Landry, Alex

Abstract Brain metastases (BMs) are a common and often fatal progression of systemic cancers, affecting up to 25% of patients. Despite advances in surgical resection and radiotherapy, the median survival remains limited to 10–16 months. While genomic profiling has enabled the development of targeted therapies, there remains a paucity of prognostic tools for clinical use. To address this, we explored the utility of DNA methylation profiling—an epigenetic marker increasingly recognized for its diagnostic and prognostic value. We profiled fresh-frozen tissue from 327 surgically resected BM samples of lung, breast, melanoma, and gastrointestinal (GI) origin using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Unsupervised analysis via partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering identified five robust groups. Four of these correlated closely with primary tumor origin. However, a distinct “Poly-Origin Cluster” emerged, comprising tumors from multiple primary sites with a shared epigenetic signature. Poly-Origin tumors showed improved survival outcomes compared to origin-aligned clusters (20.2 vs. 10.1 months, p=0.0018), independent of clinical covariates. Notably, these tumors were enriched for immune cell infiltration—including CD14+ macrophages, CD19+ B-cells, and CD56+ NK cells—based on deconvolution analysis, and exhibited reduced genomic instability as measured by copy number variation. These tumors were enriched for pathways related to cell signaling. We validated the prognostic significance of the Poly-Origin methylation signature in a publicly available independent cohort (n=96), and found that high signature concordance correlated with extended survival. Finally, we demonstrated the feasibility of detecting this signature in plasma-derived cell-free DNA using cfMeDIP-seq, with high classification accuracy (AUC = 0.98). These findings reveal a clinically meaningful subtypes of BM not captured by tissue origin or mutation status alone. Our work suggests that DNA methylation profiling may be a powerful tissue- and liquid biopsy–based tool that holds promise as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in the management of brain metastasis.

Abstract A major barrier in understanding adult diffuse gliomas lies in the inability to track tumor evolution in real time. To address this, we employed a novel method known as continuous lineage tracing, which integrates CRISPR/Cas9-based expressed DNA barcoding with single-cell RNA sequencing, enabling a phylogenetic approach to studying tumor development. Patient-derived glioma-initiating cell lines were engineered with expressed barcodes targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 and implanted into mice to create intracranial xenografts. Tumors underwent single-cell RNA sequencing; expressed barcodes were used to infer clonal relationships, and transcriptomic profiles enabled cell state classification. Phylogenetic lineage trees were reconstructed using lineage inference algorithms to characterize cell fitness, expansion, and plasticity. Our analysis uncovered extensive intra-clonal cell state heterogeneity, indicating active phenotype switching prior to therapy. We identified consistent transcriptional programs associated with tumor engraftment and in vivo clonal advantage. Lineage tracing revealed gene expression signatures linked to key phenotypes: fitness, enriched for neural-mesenchymal and injury-response pathways; expansion, associated with RNA splicing; and plasticity, correlated with cell cycle and DNA repair programs. Glioma stem cells appeared to span a transcriptional continuum from undifferentiated, high-fitness states to more differentiated, low-fitness states, with high-fitness cells potentially representing transitional phenotypes. We then validated these findings in a cohort of 185 surgically resected gliomas with matched bulk RNA and proteomic data. Phylogenetic gene signatures differed markedly between IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype tumors. When stratified by tumor type, both fitness and expansion signatures were significantly associated with overall survival in GBM (median 12.6 months, p=0.041) and oligodendrogliomas (median 66 months, p=0.027). This study demonstrates the utility of continuous lineage tracing to reconstruct tumor evolution and identify transcriptional programs linked to tumor growth and prognosis. Our approach provides a powerful framework for dissecting glioma biology and identifying potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and exhibit clinical heterogeneity. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the only adjuvant therapy, but response is variable and biomarkers are limited. RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 trial to stratify meningioma patients for adjuvant RT based on clinical risk. Here, we apply modern molecular tools to this cohort and uncover correlates of RT response. To do so, tumor tissue from 100 RTOG-0539 patients was profiled using DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Recurrence scores, Molecular Groups, gene expression, and copy number alterations were compared across clinical groups and between RT responders and non-responders. Using this approach, modern grading criteria, including brain invasion, TERT mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion and 1p/1q status, would reclassify 10% of tumors and alter treatment group assignment in 7%. Notably, non-responders to RT had more frequent 1p and 14q loss, and greater copy number burden. In addition, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling revealed immune-related signatures in RT responders and upregulation of cell cycle–related pathways in RT non-responders, several of which overlapped with targets of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor validated in aggressive meningioma models. Of particular importance, the Proliferative Molecular Group was an independent predictor of post-RT recurrence in multivariable analysis, outperforming WHO grade. In conclusion, multi-omic analysis of the RTOG-0539 cohort shows that updated WHO grading criteria, incorporating molecular and cytogenetic features, improve risk stratification. However, molecular classification, particularly the Proliferative group, remains an independent and stronger predictor of RT response. These findings support integrating molecular biomarkers alongside modern grading frameworks to guide treatment and trial design in meningioma.