLL, regressing subclones were enriched for KRAS (q<10-3) and SF3B1 mutations (q<10-3), whereas expanding subclones preferentially harboured mutations in BIRC3 (q<10-4), NOTCH1 (q <10-3), TP53 (q=0.02), and POT1 (q=0.098). In chlorambucil-treated patients, no specific mutations were found to be enriched in expanding or regressing subclones. Using the recently defined CLL expression clusters (ECs) in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy as defined by Knisbacher et al. (Nat Genet 2022), we were unable to identify any relationship between ECs and outcomes. We therefore sought to identify de novo ECs with prognostic relevance in the context of BTK-inhibition (BTKi-ECs). We identified a transcriptionally defined patient subgroup (C4, n=20) associated with inferior progression-free survival (median PFS = 63 months, log-rank q=0.05), independent of known prognostic clinical and molecular features, including epitypes, in multivariate analysis (Cox HR=3.7, 95% CI: 1.6-8.6, q=0.02). Gene-set enrichment in this cluster highlighted TNF-ɑ signalling via NF-κB (REL, TNFAIP3, NFKB2) and G2M checkpoint pathways (SMC4, EZH2). We also identified a distinct transcriptionally defined patient subgroup (C3, n=18) that was enriched for patients harboring at least one contracting subclone and no expanding subclones (q=0.005). This cluster showed a relative depletion of mutations within the chromatin modification pathway (6% vs 50%, q<0.01). Gene-set enrichment in this cluster highlighted a downregulation of genes in the TNF-ɑ signalling via NF-κB pathway (SOCS3, ICOSLG, NFKB2). CONCLUSION BTK inhibition and chemotherapy drive distinct evolutionary trajectories in CLL. Multi-omics profiling reveals mutation-defined subclones with divergent sensitivity to targeted therapy and delineates two informative expression states: a high-risk NF-κB/inflammatory cluster (C4; poor PFS) and a cluster enriched with contracting subclones with depleted TNF-ɑ signalling via NF-κB (C3). Integrating clonal growth kinetics with genomic, transcriptomic, and methylation data can potentially identify patients likely to progress on BTK inhibitors and identify actionable pathways for adaptive or combination therapy.

Abstract Background: Venetoclax (VEN)+obinutuzumab (VO) is an effective therapy for CLL/SLL requiring regular monitoring for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during VEN ramp-up. The CLL14 trial of VO reported no TLS during VEN ramp-up; however, there are limited real-world data on monitoring practices and TLS outcomes for different dose levels and monitoring timepoints. This study assessed VEN initiation prophylaxis and monitoring outcomes for patients (pts) with CLL/SLL starting VO in first line (1L) in an outpatient, real-world setting. Methods This interim analysis relied onretrospective observational data from 4 US sites of the CLL Collaborative Study of Real-World Evidence (CORE). Adult pts with CLL/SLL were eligible if they: (1) started VO per-label outside of a clinical trial in 1L, or immediately after exposure in 1L to agents with different mechanisms of action (i.e., BTKi, anti-CD20 only) of <30 days; (2) prior to VEN start, had either (i) low physician-determined tumor burden (TB) (i.e., all lymph nodes [LN] <5 cm and ALC <25 x 109/L), or (ii) medium physician-determined TB (i.e., any LN ≥5-<10 cm or ALC ≥25 x 109/L) with creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min; (3) had no strong CYP3A inhibitors or prophylactic rasburicase from 3 days prior to VEN start until end of VEN ramp-up; and (4) had VEN ramp-up in an outpatient setting. TB-related labs/imaging was assessed from 2 months prior to obinutuzumab initiation (i.e., index date) until VEN start. VEN characteristics (i.e., dosing, duration), prophylaxis measures (i.e., antihyperuricemics and IV hydration), and TLS-related monitoring and management (i.e., lab results and interventions received) were collected per ramp-up week and TLS monitoring timepoint. Results Of 128 pts in CORE who initiated VO in any line, 72 pts met inclusion criteria (low TB: 57 [79.2%]; medium TB: 15 [20.8%]). Median (IQR) age was 62 (56.0, 68.5) years, 58.3% were male, and 81.9% had ECOG grade ≤1. Among pts tested, 7/68 (10.3%) had del(17p)/TP53 mutation and 43/66 (65.2%) had unmutated IGHV. Median (IQR) time from index to VEN start was 23.0 (22.0, 30.0) days. Most pts completed ramp-up (98.6% [71/72]) and followed a per-label regular dosing schedule (93.1% [67/72]). Prior to VEN ramp-up, all pts received prophylactic antihyperuricemics (allopurinol: 71 [98.6%]; febuxostat: 2 [2.8%]) and prophylactic hydration. In the 2 days prior to a dose escalation for at least 1 week of ramp-up, prophylactic IV hydration was reported for 27 (37.5%) pts based on physician determination. One pt stopped VEN after week 2 due to neutropenia (grade 3+). During ramp-up (median [IQR] of 9 [8, 12] blood tests per pt), no lab or clinical TLS was reported. Of 21 (29.2%) pts who received an intervention following a lab assessment, most had low TB at VEN start (16 [76.2%]). All interventions were either prophylactic or non-TLS-related. Following a lab assessment for at least 1 week of ramp-up, prophylactic IV or escalated oral hydration intervention was reported in 17/21 pts (81.0%) based on physician determination (e.g., to manage impaired baseline renal function in those with low TB, patient request, or institutional practice) (IV hydration: 15 pts; escalated oral hydration: 2 pts). By per-label monitoring timepoints, hydration intervention was given prophylactically following pre-dose lab tests for 7 pts (across weeks 1-5), 6-8 hours post-dose for 5 pts (weeks 1-2), and 24 hours post-dose for 10 pts (weeks 1-2). By per-label monitoring timepoints, other non-TLS-related interventions (i.e., blood transfusion for anemia, insulin for hyperglycemia, and potassium for non-TLS-related hypokalemia) were given following pre-dose lab tests for 2 pts (weeks 1-5) and 24 hours post-dose for 4 pts (weeks 1-2). Conclusion Consistent with the CLL14 trial, no TLS was reported in this real-world, interim analysis of pts with mostly low TB and good renal function at 1L VO initation. All interventions during VEN ramp-up were prophylactic or non-TLS-related, with prophylactic hydration commonly given based on physician preference. These results suggest that VO initiation is manageable in an outpatient setting. Consideration should be given for simplified monitoring requirements including potential removal of 6-8 hour post-dose lab in this population and be further explored in prospective studies. Data collection for this study is ongoing to further contextualize real-world VEN initiation prophylaxis and monitoring outcomes in a larger cohort.

501 Background: Targeted treatment options have significantly improved outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) who provide care for fewer numbers of patients with CLL are challenged to remain current with continuously changing treatment paradigms. To assess ongoing educational needs, we analyzed the treatment choices made by HCPs in an online survey for select cases of poor-prognosis CLL and compared these with the choices of experts in CLL treatment for the same clinical scenarios. Methods: As part of a CME program, HCPs could access an online algorithm to enter specific characteristics of a CLL case scenario and receive treatment recommendations from 5 US-based CLL experts. Experts made recommendations in July 2024 for 146 possible case patients built into the algorithm. After entering their case characteristics, HCPs were asked to enter their planned treatment prior to viewing the expert recommendations. We compared expert and HCP treatment choices across various case scenarios that were entered into the algorithm, with a focus on previously untreated CLL with del(17p)/mutated TP53 or R/R CLL. Results: Between August 2024 and February 2025, 346 cases were entered into the algorithm by 174 HCPs. Among responding HCPs, 38% were based in the UK/EU, 24% in the US, and 10% in Asia; 62% treated ≤10 patients with CLL per month and 49% sought recommendations for a specific patient in their practice. Among 231 cases of previously untreated CLL entered, 91 (39%) sought recommendations for del(17p)/mutated TP53 disease. For cases with no major comorbidities and previously untreated CLL with del(17p)/mutated TP53 , all experts recommended acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib; in 19 cases submitted by HCPs practicing in locations where second-generation BTK inhibitors (BTKi) are approved for CLL (including the US, EU, and Japan), 58% planned 1 of these treatments for this case scenario, 17% planned ibrutinib-based therapy, and 11% planned venetoclax-based therapy. Among case scenarios requiring third-line therapy after progressing with 2 regimens including a covalent BTKi and venetoclax plus an anti-CD20 Ab (with progression <2 years after completing treatment), all experts would recommend a noncovalent BTKi (eg, pirtobrutinib), with 1 expert indicating they would also consider CAR T-cell therapy. For the same case scenario among 6 US-based HCPs, 1 planned pirtobrutinib and 3 planned CAR T-cell therapy. Overall, after reviewing expert recommendations, 61% of HCP respondents whose planned treatment differed from the experts indicated that they would change their approach, and 20% indicated barriers to implementing the recommendations. Conclusions: Our findings provide insight into potential educational needs among HCPs who manage patients with CLL, suggesting that targeted expert-led education could benefit these HCPs.

BACKGROUND Our knowledge of how the genomic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is impacted by the selective pressure imposed by chemotherapy and targeted agents remains incomplete. We hypothesize that the extent of clonal evolution, baseline transcriptional state, and the overall and clone-specific growth kinetics of CLL will vary under native conditions or following exposure to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. METHODS We report the systematic genomic analysis of leukemia-normal whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 420 samples collected from 170 patients who were &gt;65 years of age with treatment-naïve CLL. The treatment-cohort consisted of 83 patients who received ibrutinib (420mg daily) and 40 patients who received chlorambucil (0.5 mg/kg up to maximum 0.8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, up to 12 cycles) as part of the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487). The ‘watch and wait’ (WW) cohort comprised 47 age-matched patients whose samples originated from the CLL Research Consortium and were untreated for their CLL during sampling. Sampling occurred at baseline and at day 300, and/or day 600, following initiation of therapy or following a diagnosis of CLL for those in the WW cohort. The WW cohort had more cases with a mutated IGHV (72% vs 40%), del17p (14% vs 0%), and del13q (72% vs 45%) when compared to the treatment cohort. Baseline CLL RNA-seq data were available for 150 patients. We used PhylogicNDT to reconstruct the clonal architecture from WES. By determining the fraction of cancer cells with each mutation (cancer cell fraction [CCF]) and their multiplicities (number of DNA molecules carrying a mutation per cancer cell), subclones were identified through clustering of CCFs of mutational events across samples from each patient. This allowed us to estimate the phylogenetic relationships and significant clonal shifts (defined as a distribution shift of CCF in a subclone of &gt;95% between two timepoints, corresponding to a median ΔCCF of 18%) for each patient's CLL and to relate these shifts to somatic and clinical features. RESULTS In total, we identified 791 subclonal clusters across the three patient cohorts (ibrutinib = 406, chlorambucil = 189, WW = 196). We observed higher rates of significant clonal shifts between any two time points in patients exposed to chlorambucil (68%, q=0.008) and ibrutinib (77%, q&lt;0.0001) when compared to patients on WW (36%). There was no significant difference in the number of patients exhibiting a clonal shift between those receiving ibrutinib and chlorambucil (q=0.3). More patients treated with ibrutinib (54%, q=0.0002) and chlorambucil (50%, q=0.004) harbored a clone that reduced in size than those on WW (17%). More patients treated with ibrutinib (71%, q&lt;0.0002) and chlorambucil (55%, q=0.12) possessed at least one clone that increased in size during therapy than patients receiving WW (34%). In ibrutinib-treated patients, SF3B1 mutations (q=0.13, 14% vs 5%) and XPO1 mutations (q=0.13, 5% vs 0.3%) were enriched in subclones that significantly reduced over the complete time period. We also observed more BIRC3 mutations in subclones that had a significant shift in CCF when compared to subclones that remained stable over time (q=0.2, 5% vs 2%). Consistent with the overall study, with 8 years of follow-up in this patient subset, long-term progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the patients treated with ibrutinib when compared to chlorambucil (P&lt;0.0001). This PFS benefit was also seen regardless of subclonal growth patterns. Using baseline RNA-seq data, we identified 7 of the 8 recently defined CLL expression clusters (EC), that were identified in the context of chemoimmunotherapy for CLL (Knisbacher et al. Nat Gen 2022), and could recapitulate the relationship to outcomes in individuals treated with chlorambucil. However, despite the larger cohort, no significant relationship between EC clusters and PFS were observed in ibrutinib-treated patients, suggesting that a distinct predictive baseline transcriptional signature may be present in ibrutinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION Our analyses highlight the need to interrogate the molecular features of CLL in relation to the impact of therapeutic selective pressure imposed by BTK inhibition, which appear distinct from exposure to chemotherapy. Ongoing analyses aim to identify relationships between patterns of growth and subclonal growth rates molecular and clinical features.

Abstract Introduction The definition of respiratory events has evolved over decades. The current American Academy of Sleep Medicine scoring manual recommends hypopneas be defined by a ≥ 30% airflow reduction with either ≥ 3% desaturation or an arousal, while the prior “recommended” criteria of a ≥ 30% airflow reduction and associated ≥ 4% oxygen desaturation (with no requirement of arousal) was changed to “optional”. Consequently, events previously characterized as a respiratory effort related arousal (RERA) may now be defined as a 3% hypopnea. We hypothesized that while the 3% apnea-hypopnea index (3%AHI) will be higher than the 4%AHI, the 3%AHI will be similar to the 4% respiratory disturbance index (4%RDI), and that the measurement of RERAs under 3% scoring criteria will be clinically insignificant. Methods We prospectively collected 70 consecutive in-lab polysomnography results in 4 adult age groups. We re-scored the respiratory events utilizing the 3% hypopnea rule, and compared the differences between 3% and 4% scoring criteria. Results Among the 70 studies (mean age 50, males 46%), the 3%AHI was significantly higher than the 4%AHI (+9.247 ± 1.161, p&lt; 0.001). This was mainly due to increased hypopnea events (+10.313 ± 1.617, p&lt; 0.001). The 3%AHI was significantly different from the 4%RDI (+7.096 ± 1.133, p&lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 3% and 4% RERA indices, with both values being minimal. Results were similar in both diagnostic and titration phases of testing. Conclusion As previously shown, utilizing the 3% hypopnea rule results in an increased AHI. Most of this difference is related to hypopneas with negligible influence of RERAs. This may lead to increased diagnosis and severity of sleep-disordered breathing in the adult population, and potentially be associated with payer ramifications. Our findings demonstrated negligible RERA indices on average with either rule, thus calling into question the clinical significance of this index in most patients. Support (if any) NA

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are essentially different manifestations of the same disease that are similarly managed. A number of molecular and cytogenetic variables with prognostic implications have been identified. Undetectable minimal residual disease at the end of treatment with chemoimmunotherapy or venetoclax-based combination regimens is an independent predictor of improved survival among patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. The selection of treatment is based on the disease stage, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region mutation status, patient age, performance status, comorbid conditions, and the agent’s toxicity profile. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with CLL/SLL.

Abstract A041202 (NCT01886872) is a phase 3 study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) in previously untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The initial results showed that ibrutinib-containing regimens had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and rituximab did not add additional benefits. Here we present an updated analysis. With a median follow-up of 55 months, the median PFS was 44 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-54) for BR and not yet reached in either ibrutinib-containing arm. The 48-month PFS estimates were 47%, 76%, and 76% for BR, ibrutinib, and IR, respectively. The benefit of ibrutinib regimens over chemoimmunotherapy was consistent across subgroups of patients defined by TP53 abnormalities, del(11q), complex karyotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). No significant interaction effects were observed between the treatment arm and del(11q), the complex karyotype, or IGHV. However, a greater difference in PFS was observed among the patients with TP53 abnormalities. There was no difference in the overall survival. Notable adverse events with ibrutinib included atrial fibrillation (afib) and hypertension. Afib was observed in 11 patients (pts) on BR (3%) and 67 pts on ibrutinib (18%). All-grade hypertension was observed in 95 pts on BR (27%) and 263 pts on ibrutinib (55%). These data show that ibrutinib regimens prolong PFS compared with BR for older patients with treatment-naïve CLL. These benefits were observed across subgroups, including high-risk groups. Strikingly, within the ibrutinib arms, there was no inferior PFS for patients with abnormalities in TP53, the highest risk feature observed in CLL. These data continue to demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL.

Abstract ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor–associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposure-adjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.

7500 Background: The Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib +/- anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (IO) is a standard frontline regimen for older adults with CLL. BTKi alone do not often lead to complete response (CR) or undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), thus are given indefinitely. Smaller trials showed that IO plus venetoclax (IVO) can induce uMRD CRs which may allow successful discontinuation. Methods: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A041702 is a multicenter trial designed to evaluate if IVO with response-guided discontinuation of I improves progression free survival (PFS) versus IO with indefinite I in treatment-naïve, older CLL pts. IO is given in standard fashion, and in the IVO arm V is added at C3D1 and continued until C14D28. After 14 cycles, pts undergo response evaluation including CT scans and bone marrow biopsy with central MRD assessment by flow cytometry. Pts in IVO arm with uMRD CR discontinue I; all others continue I until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible pts were age ≥70 years (amended to ≥65). Pts had CrCl ≥ 40 mL/min, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and no other life-limiting intercurrent illness. Pts were stratified based on Rai stage and +/- del17p13.1 by FISH, and randomized 1:1 to IO:IVO. With 431 evaluable pts, the trial had 90% power to detect significant improvement in PFS using a one-sided log-rank test with one-sided type 1 error rate of 2.5%. The Alliance DSMB approved release of data on Nov 4, 2022 after meeting the protocol defined futility threshold at the second planned event-driven interim analysis. Data were locked on December 15, 2022. Results: Between January 4, 2019 and July 15, 2022, 465 pts were registered (IO:232, IVO:233). Median age was 74; 67% of pts were men. Rai stage 3-4 was seen in 55% and del17p in 13%. With median follow-up of 14 months, PFS of IO was 87.5% compared to 85% on IVO. Events were observed in 29 pts on IO (4 progressions, 23 deaths, 2 pts started other therapy) and 35 on IVO (7 progressions, 28 deaths). The predefined futility boundary was crossed, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.20 (95% CI: 0.73-1.97) in favor of IO. COVID-19 was the leading cause of death in both arms, (11 COVID-19 deaths on IO, 19 on IVO), with 13 and 11 additional deaths from other causes, respectively. Censoring pts with COVID-19 related deaths, PFS HR is 0.82 (95% CI: 0.44-1.53) in favor of IVO. Grade 3+ toxicity and discontinuation in year 1 of therapy were similar between arms. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that PFS for IVO is not superior to IO for treatment-naive older CLL pts in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study treatment is ongoing, and long-term follow-up will determine if there are advantages to IVO, with special attention to MRD and therapy discontinuation. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT03737981 .