Petershie, Bernard

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and disproportionately affects men of African ancestry. African men often present at younger ages and with more aggressive disease, and approximately half of the PCa risk has been attributed to genetic factors. Africa is the most genetically diverse region of the world, and even within the continent, populations show important differences in allele frequencies and patterns of pathogenic variation. Despite this diversity, African men remain underrepresented in genomic studies, creating significant gaps in knowledge that limit precision medicine efforts. Methods: A total of 182 prostate cancer patients were recruited from teaching hospitals in Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. 50 cancer susceptibility genes using the Aviseq ONCO50 panel and the Illumina MiSeq platform. Variant calling was performed using an in-house Snakemake workflow, followed by additional bioinformatic steps to distinguish true PMS2 variants from PMS2CL-related artifacts. Pathogenicity assessment relied on annotations from ClinVar and LOVD databases. Results: Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were detected in 31.3% of the study group identified in 26 genes. The five most frequently altered genes were RAD50, PTCH1, MSH6, MUTYH, and NF1. Nigerian patients accounted for 52.6 percent of all pathogenic variants, with recurrent alterations observed in MSH6, MUTYH, NF1, and PTCH1. In contrast, pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were observed primarily in patients from Kenya, Benin, and Côte d’Ivoire. Several frameshift, nonsense, and splice-site variants identified in this study have not been previously reported in African populations.[SR1] Conclusion: This study provides one of the most detailed assessments of inherited cancer susceptibility gene variants in African PCa patients. The findings reveal substantial regional variation in the spectrum of pathogenic variants and highlight population-specific genomic signatures that may contribute to the unequal burden of PCa in men of African ancestry. These data emphasize the importance of expanding genomic research efforts within Africa to strengthen precision oncology and reduce global PCa disparities. Citation Format: Abimbola F. Onyia, Freeman Okwuchi, Opeyemi C. De Campos, Sylvester Divine, Olutola Olasehinde, Ayinde Yahaya, Ayo Salako, Aminu Zakari, Iya Bassey, Nicholas Titiloye, Bernard Petershie, Isidore GANDAHO, Luc Brun, Tore Sanni, Safiatou Coulibaly, Noel Coulibaly, Michael Fakayode, Coulibaly Issoufou, Valérie Gbonon, Kouame Benjamin, Yao Evrard, Peter Coleman, Ayun Cassell, Victor Ajumbo, Lilac Wattanga, Benson Ochieng Nyambega, Folakemi T. Odedina, Solomon Rotimi. Targeted sequencing of common cancer susceptibility genes reveals germline variants in African prostate cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6289.

AbstractAbstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This project aimed to assess and map out the current neuro-oncology capacity in SSA, brain tumor registries, and biobanks. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey to gather data from healthcare professionals involved in CNS tumor care across SSA through the Society for Neuro-Oncology SSA (SNOSSA). The survey captured information on the availability of neuro-oncology practitioners, neuropathology, molecular diagnostics, cancer registries, and biobanking. Results A total of 145 respondents representing 70 healthcare institutions across 22 countries participated. Of the 70 institutions, specialties included neurosurgery (89%, 62/70), anatomic pathology (74%, 52/70), and medical oncology (71%, 50/70). For radiologic evaluation, 64% (45/70) of responding institutions reported having both CT and MRI. Access to molecular testing through immunohistochemistry or next-generation sequencing was available in 46% (32/70) of responding institutions. Multidisciplinary tumor boards were available for CNS cases in 86% (60/70) of responding institutions. Brain tumor-specific registries were available in 29% (20/70) of responding institutions, and 10% (7/70) maintained brain tumor biorepositories. Conclusion This study demonstrates that SSA has substantial potential in neuro-oncology care practice capacity and facilities. The most significant gaps were in neuropathology and molecular testing, which makes widespread implementation of the WHO 2021 diagnosis challenging. Understanding the prevalence of CNS tumor subtypes in SSA is difficult due to the low number of brain tumor registries and biobanks.

Abstract Background Brain tumors represent a significant global health challenge, with rising incidence and mortality impacting individuals worldwide and contributing to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. In Africa, this burden is exacerbated by limited access to advanced diagnostics, treatment options, and multidisciplinary care, compounded by the absence of standardized cancer registration and tumor biobanking. The introduction of molecular diagnostics, as outlined in the 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification, adds complexity to brain tumor management, particularly in regions with scarce resources. Methods To address these issues, the Brain Tumor Consortium for Africa (BTCA) was established in 2023, bringing together experts to improve CNS tumor diagnosis, patient care, and research. The initial project, conducted via an electronic questionnaire, aimed to assess neuro-oncology capacity across Sub-Saharan Africa. Results The study revealed significant gaps, with a limited number of institutions incorporating molecular subtyping into their diagnostic algorithms. The consortium’s efforts focus on enhancing local data use, informing public policy, and promoting collaboration to advance neuro-oncology practices in Africa. By fostering a network enlisting the expertise of collaborators in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuropathology, anatomic pathology, and medical and radiation oncology, the BTCA seeks to improve brain tumor management through better diagnostics, infrastructure, and policy advocacy. Future directions include expanding molecular diagnostic capabilities, standardizing brain tumor biobanking, enhancing data collection, and advocating for improved brain tumor care in national health agendas. Conclusions The BTCA represents a pioneering model of collaboration and innovation in addressing the unique challenges of brain tumor care in Africa.

Abstract Brain tumors constitute significant morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). There is no previous large-scale effort focusing on brain tumor genetics in SSA. This project aims to map out the current neuro-oncology capacity in terms of workforce and available services in SSA. This is an ongoing online survey among a cross section of neuro-oncology practitioners spread across SSA countries to capture information on the distribution, number of available neuro-oncology care practitioners, capacity for neuropathology and molecular diagnosis, management of brain tumors, cancer registration, and tumor biobanking. The survey was disseminated by the Society for Neuro-oncology in SSA (SNOSSA). There were 83 respondents representing 15 countries and 52 health institutions: 46 tertiary, 4 secondary, 1 private and 1 other. Here, we present data on the 52 institutions. The prevalence of specialties was 87% neurosurgery, 75% anatomic pathology, 69% medical oncology, 64% neurology, 60% radiation oncology, and 39% neuropathology. For radiologic evaluation, 81% of institutions were reported to have both CT and MRI, 17% CT only, and one institution neither. For molecular testing, 46% have access to IHC or NGS testing, whereas 52% were reported to have neither. A neuro-oncology tumor board was reported at 58% of institutions. A general cancer registry is available in 64% of institutions, 31% have a brain tumor specific registry and 10% have a brain tumor biorepository. This study shows that SSA has substantial potential in neuro-oncology care practice capacity and facilities. Most significant gaps remain in areas such as neuropathology and molecular testing, which makes widespread implementation of the WHO 2021 diagnosis challenging. Understanding the prevalence of CNS tumor subtypes is also difficult due to low number of brain tumor registries and biobanks in SSA. The present findings reveal strategic opportunities, especially in neuropathology, tumor registries, biobanks, and infrastructure for IHC and NGS in SSA.