Tabarin, Antoine

Abstract Context Biochemical test results are central to clinical decision-making for the diagnosis and management of Cushing syndrome (CS). With emerging research and increasing availability of different tests, updated consensus on the utility of these biomarkers is warranted. Objective To establish an updated consensus on the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent CS, address novel therapeutic approaches, and identify areas for future research. Design A modified 2-round Delphi panel was conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement/disagreement for Likert-scale statements or ≥70% selection of the same option for single-choice questions. Setting Participants represented a range of international expertise. Participants Forty-one participants took part in the Delphi panel, with no attrition between rounds (one nonclinician was not required to complete the second round). An 8-member Steering Committee guided statement development. Results Of statements designed to reach consensus, 45% (14/31) and 44% (11/25) statements reached consensus in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Notably, most panelists reported the use of late-night salivary cortisol for diagnosis of mild CS and for monitoring following pituitary surgery or medical or radiation therapy. Most panelists responded that block-and-replace therapies can be considered in patients with cyclical or severe CS, and consensus was reached that restoration of circadian rhythm is a treatment goal for patients with CS. Conclusion Areas of alignment among experts on the diagnosis and monitoring of CS are presented. The findings from this study are intended to support clinicians in their clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research.

Abstract Disclosure: A. Prete: HRA Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Diurnal. L. Adbi: None. J.T. Bain: None. F. Shaheen: None. O. Suntornlohanakul: None. E. Deflorenne: None. A. Blanchard: None. M. Nestola: None. C. Pamporaki: None. I. Tizianel: None. E. Nowak: None. J. Bertherat: None. D.A. Vassiliadi: None. I. Bancos: None. C.M. Dennedy: None. D. Kastelan: None. M. Fassnacht: None. P. Mulatero: None. U. Ambroziak: None. A. Tabarin: None. M. Quinkler: None. S. Puglisi: None. J. Deinum: None. G.Å. Ueland: None. L. Lenzini: None. F. Beuschlein: None. M. Reincke: None. F. Ceccato: None. G. Eisenhofer: None. S.M. Corsello: None. L. Amar: None. M. Zennaro: None. N. Karavitaki: None. A.E. Taylor: None. W. Arlt: None. Introduction: Twenty-four-hour urinary free cortisol is used to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome (CS); amongst its limitations is failure to differentiate ACTH-dependent CS (AD-CS) from ACTH-independent CS (AI-CS). We tested the performance of urine steroid metabolomics (USM), the computational analysis of 24-hour urine steroid metabolome data by machine learning, for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CS. Given the physiological diurnal rhythm of cortisol secretion and its loss in CS, we also hypothesised that the difference in glucocorticoid excretion between CS and controls should be higher during nighttime, thereby facilitating more sensitive detection of CS. Methods: 264 subjects completed a 24-hour urine collection (40 AD-CS, 103 AI-CS due to adrenocortical adenoma or hyperplasia, 121 healthy subjects). A subset of 52 individuals (13 CS, 39 healthy) provided a nighttime urine collection and a daytime urine collection. Mass spectrometry-based multi-steroid profiling was used to quantify the urinary excretion of 27 steroid metabolites. Data were analysed by generalised matrix learning vector quantisation (a prototype-based supervised machine learning approach), multiple linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, and multiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Results: Twenty-four-hour USM demonstrated very high accuracy in differentiating CS from healthy individuals (AUC-ROC 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99), reflected by higher urinary excretion of glucocorticoid and glucocorticoid precursor metabolites in CS. USM yielded high accuracy in differentiating AD-CS from AI-CS (AUC-ROC 0.91, 95%CI 0.89-0.94), with androgen metabolites being the most discriminatory. We observed significant sex differences in steroid excretion in both healthy individuals and those with CS. Women exhibited markedly lower excretion of both glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids compared to men: average glucocorticoid excretion was reduced by 43% in healthy women and 30% in CS women, while average mineralocorticoid excretion was 29% lower in healthy women and 51% lower in CS women (results adjusted for age and BMI). Timed steroid excretion in healthy individuals reflected the diurnal pattern of adrenal steroid secretion, with lower nighttime than daytime excretion of glucocorticoid metabolites. Nighttime glucocorticoid metabolite excretion (AUC-ROC 1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.00) performed better than daytime (AUC-ROC 0.91, 95%CI 0.77-1.00) and 24-hour excretion (AUC-ROC 0.94, 95%CI 0.86-1.00) in separating CS cases from healthy individuals. Conclusions: USM is a non-invasive, one-step candidate test for the accurate diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CS. Timed nighttime urine collection leverages cortisol circadian rhythmicity and improves the diagnostic accuracy of the current reference standard 24-hour collection. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: I. Bancos: Advisory Board Member; Self; Adrenas, Diurnal, Neurocrine, Spruce, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Sparrow, Recordati Rare Diseases, Xeris, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Corcept. Consulting Fee; Self; Adrenas, Diurnal, Neurocrine, Spruce, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Sparrow, Recordati Rare Diseases, Xeris, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Corcept. Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati, HRA Pharmaceuticals. Other; Self; Adrenas, Diurnal, Neurocrine, Spruce, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Sparrow, Recordati Rare Diseases, Xeris, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Corcept. E.B. Geer: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; Lundbeck, Crinetics, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Grant Recipient; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Corcept, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow. F. Castinetti: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati. Grant Recipient; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati. R. Feelders: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati. Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati. Grant Recipient; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. M. Fleseriu: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). R. Pivonello: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, H Lundbeck. Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati, Corcept Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Neurocrine Biosciences. M. Reincke: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Crinetics. Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Crinetics. Speaker; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Crinetics. A. Tabarin: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; H Lundbeck, Crinetics, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. J. Le Mouhaër: Employee; Self; Recordati. J. Stermenska: Employee; Self; Recordati. M. Maldonado: Employee; Self; Recordati. B.M. Biller: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; H Lundbeck, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Introduction: Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, provides control of cortisol production and improves outcomes in patients (pts), as shown by the clinical development program of Cushing’s disease (CD; Fleseriu M et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:847-75) leading to EMA approval for Cushing’s syndrome (CS) and FDA approval for CD. The prospective LINC 6 study (NCT05382156) evaluates long-term safety and efficacy of osilodrostat in routine clinical practice over a 3-­year follow-up of CS pts. Here, we report 1-year interim data. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with endogenous CS are being enrolled in countries where osilodrostat is approved and available (including USA and Europe), irrespective of prior osilodrostat use. Treatment decisions and follow-up are at investigator discretion. The primary endpoint is incidence of osilodrostat-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, focusing on AEs related to hypocortisolism, accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors, QT prolongation and pituitary tumor enlargement. Secondary endpoints include change in mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC), serum cortisol and late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC). Evaluation of biochemical parameters is recommended at baseline, months 1 and 3, and every 3 months thereafter, as available. AEs are recorded at baseline and each visit. Analyses are descriptive. We report change for pts with assessments at baseline and every 3 months. Results: Of 106 pts enrolled at the 1-year interim analysis, 94 were included in the safety population: CD, n=78; non-CD CS, n=16 (adrenal adenoma, n=3; adrenal hyperplasia, n=3; ectopic, n=9; other, n=1). Mean (SD) age was 53.2 years (12.7); 70.2% (n=66) were female. Median (min-max) osilodrostat exposure and dose were 5.5 months (0.1-13.9) and 5.0 mg/day (1.0-60.0). 29 pts reported 109 AEs; 12 pts reported 44 AEs that were considered treatment related. Overall, the most common (≥5%) AEs were asthenia and vomiting (both n=6/109; 5.5%); treatment-related AEs with highest frequency were vomiting and dizziness (both n=4/44; 9.1%). 7 AEs led to discontinuation in 4 pts; 5 AEs were considered osilodrostat related (nausea and vomiting in 1 pt; worsening hypertension, uncontrolled blood pressure and dizziness in another) and 2 were not (pituitary tumor surgery and right adrenalectomy). AEs related to hypocortisolism, accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors, QT prolongation and pituitary tumor enlargement occurred in 7 (7.4%), 4 (4.3%), 2 (2.1%) and 0 pts, respectively. At month 3, mUFC, serum cortisol and LNSC were normalized in 71.4% (n=10/14), 69.2% (n=18/26) and 50.0% (n=7/14) of pts. Conclusions: Results from this real-world clinical setting show that osilodrostat is generally well tolerated and provides early improvements in mUFC and LNSC in pts with endogenous CS, building on evidence from the previous randomized, controlled trials LINC 3 and LINC 4. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Abstract Objective To assess (1) comorbidities associated with and (2) treatment strategies for patients with adrenal incidentalomas and mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS; > 1.8 µg/dL (>50 nmol/L) cortisol level cut-off following the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Seven databases were searched up to July 14, 2022. Eligible studies were (randomized) trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies assessing comorbidities potentially attributable to cortisol excess or mortality in patients with adrenal incidentaloma with or without MACS or the effects of conservative or surgical management of MACS. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled proportions (with 95% CIs). Results In 30 cross-sectional and 16 cohort studies (n = 17 156 patients in total), patients with MACS had a higher prevalence of diabetes (relative risk [RR] 1.44 [1.23-1.69]), hypertension (RR = 1.24 [1.16-1.32]), and dyslipidemia (RR = 1.23 [1.13-1.34]). All-cause mortality (adjusted for confounders) in patients with MACS, assessed in 4 studies (n = 5921), was increased (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54 [1.27-1.81]). Nine observational studies (n = 856) and 2 randomized trials (n = 107) suggest an improvement in glucometabolic control (RR = 7.99 [2.95-21.90]), hypertension (RR = 8.75 [3.99-19.18]), and dyslipidemia (RR = 3.24 [1.19-8.82]) following adrenalectomy. Conclusions The present systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the relevance of MACS, since both cardiometabolic morbidities and mortality appeared to have increased in patients with MACS compared to patients with non-functioning incidentalomas. However, due to heterogeneous definitions, various outcomes, selective reporting, and missing data, the reported pooled estimates need to be interpreted with caution. The small number of patients in randomized trials prevents any strong conclusion on the causality between MACS and these comorbidities.

Abstract Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal masses detected on imaging performed for reasons other than suspected adrenal disease. In most cases, adrenal incidentalomas are nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas but may also require therapeutic intervention including that for adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, hormone-producing adenoma, or metastases. Here, we provide a revision of the first international, interdisciplinary guidelines on incidentalomas. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system and updated systematic reviews on 4 predefined clinical questions crucial for the management of incidentalomas: (1) How to assess risk of malignancy?; (2) How to define and manage mild autonomous cortisol secretion?; (3) Who should have surgical treatment and how should it be performed?; and (4) What follow-up is indicated if the adrenal incidentaloma is not surgically removed? Selected Recommendations: (1) Each adrenal mass requires dedicated adrenal imaging. Recent advances now allow discrimination between risk categories: Homogeneous lesions with Hounsfield unit (HU) ≤ 10 on unenhanced CT are benign and do not require any additional imaging independent of size. All other patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary expert meeting, but only lesions >4 cm that are inhomogeneous or have HU >20 have sufficiently high risk of malignancy that surgery will be the usual management of choice. (2) Every patient needs a thorough clinical and endocrine work-up to exclude hormone excess including the measurement of plasma or urinary metanephrines and a 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (applying a cutoff value of serum cortisol ≤50 nmol/L [≤1.8 µg/dL]). Recent studies have provided evidence that most patients without clinical signs of overt Cushing's syndrome but serum cortisol levels post dexamethasone >50 nmol/L (>1.8 µg/dL) harbor increased risk of morbidity and mortality. For this condition, we propose the term “mild autonomous cortisol secretion” (MACS). (3) All patients with MACS should be screened for potential cortisol-related comorbidities that are potentially attributably to cortisol (eg, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus), to ensure these are appropriately treated. (4) In patients with MACS who also have relevant comorbidities surgical treatment should be considered in an individualized approach. (5) The appropriateness of surgical intervention should be guided by the likelihood of malignancy, the presence and degree of hormone excess, age, general health, and patient preference. We provide guidance on which surgical approach should be considered for adrenal masses with radiological findings suspicious of malignancy. (6) Surgery is not usually indicated in patients with an asymptomatic, nonfunctioning unilateral adrenal mass and obvious benign features on imaging studies. Furthermore, we offer recommendations for the follow-up of nonoperated patients, management of patients with bilateral incidentalomas, for patients with extra-adrenal malignancy and adrenal masses, and for young and elderly patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Finally, we suggest 10 important research questions for the future.

By definition, an adrenal incidentaloma is an asymptomatic adrenal mass detected on imaging not performed for suspected adrenal disease. In most cases, adrenal incidentalomas are nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas, but may also represent conditions requiring therapeutic intervention (e.g. adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, hormone-producing adenoma or metastasis). The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with best possible evidence-based recommendations for clinical management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. We predefined four main clinical questions crucial for the management of adrenal incidentaloma patients, addressing these four with systematic literature searches: (A) How to assess risk of malignancy?; (B) How to define and manage low-level autonomous cortisol secretion, formerly called ‘subclinical’ Cushing’s syndrome?; (C) Who should have surgical treatment and how should it be performed?; (D) What follow-up is indicated if the adrenal incidentaloma is not surgically removed? Selected recommendations: (i) At the time of initial detection of an adrenal mass establishing whether the mass is benign or malignant is an important aim to avoid cumbersome and expensive follow-up imaging in those with benign disease. (ii) To exclude cortisol excess, a 1mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test should be performed (applying a cut-off value of serum cortisol ≤50nmol/L (1.8µg/dL)). (iii) For patients without clinical signs of overt Cushing’s syndrome but serum cortisol levels post 1mg dexamethasone >138nmol/L (>5µg/dL), we propose the term ‘autonomous cortisol secretion’. (iv) All patients with ‘(possible) autonomous cortisol’ secretion should be screened for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, to ensure these are appropriately treated. (v) Surgical treatment should be considered in an individualized approach in patients with ‘autonomous cortisol secretion’ who also have comorbidities that are potentially related to cortisol excess. (vi) In principle, the appropriateness of surgical intervention should be guided by the likelihood of malignancy, the presence and degree of hormone excess, age, general health and patient preference. (vii) Surgery is not usually indicated in patients with an asymptomatic, nonfunctioning unilateral adrenal mass and obvious benign features on imaging studies. We provide guidance on which surgical approach should be considered for adrenal masses with radiological findings suspicious of malignancy. Furthermore, we offer recommendations for the follow-up of patients with adrenal incidentaloma who do not undergo adrenal surgery, for those with bilateral incidentalomas, for patients with extra-adrenal malignancy and adrenal masses and for young and elderly patients with adrenal incidentalomas