Zuccato, Jeffrey

Abstract Brain metastases (BMs) are a common and often fatal progression of systemic cancers, affecting up to 25% of patients. Despite advances in surgical resection and radiotherapy, the median survival remains limited to 10–16 months. While genomic profiling has enabled the development of targeted therapies, there remains a paucity of prognostic tools for clinical use. To address this, we explored the utility of DNA methylation profiling—an epigenetic marker increasingly recognized for its diagnostic and prognostic value. We profiled fresh-frozen tissue from 327 surgically resected BM samples of lung, breast, melanoma, and gastrointestinal (GI) origin using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Unsupervised analysis via partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering identified five robust groups. Four of these correlated closely with primary tumor origin. However, a distinct “Poly-Origin Cluster” emerged, comprising tumors from multiple primary sites with a shared epigenetic signature. Poly-Origin tumors showed improved survival outcomes compared to origin-aligned clusters (20.2 vs. 10.1 months, p=0.0018), independent of clinical covariates. Notably, these tumors were enriched for immune cell infiltration—including CD14+ macrophages, CD19+ B-cells, and CD56+ NK cells—based on deconvolution analysis, and exhibited reduced genomic instability as measured by copy number variation. These tumors were enriched for pathways related to cell signaling. We validated the prognostic significance of the Poly-Origin methylation signature in a publicly available independent cohort (n=96), and found that high signature concordance correlated with extended survival. Finally, we demonstrated the feasibility of detecting this signature in plasma-derived cell-free DNA using cfMeDIP-seq, with high classification accuracy (AUC = 0.98). These findings reveal a clinically meaningful subtypes of BM not captured by tissue origin or mutation status alone. Our work suggests that DNA methylation profiling may be a powerful tissue- and liquid biopsy–based tool that holds promise as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in the management of brain metastasis.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial tumor, with a poor prognosis of 10-16 months, and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common source. Currently, we cannot reliably predict which patients will develop BMs clinically, so most are detected after they develop and growing to cause deficits. Here, we use tumor DNA methylomes to predict which patients are likely to develop BM through the course of disease and we use both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma methylomes for BM liquid biopsy, enabling their early detection and treatment. METHODS DNA methylomes were acquired from 419 tumor and plasma samples from 363 LUAD and BM patients. We built DNA methylation-based models that predict BM development and that also identify BMs non-invasively from CSF and plasma in discovery data subsets. A nomogram was built that predicts BM risk using methylation scores and clinical stage together. Models were evaluated in independent validation sets. RESULTS Our model predicting BM development was accurate (Univariable Cox: HR=5.7, 95% CI=1.9-17.2), p=0.0023), independent of clinical factors (Multivariable Cox: HR=8.9, 95% CI=2.0-40.5, p=0.0046), and more predictive than cancer staging used currently clinically (AUC=0.81 versus 0.65). Our combinatorial nomogram using methylation and staging data together showed enhanced BM prediction (Univariable Cox: HR=17.2, 95% CI=4.1-71.3, p<0.0001; AUROC=0.82). Our models identifying BM through biofluid methylomes accurately distinguished BM from differential diagnoses of gliomas and lymphomas in plasma (AUROC=0.80, 95% CI=0.68-0.93) and with greater accuracy in CSF (AUROC=0.93, 95% CI=0.71-1.0). CONCLUSION Overall, we show the first approaches for robust molecular prediction of BM development and for reliable liquid biopsy of BM. This work is expected to transform cancer management by identifying high-risk lung cancer patients after initial treatment for inclusion in screening protocols using neuroimaging and liquid biopsy, to identify BM development early with less advanced disease and more optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas pose a significant therapeutic challenge, with limited treatment options following progression after standard therapy. Combining PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade has been proposed as a synergistic strategy in IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas, leveraging vulnerabilities in homologous recombination repair and increased PD-L1 expression following PARP inhibition. OBJECTIVE This phase II trial (NCT03991832) evaluated the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab in patients with recurrent IDH-mutant glioma. We also investigated the potential of the plasma tumor methylome as a non-invasive biomarker of treatment response. METHODS Twenty-nine patients (median age 40.5 years; 41% female) were enrolled between January 2020 and February 2023. All patients received olaparib (300 mg twice daily) and durvalumab (1,500 mg IV every four weeks) until radiographic or clinical progression. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and monthly, and cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) was performed. RESULTS The objective response rate was 10%, and median overall survival was 9.3 months. Longitudinal cfMeDIP-seq profiling enabled development of a circulating methylome classifier that accurately distinguished responders from non-responders. Integration with matched tumor transcriptomic and methylation data revealed enrichment of immune and DNA repair pathways in responders. Whole-exome sequencing identified no consistent mutational correlates. Spatial transcriptomic analysis demonstrated a more interactive, immune-rich tumor microenvironment and reduced malignant cell state diversity in responders. CONCLUSION This study supports the safety of combined PARP and PD-L1 blockade in recurrent IDH-mutant glioma and highlights the plasma methylome as a promising non-invasive biomarker of therapeutic response.

2030 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common and arise in 30% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Patients with LUAD that develop BM have significantly poorer outcomes, with a 10-16 month median overall survival. Unfortunately, current clinical practice for BM prediction is limited and so BM are typically detected after they develop and grow to cause neurological symptoms. Once BM are detected, currently neurosurgical tumor biopsies are performed to enable BM diagnosis via neuropathological evaluation. The aims of this study were to develop DNA methylation-based models that predict LUAD BM and non-invasively detect BM in blood to enable early diagnosis and treatment. Methods: DNA methylomes were acquired from 402 tumor tissue and plasma samples in a cohort of 346 LUAD and BM patients. Machine learning models were built using DNA methylation signatures that stratify BM risk in tissue and detect BM in plasma. Models were evaluated in independent validation datasets. A predictive nomogram was developed using the BM prediction model together with clinical factors to provide composite patient-specific scores reflecting BM risk. Results: The methylation-based BM predictor accurately stratified BM risk in a univariable Cox model using validation set data (HR = 5.65, 95%CI 1.85–17.2, p = 0.0023). Model utility was independent of the predictive value of clinical factors in a multivariable Cox model using validation set data (Table 1: HR = 8.92, 95%CI 1.97–40.5, p = 0.0046). The 5-year model accuracy was 0.81 and significantly higher than a similarly built cancer stage-based model (0.65), demonstrating utility over current practice. The combinatorial clinical-methylomic predictive nomogram had enhanced utility with an accuracy of 0.82 univariable Cox HR of 17.2 (95%CI 4.13–71.3, p < 0.0001), demonstrating comprehensive patient-specificity. The plasma-based model accurately classified BM from gliomas and lymphomas (AUROC=0.80), as typical clinical differential diagnoses, in validation set data. The models were validated further in additional external data. Conclusions: DNA methylation-based modeling of BM can accurately predict LUAD patients at risk for BM development and can non-invasively detect BM that develop. Future treatment approaches may tailor initial LUAD treatment and ongoing cancer surveillance to a patient’s BM risk, allowing for the potential to prevent and treat BM early. DNA methylation-based BM prediction is independent of clinical factors in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Variable HR 95% CI p Methylome risk score 8.92 1.97–40.5 0.005 Age Years 0.96 0.92–1.02 0.177 Smoking Pack-years 0.99 0.95–1.03 0.496 EGFR Mutant vs wildtype 0.92 0.25–3.34 0.895 T T2 vs T1 1.58 0.41–6.04 0.505 T3−4 vs T1 1.49 0.28–7.98 0.642 N N1 vs N0 1.05 0.31–3.58 0.943 N2−3 vs N0 1.00 0.27–3.69 0.995 M M1 vs M0 145 12.2–1730 <0.001

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has emerged as a valuable liquid biopsy source for glioma biomarker discovery and validation. CSF produced within the ventricles circulates through the subarachnoid space, where the composition of glioma-derived analytes is influenced by the proximity and anatomical location of sampling relative to tumor, in addition to underlying tumor biology. The substantial gradients observed between lumbar and intracranial CSF compartments for tumor-derived analytes underscore the importance of sampling site selection. Moreover, radiographic features, such as tumor-CSF contact and blood-brain barrier disruption, are critical covariates that may affect biomarker detection and the abundance of plasma-derived analytes in CSF, respectively. Longitudinal intracranial CSF sampling, enabled by access devices like Ommaya reservoirs, may offer a window into treatment response and disease progression, though variability in analyte yield, sample volumes, and the dynamic effects of surgical resection pose challenges. This review critically evaluates the anatomic, radiographic, and longitudinal factors, or “time-space continuum,” that impact glioma CSF biomarker abundance. Practical considerations for longitudinal CSF biobanking, including access device placement and collection, are also reviewed. Key takeaways and recommendations for CSF glioma biomarker discovery and validation are provided as a “hitchhiker’s guide” based on our collective experience, along with resources for investigators aiming to develop CSF biobanking at their institutions.