Elliott, Tyler

Abstract Current advances in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases through immune checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy has significantly improved outcomes and patient survival. Yet, half of all patients continue to die from brain metastases despite use of these therapies and the addition of localized therapies like surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery. Novel treatments are needed to improve the morbidity and mortality associated with melanoma brain metastases. We have identified the inflammatory myddosomal pathway as a novel potential target of therapy in melanoma brain metastases, with gross upregulation in both tumor tissue and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. These cells display upregulation in MYD88, IRAK-1, IRAK-4, and downstream mediators of inflammatory activation at both the gene and protein level. We have previously shown the ability of the oral IRAK-4 inhibitor emavusertib (CA-4948) to penetrate the blood brain barrier and inhibit the myddosomal pathway in metastatic melanoma and primary CNS lymphoma. In this study we further show the capacity for IRAK-4 inhibition with emavusertib to improve the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma brain metastases. Emavusertib in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy results in improved tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte recruitment, decreased myeloid derived suppressor cell function, and upregulation of interferon γ signaling resulting in improved survival in aggressive mouse models of melanoma brain metastases. This work supports the development of combination strategies of emavusertib with immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma brain metastases.

ABSTRACTIntroductionLung transplantation has been evolving since its inception in 1963. Over recent years, literature has suggested a shift in the perioperative strategy of mechanical support toward extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the preferred modality of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in lung transplantation. The Survey of ECLS Application in Lung transplantation (SEAL) was designed to elucidate the current practice patterns of perioperative ECLS within the United States.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, a physician from 62 adult lung transplantation centers across the United States of America (USA) was surveyed on their institutional practices regarding the perioperative management of lung transplantation patients, with a focus on mechanical support.ResultsThe survey completion rate was 74% (46/62 eligible institutions). Most transplant centers utilize venoarterial (VA) ECMO (78%, 36/46) and/or venovenous (VV) ECMO (93%, 29/43) as a bridge to lung transplantation. When ECLS is used intraoperatively, 61% of (28/46) responding programs use VA ECMO as their preferred support. All programs use transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) intraoperatively, 85% (33/39) cannulate for ECMO centrally, and 74% (29/39) use a combination of inhaled and intravenous anesthesia while using ECMO intraoperatively. Most programs do not use antifibrinolytic during VA ECMO (62%, 28/45). Anticoagulation management and VA ECMO flows throughout the procedure showed considerable variation.ConclusionData from SEAL illustrates that though there are some practice commonalities within the United States, there is also quite a bit of variability in practice. Multiple dominant practices within the USA are consistent with a recently published International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus.