Subramani, Sudhakar

ABSTRACTIntroductionLung transplantation has been evolving since its inception in 1963. Over recent years, literature has suggested a shift in the perioperative strategy of mechanical support toward extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the preferred modality of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in lung transplantation. The Survey of ECLS Application in Lung transplantation (SEAL) was designed to elucidate the current practice patterns of perioperative ECLS within the United States.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, a physician from 62 adult lung transplantation centers across the United States of America (USA) was surveyed on their institutional practices regarding the perioperative management of lung transplantation patients, with a focus on mechanical support.ResultsThe survey completion rate was 74% (46/62 eligible institutions). Most transplant centers utilize venoarterial (VA) ECMO (78%, 36/46) and/or venovenous (VV) ECMO (93%, 29/43) as a bridge to lung transplantation. When ECLS is used intraoperatively, 61% of (28/46) responding programs use VA ECMO as their preferred support. All programs use transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) intraoperatively, 85% (33/39) cannulate for ECMO centrally, and 74% (29/39) use a combination of inhaled and intravenous anesthesia while using ECMO intraoperatively. Most programs do not use antifibrinolytic during VA ECMO (62%, 28/45). Anticoagulation management and VA ECMO flows throughout the procedure showed considerable variation.ConclusionData from SEAL illustrates that though there are some practice commonalities within the United States, there is also quite a bit of variability in practice. Multiple dominant practices within the USA are consistent with a recently published International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus.

Bleeding after cardiac surgery is a common and serious complication leading to transfusion of multiple blood products and resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the publication of numerous guidelines and consensus statements for patient blood management in cardiac surgery, research has revealed that adherence to these guidelines is poor, and as a result, a significant variability in patient transfusion practices among practitioners still remains. In addition, although utilization of point-of-care (POC) coagulation monitors and the use of novel therapeutic strategies for perioperative hemostasis, such as the use of coagulation factor concentrates, have increased significantly over the last decade, they are still not widely available in every institution. Therefore, despite continuous efforts, blood transfusion in cardiac surgery has only modestly declined over the last decade, remaining at ≥50% in high-risk patients. Given these limitations, and in response to new regulatory and legislature requirements, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) has formed the Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery Working Group to organize, summarize, and disseminate the available best-practice knowledge in patient blood management in cardiac surgery. The current publication includes the summary statements and algorithms designed by the working group, after collection and review of the existing guidelines, consensus statements, and recommendations for patient blood management practices in cardiac surgery patients. The overall goal is creating a dynamic resource of easily accessible educational material that will help to increase and improve compliance with the existing evidence-based best practices of patient blood management by cardiac surgery care teams.