Citations

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract Brain metastases (BMs) are a common and often fatal progression of systemic cancers, affecting up to 25% of patients. Despite advances in surgical resection and radiotherapy, the median survival remains limited to 10–16 months. While genomic profiling has enabled the development of targeted therapies, there remains a paucity of prognostic tools for clinical use. To address this, we explored the utility of DNA methylation profiling—an epigenetic marker increasingly recognized for its diagnostic and prognostic value. We profiled fresh-frozen tissue from 327 surgically resected BM samples of lung, breast, melanoma, and gastrointestinal (GI) origin using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Unsupervised analysis via partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering identified five robust groups. Four of these correlated closely with primary tumor origin. However, a distinct “Poly-Origin Cluster” emerged, comprising tumors from multiple primary sites with a shared epigenetic signature. Poly-Origin tumors showed improved survival outcomes compared to origin-aligned clusters (20.2 vs. 10.1 months, p=0.0018), independent of clinical covariates. Notably, these tumors were enriched for immune cell infiltration—including CD14+ macrophages, CD19+ B-cells, and CD56+ NK cells—based on deconvolution analysis, and exhibited reduced genomic instability as measured by copy number variation. These tumors were enriched for pathways related to cell signaling. We validated the prognostic significance of the Poly-Origin methylation signature in a publicly available independent cohort (n=96), and found that high signature concordance correlated with extended survival. Finally, we demonstrated the feasibility of detecting this signature in plasma-derived cell-free DNA using cfMeDIP-seq, with high classification accuracy (AUC = 0.98). These findings reveal a clinically meaningful subtypes of BM not captured by tissue origin or mutation status alone. Our work suggests that DNA methylation profiling may be a powerful tissue- and liquid biopsy–based tool that holds promise as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in the management of brain metastasis.

Abstract A major barrier in understanding adult diffuse gliomas lies in the inability to track tumor evolution in real time. To address this, we employed a novel method known as continuous lineage tracing, which integrates CRISPR/Cas9-based expressed DNA barcoding with single-cell RNA sequencing, enabling a phylogenetic approach to studying tumor development. Patient-derived glioma-initiating cell lines were engineered with expressed barcodes targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 and implanted into mice to create intracranial xenografts. Tumors underwent single-cell RNA sequencing; expressed barcodes were used to infer clonal relationships, and transcriptomic profiles enabled cell state classification. Phylogenetic lineage trees were reconstructed using lineage inference algorithms to characterize cell fitness, expansion, and plasticity. Our analysis uncovered extensive intra-clonal cell state heterogeneity, indicating active phenotype switching prior to therapy. We identified consistent transcriptional programs associated with tumor engraftment and in vivo clonal advantage. Lineage tracing revealed gene expression signatures linked to key phenotypes: fitness, enriched for neural-mesenchymal and injury-response pathways; expansion, associated with RNA splicing; and plasticity, correlated with cell cycle and DNA repair programs. Glioma stem cells appeared to span a transcriptional continuum from undifferentiated, high-fitness states to more differentiated, low-fitness states, with high-fitness cells potentially representing transitional phenotypes. We then validated these findings in a cohort of 185 surgically resected gliomas with matched bulk RNA and proteomic data. Phylogenetic gene signatures differed markedly between IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype tumors. When stratified by tumor type, both fitness and expansion signatures were significantly associated with overall survival in GBM (median 12.6 months, p=0.041) and oligodendrogliomas (median 66 months, p=0.027). This study demonstrates the utility of continuous lineage tracing to reconstruct tumor evolution and identify transcriptional programs linked to tumor growth and prognosis. Our approach provides a powerful framework for dissecting glioma biology and identifying potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and exhibit clinical heterogeneity. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the only adjuvant therapy, but response is variable and biomarkers are limited. RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 trial to stratify meningioma patients for adjuvant RT based on clinical risk. Here, we apply modern molecular tools to this cohort and uncover correlates of RT response. To do so, tumor tissue from 100 RTOG-0539 patients was profiled using DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Recurrence scores, Molecular Groups, gene expression, and copy number alterations were compared across clinical groups and between RT responders and non-responders. Using this approach, modern grading criteria, including brain invasion, TERT mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion and 1p/1q status, would reclassify 10% of tumors and alter treatment group assignment in 7%. Notably, non-responders to RT had more frequent 1p and 14q loss, and greater copy number burden. In addition, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling revealed immune-related signatures in RT responders and upregulation of cell cycle–related pathways in RT non-responders, several of which overlapped with targets of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor validated in aggressive meningioma models. Of particular importance, the Proliferative Molecular Group was an independent predictor of post-RT recurrence in multivariable analysis, outperforming WHO grade. In conclusion, multi-omic analysis of the RTOG-0539 cohort shows that updated WHO grading criteria, incorporating molecular and cytogenetic features, improve risk stratification. However, molecular classification, particularly the Proliferative group, remains an independent and stronger predictor of RT response. These findings support integrating molecular biomarkers alongside modern grading frameworks to guide treatment and trial design in meningioma.

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Abstract Advocacy has long been at the core of the infectious diseases (ID) field, with clinicians and researchers advocating to ensure patients can access the care they need on an individual and global scale. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Training Program Directors’ (PD) Committee met in 2024 and discussed ways that advocacy is and should be incorporated into fellowship training, as well as highlighted the role PDs play in advocating for their trainees. Policies with a negative impact on ID clinical care, public health, and research underscore the importance of mobilizing the field of ID to advocate for the patients and communities we serve, as well as for ourselves. This paper presents ideas generated at this meeting and is meant to serve as a reference for ID PDs, as well as the wider ID community, as a call to action for teaching and participating in advocacy work.

Introduction: Corticosteroid therapy has been demonstrated to improve prognosis and reduce mortality in patients with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection by attenuating the exaggerated inflammatory response that emerges in the late phase of infection. However, its impact on patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, who are at higher risk of complications, has not been specifically studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of corticosteroid therapy on mortality and long-term COVID-19 symptoms in this high-risk population. Methods: We analyzed the prospective registry HOPE-2. Patients with previous cardiovascular disease were selected, and 18-month all-cause death was defined as the primary endpoint. Long-term COVID-19 symptoms were considered as secondary endpoints. A total of 1188 patients with previous heart disease were included, of which 453 received corticosteroid treatment. Propensity score matching analysis in a 1:1 fashion was performed based on baseline variables that exhibited a p-value < 0.05 in the univariant analysis and outcome variables that defined corticosteroid use, with a final matched population of 796 patients. Results: In patients with pre-existing heart disease, corticosteroid treatment was not associated with differences in 18-month all-cause mortality (p = 0.52). However, a shorter duration of hospitalization (median: 8 days [IQR: 4–14] and 11 days [IQR: 7–18]; p < 0.001) was observed in patients who received corticosteroids. No significant differences in long-term COVID-19 symptoms were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with pre-existing heart disease, the absence of a clear harmful effect suggests that the positive effects of corticosteroids may be offset by their potential adverse effects which could contribute to the persistence of long COVID symptoms. This finding may reflect a differential response to corticosteroids in this high-risk subgroup, highlighting the need for further studies to clarify the role of this therapy in such patients.

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480

Objectives: To compare ACL reconstruction with quadriceps autograft with or without LET for primary ACL reconstruction Methods: A retrospective study was performed from 2013- 2021 including patient undergoing quadriceps autograft (QA) or QA plus lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) for primary ACLR. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing multi-ligamentous reconstruction, concomitant procedures outside of meniscal work, revision cases, and patients with less than 2 years of follow up. The surgeon favored LET in young (less than 18 years old) females participating in cutting and twisting sports. An additional relative indication was a high-grade pivot shift (2 or 3+). Clincal outcomes incldued IKDC and Lysholm scores, retrun to sport/return to sport at same level and time to return to sport in athletes along with complication rates. Failure rate was determined by rate of graft re-tearing and presence of a residual pivot shift (2+ or higher) at final follow up. Results: A total of 142 patients underwent QA+LET with 18 excluded, leaving 124 patients in this group. The QA group had 371 patients with 57 excluded, leaving 314 for analysis. The QA+LET group had a significantly higher percentage of females, ligamentous laxity, and athletes. IKDC scores were significantly higher in the QA+LET group at final follow up. Lysholm scores were significantly higher in the QA group at 6 months, with no difference at other time points. Graft re-tear rates were similar between the 2 groups. Residual pivot shift at final follow up was significantly higher in the QA group (21% vs. 11%, p = 0.012) as was overall failure rate (24% vs. 14.5%. p = 0.026). Return to sport was similar between the 2 groups, but time to return to sport and return at the same or higher level was significantly higher in the QA+LET group. Hematomas were more common (12.9% vs. 0%) in the QA+LET group. Conclusions: Addition of an LET to QA leads to lower residual pivot shift when compared to QA alone. The addition of a LET to QA may lead to a higher return to sport at same or higher level compared to QA alone. This provides preliminary data that will be built upon with results from the Stability 2 trial.