Back to Authors

Dralle, Henning

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-8193

Mayo Clinic

Sektion Endokrine Chirurgie, Klinik für Allgemein‐ Viszeral‐ und Transplantationschirurgie Medizinisches Zentrum Germany

Citations 2

AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Optimizing outcomes in reoperative parathyroid surgery: Definitive multidisciplinary joint consensus guidelines of the American Head and Neck Society and the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons
Stack, Brendan C. , Tolley, Neil , Bartel, Twyla B. , Bilezikian, John P. , Bodenner, Donald, Camacho, Pauline M., Cox, Jeremy, Dralle, Henning , Jackson, James E. , Palazzo, Fausto , Scott‐Coombes, David , Steward, David L. , Terris, David J. , Thompson, Geoffrey B. , Thompson, Geoffrey, Morris, John C., Orloff, Lisa A. , Ridge, John Andrew , Randolph, Gregory William

Head & Neck | August 5, 2018 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1617-1629

10.1002/hed.25023 Get It

Abstract Background Revision parathyroid is challenging due to possible diagnostic uncertainty as well as the technical challenges it can present. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of distinguished experts from the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Endocrine Section, the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS), and other invited experts have reviewed this topic with the purpose of making recommendations based on current best evidence. The literature was also reviewed on May 12, 2017. PubMed (1946‐2017), Cochrane SR (2005‐2017), CT databases (1997‐2017), and Web of Science (1945‐2017) were searched with the following strategy: revision and reoperative parathyroidectomy to ensure completeness. Results Guideline recommendations were made in 3 domains: preoperative evaluation, surgical management, and alternatives to surgery. Eleven guideline recommendations are proposed. Conclusion Reoperative parathyroid surgery is best avoided if possible. Our literature search and subsequent recommendations found that these cases are best managed by experienced surgeons using precision preoperative localization, intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH), and the team approach.
Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors
Arlt, Wiebke , Bancos, Irina , Dralle, Henning , Newell‐Price, John , Sahdev, Anju , Tabarin, Antoine , Tsagarakis, Stylianos , Dekkers, Olaf M, Dekkers, Olaf M. , Faßnacht, Martin , Terzolo, Massimo , Dekkers, Olaf M, Bancos, Irina , Arlt, Wiebke , Newell-Price, John , Dekkers, Olaf M

European Journal of Endocrinology | July 7, 2016 | Volume: 175 | Issue: 2 | Pages: G1-G34

10.1530/eje-16-0467 Get It

By definition, an adrenal incidentaloma is an asymptomatic adrenal mass detected on imaging not performed for suspected adrenal disease. In most cases, adrenal incidentalomas are nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenomas, but may also represent conditions requiring therapeutic intervention (e.g. adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, hormone-producing adenoma or metastasis). The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with best possible evidence-based recommendations for clinical management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. We predefined four main clinical questions crucial for the management of adrenal incidentaloma patients, addressing these four with systematic literature searches: (A) How to assess risk of malignancy?; (B) How to define and manage low-level autonomous cortisol secretion, formerly called ‘subclinical’ Cushing’s syndrome?; (C) Who should have surgical treatment and how should it be performed?; (D) What follow-up is indicated if the adrenal incidentaloma is not surgically removed? Selected recommendations: (i) At the time of initial detection of an adrenal mass establishing whether the mass is benign or malignant is an important aim to avoid cumbersome and expensive follow-up imaging in those with benign disease. (ii) To exclude cortisol excess, a 1mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test should be performed (applying a cut-off value of serum cortisol ≤50nmol/L (1.8µg/dL)). (iii) For patients without clinical signs of overt Cushing’s syndrome but serum cortisol levels post 1mg dexamethasone >138nmol/L (>5µg/dL), we propose the term ‘autonomous cortisol secretion’. (iv) All patients with ‘(possible) autonomous cortisol’ secretion should be screened for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus, to ensure these are appropriately treated. (v) Surgical treatment should be considered in an individualized approach in patients with ‘autonomous cortisol secretion’ who also have comorbidities that are potentially related to cortisol excess. (vi) In principle, the appropriateness of surgical intervention should be guided by the likelihood of malignancy, the presence and degree of hormone excess, age, general health and patient preference. (vii) Surgery is not usually indicated in patients with an asymptomatic, nonfunctioning unilateral adrenal mass and obvious benign features on imaging studies. We provide guidance on which surgical approach should be considered for adrenal masses with radiological findings suspicious of malignancy. Furthermore, we offer recommendations for the follow-up of patients with adrenal incidentaloma who do not undergo adrenal surgery, for those with bilateral incidentalomas, for patients with extra-adrenal malignancy and adrenal masses and for young and elderly patients with adrenal incidentalomas