Мелмед, Шломо

Abstract Context Biochemical test results are central to clinical decision-making for the diagnosis and management of Cushing syndrome (CS). With emerging research and increasing availability of different tests, updated consensus on the utility of these biomarkers is warranted. Objective To establish an updated consensus on the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent CS, address novel therapeutic approaches, and identify areas for future research. Design A modified 2-round Delphi panel was conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement/disagreement for Likert-scale statements or ≥70% selection of the same option for single-choice questions. Setting Participants represented a range of international expertise. Participants Forty-one participants took part in the Delphi panel, with no attrition between rounds (one nonclinician was not required to complete the second round). An 8-member Steering Committee guided statement development. Results Of statements designed to reach consensus, 45% (14/31) and 44% (11/25) statements reached consensus in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Notably, most panelists reported the use of late-night salivary cortisol for diagnosis of mild CS and for monitoring following pituitary surgery or medical or radiation therapy. Most panelists responded that block-and-replace therapies can be considered in patients with cyclical or severe CS, and consensus was reached that restoration of circadian rhythm is a treatment goal for patients with CS. Conclusion Areas of alignment among experts on the diagnosis and monitoring of CS are presented. The findings from this study are intended to support clinicians in their clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research.

Abstract Disclosure: M. Fleseriu: Consulting Fee; Self; Novo Nordisk, Amryt Pharma Holdings Ltd, Ascend Therapeutics (A Besins Healthcare company). Speaker; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., RECORDATI_RARE_DISEASES_INC., Ipsen Pharma SAS. S.L. Samson: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amryt. Research Investigator; Self; Amryt. N. Biermasz: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati, Pfizer Global R&D. Grant Recipient; Self; Macro Registry Grant, Amryt. C.J. Strasburger: Advisory Board Member; Self; Sandoz, Ipsen, Recordati. Consulting Fee; Self; Ascendis, Amryt, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Sandoz, Recordati. Speaker; Self; Ipsen, Novo Nordisk, HRA-Pharma. S. Fuchs Orenbach: Employee; Self; Chiesi Global Rare Diseases. J.A. Crompton: Employee; Self; Chiesi Global Rare Diseases. S. Melmed: Advisory Board Member; Self; Ionis, Crinetics. Consulting Fee; Self; Ipsen. Grant Recipient; Self; Pfizer. Background: Treatment with oral octreotide capsules (OOC) was evaluated in three phase 3 trials (CH-ACM-01, OPTIMAL, MPOWERED) in patients with acromegaly who previously tolerated and responded to the injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (iSRLs) octreotide and lanreotide. Results demonstrated efficacy and safety despite differences in trial design. Pooling data from all three trials can provide further insight into the biochemical response, symptom improvement, and safety profile of OOC. Objective: Analyze the biochemical changes, symptom control, and safety of OOC through a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trial datasets. Methods: Patients included were aged ≥18 years with acromegaly and responded biochemically to iSRL therapy before the initiation of OOC (defined as IGF-I <1.3 × ULN and mean integrated GH <2.5 ng/mL for CH-ACM-01 and MPOWERED, and IGF-I ≤1.0 × ULN for OPTIMAL). Data analyzed were from the following periods: baseline until the end of the double-blind placebo-controlled phase of OPTIMAL (36 weeks); the run-in phase of MPOWERED (26 weeks); end of dose escalation (2-5 months; efficacy data) and end of fixed dose phase (up to 7 months, safety data) for CH-ACM-01. Effect of prior iSRL dose was analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis. Symptom severity was scored using the Acromegaly Index of Severity (AIS) tool. Results: Efficacy, symptom, and safety data were available for 318, 194, and 329 patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 65% with no effect of prior iSRL dose (p>0.05). Mean (SD) IGF-I change from baseline was +0.17 (0.32; n=214), +0.19 (0.39; n=81), and +0.22 (0.57; n=23) for patients with baseline IGF-I levels ≤1 × ULN, 1 to <1.3 × ULN, and ≥1.3 × ULN. Twenty percent (16/81) and 35% (8/23) of patients with baseline IGF-I of 1 to <1.3 x ULN and ≥1.3 x ULN shifted to an improved category of response. There was a median decrease of one symptom per patient (p<0.05) and a mean decrease of 0.8 in AIS (p<0.05). The proportion of OOC responders reporting ≤1, 2, or 3 moderate/severe acromegaly symptoms at baseline and month 6 decreased from 56% to 39%, 32% to 20%, and 20% to 12%. At month 6, improvement was seen for all individual symptoms (joint pain, swelling, sweating, fatigue, headache) of moderate/severe grade and was significant for joint pain (36% to 22%) and swelling (15% to 10%) (p<0.02). Most adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal (GI) in nature (54%, n=179/329) with a median onset and duration of 15 and 12 days for first reported GI events. Conclusion: Pooled analysis confirms overall maintenance of biochemical control in patients previously responding to iSRL therapy, with decreased symptom burden in OOC responders. OOC was generally well tolerated with no new safety signals. GI-related AEs were largely transient. These results support OOC as a therapeutic option for treating acromegaly. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to report results from the open-label extension (OLE) of the OPTIMAL trial of oral octreotide capsules (OOC) in adults with acromegaly, evaluating the long-term durability of therapeutic response. Design The study design is an OLE of a double-blind placebo-controlled (DPC) trial. Methods Patients completing the 36-week DPC period on the study drug (OOC or placebo) or meeting predefined withdrawal criteria were eligible for OLE enrollment at 60 mg/day OOC dose, with the option to titrate to 40 or 80 mg/day. The OLE is ongoing; week 48 results are reported. Results Forty patients were enrolled in the OLE, 20 each having received OOC or placebo, with 14 and 5 patients completing the DPC period as responders, respectively. Ninety percent of patients completing the DPC period on OOC and 70% of those completing on placebo completed 48 weeks of the OLE. Maintenance of response in the OLE (i.e. insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1) ≤ 1.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN)) was achieved by 92.6% of patients who responded to OOC during the DPC period. Mean IGF1 levels were maintained between the end of the DPC period (0.91 × ULN; 95% CI: 0.784, 1.045) and week 48 of the OLE (0.90 × ULN; 95% CI: 0.750, 1.044) for those completing the DPC period on OOC. OOC safety was consistent with previous findings, with no increased adverse events (AEs) associated with the higher dose and improved gastrointestinal tolerability observed over time. Conclusions Patients with acromegaly maintained long-term biochemical response while receiving OOC, with no new AEs observed with prolonged OOC exposure.