Citations

Background: Coronary wave intensity analysis (WIA) provides a mechanistic view of coronary hemodynamics and has been increasingly used to phenotype coronary microvascular disease (CMD). Standard WIA requires simultaneous pressure and flow measurements within the same vessel, but intra-coronary pressure measurement may be limited by hardware availability. In patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries, aortic pressure may serve as a surrogate for intra-coronary pressure to enable broader feasibility of WIA. We aimed to determine whether wave profiles derived from intra-aortic and intra-coronary pressure measurements are comparable when paired with intracoronary Doppler flow in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Methods: Patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment of the left anterior descending artery were included. Intracoronary flow velocity and intra-coronary pressure were simultaneously recorded using a ComboWire (Philips Volcano) in the proximal LAD. Aortic pressure was concurrently measured via the guide catheter to allow comparison of pressure sources. In the intra-aortic pressure group, pressure and flow data were aligned using the R wave of the ECG trace. WIA was performed using conventional methods to quantify the dominant waves: forward compression wave (FCW), backward compression wave (BCW), and backward expansion wave (BEW). Agreement between wave intensity was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation. Results: A total of 14 paired waveforms were analyzed with a total of 42 coronary waves compared. Wave intensities calculated using intra-coronary versus intra-aortic pressure showed excellent agreement across all wave types. Mean bias between methods was −0.07 x 10 3 W×m -2 ×s -1 with limits of agreement from −0.63 to +0.49. The correlation between intra-coronary and intra-aortic wave intensities was strong (r = 0.997, p < 0.001), with minimal dispersion and consistent agreement across the full range of wave intensities ( Figure 1 ). Conclusions: In patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries, wave intensity analysis using guide-catheter aortic pressure yields results nearly identical to those obtained with intra-coronary pressure. These findings support the use of aortic pressure as a reliable surrogate for intra-coronary pressure in WIA for the calculation of microvascular coronary hemodynamics, reducing technical barriers and enabling broader clinical and research utilization.

Background: Patients with low gradient non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) at rest, in the context of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (less than 50%), occasionally undergo dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE). However, limited data is available in the literature regarding the utility of DSE in this context. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with non-severe AS and LVEF less than 50% at rest who underwent DSE after Institutional Review Board approval. Retrospective data was extracted including rest and DSE parameters using an internal database. Only patients greater than 18 years old, who had an LVEF less than 50%, mean gradient (MG) less than 40 mmHg, and valve area greater than or equal to 1 cm 2 at rest were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate regression methods were used to identify which resting variables were associated with severe AS (MG greater than 40 mm Hg and valve area less than 1 cm 2 ) with DSE. Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 78 years (±9) and 84% were male. The mean resting LVEF was 34% (±8%) while it was 40% (±12%) with DSE, mean stroke volume index at rest was 39 mL/m2 (±9) while it was 45 mL/m2 (±10) with DSE, MG at rest was 20 mmHg (±7) while it was 31 mmHg (±10) with DSE, and mean aortic valve area at rest was 1.27 cm 2 (±0.27) while it was 1.24 cm 2 (±0.29) with DSE. Of the 124 patients with non-severe AS at rest, 13 (10.5%) patients had severe AS with DSE. MG at rest was associated with severe AS (OR 1.3; 95% Cl: 1.1 - 1.5; p < 0.001) in a multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for age, sex, LVEF at rest, SV index at rest. Resting aortic valve mean gradient also showed the highest AUC in relation to likelihood of having severe AS (0.87) (figure 1). Conclusion: Our study indicated that DSE remains useful in identifying severe AS in certain patients (up to 10%) who exhibit non-severe AS at rest in the setting of reduced LVEF. Additionally, MG at rest is the most reliable parameter to determine those who may benefit from undergoing DSE. This is one of the first studies to our knowledge in the literature suggesting that DSE may still be useful in identifying severe AS patients despite non-severe AS (i.e., valve area greater than or equal to 1 cm 2 ) at rest with reduced LVEF. Further research is warranted to validate our findings.

Introduction: Cardiovascular risks following SARS-CoV-2 infection are incompletely defined. We evaluated evolving cardiovascular outcomes across COVID-19 variant eras using a large community-based cohort to inform risk stratification and clinical care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 162,471 adults with COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2023 using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Patients were stratified by variant era (Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron). Cardiovascular outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, death), ischemic and inflammatory heart disease, thrombotic events, and dysrhythmias. Diagnoses were identified using ICD-10 codes and validated in a subset. Cumulative incidence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk models. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess differences by era and age. Results: MACE occurred in 4,922 patients, primarily in those ≥80 (2-year incidence: 17%). Event rates peaked within 30 days post-infection, with marked variation by variant. In patients ≥80, 30-day MACE risk was highest in the Pre-Delta (HR 3.85; 95% CI, 3.14–4.71) and Delta (HR 2.72; 95% CI, 2.13–3.47) eras versus Omicron. After 30 days, event rates fell and era differences narrowed. Thrombotic events (n=2,090; 1.4%) decreased across eras. Ischemic and inflammatory heart disease rates were stable. Myocarditis/pericarditis were rare (0.1%) without age trends. Dysrhythmias affected 6,765 patients (2-year incidence: 4.9%) and rose with age (2.0% in <40 vs. 19.9% in ≥80). Within 30 days, risk was higher in the Pre-Delta and Delta eras for age ≥40, especially ≥80 (Delta HR 3.08; 95% CI, 2.08–4.56) and 60–79 (HR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.75–2.85). Among those 40–59, Delta posed the highest risk (HR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.94–3.86 vs. Pre-Delta HR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.26–2.49). No differences were observed in <40. Beyond 30 days, risk converged across variants. Conclusion: Cardiovascular risk after SARS-CoV-2 infection was concentrated in the first 30 days, with attenuation thereafter. While MACE and thrombotic event rates declined over time, early dysrhythmia risk varied by variant and age, especially in older adults. These findings define a time-sensitive, variant-specific risk window and support short-term, risk-stratified post-COVID monitoring. This work informs targeted follow-up protocols by infection era and age, with implications for quality improvement, resource use, and equitable care.

Abstract The Patient‐Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO‐CTCAE) was developed by the US National Cancer Institute to allow patients to directly report their side effects, enhancing the accuracy and patient‐centeredness of cancer clinical trial adverse event reporting. Clinician‐based reporting often misses the full range of patient symptoms, resulting in underreporting of side effects. The selection of adverse events for patient reporting must be defined in advance and consistently applied across all study arms. Investigators can use core symptom sets, including diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea, alongside tailored items specific to the treatments being studied. PRO‐CTCAE has demonstrated similar scores across electronic, paper‐based, and automated telephone administration methods. PRO‐CTCAE administration typically occurs before start of treatment and regularly throughout treatment, with the administration frequency tailored to the expected trajectory of side effects. Ensuring high survey completion rates is essential for PRO‐CTCAE success. Standard reporting can include tabular reporting of the proportion of patients with any (score ≥1) and high (score ≥3) levels of symptoms at the individual item level. A baseline‐adjustment approach should be applied to account for symptoms before start of treatment to isolate treatment‐emergent adverse events. The distribution of PRO‐CTCAE scores at each time point can be visualized using stacked bar charts. PRO‐CTCAE integration into cancer clinical trials is crucial for capturing a comprehensive range of treatment‐related symptomatic adverse events and improving the evaluation of therapy tolerability. Ongoing research continues to refine its implementation, supported by regulatory guidance.

Variations in liver allocation systems worldwide are presented, with a specific focus on regional differences and their potential impact on outcomes, with the goal of serving as a reference for future policy development. Summaries of liver allocation across multiple European, Scandinavian, and Asian systems, as well as the combined allocation system of Australia plus Canada, the United States, and the systems in Central America, South America, and the Caribbean are reviewed. A comprehensive comparison of how different regions address MELD exceptions, primarily focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma, along with the most common etiologies of liver disease requiring transplantation is presented. In addition, the adoption of living donation and donation after circulatory death is discussed. The study involves contributions from a diverse group of world experts in liver transplantation and may serve as an essential resource to foster international dialogue as countries strive to optimize organ allocation policies, including MELD exceptions.

Abstract Aims Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is a rarely reported complication of infective endocarditis (IE). In an international series, we sought to determine the clinical and microbiological profile, treatment, and outcome of patients presenting with IE-related EE. Methods and results Cases recorded from 2014 to 2023 in nine centres in Europe and the United States were collected. Results were compared to a matched control group. Conclusion Sixty-six patients with EE were reported, mean age of 65.2 ± 14.9 years, 71% (n = 47) male. Blood cultures were positive in 97% (64 cases) of patients, with a predominance of streptococci (46%, n = 30). As compared with the control group (n = 264), the EE group presented with more frequent diabetes (35% vs. 21%, P = 0.02), history of cirrhosis (9% vs. 3%, P = 0.04), glomerulonephritis (15% vs. 0.4%, P &lt; 0.001), embolism before admission (92% vs. 55%, P &lt; 0.001), and Janeway lesions (9% vs. 1%, P = 0.002). Streptococcal infection (46% vs. 26%, P = 0.001) was more frequent and Enterococcal infection (0% vs. 18%, P &lt; 0.001) less frequent in the EE group. The main ocular symptoms were a decrease in visual acuity (96%), red eye (55%), and ocular pain (55%). Treatment of EE consisted of intravitreal antibiotic injection in 55 (83%) patients and vitrectomy in 17 (26%). Improvement of visual acuity was observed in 36 (55%) patients. Conclusion EE is a serious complication of IE with severe residual vision impairment. Patients with IE should be evaluated for ocular complications, since early detection of EE is crucial to prevent delays in management and to preserve visual function.

Abstract Background Patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) have worse exercise capacity and survival than ILD patients without PH. Vasoreactivity with inhaled nitric oxide (NO) provides prognostic and therapeutic implications in pulmonary arterial hypertension, but little is known about its value in PH-ILD. We evaluated the pulmonary hemodynamic changes following inhaled NO and their association with outcomes in PH-ILD. Methods We measured pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with PH-ILD who underwent inhaled NO administration during right heart catheterization. We recorded baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and pulmonary function testing measures, and investigated the use of inhaled treprostinil as well as the rate of hospitalization, death, and lung transplantation. Results In 120 patients (age 67 ± 11 years, 62% women), the administration of inhaled NO resulted in a median (IQR) decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of −3 (−5, −1) mmHg, P &lt; 0.001, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of −0.8 (−1.8, −0.2) wood units (WU), P &lt; 0.001. The % change in mPAP and PVR were −6.3 (−10.9, −1.8) % and −16.8 (−27.3, −3.3) %, respectively. Factors associated with the % drop in PVR included baseline PVR (r = 0.30, P &lt; 0.001), cardiac output (r = −0.19, P = 0.04), and WHO functional class (r = 0.25, P = 0.01). The median (IQR) follow-up was 14.5 (7, 25) months. During this time, 40 (33%) patients died, 8 (7%) underwent lung transplantation, and 76 (63%) experienced either hospitalization due to respiratory failure, transplantation, or death. The % drop in mPAP and PVR during inhalation of NO had no significant impact on these outcomes and was not associated with clinical response to inhaled treprostinil measured by changes in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and forced vital capacity (FVC). Conclusion Inhaled NO caused a modest reduction in mPAP and PVR in patients with PH-ILD, but the acute hemodynamic response to inhaled NO was not associated with outcomes or response to inhaled treprostinil therapy.

AbstractAbstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This project aimed to assess and map out the current neuro-oncology capacity in SSA, brain tumor registries, and biobanks. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey to gather data from healthcare professionals involved in CNS tumor care across SSA through the Society for Neuro-Oncology SSA (SNOSSA). The survey captured information on the availability of neuro-oncology practitioners, neuropathology, molecular diagnostics, cancer registries, and biobanking. Results A total of 145 respondents representing 70 healthcare institutions across 22 countries participated. Of the 70 institutions, specialties included neurosurgery (89%, 62/70), anatomic pathology (74%, 52/70), and medical oncology (71%, 50/70). For radiologic evaluation, 64% (45/70) of responding institutions reported having both CT and MRI. Access to molecular testing through immunohistochemistry or next-generation sequencing was available in 46% (32/70) of responding institutions. Multidisciplinary tumor boards were available for CNS cases in 86% (60/70) of responding institutions. Brain tumor-specific registries were available in 29% (20/70) of responding institutions, and 10% (7/70) maintained brain tumor biorepositories. Conclusion This study demonstrates that SSA has substantial potential in neuro-oncology care practice capacity and facilities. The most significant gaps were in neuropathology and molecular testing, which makes widespread implementation of the WHO 2021 diagnosis challenging. Understanding the prevalence of CNS tumor subtypes in SSA is difficult due to the low number of brain tumor registries and biobanks.

Abstract The environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) in colonoscopy is unknown. The potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by limiting unnecessary polypectomies may be offset by emissions associated with CADx devices. We quantified and compared the carbon footprint of colonoscopy with and without CADx. Life-cycle carbon emissions associated with endoscopic snares, polyp traps, histopathology, and CADx devices were estimated using life-cycle assessment software. The effect of CADx was estimated by the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions related to outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients who underwent colonoscopy with optical diagnosis under a leave-in-situ strategy (i.e. rectosigmoid polyps ≤5 mm predicted as non-neoplastic were not removed) with and without CADx assistance. We analyzed 1134 individuals (median age 67 years, 59% male) with 1716 colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with CADx reduced the number of snares and polyp traps from 567 to 543 (difference: 24) and histopathology submissions from 1343 to 1278 (difference: 65). However, the total carbon footprint increased from 832 kg CO2e (95%CI 815 to 847) without CADx to 946 kg CO2e (95%CI 927 to 965) with CADx, corresponding to an absolute increase of 114 kg CO2e (95%CI 80 to 150) or 0.10 kg CO2e per colonoscopy. Using CADx under a leave-in-situ strategy increased the environmental burden of colonoscopy.