Back to Authors

Quevedo, J. Fernando

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2137-3723

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Paclitaxel and carboplatin after disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitor for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Jang, Albert , Muniz, Miguel, Spychalla, Megan, Burns, Timothy, Singh, Amrit , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Costello, Brian A., Orme, Jacob J. , Quevedo, J. Fernando , Pagliaro, Lance C. , Muniz, Miguel , Childs, Daniel S , Pagliaro, Lance C , Jang, Albert , Spychalla, Megan, Costello, Brian A. , Childs, Daniel S.

Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy | July 29, 2026 | Volume: 7 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.37349/etat.2026.1002387 Get It

Aim: Despite advances with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens in the past decade, patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) face a poor prognosis with few approved options. Platinum-based chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) +/– ICI may be a feasible choice. Methods: We generated an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective database of patients at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center with mUC who started TC +/– ICI after disease progression on ICI from January 2018 through December 2024. Baseline demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment outcomes were extracted from the electronic health record. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: There were 32 patients who fit inclusion criteria, including 31 patients who had disease progression on ICI in the metastatic setting and 1 patient who developed metastatic disease on adjuvant nivolumab. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–14) of TC over median 12 weeks (range 3–53). Overall, 81% of patients received TC concurrently with an ICI, and 28% continued maintenance ICI after TC discontinuation (at the treating oncologist’s discretion due to adequate response or toxicity). The best objective response rate was 41% and disease control rate was 75%, with median DOR of 4.8 months (IQR 2.7–10.4), median PFS of 4.6 months (IQR 3.3–10.2), and median OS of 9.4 months (IQR 6.3–15.9). Some patients in this series had very durable responses with PFS > 12 months and OS > 24 months. TC +/– ICI was overall well tolerated with expected type and severity of adverse events. Conclusions: Strategies to overcome ICI resistance are needed, and TC +/– ICI after disease progression on an ICI shows promising tolerability and efficacy in this setting for patients with mUC. Our series was notable for some patients having a durable response. Validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
“Malignant” Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasm: Risk Stratification and Treatment Strategies
Bleeker, Jonathan , Quevedo, J. Fernando , Folpe, Andrew L.

Sarcoma | April 26, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-12

10.1155/2012/541626 Get It

Purpose . Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are a rare collection of tumors characterized by a myomelanocytic phenotype, and PEComas occurring in “nonclassic” anatomic distributions are known as perivascular epithelioid cell tumor not otherwise specified (PEComa-NOS). This review aims to compile and analyze cases of PEComa-NOS in an effort to better define their natural history. Design . We evaluated all 234 cases of PEComa-NOS reported in the English literature, extracting information regarding diagnostic features, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Multivariate analysis of a number of variables evaluable on pathologic review was performed to refine preexisting risk stratification criteria. Outcomes for patients receiving nonsurgical treatment are also reported. Results . Primary tumor size ≥5 cm ( P = 0.02 ) and a high (1/50 HPF) mitotic rate ( P < 0.0001 ) were the only factors significantly associated with recurrence following surgical resection. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy have shown little benefit in treating PEComa-NOS; mTOR inhibition is emerging as a treatment option. Conclusion . Progress has been made in understanding the natural history and molecular biology of PEComa-NOS. This review further clarifies risk of recurrence in this disease, allowing clinicians to better risk stratify patients. Further work should focus on applying this knowledge to making treatment decisions for patients with this disease.