Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) have distinct clinical manifestations, with prior work based on small samples suggesting unique patterns of neurodegeneration. The current study performed a head‐to‐head comparison of cortical atrophy in EOAD and LOAD, using two large and well‐characterized cohorts (LEADS and ADNI). METHODS We analyzed brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired from 377 sporadic EOAD patients and 317 sporadicLOAD patients who were amyloid positive and had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia (i.e., early‐stage AD), along with cognitively unimpaired participants. RESULTS After controlling for the level of cognitive impairment, we found a double dissociation between AD clinical phenotype and localization/magnitude of atrophy, characterized by predominant neocortical involvement in EOAD and more focal anterior medial temporal involvement in LOAD. DISCUSSION Our findings point to the clinical utility of MRI‐based biomarkers of atrophy in differentiating between EOAD and LOAD, which may be useful for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. Highlights Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset AD (LOAD) patients showed distinct and overlapping cortical atrophy patterns. EOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in widespread neocortical regions. LOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in the anterior medial temporal lobe. Regional atrophy was correlated with the severity of global cognitive impairment. Results were comparable when the sample was stratified for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

ABSTRACTImportanceHighlighting the global disparities in otolaryngology training and, ultimately, service delivery, emphasizing the need for equitable access to training resources and programs.ObjectiveTo describe the relationship between the quality, content, and location of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery training and education and the resulting impact on the delivery of otolaryngology care globally.DesignAn online cross‐sectional survey to otolaryngologists, gathering information on their training and education experiences, and factors influencing their choice of training location and practice.SettingThe online survey was available in multiple languages, distributed via national and international professional otolaryngology societies, snowballing and social media.ParticipantsThe respondents were practicing otolaryngologists representing all seven World Health Organization regions.ExposuresWorld Bank income groups classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOur expected outcome was that subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly readily available to respondents from high‐income countries, leading to more confidence in performing complex procedures post training.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included in the analysis, with 47 (52%) practicing in high‐income countries and 44 (48%) in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Sixty‐one participants (67%) were male. Subspecialty training and access to educational resources were significantly less available in low‐ and middle‐income countries, leading to lower confidence among low‐ and middle‐income countries physicians in performing complex procedures. High‐income country respondents reported better access to diverse training resources and felt more prepared for a broader range of procedures.Conclusion and RelevanceSignificant disparities exist in OHNS training resources and subspecialty training opportunities between high‐ and low‐middle‐income countries. There is a critical need to integrate complementary training and educational modalities into local systems. Addressing the shortage of educational resources and promoting open‐access initiatives in low‐middle‐income countries are essential steps toward enhancing surgical education and improving global otolaryngology healthcare outcomes.

ABSTRACT Objective Availability of surgical equipment and access to essential clinical services remains an important barrier to surgical care delivery, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). This study aims to characterize the relative availability of essential equipment for otolaryngology‐head and neck surgery (OHNS) care across World Bank income groups. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional survey on otolaryngologists' perceptions on the availability of surgical equipment and ancillary services in their respective practice settings per a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from never to always available. The study was disseminated online via professional societies, personal contacts, and social media. Eligible participants included otolaryngologists from 194 WHO‐recognized countries, which were grouped by World Bank income group classification and WHO region. Results The study involved 146 otolaryngologists, 69 (47%) from high‐income countries (HICs), and 77 (53%) from LMICs. LMIC respondents were predominantly from the African and South‐East Asian regions, which comprised 48% and 7.8% of all LMIC respondents, respectively. Results revealed significant differences in the availability of otologic, rhinologic, and endoscopic airway equipment between HICs and LMICs. Differences existed among commonly used equipment such as tympanomastoidectomy equipment and rigid bronchoscopy, to subspecialized equipment such as functional endoscopic sinus surgery equipment and cochlear implants ( p < 0.05 each). Conclusions The study highlighted key disparities in the availability of essential equipment for baseline OHNS care, especially for pediatric airway and otologic conditions. These results can be used to guide investment and advocacy efforts to improve specialty‐specific surgical infrastructure relative to the global burden of OHNS diseases in low‐resource settings. Level of Evidence 3

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

Purpose The Sangre Por Salud (SPS) Biobank was established to facilitate biomedical research opportunities for the Latino community by creating an easily accessible prospective cohort for scientists interested in studying health conditions and health disparities in this population. Participants Individuals self-identifying as Latino, aged 18–85 years, were prospectively recruited from the primary care Internal Medicine clinic at Mountain Park Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona. After obtaining informed consent, detailed medical history questionnaires were captured, and blood samples were obtained for common laboratory tests. Participants authorised the research team to access their electronic health records for research purposes. In addition, participants had serum, plasma and DNA samples isolated and stored at the Mayo Clinic Arizona Biorepository Laboratory for long-term storage and future access. As part of the study, participants consented and agreed to be contacted for potential participation in future research studies. Findings to date 3756 participants provided informed consent, of whom 3733 completed all study questionnaires, an oral glucose tolerance test and had blood collected and stored. The SPS cohort is predominantly composed of females (72%), with a median age at time of consent of 42 years. All participants self-identified as Hispanic/Latino, 45% were married, 53% were employed for wages and 60% had less than a high school degree. Around 25% of participants met diagnostic criteria for overweight (BMI 25–29 kg/m 2 ), and 49% met for obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ). At time of recruitment, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and depression affected 22%, 20% and 13% of the cohort, respectively. Future plans We plan to regularly update the participants’ electronic health records and self-reported health data to longitudinal research. Additionally, we plan to obtain a more comprehensive genomic analysis on the entire cohort, ensuring greater research interest and investigation into the underlying genetic factors that contribute to disease susceptibility in this cohort.

ABSTRACTIntroductionLung transplantation has been evolving since its inception in 1963. Over recent years, literature has suggested a shift in the perioperative strategy of mechanical support toward extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the preferred modality of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in lung transplantation. The Survey of ECLS Application in Lung transplantation (SEAL) was designed to elucidate the current practice patterns of perioperative ECLS within the United States.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, a physician from 62 adult lung transplantation centers across the United States of America (USA) was surveyed on their institutional practices regarding the perioperative management of lung transplantation patients, with a focus on mechanical support.ResultsThe survey completion rate was 74% (46/62 eligible institutions). Most transplant centers utilize venoarterial (VA) ECMO (78%, 36/46) and/or venovenous (VV) ECMO (93%, 29/43) as a bridge to lung transplantation. When ECLS is used intraoperatively, 61% of (28/46) responding programs use VA ECMO as their preferred support. All programs use transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) intraoperatively, 85% (33/39) cannulate for ECMO centrally, and 74% (29/39) use a combination of inhaled and intravenous anesthesia while using ECMO intraoperatively. Most programs do not use antifibrinolytic during VA ECMO (62%, 28/45). Anticoagulation management and VA ECMO flows throughout the procedure showed considerable variation.ConclusionData from SEAL illustrates that though there are some practice commonalities within the United States, there is also quite a bit of variability in practice. Multiple dominant practices within the USA are consistent with a recently published International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus.

Background: Multiple randomized clinical trials failed to show benefit of anticoagulation over antiplatelets in the secondary prevention for embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, the benefit of combination antithrombotic regimens remains unexplored in the same patient population. Methods: This is a subgroup analysis of a multicenter retrospective observational cohort of consecutive adult patients with ESUS (n=27 sites, 2015-2024). Comparisons were made between patients treated with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), exclusive anticoagulation (AC) (direct oral anticoagulant, vitamin K antagonist, low molecular weight heparin) and combination anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy initiated within the first 7 days of index stroke. The primary composite outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. Secondary outcomes were individual outcomes of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or death. Results: Of the 2201 included patients, 1456 (66.1%) were on SAPT, 527 (23.9%) were on DAPT, 195 (8.8%) were on exclusive AC and 23 (1.0%) were on AC+AP (all of which were on DAPT). Patients treated with AC+AP were older (median 66 years [IQR 51-78]), more likely to have history of hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, PFO and left atrial enlargement. Compared to SAPT, all treatment strategies were associated with similar risk of the primary outcomes in the unadjusted and adjusted cox regression. Similarly, there was no difference in individual outcomes including recurrent stroke, major bleeding and death in the adjusted cox regression. However, there was an increased risk of major bleeding with AC+AP in the unadjusted cox regression (HR 4.0, [95% CI 1.2-12.8], p=0.02) but not in the adjusted model when compared to SAPT. Also, DAPT was associated with lower risk of death than SAPT in the unadjusted model (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.4-0.8],p=0.005) but not the adjusted model. Additionally, when adjusted by the HASBLED score, there was no difference in major bleeding when AC+AP was compared to SAPT. Conclusion: Over 90% of ESUS patients in this cohort were prescribed SAPT or DAPT. Antithrombotic therapy with DAPT, exclusive AC, or AC+AP was not associated with any lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding and death compared with SAPT in an unselected cohort of ESUS patients.

Abstract Background Morbidity from bacteremia may be exacerbated by inadequate initial antibiotic therapy. This concern however may lead to hesitance to de-escalate while awaiting pathogen identification and susceptibility results. We performed a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a strategy for rapid pathogen and resistance detection directly from positive blood culture bottles (BCBs) using a rapid multiplex PCR (rmPCR) complemented with a rapid phenotypic screen (RPS) for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases in a setting with moderate to high levels of antimicrobial resistance where routine direct-from-BCB disk diffusion susceptibility testing was in place Methods Patients with positive BCBs were randomized to 2 arms: 1) Standard BCB processing (including direct from BCB disk diffusion susceptibility testing - control, n=419) with antimicrobial stewardship (AS); or 2) rmPCR/RPS with AS (rmPCR/RPS, n=425). The primary outcome was time from positive blood culture result to prescription of an effective or optimal antibiotic regimen. An effective antibiotic regimen was defined as one active against the detected pathogen(s); an optimal antibiotic regimen was defined as an effective regimen which was also the most narrow spectrum and targeted one, as recommended by institutional guidelines. Mortality was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Results True bacteremia was identified in 658 patients (n=329 in both arms); 597 were monomicrobial (405 with aerobic or facultative anaerobic Gram negatives rods [AGNR]) and 61 polymicrobial (41 harboring AGNR). Time from BCB Gram stain to prescription of an effective antibiotic was 9.9 versus 3.2 hours in the control and rmPCR/RPS groups, respectively (p=0.58) and time from Gram stain to prescription of an optimal antibiotic regimen was 41.6 versus 29.4 hours in the two groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). 14-day mortality was 7.6% versus 4.3% (p = 0.069) and 30-day mortality was 11.2% versus 8.8% (p=0.30) in the two groups, respectively. Conclusion Compared to control methods which included direct-from-BCB disk diffusion susceptibility testing, an intervention comprising rmPCR/RPS with AS applied to positive blood cultures improved time to optimal therapy but not time to effective therapy or mortality. Disclosures Shawn Vasoo, MBBS, MRCP, D(ABP), D(ABIM) (Inf Dis), FRCPath, bioMerieux: In-kind, for this study|Rosco Diagnostica: In-kind, for this study Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria Paul Tambyah, MBBS (S'pore), Diplomate, American Board of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi-Pasteur: Grant/Research Support