Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

302 citation(s) found for "Faisal, H".

Clinical Decision Making in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Mimics: Practice Management from Inflammatory Bowel Disease LIVE
Fiske, Hannah W. , Shah, Samir A. , Al-Bawardy, Badr , Binion, David G. , Bohm, Matthew , Brand, Myron, Cohen, Benjamin L, Dueker, Jeffrey, Engels, Michael , Fine, Sean , Förster, E , Gaidos, Jill , Ginsburg, Philip, Goyal, Alka , Hanson, John S. , Herfath, Hans, Hull, Tracy L. , Kelly, Colleen , Lazarev, Mark , Levy, L. Campbell, Melia, Joanna , Philpott, Jessica, Qazi, Taha , Watson, Andrew , Wexner, Steven D. , Williams, Emmanuelle, Al‐Bawardy, Badr , Al-Bawardy, Badr , Bohm, Matthew , Fine, Sean , Forster, Erin , Gaidos, Jill K J , Hull, Tracy , Melia, Joanna , Qazi, Taha , Regueiro, Miguel , Wexner, Steven D , Ward, Chris , Holubar, Stefan D. , Barnes, Edward L. , Clarke, Kofi , Cohen, Benjamin L, Cross, Raymond K. , Farraye, Francis A. , Hanson, John, Philpott, Jessica R., Siegel, Corey A , Regueiro, Miguel

Crohn's & Colitis 360 | April 10, 2024 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/crocol/otae022 | PMID 38720935 Get It

Abstract Background Since 2009, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists have utilized “IBD LIVE,” a weekly live video conference with a global audience, to discuss the multidisciplinary management of their most challenging cases. While most cases presented were confirmed IBD, a substantial number were diseases that mimic IBD. We have categorized all IBD LIVE cases and identified “IBD-mimics” with consequent clinical management implications. Methods Cases have been recorded/archived since May 2018; we reviewed all 371 cases from May 2018–February 2023. IBD-mimics were analyzed/categorized according to their diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Results Confirmed IBD cases made up 82.5% (306/371; 193 Crohn’s disease, 107 ulcerative colitis, and 6 IBD-unclassified). Sixty-five (17.5%) cases were found to be mimics, most commonly medication-induced (n = 8) or vasculitis (n = 7). The evaluations that ultimately resulted in correct diagnosis included additional endoscopic biopsies (n = 13, 21%), surgical exploration/pathology (n = 10, 16.5%), biopsies from outside the GI tract (n = 10, 16.5%), genetic/laboratory testing (n = 8, 13%), extensive review of patient history (n = 8, 13%), imaging (n = 5, 8%), balloon enteroscopy (n = 5, 8%), and capsule endoscopy (n = 2, 3%). Twenty-five patients (25/65, 38%) were treated with biologics for presumed IBD, 5 of whom subsequently experienced adverse events requiring discontinuation of the biologic. Many patients were prescribed steroids, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate, and 3 were trialed on tofacitinib. Conclusions The diverse presentation of IBD and IBD-mimics necessitates periodic consideration of the differential diagnosis, and reassessment of treatment in presumed IBD patients without appropriate clinical response. The substantial differences and often conflicting treatment approaches to IBD versus IBD-mimics directly impact the quality and cost of patient care.
Rh immune globulin immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐positive red cell exposure in RhD‐negative patients via transfusion: A survey of practices
Stephens, Laura D. , Shmookler, Aaron , O’Brien, Kerry L., Hermelin, Daniela , Bakhtary, Sara , AlMozain, Nour , Lu, Wen , Stephens, Laura , Shmookler, Aaron , O'Brien, Kerry , Karp, Julie Katz , Hermelin, Daniela , Bakhtary, Sara , Fung, Mark K , Almozain, Nour , George, Melissa

Transfusion | March 27, 2024 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 839-845

10.1111/trf.17812 | PMID 38534065 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCurrent Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) standards require transfusion services to have a policy on Rh immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis for when RhD‐negative patients are exposed to RhD‐positive red cells. This is a survey of AABB‐accredited transfusion services in the United States (US) regarding institutional policies and practices on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐negative patients receive RhD‐positive (i.e., RhD‐incompatible) packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions.ResultsApproximately half of the respondents (50.4%, 116/230) have policies on RhIG administration after RhD‐incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, while others had policies for only pRBC (13.5%, 31/230) or only platelet (17.8%, 41/230) transfusions, but not both. In contrast, 18.3% (42/230) report that their institution has no written policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐incompatible transfusions. Most institutions (70.2%, 99/141) do not have policies addressing safety parameters to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required to prevent RhD alloimmunization after RhD‐incompatible pRBC transfusions.DiscussionWith approximately half of US AABB‐accredited institutions report having policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after both RhD‐incompatible pRBC and platelet transfusions, some institutions may not be in compliance with AABB standards. Further, most with policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD‐incompatible pRBC transfusion do not have written safeguards to mitigate the risk of hemolysis associated with the high dose of RhIG required.ConclusionThis survey underscores the diverse and inadequate institutional policies on RhIG immunoprophylaxis after RhD exposure in Rh‐negative patients via transfusion. This observation identifies an opportunity to improve transfusion safety.
International Prognostic Score for Nodular Lymphocyte–Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma
Binkley, Michael S. , Flerlage, Jamie E. , Savage, Kerry J. , Akhtar, Saad , Steiner, Raphaël , Zhang, Xiaoyin , Dickinson, Michael , Major, Ajay , Hendrickson, Peter G. , Hopkins, David , Ng, Andrea K. , Casulo, Carla , Baron, Jonathan , Roberts, Kenneth B. , Alkendi, Jalila , Balogh, Alex, Torka, Pallawi , Specht, Lena , Silva, Ravi De , Pickard, Keir , Henry, M M , Smith, Christine M. , Brady, J.L. , Brennan, Bernadette , Сенченко, М. А. , Reeves, Marie, Terezakis, Stephanie , Fergusson, Paige, Hawkes, Eliza A. , Lee, Denise , Barraclough, Allison , Cheah, Chan Y. , Ku, Matthew , Mutsando, Howard , Gilbertson, Michael , Marconi, Tamara , Viiala, Nicholas , Hoppe, Richard T. , Borchmann, Peter , Fuchs, Michael , Hartmann, Sylvia , Eich, Hans Theodor, Skinnider, Brian, Milgrom, Sarah A. , Alomari, Mohammed H., Advani, Ranjana H. , Metzger, Monika L. , Wirth, Andrew, Smith, Sonali M. , Koenig, Julie L. , Sakthivel, Ku G., Gao, Sarah , Rahbi, Nasser Al, Sridhar, Akshay , Shah, Nimish , Osborne, Wendy , Chang, Isabela , Miall, Fiona , Mikhaeel, G., Penn, Anthony, Pepa, Roberta Della , Opat, Stephen , Tedjaseputra, Aditya , Palese, Monica , Kelly, Kara M. , Binkley, Michael Sargent , Major, Ajay , Hopkins, David , Ng, Andrea , Casulo, Carla , Baron, Jonathan , Roberts, Kenneth B , Al Kendi, Jalila , Ricardi, Umberto , Torka, Pallawi , Specht, Lena , De Silva, Ravindu , Pickard, Keir , Blazin, Lindsay J , Smith, Christine M , Brady, Jessica , Senchenko, Maria Anatolevna , Hoppe, Bradford S , Terezakis, Stephanie A , Hawkes, Eliza , Doo, Nicole Wong , Barraclough, Allison , Cheah, Chan Yoon , Ku, Matthew , Hamad, Nada , Gilbertson, Michael , Marconi, Tamara , Maurer, Matthew , Eichenauer, Dennis A , Hoppe, Richard T , Savage, Kerry J , Advani, Ranjana H , Opat, Stephen , Dickinson, Michael , Flerlage, Jamie E , Prica, Anca A. , Casulo, Carla , Blazin, Lindsay , Henry, Michael, Halperin, Daniel M. , Hoppe, Bradford S. , Talaulikar, Dipti , Picardi, Marco , Kirova, Youlia , Doo, Nicole Wong , Hamad, Nada , Maurer, Matthew J. , Eichenauer, Dennis A. , Hodgson, David C. , Rauf, M. Shahzad , Maghfoor, Irfan , Pinnix, Chelsea C. , Vega, Francisco , Alomari, Mohammed, Collins, Graham P. , Tsang, Richard , Kelsey, Chris R. , McKay, Pamela , Constine, Louis S , Plastaras, John Peter , Levis, Mario , Sridhar, Akshay, Volchkov, Egor Vasilevich , Northend, Michael , Salvaris, Ross , Shankar, Ananth , Natkunam, Yasodha

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 26, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 2271-2280

10.1200/jco.23.01655 | PMID 38531001 Get It

PURPOSE Nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare cancer, and large international cooperative efforts are needed to evaluate the significance of clinical risk factors and immunoarchitectural patterns (IAPs) for all stages of pediatric and adult patients with NLPHL. METHODS Thirty-eight institutions participated in the Global nLPHL One Working Group retrospective study of NLPHL cases from 1992 to 2021. We measured progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), transformation rate, and lymphoma-specific death rate. We performed uni- and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression stratified by management to select factors for the lymphocyte-predominant international prognostic score (LP-IPS) validated by five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS We identified 2,243 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR, 23-51). The median follow-up was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-10.8). Most had stage I to II (72.9%) and few B symptoms (9.9%) or splenic involvement (5.4%). IAP was scored for 916 (40.8%). Frontline management included chemotherapy alone (32.4%), combined modality therapy (30.5%), radiotherapy alone (24.0%), observation after excision (4.6%), rituximab alone (4.0%), active surveillance (3.4%), and rituximab and radiotherapy (1.1%). The PFS, OS, transformation, and lymphoma-specific death rates at 10 years were 70.8%, 91.6%, 4.8%, and 3.3%, respectively. On MVA, IAPs were not associated with PFS or OS, but IAP E had higher risk of transformation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; P < .05). We developed the LP-IPS with 1 point each for age ≥45 years, stage III-IV, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL, and splenic involvement. Increasing LP-IPS was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.52) and OS (HR, 2.31) and increased risk of lymphoma-specific death (HR, 2.63) and transformation (HR, 1.41). CONCLUSION In this comprehensive study of all ages of patients with NLPHL, we develop the LP-IPS to identify high-risk patients and inform upcoming prospective clinical trials evaluating de-escalation of therapy for patients with low LP-IPS scores (<2).
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation versus Other Fertility Techniques for Chemoradiation-Induced Premature Ovarian Insufficiency in Women: A Systematic Review and Future Directions
Chaudhri, Eman N. , Salman, Ayman, Awartani, Khalid, Khan, Zaraq , Hashmi, Shahrukh K.

Life | March 15, 2024 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 393

10.3390/life14030393 | PMID 38541717 Get It

Current advances in cancer therapy have increased survival, emphasizing the need for life quality improvement. Fertility loss is common post-chemotherapy. Current guidelines establish embryo and oocyte cryopreservation to address premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has also recently become an acceptable option for fertility preservation, particularly as it is the only option for pre-pubertal patients. Few definitions for optimum fertility outcomes, and few systematic reviews comparing embryo, oocyte, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation as a means of fertility preservation (FP) in pre- and post-pubertal female cancer patients exist. This systematic review aims to improve understanding of gonadotoxic effects of chemoradiation therapy in cancer patients, to analyze the different fertility preservation techniques and procedures available to women with chemoradiation induced ovarian insufficiency, and to compare and recognize the benefits of each technique in restoring fertility, sexual hormone function, and quality of life. Searches were conducted electronically on PubMed, Cochrane, and EBSCOHost, including clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective studies of female cancer patients undergoing anti-cancer therapy, with predefined MeSH terminology. Data were collected, analyzed, and compared. Non-randomized clinical studies were evaluated for risk bias through the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. In total, 23 studies were included. From there, 647 patients opted for oocyte cryopreservation, 267 for embryo cryopreservation, and 1382 for ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). A total of 175, 18, and 121 live births resulted respectively from oocyte, embryo, and OTC, respectively. Studies without live births discussed other fertility markers as indicators of improvement in sexual hormone function and fertility. The gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy call for FP intervention. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation/implantation are well-established procedures. With changing trends and life quality consideration, OTC is a promising interventional method for pre-pubertal patients facing the prospect of fertility loss.
Abstract 174: Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Aneurysms with PED: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Outcomes
Zermeno, Jorge A. Rios, Ghaith, Abdel Karim, Michaelides, Loizos , RUIZ, OMAR, Faisal, Umme Habiba , Zermeno, Jorge Rios, Greco, Elena, Tawk, Rabih G.

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology | March 5, 2024 | Volume: 3 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/svin.03.suppl_2.174 Get It

Introduction The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is commonly used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. While its effectiveness for certain types of aneurysms is well‐established, its efficacy for saccular aneurysms remains debatable. This review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the long‐term outcomes of PED treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least one year of follow‐up after PED treatment for saccular aneurysms were included. The primary endpoint was angiographic complete aneurysm occlusion at long‐term (≥ 12 mo.) follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included long‐term complications. We conducted a meta‐regression analysis to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity across studies. Results Eleven studies on 594 patients with 726 aneurysms were included, of which 5% were previously treated. The mean age was 55.7 years, and 78.3% were women. The mean aneurysm size was 7.72 mm, 8.95% were treated with more than one device, and 2.9% had adjunct coiling. The long‐term complete occlusion rate was 81% (CI 95%: 72% to 88%, p<0.01). Regarding long‐term complications, the rate of symptomatic ischemic stroke was 1% (CI 95%: 0% to 4%, p=0.07), the rate of delayed rupture was 1% (95%, CI 0% to 3%, p=0.02), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 3% (CI 95%: 1% to 6%, p=0.81). The meta‐regression analysis revealed a decreasing trend per year for aneurysmal occlusion, ischemic stroke rate, and aneurysmal rupture rate over time and an increasing trend for ICH over time. Conclusion PED demonstrates high long‐term occlusion and low complication rates, suggesting it is a safe and effective treatment option for unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. However, studies with greater than 5‐10 years of follow‐up are needed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcomes of incompletely occluded aneurysms Additionally, as newer devices exhibit reduced thrombogenic profiles and ICH rates increase over time, reevaluation of antiplatelet therapy's role, including dosage and DAPT, is warranted.
Characteristics of and risk factors for COVID-19 breakthrough infections in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results from the COVAD study
Ravichandran, Naveen , Day, Jessica , Nune, Arvind , Nikiphorou, Elena , Tan, Ai Lyn , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Milchert, Marcin , Parodis, Ioannis , Kuwana, Masataka , Patel, Aarat , Wincup, Chris , Tehozol, Erick Adrian Zamora , Chibuzo, Okwara Celestine , Katchamart, Wanruchada , Goo, Phonpen Akarawatcharangura , Kibbi, Lina El , Vaidya, Binit , Shaharir, Syahrul Sazliyana , Hasan, A T M Tanveer , Dey, Dzifa , Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique Toro , Caballero‐Uribe, Carlo V. , Salim, Babur , Chinoy, Hector , Gupta, Latika, Group, COVAD Study, Ranjan, Rajiv , Jain, Avinash , Pandya, Sapan C , Sharma, Aman , M, Manesh Manoj, Patro, Pradeepta Sekhar , Ajmani, Sajal , Chowdhury, Abhra Chandra , Shenoy, Padnamabha, Bommakanti, Keerthi Talari, Shukla, Anuj , Gaur, Prithvi Sanjeevkumar , Mamadapur, Mahabaleshwar , Ghodke, Akanksha, Kadam, Esha , Fazal, Zoha Zahid , Kardeş, Sinan , Yıldırım, Reşit, Maurier, F. , Meyer, Alain, Atzeni, Fabiola , Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Orsolini, Giovanni , Angelis, Rossella De , Danielli, Maria Giovanna, Grignaschi, Silvia, Giollo, Alessandro, Lini, Daniele , Alluno, Alessia, Loarce‐Martos, Jesus , Aránega, Raquel, Nakashima, Ran , Sato, Shinji , Kaneko, Yuko , Gono, Takahisa, Tomaras, Stylianos , Aharonov, Mr Or, Nagy‐Vincze, Melinda , Schrieber, Karen, bouchti, Pr Imane El, Baba, Zineb, Ima-Edomwonyi, Uyi, Dedeke, Ibukunoluwa, Madu, Nwankwo Henry, Yerima, Abubakar , Olaosebikan, Hakeem , Becky, A, Koussougbo, Ouma Devi , Palalane, Elisa, Limaye, Vidya, Hudson, Marie , Landon‐Cardinal, Océane, Zuleta, Wilmer Gerardo Rojas, Cajas, Javier, Silva, José António Pereira, Doskaliuk, Bohdana , Chinchay, Lyn , Bernaola, José Proaño, Pimentel, Victorio, Harifi, Ghita, Fuentes-Silva, Yurilís , Cabriza, Karoll, Losanto, Jonathan, Colaman, Nelly, Cachafeiro-Vilar, Antonio , Bautista, Generoso Guerra , Ho, Enrique Julio Giraldo, González, Raúl, Nunez, Lilith Stange, Vergara, M Cristian, Báez, Jossiell Then , Alonzo, Hugo, Pastelin, Carlos Benito Santiago, Obiols, Alejandro Quiñónez, Chávez, Nilmo , Ordóñez, Andrea Bran , Argueta, Sandra, Quijivix, Daniel, Llerena, Gil Alberto Reyes, Sierra-Zorita, Radames, Arrieta, Dina , Hidalgo, Eduardo Romero, Saénz, Ricardo, M, Roberto Morales Idania Escalante, Calapaqui, Wendy, Quezada, Ivonne, Arredondo, Gabriela, Agarwal, Vikas , Giollo, Alessandro , Gupta, Latika , Naveen, R , Day, Jessica , Nune, Arvind , Tan, Ai Lyn , Ziade, Nelly , Milchert, Marcin , Parodis, Ioannis , Gracia-Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Kuwana, Masataka , Knitza, Johannes , Pauling, John D , Wincup, Chris , Colunga-Pedraza, Iris J , Merayo-Chalico, Javier , Lilleker, James B , Gheita, Tamer , Distler, Oliver , Chinoy, Hector , Agarwal, Vikas , Aggarwal, Rohit , Gupta, Latika , Agarwal, Vikas , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Zamora Tehozol, Erick Adrian , Dey, Dzifa , Caballero-Uribe, Carlo Vinicio , De Angelis, Rossella , Hoff, Leonardo Santos , Sen, Parikshit , Joshi, Mrudula , Saha, Sreoshy , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Ziadé, Nelly , Jagtap, Kshitij , Gracia‐Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Cavagna, Lorenzo , Chen, Yi‐Ming , Makol, Ashima , Agarwal, Vishwesh , Pauling, John D , Barman, Bhupen , Rojas Serrano, Jorge , Torre, Ignacio García‐De La , Colunga-Pedraza, I. J. , Goo, Phonpen Akawatcharangura , Shumnalieva, Russka , Halabi, Hussein , Gheita, Tamer A. , Chatterjee, Tulika , Distler, Oliver , Saavedra, Miguel A , Aggarwal, Rohit , Group, COVAD Study, Singh, Yogesh Preet , Pilania, Rakesh Kumar , Gupta, Vikas , Kavadichanda, Chengappa G. , Phatak, Sanat B. , Goswami, Rudra P , Mathew, Ashish Jacob , Asranna, Ajay , Pande, Arun K. , Chandwar, Kunal , Cansu, Döndü Üsküdar , Gasparyan, Armen Yuri , Giannini, Margherita , Campagne, Julien , Meyer, Alain , Papa, Nicoletta Del , Sambataro, Gianluca , Govoni, Marcello , Parisi, Simone , Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Sebastiani, Gian Domenico , Fusaro, Enrico , Sebastiani, Marco , Quartuccio, Luca , Franceschini, Franco , Sainaghi, Pier Paolo , Venerito, Vincenzo , Andréoli, Laura , Iannone, Florenzo , Fornaro, Marco , Traboco, Lisa S , Wibowo, Suryo Anggoro Kusumo , Prieto‐González, Sergio , Yoshida, Akira , Kimura, Naoki, Proft, Fabian Nikolai , Holzer, Marie‐Therese , Gromova, Margarita Aleksandrovna , Griger, Zoltán , Hmamouchi, Ihsane , Emorinken, Airenakho , Langguth, Daman , Limaye, Vidya , Needham, Merrilee , Srivastav, Nilesh , Landon‐Cardinal, Océane , Arbeláez-Cortés, Álvaro , Silva, José António Pereira, Fonseca, João Eurico , Zimba, Olena , So, Ho , Ugarte‐Gil, Manuel F. , Fathi, Hanan Mohamed , Mohammed, Reem Hamdy A , Harifi, Ghita , Salinas, Rodrigo Nicolás Garcia

Rheumatology | March 2, 2024 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 597-606

10.1093/rheumatology/keae128 | PMID 38430474 Get It

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study was to explore the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of COVID-19 breakthrough infections (BIs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) using data from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study. Methods A validated patient self-reporting e-survey was circulated by the COVAD study group to collect data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination in 2022. BIs were defined as COVID-19 occurring ≥14 days after two vaccine doses. We compared BI characteristics and severity among patients with IIMs, patients with other autoimmune rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases (AIRD, nrAID), and healthy controls (HCs). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the risk factors for BI, severe BI ,and hospitalizations among patients with IIMs. Results Among the 9449 included responses, BIs occurred in 1447 respondents (15.3%). The median age was 44 years [interquartile range (IQR) 21], 77.4% were female, and 182 BIs (12.9%) occurred among the 1406 patients with IIMs. Multivariable Cox regression among the data for patients with IIMs showed increasing age to be a protective factor for BIs [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97–0.99], and HCQ and SSZ use were risk factors (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.24–2.64, and HR = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.69–8.42, respectively). Glucocorticoid use was a risk factor for a severe BI (HR = 3.61, 95% CI = 1.09–11.8). Non-white ethnicity (HR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.03–6.59) was a risk factor for hospitalization. Compared with other groups, patients with IIMs required more supplemental oxygen therapy (IIMs = 6.0% vs AIRDs = 1.8%, nrAIDs = 2.2% and HCs = 0.9%), intensive care unit admission (IIMs = 2.2% vs AIRDs = 0.6%, nrAIDs and HCs = 0%), advanced treatment with antiviral or monoclonal antibodies (IIMs = 34.1% vs AIRDs = 25.8%, nrAIDs = 14.6% and HCs = 12.8%) and had more hospitalization (IIMs = 7.7% vs AIRDs = 4.6%, nrAIDs = 1.1% and HCs = 1.5%). Conclusion Patients with IIMs are susceptible to severe COVID-19 BIs. Age and immunosuppressive treatments were related to the risk of BIs.
Impaired health-related quality of life in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a cross-sectional analysis from the COVAD-2 e-survey
Yoshida, Akira , Maroufy, Vahed , Kuwana, Masataka , Shaharir, Syahrul Sazliyana , Kadam, Esha , Goo, Phonpen Akawatcharangura , Milchert, Marcin , Dey, Dzifa , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Parodis, Ioannis , Nikiphorou, Elena , Tan, Ai Lyn , Gutiérrez, Carlos Enrique Toro , Caballero‐Uribe, Carlo V. , Ziadé, Nelly , Kibbi, Lina El, Chinoy, Hector , Agarwal, Vikas , Gupta, Latika, Group, COVAD Study, Kardeş, Sinan , Vince, Melinda Nagy, Pandya, Sapan C , Sharma, Aman , Manoj, Manesh , Patro, Pradeepta Sekhar , Ajmani, Sajal, Chowdhury, Abhra Chandra , Shenoy, Padnamabha, Asranna, Ajay, Bommakanti, Keerthi Talari, Shukla, Anuj , Ghodke, Akanksha, Fazal, Zoha Zahid , Vaidya, Binit , Yıldırım, Reşit, Atzeni, Fabiola , Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Orsolini, Giovanni , Angelis, Rossella De , Giollo, Alessandro, Fornaro, Marco, González, Raquel , Nakashima, Ran , Sato, Shinji , Kimura, Naoki , Kaneko, Yuko , Gono, Takahisa , Tomaras, Stylianos, Aharonov, Or, Bouchti, I. El , Baba, Zineb, Maurier, F. , Meyer, Alain, Limaye, Vidya, Hudson, Marie , Landon‐Cardinal, Océane , Zuleta, Wilmer Gerardo Rojas, Cajas, Javier, Silva, José António Pereira, Ima-Edomwonyi, Uyi, Dedeke, Ibukunoluwa, Madu, Nwankwo Henry, Yerima, Abubakar , Becky, A, Koussougbo, Oruma Devi, Palalane, Elisa, So, Ho, Chinchay, Lyn , Bernaola, José Proaño, Pimentel, Victorio, Fathi, Hanan Mohammed, Harifi, Ghita, Cabriza, Karoll, Losanto, Jonathan, Colaman, Nelly, Cachafeiro-Vilar, Antonio , Bautista, Generoso Guerra , Ho, Enrique Julio Giraldo, Nunez, Lilith Stange, Vergara, Cristián, Báez, Jossiell Then , Alonzo, Hugo, Pastelin, Carlos Benito Santiago, Obiols, Alejandro Quiñónez, Chávez, Nilmo , Ordóñez, Andrea Bran , Llerena, Gil Alberto Reyes, Sierra-Zorita, Radames, Arrieta, Dina , Hidalgo, Eduardo Romero, Saénz, Ricardo, Mendoza, Idania Escalante, Calapaqui, Wendy, Quezada, Ivonne, Arredondo, Gabriela, Patel, Aarat , Tehozol, Erick Adrian Zamora , Chalico, Javier Merayo, Chibuzo, Okwara Celestine , Katchamart, Wanruchada , Hasan, A T M Tanveer , Salim, Babur , Gupta, Latika , Kuwana, Masataka , Lilleker, James B , Day, Jessica , Milchert, Marcin , Dey, Dzifa , Gracia-Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Parodis, Ioannis , Tan, Ai Lyn , Nune, Arvind , Ziade, Nelly , Knitza, Johannes , Distler, Oliver , Chinoy, Hector , Aggarwal, Rohit , Gupta, Latika , Agarwal, Vikas , Velikova, Tsvetelina , Zamora Tehozol, Erick Adrian , Caballero-Uribe, Carlo Vinicio , Yoshida, Akira , De Angelis, Rossella , Li, Yuan , Makol, Ashima , Sen, Parikshit , Agarwal, Vishwesh , Day, Jessica , Chen, Yi‐Ming , Saha, Sreoshy , Gracia‐Ramos, Abraham Edgar , Nune, Arvind , Cavagna, Lorenzo , Saavedra, Miguel A , Shinjo, Samuel Katsuyuki , Distler, Oliver , Aggarwal, Rohit , Group, COVAD Study, Griger, Zoltán , Singh, Yogesh Preet , Ranjan, Rajiv , Jain, Avinash , Pilania, Rakesh Kumar , Gupta, Vikas , Kavadichanda, Chengappa G. , Ajmani, Sajal , Phatak, Sanat B. , Goswami, Rudra P , Mathew, Ashish Jacob , Pande, Arun K. , Chandwar, Kunal , Boro, Hiya , Cansu, Döndü Üsküdar , Gasparyan, Armen Yuri , Papa, Nicoletta Del , Sambataro, Gianluca , Govoni, Marcello , Parisi, Simone , Bocci, Elena Bartoloni, Sebastiani, Gian Domenico , Fusaro, Enrico , Sebastiani, Marco , Quartuccio, Luca , Franceschini, Franco , Sainaghi, Pier Paolo , Danieli, Maria Giovanna , Venerito, Vincenzo , Grignaschi, Silvia , Giollo, Alessandro, Alunno, Alessia , Iannone, Florenzo , Traboco, Lisa S , Wibowo, Suryo Anggoro Kusumo , Loarce‐Martos, Jesus , Prieto‐González, Sergio , Gonzalez, Raquel Aranega, Tomaras, Stylianos , Proft, Fabian Nikolai , Holzer, Marie‐Therese , Gromova, Margarita Aleksandrovna , Hmamouchi, Ihsane , Baba, Zineb, Giannini, Margherita , Campagne, Julien , Meyer, Alain , Langguth, Daman , Limaye, Vidya , Needham, Merrilee , Srivastav, Nilesh , Arbeláez-Cortés, Álvaro , Cajas, Javier, Silva, José António Pereira, Fonseca, João Eurico , Zimba, Olena , Doskaliuk, Bohdana , Emorinken, Airenakho , Olaosebikan, Hakeem , Ugarte‐Gil, Manuel F. , Mohammed, Reem Hamdy A , Harifi, Ghita , Fuentes-Silva, Yurilís , Salinas, Rodrigo Nicolás Garcia , Andréoli, Laura , Lini, Daniele , Schreiber, Karen , Pauling, John D , Wincup, Chris , Barman, Bhupen , Rojas Serrano, Jorge , Torre, Ignacio García-De La, Colunga-Pedraza, I. J. , Shumnalieva, Russka , Hoff, Leonardo Santos , Halabi, Hussein , Gheita, Tamer A. , Chatterjee, Tulika

Rheumatology Advances in Practice | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/rap/rkae028 | PMID 38524696 Get It

Abstract Objectives To investigate health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) compared with those with non-IIM autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and without autoimmune diseases (controls) using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument data obtained from the second COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune disease (COVAD-2) e-survey database. Methods Demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, disease activity, treatments and PROMIS instrument data were analysed. Primary outcomes were PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores. Factors affecting GPH and GMH scores in IIMs were identified using multivariable regression analysis. Results We analysed responses from 1582 IIM, 4700 non-IIM AIRD and 545 nrAID patients and 3675 controls gathered through 23 May 2022. The median GPH scores were the lowest in IIM and non-IIM AIRD patients {13 [interquartile range (IQR) 10–15] IIMs vs 13 [11–15] non-IIM AIRDs vs 15 [13–17] nrAIDs vs 17 [15–18] controls, P &lt; 0.001}. The median GMH scores in IIM patients were also significantly lower compared with those without autoimmune diseases [13 (IQR 10–15) IIMs vs 15 (13–17) controls, P &lt; 0.001]. Inclusion body myositis, comorbidities, active disease and glucocorticoid use were the determinants of lower GPH scores, whereas overlap myositis, interstitial lung disease, depression, active disease, lower PROMIS Physical Function 10a and higher PROMIS Fatigue 4a scores were associated with lower GMH scores in IIM patients. Conclusion Both physical and mental health are significantly impaired in IIM patients, particularly in those with comorbidities and increased fatigue, emphasizing the importance of patient-reported experiences and optimized multidisciplinary care to enhance well-being in people with IIMs.
Leadless pacemakers at 5-year follow-up: the Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry
Garweg, Christophe , Clementy, Nicolas, Al-Samadi, Faisal, Iacopino, Saverio , Roberts, Paul R. , Johansen, Jens Brock , Vinolas-Prat, X., Cha, Yong‐Mei , Grubman, Eric , Bordachar, Pierre , Fagan, Dedra H. , Piccini, Jonathan P. , El-Chami, Mikhael F , Garweg, Christophe , Johansen, Jens Brock , Cha, Yong-Mei , Stromberg, Kurt , El‐Chami, Mikhael F. , Clémenty, Nicolas , Martínez‐Sande, José Luis , Tondo, Claudio , Stromberg, Kurt

European Heart Journal | February 9, 2024 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1241-1251

10.1093/eurheartj/ehae101 | PMID 38426911 Get It

Abstract Background and Aims Prior reports have demonstrated a favourable safety and efficacy profile of the Micra leadless pacemaker over mid-term follow-up; however, long-term outcomes in real-world clinical practice remain unknown. Updated performance of the Micra VR leadless pacemaker through five years from the worldwide post-approval registry (PAR) was assessed. Methods All Micra PAR patients undergoing implant attempts were included. Endpoints included system- or procedure-related major complications and system revision rate for any cause through 60 months post-implant. Rates were compared through 36 months post-implant to a reference dataset of 2667 transvenous pacemaker patients using Fine–Gray competing risk models. Results 1809 patients were enrolled between July 2015 and March 2018 and underwent implant attempts from 179 centres in 23 countries with a median follow-up period of 51.1 months (IQR: 21.6–64.2). The major complication rate at 60 months was 4.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6%–5.5%] and was 4.1% at 36 months, which was significantly lower than the 8.5% rate observed for transvenous systems (HR: .47, 95% CI: .36–.61; P &lt; .001). The all-cause system revision rate at 60 months was 4.9% (95% CI: 3.9%–6.1%). System revisions among Micra patients were mostly for device upgrades (41.2%) or elevated thresholds (30.6%). There were no Micra removals due to infection noted over the duration of follow-up. At 36 months, the system revision rate was significantly lower with Micra vs. transvenous systems (3.2% vs. 6.6%, P &lt; .001). Conclusions Long-term outcomes with the Micra leadless pacemaker continue to demonstrate low rates of major complications and system revisions and an extremely low incidence of infection.
Abstract A037: Investigating the role of the somatic DDX41 variant in the context of DDX41 hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes (HMMS)
Marando, Ludovica , Kusne, Yael , Morris, Audrey, Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Finke, Christy M. , Crawley, Carles, Foran, James M. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Gangat, Naseema , He, Rong , Viswanatha, David S., Basheer, Faisal, Litzow, Mark R. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Badar, Talha , Lasho, Terra L. , King, Andrew Peter , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Wong, Chi, Ferrer, Alejandro , Vassiliou, George S.

Cancer Research | February 1, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 3_Supplement_2 | Pages: A037-A037

10.1158/1538-7445.canevol23-a037 Get It

Abstract Heterozygous germline variants in DDX41 are identified in ~5% of patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Recognition of the hereditary nature of such cancers and a better understanding of the factors that affect progression to malignancy has deep implications for health surveillance of patients and relatives that share a pathogenic DNA variant. DDX41 has a role in ribosome biogenesis and in opposing R-loop accumulation at promoters, but the mechanisms through which DDX41 loss drives cancer development are poorly understood. In a collaboration between Cambridge, UK and Mayo Clinic, USA we identified 85 patients with germline DDX41 variants [73/85 with germline pathogenic variants (GPV) and 12 with variants of uncertain significance (VUS)]. The majority were identified through targeted myeloid NGS upon presentation with AML (30/85) or MDS (44/85). Average age at diagnosis was 65 (35-93) with male predominance (57/85). The most common GPV was the NM_016222.4(DDX41):c.415_418dup; p.D140Gfs*2 (15/85). The majority (53.4% 39/73), also acquired a somatic variants in the other DDX41 allele (referred to as GPV+Som). The most common somatic variant (82% 32/39) was the R525H, a variant predicted to reduce the ATPase function of the helicase domain. We hypothesise that the markedly reduced DDX41 activity in cells with biallelic variants, is a key cause of progression to overt malignancy. In our cohort, we observed that somatic variants occurred at a similar frequency in association with start loss, truncating, splice, in-frame deletion, and missense GPV. However, whereas MDS was the predominant diagnosis within GPV (67.6% 23/34, AML 26.4% 9/34), AML was the most frequent diagnosis within GPV+Som (AML 51%.2 20/39, MDS 38.4% 15/39). Overall, there was a significantly higher likelihood of AML in the presence of a somatic variant (p&lt;0.05), suggesting that there might be a dosage effect on the phenotype. This pattern was observed across all the GPV, with the exception of missense, suggesting that many might be benign polymorphysms. In addition, although somatic variants are typically subclonal (overall mean variant allele fraction VAF=9.87%, 3-27.8%), we observed a higher somatic VAF in AML over MDS cases (12.4% vs 7.7% respectively p&lt;0.05). A lower bone marrow cellularity was also characteristic of GPV+Som vs GPV alone (mean observed/expected cellularity for age 0.9 vs 1.32 respectively p&lt;0.05). In two cases, serial bone marrow morphology and NGS data were available, and we observed marked reduction in bone marrow cellularity upon acquisition of the R525H clone. The mechanisms of AML evolution appear different in DDX41 HMMS compared to sporadic cases. Interestingly, over half of our patients (21/34 GPV and 23/39 GPV+Som) did not exhibit additional somatic drivers. Our work suggests that acquisition of a somatic variant is a critical event in disease progression. Furthermore, the near universally subclonal nature of somatic variants suggest that they may affect disease phenotype through non-cell autonomous mechanisms. Citation Format: Ludovica Marando, Talha Badar, Yael Kusne, Audrey Morris, Terra Lasho, Abhishek Mangaonkar, Christy Finke, Carles Crawley, James M. Foran, Aref Al-Kali, Andrew King, Hassan Alkhateeb, Naseema Gangat, Chi Wong, Rong He, David Viswanatha, Faisal Basheer, Mark Litzow, Alejandro Ferrer, George Vassiliou, Mrinal Patnaik. Investigating the role of the somatic DDX41 variant in the context of DDX41 hereditary myeloid malignancy syndromes (HMMS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Cancer Evolution and Data Science: The Next Frontier; 2023 Dec 3-6; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A037.
A cost-effectiveness analysis assessing systemic treatments in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by volume of disease.
Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Faisal, Kunwer Sufyan , Khakwani, Kaneez Zahra Rubab, Houten, Holly K. Van , Sharma, Vidit , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Humphreys, Mitchell R. , Cobran, Ewan K. , Khan, Muhammad Ali , Moriarty, James P. , Borah, Bijan J. , Singh, Parminder Pal , Childs, Daniel S. , Sartor, Oliver , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Bryce, Alan H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 93-93

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.93 Get It

93 Background: The treatment paradigm for mCSPC patients has rapidly evolved over the last few years with the emergence of triplet therapy and prognostication by volume of disease. However, the health economic implications of triplet therapy by disease volume remain unclear. Methods: A Markov model where patients transitioned between the progression-free, progression and death states was developed. State utilities were derived from the LATITUDE trial. Point probabilities for overall survival, progression-free survival, grade ≥ 3 and 5 toxicities were obtained from the eligible mCSPC phase III clinical trials. Medicare Advantage and commercial total paid amounts (2022 US$) of treatments were obtained from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Costs and disutilities of adverse events were derived from published literature. Half-cycle corrected costs and utilities were accrued monthly over a 20-year lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3%. Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000 was used. Results: In terms of Medicare Advantage payer’s perspective (Table), docetaxel (D)+ADT was observed to provide additional 0.068 QALYs compared to ADT at an ICER of US$16,544 per QALY in high volume disease. Compared to D+ADT, abiraterone (AAP) triplet provided additional 1.03 QALYs at US$56,641 per QALY. Compared to AAP triplet, apalutamide (APA)+ADT provided additional 0.048 QALYs at US$5,846,248 per QALY in high volume disease. In low volume disease, D+ADT provided 0.45 more QALYs at US$20,690 per QALY compared to ADT alone. Compared to D+ADT, AAP triplet provided an additional 1.51 QALYS at US$44,267 per QALY. In terms of total paid commercial costs, AAP triplet provided an additional 1.19 QALYs compared to ADT at US$91,952 per QALY in high volume disease. In low volume, D+ADT provided additional 0.38 QALYs at US$22,058 per QALY compared to ADT. Compared to D+ADT, AAP triplet provided a 0.97 QALY gain at US$105,958 per QALY. Compared to AAP triplet, darolutamide (DARO) triplet provided a 0.47 QALY at US$689,196 per QALY. Compared to DARO triplet, APA+ADT provided an additional 0.49 QALYs at an ICER of US$971,389 per QALY. All other treatments (not reported here) were dominated. Conclusions: At the selected WTP of US$100,000 per QALY, AAP triplet therapy was most likely the cost-effective strategy in overall mCSPC population particularly in patients with high volume disease. However, these results should be interpreted with careful accounting for timing of metastases. [Table: see text]