Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

12581 citation(s) found for "Wu, John".

Developing a Measles Flagging System within the Electronic Health Record
Rasmusson, Jenna, Sampathkumar, Priya , OHoro, John, Barth, Jean, Olson, Alyssa, Nelson, Ben, Faller, Rebecca, Siple, Leah, Rasmusson, Jenna, O’Horo, John C.

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 6 | Issue: S1 | Pages: s154-s154

10.1017/ash.2026.10678 Get It

Background: In 2025, 50 measles outbreaks drove 87% of confirmed cases reported in the United States. As a highly infectious virus with an estimated R ranging from 12-18, we sought rapidly scalable and implementable measles preparedness measures for our facilities. Methods: The electronic health record (EHR) has flags that can be placed on patient records to denote the presence of, or concern for, active, transmissible infections. These flags are highly visible in the EHR and represent a good usability heuristic as front line providers are already trained to look for this information. Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) worked with nursing informatics to develop measles-specific flags for suspected, confirmed and exposed patients in the EHR, expanding flagging functionality in preparation for potential measles cases and exposures. The flagging was tied to registry functionality to allow for tracking of exposed and confirmed cases longitudinally for supporting IPAC investigations in addition to clinical operations. Results: Three different flags were developed in the EHR to address measles. Specific criteria were created for each flag, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Attached as Image Conclusion: As a highly contagious virus, measles presents unique challenges to healthcare facilities managing both cases and exposures. Measles flags within the EHR can be leveraged to assist facilities with case tracking, exposure management, and infection prevention and control.
Bone Shape Feature Differences in Single and Recurrent Patellar Dislocations via Statistical Shape Modeling
Yang, Mingrui , Elias, John J. , Li, Mei, Ma, Jin , Çolak, Ceylan , Winalski, Carl S. , Farrow, Lutul, Li, X, Li, Mei , Farrow, Lutul D. , Li, Xiaojuan

Journal of Orthopaedic Research | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jor.70243 | PMID 42464872 Get It

ABSTRACT This study aims to develop MRI‐based 3D statistical shape models for patellar dislocation patients and investigate bone shape features that distinguish between single and recurrent dislocation populations, as well as control and patellar dislocation populations. MRIs from 16 single dislocation patients, 17 recurrent dislocation patients, and 20 control subjects were used to build statistical shape models for femur and patella bones. Bone shape features were extracted and tested for statistical significance ( p < 0.05) for distinguishing the single dislocation group from the recurrent dislocation groups, and the control group from the dislocation group. Statistically significant shape features distinguishing the three groups were identified for both bones. A shallower trochlear groove and smaller patellar ridge told the dislocation groups apart from the control group. A prolonged lateral condyle in femur and a laterally shifted ridge and hood shaped lateral facet in patella distinguished the recurrent dislocation group from the single dislocation group. The study's findings from 3D statistical shape modeling of the femur and patella reveal distinct anatomical differences across control, single dislocation, and recurrent patellar dislocation groups. This advanced understanding aids in identifying individuals at higher risk for initial or recurring patellar dislocations, enabling clinicians to tailor treatment and management strategies more effectively to prevent further dislocations and mitigate potential patellofemoral joint damage.
Cross-cohort analysis of expression and splicing quantitative trait loci in TOPMed
Blackwell, Thomas W., Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J. , Cho, Michael H. , Christenson, Stephanie A. , Durda, Peter , Gabriel, Stacey , Hersh, Craig P. , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, S.-J., Joehanes, Roby, Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching‐Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C. Y. , Manichaikul, Ani , Paik, David T. , Saferali, Aabida , Smith, Joshua D. , Taylor, Kent D. , Wang, Jiongming , Weinstock, Joshua S. , Weiss, Jeffrey, Wheeler, Heather E. , Zhou, Ying , Zoellner, Sebastian, Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R.G. , Ortega, Victor E. , Johnson, Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Abecasis, Gonçalo , Nickerson, Deborah A. , Ardlie, Kristin G., Woodruff, Prescott G. , Bowler, Russell P. , Meyers, Deborah A. , Reiner, Alex, Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S. , Silverman, Edwin K. , Rich, Stephen S., Heard‐Costa, Nancy L. , Tang, Hua, Rotter, Jerome I. , Smith, Albert V. , Aguet, François, Scott, Laura J. , Raffield, Laura M. , Parker, Stephen C.J. , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan, Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Pankow, James, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric, Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng, Rich, Stephen S. , Pankow, James S. , Reiner, Alex P. , Aguet, François , Johnson, W. Craig , Ardlie, Kristin , Orchard, Peter , Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J , Cho, Michael H , Christenson, Stephanie A , Durda, Peter , Hersh, Craig P , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, Seungyong , Joehanes, Roby , Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching-Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C Y , Manichaikul, Ani W , Paik, David T , Smith, Joshua D , Taylor, Kent D , Tracy, Russell P , Wang, Jiongming , Wang, Mingqiang , Weinstock, Joshua S , Weiss, Jeffrey , Wheeler, Heather E , Zhou, Ying , Zöllner, Sebastian , Wu, Joseph C , Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R G , Ortega, Victor E , Johnson, W Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Gupta, Namrata , Ardlie, Kristin , Woodruff, Prescott G , Bowler, Russell P , Reiner, Alexander P , Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S , Silverman, Edwin K , Rich, Stephen S , Heard-Costa, Nancy , Tang, Hua , Rotter, Jerome I , Smith, Albert V , Levy, Daniel , Aguet, François , Scott, Laura J , Raffield, Laura M , Parker, Stephen C J , Pankow, James S , Tracy, Russell P. , Wu, Joseph C. , Larson, Martin G. , Cupples, L. Adrienne , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan , Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric , Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng

Science | July 16, 2026 | Volume: 393 | Issue: 6808 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.adx2989 | PMID 42462027 Get It

Most genetic variants associated with complex traits are hypothesized to regulate gene expression. To understand the genetics underlying gene expression variability, we characterized 14,324 RNA-sequencing samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program and performed expression and splicing quantitative trait locus (e/sQTL) analyses in six tissues and cell types, including whole blood ( n = 6454) and lung ( n = 1291). We detected tens of thousands of secondary cis-e/sQTLs, showing that secondary cis-e/sQTL discovery remains unsaturated. We fine-mapped UK Biobank–derived genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals from 164 traits and identified e/sQTL colocalizations for 10,611 GWAS signals, including 7096 that colocalize with secondary e/sQTLs. Our results suggest that even larger e/sQTL analyses will uncover additional secondary e/sQTLs, further benefiting GWAS interpretation.
Consensus on biomarker utility for ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome: a Pituitary Society Modified Delphi Panel
Fleseriu, Maria , Biller, Beverly M. K. , Reincke, Martín , Мелмед, Шломо , Group, the Pituitary Society International Cushing Syndrome Delphi Panel Consensus, Akirov, Amit , Araki, Takako, Auchus, Richard, Ben-Shlomo, Anat , Bertherat, Jérôme, Biermasz, Nienke R, Castinetti, Frédéric, Ceccato, Filippo, Christ-Crain, Mirjam, Feelders, Richard A. , Findling, James W. , Gadelha, Monica, Geer, Eliza B, Giustina, Andrea, Grossman, Ashley, Gurnell, Mark, Hanzu, Felicia, Hinojosa-Amaya, Jose M, Isand, Kristina , Isidori, Andrea M, Kadioğlu, Pinar, Karavitaki, Niki, McCormack, A I, Nieman, Lynnette, Nowak, Elisabeth, Pivonello, Rosario, Salvatori, Roberto , Stewart, Paul M., Tabarin, Antoine, Takahashi, Yutaka, Theodoropoulou, Marily , Valassi, Elena, Varlamov, Elena V , Walia, Rama, Wass, John, Cheung, Cassandra, Priven, Mariel , Brown, Marielle, Biller, Beverly M K , Bancos, Irina , Fukuoka, Hidenori , Reincke, Martin , Newell-Price, John , Melmed, Shlomo , Bancos, Irina , Newell‐Price, John , Bertherat, Jérôme , Bidlingmaier, Martin , Biermasz, Nienke Ruurdje , Castinetti, Frédéric , Ceccato, Filippo , Christ‐Crain, Mirjam , Gadelha, Mônica R. , Geer, Eliza B. , Glezer, Andréa , Giustina, Andrea , Greenman, Yona , Grossman, Ashley, Gurnell, Mark , Hanzu, Felicia Alexandra , Hinojosa‐Amaya, José Miguel , Isidori, Andrea M. , Kadıoğlu, Pınar , Karavitaki, Niki , Langlois, Fabienne , Nieman, Lynnette K. , Nowak, Elisabeth , Pereira, Alberto M. , Petersenn, Stephan , Pivonello, Rosario , Tabarin, Antoine , Valassi, Elena , Vila, Greisa , Brown, Marielle

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | July 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1210/clinem/dgag279 | PMID 42460773 Get It

Abstract Context Biochemical test results are central to clinical decision-making for the diagnosis and management of Cushing syndrome (CS). With emerging research and increasing availability of different tests, updated consensus on the utility of these biomarkers is warranted. Objective To establish an updated consensus on the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent CS, address novel therapeutic approaches, and identify areas for future research. Design A modified 2-round Delphi panel was conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement/disagreement for Likert-scale statements or ≥70% selection of the same option for single-choice questions. Setting Participants represented a range of international expertise. Participants Forty-one participants took part in the Delphi panel, with no attrition between rounds (one nonclinician was not required to complete the second round). An 8-member Steering Committee guided statement development. Results Of statements designed to reach consensus, 45% (14/31) and 44% (11/25) statements reached consensus in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Notably, most panelists reported the use of late-night salivary cortisol for diagnosis of mild CS and for monitoring following pituitary surgery or medical or radiation therapy. Most panelists responded that block-and-replace therapies can be considered in patients with cyclical or severe CS, and consensus was reached that restoration of circadian rhythm is a treatment goal for patients with CS. Conclusion Areas of alignment among experts on the diagnosis and monitoring of CS are presented. The findings from this study are intended to support clinicians in their clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research.
Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle , Kavoussi, Louis, Wren, Sherry M. , Fowler, Dennis, Anvari, Mehran, Bianco, Francesco, Liang, Xiao, Li, Zheyong, Yin, Xiaoyu, Piccoli, Micaela, Marks, John, Shen, Baiyong, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara, Hagendoorn, Jeroen, Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew, Oleynikov, Dmitry, Jones, Stephanie B., Bindal, Vivek , Kim, Hyun Koo, Hyung, Woo Jin, Hashimoto, Daniel, Chen, Liaohai Leo, Burt, Bryan M., Lafaro, Kelly, Elli, Fernando, Wilson, Erik, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Morgan, Annette, Bartlett, Stephen T., Rashidi, Laila, Yu, Liu, Gawkins, Bill, Hinoul, Piet, Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee, Raoof, Mustafa, Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya, Bernard, Jordana , Wang, Yulun, Broering, Dieter C., Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo, Fong, Yuman , Raptis, Dimitri , Wren, Sherry M , Aldousari, Saad , Ruurda, Jelle P. H. , Bindal, Vivek , Melstrom, Laleh , Celotto, Francesco , Kudsi, Yusef , Ratti, Francesca , Bernard, Jordana , Kavoussi, Louis R., Fowler, Dennis L. , Anvari, Mehran , Bianco, Francesco Maria , Piccoli, Micaela , Marks, John, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara , Hagendoorn, Jeroen , Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew , Oleynikov, Dmitry , Hyung, Woo Jin , Hashimoto, Daniel A. , Burt, Bryan M. , Lafaro, Kelly J. , Elli, Fernando, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Rashidi, Laila, Hinoul, Piet , Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee , Raoof, Mustafa , Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya , Bröering, Dieter C. , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo

World Journal of Surgery | July 14, 2026 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2274-2288

10.1002/wjs.70468 | PMID 42444290 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Implementation of remote robotic‐assisted surgery (rRAS) has the potential to significantly improve access to high‐quality surgical care for patients worldwide. Advances in robotic systems and telecommunications now enable highly reliable, low latency, and cybersecure connectivity. These technological developments, together with the broader adoption of telemedicine, have driven an increasing interest in the implementation of rRAS. Methods The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non‐expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day‐long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines. Results Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico‐legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations). Conclusions There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.
MAGIC Composite Score Predicts Outcomes of Second-Line Therapy for Acute GVHD
Sebastian, Tara, Weber, Daniela, Etra, Aaron M., Vasova, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis, Choe, Hannah K., DeFilipp, Zachariah, Quagliarella, Francesco, Bedirian, Karni, Diniz, Marcio Augusto, Aguayo-Hiraldo, Paibel, Bader, Peter, Baez, Janna, Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya, Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O., Katsivelos, Nikolaos, Kitko, Carrie L., Kraus, Sabrina, Louloudis, Ioannis E., Morales, George, Nakamura, Ryotaro, Olson, Timothy S., Qayed, Muna, Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran, Schechter, Tal, Wang, Tingyu, Wolf, Matthias, Young, Rachel, Zeiser, Robert, Hogan, William J., Levine, John E., Ferrara, James L.M., Sebastian, Tara M. , Weber, Daniela , Etra, Aaron , Vášová, Ingrid, Ayuk, Francis , Choe, Hannah , DeFilipp, Zachariah , Quagliarella, Francesco , Bedirian, Karni, Aguayo‐Hiraldo, Paibel , Bader, Peter , Baez, Janna , Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya , Eng, Gilbert, Francke, Thomas, Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Katsivelos, Nikolaos , Kitko, Carrie L. , Kraus, Sabrina , Morales, George , Nakamura, Ryotaro , Olson, Timothy S. , Qayed, Muna , Reddy, Pavan, Reshef, Ran , Schechter, Tal , Wölfl, Matthias , Young, Rachel , Zeiser, Robert , Hogan, William J. , Levine, John E. , Ferrara, James L.M.

No container title available | July 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357664 | PMID 42523406 Get It

ABSTRACT Approximately 30% of patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) develop steroid-refractory disease and have very poor outcomes. Ruxolitinib has become the standard of care for steroid-refractory acute GVHD, but it is unclear which patients derive benefit. The MAGIC Composite Score (MCS), an algorithm that combines clinical symptoms and biomarkers, has been validated to predict outcomes at the start of primary GVHD treatment. Here, we evaluated its performance at the initiation of second-line treatment in 278 patients. MCS stratified patients into three risk groups (MCS1-3), with the majority (88%) classified as intermediate or high risk. Increasing MCS score was associated with progressively higher 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates (16%, 41%, and 73%; p<0.001), lower 1-year survival (77%, 56%, and 24%; p<0.001), and lower complete response (CR) rates at day 28 (47%, 38%, and 20%, respectively; p<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for 1-year NRM was significantly higher with MCS compared to clinical symptoms alone (0.70 vs. 0.63; p=0.023). Among patients treated with ruxolitinib, higher MCS similarly predicted higher NRM and lower survival and CR rates. Patients classified as MCS2/3 had poor outcomes despite ruxolitinib, underscoring the need for novel therapies in this patient population. In conclusion the MCS is an accurate predictor of outcomes for patients who require second-line treatment and may be of use as an eligibility criterion for future clinical trials in this high-risk population. Key Points MAGIC Composite Scores that integrate clinical symptoms and biomarker scores predict outcomes of second-line therapy for acute GVHD more accurately than clinical symptoms alone. MCS identifies patients with high NRM despite treatment with ruxolitinib.
Drivers of Diagnostic Variation in a Digital Global Kidney Transplant Reader Study
Hofstraat-Boersma, Rianne, Long, Romy du , Buzzanca, Giorgio , Abiola, Adeyemi A., Albadri, Sam, Ali, Zahabia, Altaleb, Ahmed, Banu, Sultana G., Barry, Marc , Bhalodia, Ami , Bianco, Paola, Broecker, Verena , Buelow, Roman, Cheunsuchon, Boonyarit , Crisi, Giovanna M., Daneshvar, Simin, Dokouhaki, Pouneh, Drachenberg, C., Florquin, Sandrine, Gibson, Ian W., Gujarathi, Saurabh, Hendricks, Allen R. , Islam, Jaynul, Ismail, Wesam, Jagannathan, Geetha , Kläger, Johannes, Krizova, Adriana , Kurien, Anila A., Kwon, Boomi , Ledesma, Felipe L., Martin, Jonne, Mehta, Shweta S., Messias, Nidia , Mignano, Salvatore , Miranda, Monik E., Moeckel, Gilbert, Pala, Chiara, Ranson, Marc A., Rodriguez, A Castell, Rosenberg, Avi, Setty, Suman , Sheaff, M., Soares, Maria F.S., Surintrspanont, Jerasit , Terinte-Balcan, George, Testa, Francesca , Ticas, David O. Hendriquez, Toniolo, Maria F., Midden, Dominique van, Velagapudi, R, Viswanathan, Seethalakshmi , Stillfried, Saskia von, Kalverboer, Nienke , Bruns, Imke B. , Callegaro, Giulia , Vries, A A F De, Peters-Sengers, Hessel, Kers, Jesper, Hofstraat, Rianne , Adefidipe, Adeyemi Abiola, Albadri, Sam , Angioi, Andrea , Banu, Sultana Gulshana, Bianco, Paola, Buelow, Roman David, Chauveau, Bertrand , Chen, Guoli , Crisi, Giovanna Maria, Dendooven, Amélie , Drachenberg, Cinthia Beskow , Farris, Alton B. , Ferlicot, Sophie , Florquin, Sandrine , Fontana, Francesco , Gibier, Jean‐Baptiste , Gibson, Ian W. , Husain, Sufia , Ismail, Wesam, Kläger, Johannes Philipp , Kozakowski, Nicolas , Kurien, Anila Abraham , L’Imperio, Vincenzo , Ledesma, Felipe L , Low, Julia P. , Miranda, Monik Ediana , Price, Brendon , Ranson, Marc Andres, Roelofs, Joris J. T. H. , Sadeghipour, Alireza , Sekulic, Miroslav , Setty, Suman , Soares, Maria Fernanda , Terinte‐Balcan, George , Ticas, David Henriquez, Toniolo, María Fernanda , Midden, Dominique van , Velagapudi, Ramya Krishna , Stillfried, Saskia Freifrau von , Wu, Chih‐Ying , Water, Bob van de , Helm, Danny van der , Sengers, Hessel Peters , Kers, Jesper

No container title available | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357318 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.
Amyloid PET Quantitation and Centiloid Thresholds in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Chiotis, Konstantinos, Allen, Isabel E., Rabinovici, Gil D., Joie, Renaud La , Group, Meta-Centiloid Study, Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M., Benzinger, Th., Betthauser, Tobey J., Bluma, Marina, Bombois, Stephanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Bouteloup, Vincent , Braskie, Meredith N., Brendel, Matthias, Brickman, Adam M., Bryant, Natalie, Bullich, Santiago , Carrillo, Maria C., Casaletto, Kaitlin, Cash, David M., Chang, Chiung-Chih, CHANG, H L, Chao, Yishu , Collij, Lyduine E., Corrada, Maria M., Craft, Suzanne , Dickerson, Bradford C., Dubois, Bruno, Dufouil, Carole, Fajardo, Alfonso, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan, Frings, Lars , Frisoni, Giovanni B., Gardner, Raquel C., Gnörich, Johannes , Gordon, Brian A., Gu, Yuna , Guan, Yihui, Guo, Tengfei, Hanseeuw, Bernard J., Hansson, Oskar, Harrison, Theresa M., Huang, Qi, Huang, ST , Iaccarino, Leonardo, Ishii, Kazunari, Ishi, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Johnson, Sterling C., Kato, Takashi, Katsumi, Yuta, Kaye, Jeffrey, Kolinger, Guilherme D., Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lao, Patrick J., Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J., Lowe, Val J. , Luchsinger, José A., Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Meyer, Philipp T., Mezenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, Nordberg, Agneta, O’Brien, John T., O’Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis, Peretti, Debora E., Rowe, Christopher C., Rowe, James B., Schwartz, Daniel L., Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Snyder, Heather M. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan, Taggett, Jacinda Z., Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Vaillancourt, David E., Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Vijverberg, Jort, Villemagne, Victor L. , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei-en, Weiner, Michael, Woodworth, Davis, Xiao, Cally , Xie, F, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, Mijin, Severanc, A4, ABIDE, ADNI*, ADNI-DoD, AgeWell, AIBL, AMYPAD, BACS, BATON, BIOCARD, BLSA, BioFINDER-2, BrANCH, CPAS, DETECT-AD, GEMS, GHABS, HABS, HABS-HD, IDEAS, IMAP, INSIGHT-preAD, Insight46, K-ROAD, LEADS, MCSA, MULNIAD, MEMENTO, SCAN, PREVENT-AD, SPIN,, Corrada, María M. , La Joie, Renaud , Blazhenets, Ganna , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Blūma, Marina , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Braskie, Meredith N. , Brendel, Matthias , Brickman, Adam M. , Carrillo, María C. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Chiung‐Chih , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chêne, Geneviève , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dubois, Bruno , Dufouil, Carole , Fortea, Juan , Garibotto, Valentina , Gordon, Brian A. , Guan, Yihui , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Ishii, Kazunari , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Katsumi, Yuta , Kaye, Jeffrey , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kolinger, Guilherme Domingues , Landau, Susan , Landeau, Brigitte , Lao, Patrick , Lee, Sangwon, Lleó, Alberto , Lopresti, Brian J. , Malpetti, Maura , March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Nakamura, Akinori , Nordberg, Agneta , O'Brien, John Tiernan , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Pappas, Ioannis , Quenon, Lisa , Rowe, Christopher Cleon , Rowe, James B. , Rudolph, Marc D. , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Smith, Ruben, Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Taggett, Jacinda , Toga, Arthur W. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villain, Nicolas , Wang, Wei‐en , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Yun, M R

JAMA | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jama.2026.13116 | PMID 42441390 Get It

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.