Howick V, James F

ABSTRACT Purpose This study assesses the association between colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and a validated, housing-based measure of individual-level socioeconomic status (SES, called HOUSES hereafter) within rural communities and determines whether HOUSES-integrated geospatial analysis can be used to tailor interventions. Methods We used CRC screening data from a subset of Mayo Clinic Midwest patients living in cities without ready access to routine care in the Mayo Clinic Health System in 2019 to represent rural communities. At the individual level, we assessed the association between CRC screening rates and the HOUSES index, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, distance from home address to clinic, and area deprivation index, using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model. Additionally, we conducted geospatial analysis to examine the correlation between hotspots of 1) lower CRC screening rates and 2) lower SES of the subject population (HOUSES quartile 1). Findings Among 34,489 individuals (median age 64.0 years, 52.4% female), those with the lowest SES (HOUSES Q1) had 37% lower odds of being CRC screening adherent than those with the highest SES (HOUSES Q4) (adj. OR [95% CI]: 0.63 [0.58-0.69]). In the 14 identified HOUSES Q1 hotspots, there was a significant correlation in counts of HOUSES Q1 and low CRC screening (correlation coefficient=0.81). Conclusion Lower SES was significantly associated with lower CRC screening among rural populations. HOUSES-enabled geospatial analysis identified geographic hotspots with lower CRC screening rates for targeted interventions to address disparities in CRC screening in rural communities. HOUSES may be a useful digital tool for cancer preventive care and research.

Abstract Background Chronic Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii, presents significant diagnostic and management challenges due to its variable presentation and high morbidity, especially among patients with underlying cardiac or vascular disease. In the United States, cases are rising, often without identifiable exposures, and diagnostic delays remain common. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of chronic Q fever cases at the Mayo Clinic from 2007 to 2023. Patients with clinical evidence and a phase I IgG titer ≥1:1024 and/or positive PCR for C. burnetii were included. Data were abstracted from electronic health records, including demographics, exposures, clinical manifestations, diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes. Statistical analyses assessed factors influencing diagnostic delay and treatment response. Results We identified 33 patients with chronic Q fever (median age 56; 88% male). Median time to diagnosis was 99 days with 11.4 days between Infectious Diseases (ID) evaluation and diagnosis. Animal exposure was reported in 17 patients (52%), while eight (24%) had no identifiable exposure. Patients primarily presented with prosthetic valve endocarditis (n=14, 42%), or vascular graft infection (n=9, 27%). The majority were treated with doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine (n=25, 75%) and 14 patients (42%) required surgical intervention. Mortality attributable to chronic Q fever was 6% (n=2). Conclusions Chronic Q fever remains under-recognized, with substantial diagnostic delays prior to treatment. Cardiovascular infection predominates, and surgical intervention is often required despite prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Early specialist evaluation and standardized diagnostic pathways may improve outcomes.

Introduction: Cardiovascular risks following SARS-CoV-2 infection are incompletely defined. We evaluated evolving cardiovascular outcomes across COVID-19 variant eras using a large community-based cohort to inform risk stratification and clinical care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 162,471 adults with COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2023 using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Patients were stratified by variant era (Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron). Cardiovascular outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, death), ischemic and inflammatory heart disease, thrombotic events, and dysrhythmias. Diagnoses were identified using ICD-10 codes and validated in a subset. Cumulative incidence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk models. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess differences by era and age. Results: MACE occurred in 4,922 patients, primarily in those ≥80 (2-year incidence: 17%). Event rates peaked within 30 days post-infection, with marked variation by variant. In patients ≥80, 30-day MACE risk was highest in the Pre-Delta (HR 3.85; 95% CI, 3.14–4.71) and Delta (HR 2.72; 95% CI, 2.13–3.47) eras versus Omicron. After 30 days, event rates fell and era differences narrowed. Thrombotic events (n=2,090; 1.4%) decreased across eras. Ischemic and inflammatory heart disease rates were stable. Myocarditis/pericarditis were rare (0.1%) without age trends. Dysrhythmias affected 6,765 patients (2-year incidence: 4.9%) and rose with age (2.0% in <40 vs. 19.9% in ≥80). Within 30 days, risk was higher in the Pre-Delta and Delta eras for age ≥40, especially ≥80 (Delta HR 3.08; 95% CI, 2.08–4.56) and 60–79 (HR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.75–2.85). Among those 40–59, Delta posed the highest risk (HR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.94–3.86 vs. Pre-Delta HR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.26–2.49). No differences were observed in <40. Beyond 30 days, risk converged across variants. Conclusion: Cardiovascular risk after SARS-CoV-2 infection was concentrated in the first 30 days, with attenuation thereafter. While MACE and thrombotic event rates declined over time, early dysrhythmia risk varied by variant and age, especially in older adults. These findings define a time-sensitive, variant-specific risk window and support short-term, risk-stratified post-COVID monitoring. This work informs targeted follow-up protocols by infection era and age, with implications for quality improvement, resource use, and equitable care.

Background: Subaortic membrane (SAM) is a fibromuscular ridge beneath the aortic valve that causes fixed left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Surgical resection is the standard treatment for symptomatic patients or those with high gradients; however, recurrence occurs in up to 14% of adults within 5 years. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is well-established in arrhythmia management, its role in treating SAM has not been previously described. Case Information: 53-year-old man with HTN, BMI 51.7, and well-controlled OSA presented with worsening exertional dyspnea and fatigue in April 2024. He had prior surgical SAM resection in 2018, complicated by third-degree AV block requiring pacemaker implantation. Follow-up echocardiography revealed SAM recurrence with peak LVOT gradient of 52 mmHg. Given elevated surgical risk, a novel catheter-based RFA approach was pursued. In July 2024, the patient underwent catheter-based RFA under general anesthesia. A ThermoCool SmartTouch SF catheter was advanced retroaortically across the aortic valve toward the subaortic ridge, guided by CARTO 3 with CartoSound. A semi-circular lesion set was delivered to the septum inferior to the membrane. Two steam pops occurred during ablation in this area. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms at 3 and 8 months demonstrated sustained LVOT gradient reduction, from 52 mmHg pre-ablation to 49 mmHg and 38 mmHg, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remained stable at 61%, with no new wall motion abnormalities or pericardial effusion. The patient reported marked improvement in symptoms and normalization of daily activity tolerance. No procedural complications or hospital readmissions occurred. Decision-Making: Given the patient’s high surgical risk and recurrent symptoms, the multidisciplinary team determined that repeat sternotomy carried elevated morbidity. RFA offered a targeted, minimally invasive solution that leveraged electrophysiology tools and preserved structural integrity while maximizing safety. Conclusions: This first-in-human case illustrates the feasibility of intracardiac RFA for recurrent SAM. The patient experienced sustained LVOT gradient reduction, preserved EF, and marked symptomatic improvement. This novel approach may offer a viable option for select patients with recurrent subaortic obstruction and prior sternotomy, warranting further investigation to define lesion durability, depth of tissue effect, and conduction system safety.