Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

71 citation(s) found for "Quevedo, João".

Paclitaxel and carboplatin after disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitor for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Jang, Albert , Muniz, Miguel, Spychalla, Megan, Burns, Timothy, Singh, Amrit , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Costello, Brian A., Orme, Jacob J. , Quevedo, J. Fernando , Pagliaro, Lance C. , Muniz, Miguel , Childs, Daniel S , Pagliaro, Lance C , Jang, Albert , Spychalla, Megan, Costello, Brian A. , Childs, Daniel S.

Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy | July 29, 2026 | Volume: 7 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.37349/etat.2026.1002387 | PMID 42539996 Get It

Aim: Despite advances with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens in the past decade, patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) face a poor prognosis with few approved options. Platinum-based chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) +/– ICI may be a feasible choice. Methods: We generated an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective database of patients at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center with mUC who started TC +/– ICI after disease progression on ICI from January 2018 through December 2024. Baseline demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment outcomes were extracted from the electronic health record. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: There were 32 patients who fit inclusion criteria, including 31 patients who had disease progression on ICI in the metastatic setting and 1 patient who developed metastatic disease on adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–14) of TC over median 12 weeks (range 3–53). Overall, 81% of patients received TC concurrently with an ICI, and 28% continued maintenance ICI after TC discontinuation (at the treating oncologist’s discretion due to adequate response or toxicity). The best objective response rate was 41% and disease control rate was 75%, with median DOR of 4.8 months (IQR 2.7–10.4), median PFS of 4.6 months (IQR 3.3–10.2), and median OS of 9.4 months (IQR 6.3–15.9). Some patients in this series had very durable responses with PFS > 12 months and OS > 24 months. TC +/– ICI was overall well tolerated with expected type and severity of adverse events. Conclusions: Strategies to overcome ICI resistance are needed, and TC +/– ICI after disease progression on an ICI shows promising tolerability and efficacy in this setting for patients with mUC. Our series was notable for some patients having a durable response. Validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
A Novel Emerin/Nesprin-3 Interaction Mediates Nuclear Size Changes Induced by Oncogenic KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer Cells
LaRue-Nolan, Kayla C. , Flores, Luis F., Vera, Renzo E., Sigafoos, Ashley N. , Garcia, Laura Hilario, Almada, Luciana L. , Tader, Brooke R , Rodriguez-Quevedo, Maria F. , Marks, David L. , Roux, Kyle J., Fernandez-Zapico, Martin E., Flores, Luis F. , Hilario Garcia, Laura, Vera, Renzo E., Hilario-Garcia, Laura, May, Danielle G. , Roux, Kyle J. , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E.

Molecular and Cellular Biology | May 23, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 746-765

10.1080/10985549.2026.2670710 | PMID 42175908 Get It

Comparison of neuropsychological side effects between contemporary radiofrequency ablative neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders and conventional neurosurgical procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis
Vilela-Filho, Osvaldo , Bannach, Matheus A., Lino-Filho, Adriano M. , Nuttin, Bart , Hariz, Marwan , Schulder, Michael , Greenberg, Benjamin David, Cosgrove, Rees, Oliveira-Souza, Ricardo de, Horn, Andreas, Sheth, Sameer A, Kubu, Cynthia S. , Salem, Sherif, Zaccariotti, Alice Jardim, Tavares, Naraiana O, Damasceno, Benito Pereira, Lozano, Andres M, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Kühn, JP, Slavin, K. V., Lopes, A. Dwight, Vattimo, Edoardo FQ, Coyne, Terry, Akram, Harith, Toda, Hiroki , Halpern, Casey H. , Coenen, Volker A., Gorgulho, Alessandra, Andrade, Pablo, Wu, Hemmings , Sun, Bomin, Belmonte-De-Abreu, Paulo, Cosyns, Paul, McLaughlin, Nicole , Giordano, Prof. J., Berk, Michael, Chabardes, Stephan, Abbadi, Najia E, Salles, Antonio Afonso Ferreira De, Enslin, Nico, Sousa, Marcelo Basso de, Oliveira, José Oswaldo, Labruna, Rodrigo, Reis, Antonio Marcos dos , Jiménez-Ponce, Fiacro , Ferragut, Maria Alice, Régis, Jean, Lipsman, Nir , Rezai, Ali R. , Schuurman, Rick, Martínez-Álvarez, Roberto, Broggi, Giovanni, Huys, Daniel, Bervoets, Chris , Oliveira, P. A., Ragazzo, Paulo C., Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel, Polosan, Mircea , Naesström, Matilda, Ribeiro, Telma MC, Lee, Kendall H, Hodaie, Mojgan , Sitnikov, Andrey, Yilmaz, Atilla, Almahariq, F., Rios, Adriana L Lopez, Gonçalves-Ferreira, António, Lozano, Andrés M. , Huys, Daniel , Enslin, Nico , Nuttin, Bart , Hariz, Marwan , Sheth, Sameer A , Damasceno, Benito Pereira , Kuhn, Jens , Slavin, Konstantin V. , Doshi, Paresh , Toda, Hiroki , Andrade, Pablo , Zrinzo, Ludvic , Chabardes, Stephan , Chang, Jin Woo , Polosan, Mircea , Hodaie, Mojgan , Almahariq, Fadi , Nico Enslin, Johannes M , Hamani, Clement , Greenberg, Benjamin D. , Oliveira‐Souza, Ricardo de , Sheth, Sameer A. , Zaccariotti, Alice Jardim , Tavares, Naraiana de Oliveira , Mayberg, Helen S. , Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle E. R. M. , Falkai, Peter , Lopes, Antonio C, Vattimo, Edoardo Filippo de Queiroz , Akram, Harith , Blomstedt, Patric C. , Quevedo, João , Belmonte-de-Abreu, Paulo Silva , Alkhani, Ahmed M. , Berk, Michael , Yatham, Lakshmi N. , Abbadi, Najia El , Salles, Antonio A. F. De, Chang, Jin Woo , Régis, Jean , Torres, Cristina V. , Taira, Takaomi , Barcia, Juan Antonio , Schuurman, Rick , Dougherty, Darin Dean , Giacobbe, Peter , Lázaro‐Muñoz, Gabriel , Naesström, Matilda , Johansson, Viktoria , Schlaepfer, Thomas Eduard , Neimat, Joseph S. , Sitnikov, A., Yilmaz, Atilla, Almahariq, Fadi, Ríos, Adriana Lucia López , Gonçalves-Ferreira, António JC.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry | April 7, 2026 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 532-541

10.1136/jnnp-2025-337800 | PMID 41946555 Get It

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.
Olanzapine for managing side effects from tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.
Koch, Regina M. , Muniz, Miguel, Peskey, Candy S , Jatoi, Aminah , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Orme, Jacob J. , Pagliaro, Lance C. , Quevedo, Fernando , Costello, Brian A. , Spychalla, Megan, Heath, Elisabeth I. , D’Andre, Stacy D. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Zakharia, Yousef , Singh, Parminder Pal , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth , Childs, Daniel S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 524-524

10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.524 Get It

524 Background: Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) play a key role in treating renal cell carcinoma and other solid organ malignancies, but TKIs cause bothersome side effects that frequently necessitate dose reductions or treatment holds. Olanzapine has been useful for palliating symptoms from classical chemotherapies and advanced cancer, but its effect on TKI-related symptoms is largely unknown. This retrospective study aimed to estimate the efficacy of olanzapine for TKI-induced nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, and insomnia. Methods: All patients prescribed olanzapine with lenvatinib, cabozantinib, axitinib, or tivozanib at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2024 were assessed for inclusion. For baseline symptom assessment, clinical care team notes documenting the presence or absence of symptoms and indication(s) for starting olanzapine were reviewed. For response assessment, clinical notes and patient portal messages from the first three months after starting olanzapine were evaluated for qualitative descriptions of change in symptom burden. Relevant data were extracted as direct quotations, which were reviewed by the research team and categorized as “improved,” “worsened,” “stable,” or “missing data.” Each symptom domain was analyzed independently when olanzapine was prescribed for multiple interrelated symptoms. Results: A total of 60 patients who received olanzapine for the treatment of TKI-related adverse effects were included. The most common documented indication for olanzapine was nausea without vomiting (n=35), followed by anorexia (n=25), nausea with vomiting (n=16), weight loss (n=16), and insomnia (n=11). In 32 cases (53%), olanzapine was prescribed for multiple, simultaneous symptoms. Response rates for each symptom domain are shown in the table. In addition, prior to olanzapine, 34 patients (57%) had documented weight loss. Following olanzapine, 50% (n=17) gained weight (median increase: 6.1 kg; range: 2.0 - 10.7 kg), 26% (n=9) stabilized their weight (±1 kg), and 24% (n=8) continued to lose weight. Clinicians utilized a TKI dose reduction within one week of olanzapine initiation in 5 cases (8.3%), and 3 of these patients could resume the higher dose of TKI after starting olanzapine. Only 4 patients (7%) discontinued olanzapine within 3 months due to perceived side effects. Conclusions: Olanzapine appears to be effective in treating TKI-induced nausea, vomiting, anorexia, insomnia, and weight loss. Prospective randomized placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings. Improvedn (%) Worsened n (%) Stablen (%) Missing Datan (%) Nausea without emesis 32 (84) 3 (8) 1 (3) 2 (5) Nausea with emesis 13 (93) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (7) Anorexia 26 (74) 2 (6) 4 (11) 3 (9) Insomnia 11 (85) 0 (0) 2 (15) 0 (0)
Utility of post-treatment SPECT/CT for identifying disease progression in patients with mCRPC treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617.
Muniz, Miguel, Sartor, Alton Oliver, Orme, Jacob J. , Koch, Regina M. , Kase, Adam M. , Kendi, Ayşe Tuba Karagülle, Bilgin, Gokce Belge , Nikanpour, Yalda , Kwon, Eugene D., Quevedo, Fernando , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Thorpe, Matthew , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Childs, Daniel S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 114-114

10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.114 Get It

114 Background: Oncologists have traditionally relied upon serial assessments of PSA and periodic imaging (i.e., every 2 to 3 cycles) to monitor treatment response. Early identification of disease progression allows for faster transitions to alternative therapies that might be more effective. In this study, we evaluated the utility of post-treatment SPECT/CT for earlier detection of treatment failure in patients receiving Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 (LuPSMA). Methods: We queried an IRB-approved registry including all patients starting LuPSMA at Mayo Clinic, MN, in the interval of March 2022 to March 2023. Those receiving fewer than 2 cycles of treatment and missing SPECT/CT data were excluded. We reviewed clinical notes to document the date and reason(s) for treatment discontinuation. The assembled cohort consists of patients stopping LuPSMA for progressive disease ([PD], categorized as biochemical, radiographic, or both). Results of the prior SPECT/CT imaging reports were reviewed. At our institution SPECT/CT images are typically acquired on the day after each infusion. Metrics collected from the radiology reports included: new foci of PSMA localization since the prior PSMA PET or SPECT/CT, suspicion for new non-PSMA avid disease, and a visual determination of PSMA-avid tumor volume. Results: A total of 256 patients received an initial cycle of LuPSMA. SPECT/CT imaging data for at least 2 consecutive treatment cycles was available for 68 patients who developed PD after a median (IQR) of 3 (2-4) cycles. There were 55 patients (81%) with both biochemical and radiographic evidence of PD, 7 (10%) with biochemical only progression, and 6 (9%) with radiographic only progression. The most used imaging modality for response assessment was PSMA PET/CT (n=46, 67%), followed by conventional imaging (n=9, 13%), and choline PET/CT (n=5, 7%). The median time between most recent post-therapy SPECT/CT and determination of PD was 39 days. The prior SPECT/CT had detected new foci of PSMA avid disease in 12 (18%) cases and new non-PSMA avid disease in 5 (7%) cases. Two patients had both new PSMA-avid and non-PSMA avid lesions. The most common sites of new PSMA-avid disease on SPECT/CT were bone (n=10) and liver (n=2). A total of 20 (29%) patients had visually increased tumor volume on SPECT/CT, 9 (45%) of which had no new lesions. In total, 24 of 68 patients (35%) had early detection of treatment futility detected by SPECT/CT. At a median (IQR) follow-up time of 8 (6.4-12) mo, the median OS [95% CI] was similar for patients with PD detected on SPECT/CT (7.8 [6.6 – 9] mo) compared to those without clear evidence of PD on SPECT/CT(8.4 [6.4-10.3] mo, p=0.885). Conclusions: Post-treatment SPECT/CT imaging may complement traditional forms of response assessment and provide an earlier warning of treatment failure through identification of new PSMA-avid lesions, non-PSMA avid disease, and increased tumor volume.
Outcomes for 177 Lu-PSMA-617 with and without concurrent use of ARPIs in patients with mCRPC.
Muniz, Miguel, Sartor, Alton Oliver, Orme, Jacob J. , Koch, Regina M. , Quevedo, Fernando , Kase, Adam M. , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Andrews, Jack R. , Bilgin, Gokce Belge , Kwon, Eugene D., Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Thorpe, Matthew , Kendi, A. Tuba , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Childs, Daniel S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 112-112

10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.112 Get It

112 Background: We now have more than a decade of experience using Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs) across various disease states of prostate cancer, and the safety of their combination with Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 has been demonstrated in VISION and other large randomized clinical trials. However, real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes involving combination therapies with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 remain limited. Methods: For this analysis, we utilized the Mayo Clinic Rochester radiopharmaceutical database, a prospectively maintained retrospective database containing all patients who received 177 Lu-PSMA-617 at our institution. We focused on patients who started treatment from March 2022 to March 2023. Patients receiving an ARPI (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide) during the course of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment were identified, inclusive of patients who continued using an ARPI prescribed as a prior line of treatment and those who started (i.e., switched) to a new ARPI. Baseline clinicopathologic and imaging characteristics were abstracted and compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Best PSA response during treatment was reported as a percent decline from baseline. Survival was calculated from the date of the first cycle of 177 Lu-PSMA-617. PSA50 response and overall survival (OS) outcomes for the two groups (concurrent use of ARPI vs. 177 Lu-PSMA-617 alone) were compared using the Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed, including established prognostic factors. Results: An ARPI was prescribed to 106 of the 256 patients (41.4%) starting 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in the interval of March 2022 to March 2023. With regards to baseline characteristics, those receiving an ARPI concurrently with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 had a lower PSA (3.4 vs 29.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and a lower frequency of bone (77.4% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.035) and visceral metastases (18.9 vs 34%, p = 0.008) at start of treatment. Median follow-up for the overall cohort (IQR) was 19.1 months (8.7 – 23.6). Patients receiving an ARPI plus 177 Lu-PSMA-617, as compared to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 alone, were more likely to complete all 6 planned doses of treatment (63.2% vs. 48.7%, p < 0.001), though the PSA50 response rate was similar (49.1% vs 47.3%, p = 0.786). Median OS [95% CI] for the overall cohort was 21.3 [16.7 – 25.9] months and significantly longer for those receiving ARPI with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (NR [NE – NE]) as compared to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 alone (15.3 mo [11.6 – 19.1], p < 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis including known prognostic variables, use of ARPI was not independently associated with improved survival (HR = 1.03 [CI: 0.68 to 1.55], p = 0.891). Conclusions: Patients receiving an ARPI with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 were more likely to complete all 6 cycles of treatment, but no clear differences in survival were observed on multivariate analysis.
Safety evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) during lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Kessel, Adam , Muniz, Miguel, O'Byrne, J, Phillips, Ryan , Park, Sean Sunghun, Stish, B.J., Choo, Chunhee Richard, Merrell, Kenneth W. , Kwon, Eugene D., Orme, Jacob J. , Wilson, Jessica , O'Byrne, Jamie T, Davis, Brian J. , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Quevedo, Fernando , Childs, Daniel S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 18, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 129-129

10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.129 Get It

129 Background: Few studies have explored the use of focal therapies to address select sites of resistant disease in men receiving 177-Lu-PSMA-617 for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our institutional practice is to offer SBRT for patients with up to 5 sites of oligoprogression or non-responding lesions while undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for 6 cycles total). This is determined by PSMA or choline PET imaging during the course of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Herein, we evaluated the safety of adding target SBRT during treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: This retrospective single institution analysis was conducted via systematic chart review to evaluate for adverse events during or after treatment. Grading of treatment-related adverse events was conducted using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5). Results: Thirty-one patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 with 51 sites of oligoprogressive or non-responding metastatic disease were treated with SBRT. The median number of sites treated was 1 (range 1-4). Most patients received SBRT immediately after cycle 6 (32%) or after cycle 3 or 4 (42%). Bone was the most commonly treated site of disease (90%) with the majority (54%) of bone sites being spine or sacrum, followed by lymph nodes (10%). Ultimately, 84% of patients completed all 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (range 4-6). The median follow-up time was 19.1 months (IQR 15.5-22.4) after 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy start. A total of 2 patients experienced a pathologic fracture within the SBRT treatment field that could possibly be related to radiotherapy. One patient experienced a grade 2 neuropathy which may have been related to radiation therapy. Other potential adverse events are listed (Table). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates a low rate of significant toxicity with the use SBRT during treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Further study is indicated to determine the oncologic efficacy and potential late side effects of this treatment strategy. Adverse events. Event All Grades Grade > 3 Any Adverse Event 104 2 Anemia 29 (94%) 0 Low Platelets 11 (35.5%) 1 (3.2%) Any Pathologic Fracture 7 (22.5%) 1 (3.2%) Possible SBRT-related Pathologic Fracture 2 (6.5%) 1 (3.2%) Bone Pain Flare 3 (9.6%) 0 Neuropathy 1 (3.2%) 0
Germline mutations in a G protein identify signaling cross-talk in T cells
Ham, Hyoungjun , Jing, Huie , Lamborn, Ian T. , Kober, M. , Anderson, David E. , Druey, Kirk M. , Mandl, Judith N. , Isidor, Bertrand , Freeman, Alexandra F. , Ganesan, Sundar , Karsak, Meliha , Mustillo, Peter , Teo, Juliana , Zolkipli‐Cunningham, Zarazuela , Lecoquierre, François , Schmid, Jana Pachlopnik , Kuhns, Douglas B. , Xu, Xuehua , Al–Herz, Waleed , Terhal, Paulien A., Muurinen, Mari , Barlogis, Vincent , Danielson, Jeffrey J. , Stewart, Helen , Rading, Sebastian, Keren, Boris , Pfundt, Rolph , Potocki, Lorraine , Olivier, Kenneth N., Faivre, Laurence , Wong, Melanie , Puel, Anne , Chou, Janet , Tusseau, Maud, Moutsopoulos, Niki M. , Matthews, Helen, Simons, Cas , Fink, Danielle , Kong, Heidi H. , Kabát, Juraj , Kim, Woo Sung , Bierhals, Tatjana , Meguro, Kazuyuki , Gu, Jingwen , Stoddard, Jennifer , Banos-Pinero, Benito, Slack, Maria A., Trivellin, Giampaolo , Mazel, Benoît , Li, Samuel T. , Watts, Val J. , Rodriguez-Quevedo, Maria F. , Bruel, Ange‐Line , Lehalle, Daphné , Torres, Daniel , Sullivan, Kathleen E. , Duffourd, Yannis, Similuk, Morgan , Blanc, Pierre , Jin, Tian, Geha, Raif S., Casanova, Jean‐Laurent , Mäkitie, Outi , Edery, Patrick , Germain, Ronald N. , Billadeau, Daniel D. , Zhang, Yu , Lenardo, Michael J. , Kober, Megan M , Koval, Alexey , Anderson, D Eric , Druey, Kirk M , Mandl, Judith N , Isidor, Bertrand , Ferreira, Carlos R , Freeman, Alexandra F , Karsak, Meliha , Mustillo, Peter J , Teo, Juliana , Chatron, Nicolas , Lecoquierre, Francois , Oler, Andrew J , Schmid, Jana Pachlopnik , Kuhns, Douglas B , Xu, Xuehua , Hauck, Fabian , Al-Herz, Waleed , Wagner, Matias , Terhal, Paulien A , Muurinen, Mari , Barlogis, Vincent , Loid, Petra , Keren, Boris , Pfundt, Rolph , Zarember, Kol A , Vill, Katharina , Olivier, Kenneth N , Lesca, Gaetan , Faivre, Laurence , Puel, Anne , Chou, Janet , Moutsopoulos, Niki M , Simons, Cas , Soldatos, Ariane , Masle-Farquhar, Etienne , Pittaluga, Stefania , Brink, Robert , Kong, Heidi H , Kabat, Juraj , Bierhals, Tatjana , Hsu, Amy P. , Gu, Jingwen , Trivellin, Giampaolo , Mazel, Benoît , Soomann, Maarja , Li, Samuel , Watts, Val J , Stratakis, Constantine A , Rodriguez-Quevedo, Maria F , Bruel, Ange-Line , Lipsanen-Nyman, Marita , Saultier, Paul , Lehalle, Daphne , Torres, Daniel , Barbarot, Sébastien , Neu, Axel , Similuk, Morgan N , McWalter, Kirsty , Blanc, Pierre , Bézieau, Stéphane , Geha, Raif S , Casanova, Jean Laurent , Makitie, Outi M , Edery, Patrick , Christodoulou, John , Germain, Ronald N , Goodnow, Christopher C , Sakmar, Thomas P , Billadeau, Daniel D , Kury, Sebastien , Katanaev, Vladimir L , Zhang, Yu , Lenardo, Michael J , Su, Helen C , Berchiche, Yamina A. , Wagner, Matias , Cruz, Phillip , Lesca, Gaëtan , Tusseau, Maud , Taft, Ryan J. , Pittaluga, Stefania , Baños-Piñero, Benito, Stratakis, Constantine A. , Jain, Rashmi, Bezieau, Stéphane , Jin, Tian , Kubisch, Christian , Küry, Sébastien , Su, Helen C.

Science | September 19, 2024 | Volume: 385 | Issue: 6715 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.add8947 | PMID 39298586 Get It

Humans with monogenic inborn errors responsible for extreme disease phenotypes can reveal essential physiological pathways. We investigated germline mutations in GNAI2 , which encodes G αi2 , a key component in heterotrimeric G protein signal transduction usually thought to regulate adenylyl cyclase–mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production. Patients with activating G αi2 mutations had clinical presentations that included impaired immunity. Mutant G αi2 impaired cell migration and augmented responses to T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation. We found that mutant G αi2 influenced TCR signaling by sequestering the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)–activating protein RASA2, thereby promoting RAS activation and increasing downstream extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT S6 signaling to drive cellular growth and proliferation.
Anti‐manic effect of deep brain stimulation of the ventral tegmental area in an animal model of mania induced by methamphetamine
Houghton, Tristan, Lee, Kendall H. , Bennet, Kevin E. , Quevedo, João , Valvassori, Samira S. , Quevedo, João , Tye, Susannah J , Varela, Roger B. , Boschen, Suelen L. , Yates, Nathanael J. , Blaha, Charles D. , Kouzani, Abbas Z. , Berk, Michael , Tye, Susannah J.

Bipolar Disorders | April 1, 2024 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 376-387

10.1111/bdi.13423 | PMID 38558302 Get It

Abstract Background Treatment of refractory bipolar disorder (BD) is extremely challenging. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) holds promise as an effective treatment intervention. However, we still understand very little about the mechanisms of DBS and its application on BD. Aim The present study aimed to investigate the behavioural and neurochemical effects of ventral tegmental area (VTA) DBS in an animal model of mania induced by methamphetamine (m‐amph). Methods Wistar rats were given 14 days of m‐amph injections, and on the last day, animals were submitted to 20 min of VTA DBS in two different patterns: intermittent low‐frequency stimulation (LFS) or continuous high‐frequency stimulation (HFS). Immediately after DBS, manic‐like behaviour and nucleus accumbens (NAc) phasic dopamine (DA) release were evaluated in different groups of animals through open‐field tests and fast‐scan cyclic voltammetry. Levels of NAc dopaminergic markers were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results M‐amph induced hyperlocomotion in the animals and both DBS parameters reversed this alteration. M‐amph increased DA reuptake time post‐sham compared to baseline levels, and both LFS and HFS were able to block this alteration. LFS was also able to reduce phasic DA release when compared to baseline. LFS was able to increase dopamine transporter (DAT) expression in the NAc. Conclusion These results demonstrate that both VTA LFS and HFS DBS exert anti‐manic effects and modulation of DA dynamics in the NAc. More specifically the increase in DA reuptake driven by increased DAT expression may serve as a potential mechanism by which VTA DBS exerts its anti‐manic effects.
Utility of PSMA PET/CT for imaging ductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Mahmoud, Ahmed , Muniz, Miguel, Orme, Jacob J. , Andrews, Jack R. , Kase, Adam M. , Ravi, Praful , Kwon, Eugene D., Mahmoud, Ahmed M , Navin, Patrick J. , Quevedo, Fernando , Mosalem, Osama , Bryce, Alan H. , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Burkett, Brian J. , Kendi, A. Tuba , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Sartor, Oliver , Childs, Daniel S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 49-49

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.49 Get It

49 Background: Ductal carcinoma (DC) is the second most commonly encountered histologic variant of prostate cancer. Previous studies have described its molecular features and aggressive behavior, but few have explored the performance of PSMA PET/CT in the initial staging and follow-up of DC. Methods: To address this gap, we performed a single-institution retrospective analysis using the Mayo Clinic PSMA PET database. All patients receiving a PSMA PET/CT scan in the interval of January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Cases were filtered and categorized by histology at the time of diagnosis to select for pure DAC and mixed ductal variants. Trained research personnel annotated disease- and treatment-related variables. A board-certified radiologist performed tumor burden segmentation with calculations of SUV max, total lesion SUV mean and volume, and total lesion uptake, and ascribed a miPSMA expression score. Results: We queried 1792 patients from our PSMA PET/CT registry and identified 32 (1.8%) patients with a pathologically confirmed DC, including 8 (25%) patients with pure ductal and 25 (75%) patients with mixed histology. The indication for PSMA PET/CT was biochemical progression or restaging for 29 (91%) patients and initial staging for 3 (9%) patients. The median (IQR) time from prostate cancer diagnosis to PSMA PET scan was 41.6 (11.5-64.7) months, during this time 50% (n= 16) of patients developed CRPC. At the time of the PSMA PET/CT scan, the median age was 70 years, the median (IQR) PSA was 0.5 ng/mL (0.2-2.6). The distribution of metastatic spread and quantitative imaging parameters from PSMA PET are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Despite low PSA at the time of imaging, PSMA PET/CT frequently detected high volume osseous and/or visceral metastases in patients with DC. However, it is noteworthy that more than 50% of patients with DC had a low miPSMA score (0-1). Additional studies are needed to better understand the performance of novel imaging modalities when evaluating variant prostate cancers. [Table: see text]