Peskey, Candy S

524 Background: Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) play a key role in treating renal cell carcinoma and other solid organ malignancies, but TKIs cause bothersome side effects that frequently necessitate dose reductions or treatment holds. Olanzapine has been useful for palliating symptoms from classical chemotherapies and advanced cancer, but its effect on TKI-related symptoms is largely unknown. This retrospective study aimed to estimate the efficacy of olanzapine for TKI-induced nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, and insomnia. Methods: All patients prescribed olanzapine with lenvatinib, cabozantinib, axitinib, or tivozanib at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2024 were assessed for inclusion. For baseline symptom assessment, clinical care team notes documenting the presence or absence of symptoms and indication(s) for starting olanzapine were reviewed. For response assessment, clinical notes and patient portal messages from the first three months after starting olanzapine were evaluated for qualitative descriptions of change in symptom burden. Relevant data were extracted as direct quotations, which were reviewed by the research team and categorized as “improved,” “worsened,” “stable,” or “missing data.” Each symptom domain was analyzed independently when olanzapine was prescribed for multiple interrelated symptoms. Results: A total of 60 patients who received olanzapine for the treatment of TKI-related adverse effects were included. The most common documented indication for olanzapine was nausea without vomiting (n=35), followed by anorexia (n=25), nausea with vomiting (n=16), weight loss (n=16), and insomnia (n=11). In 32 cases (53%), olanzapine was prescribed for multiple, simultaneous symptoms. Response rates for each symptom domain are shown in the table. In addition, prior to olanzapine, 34 patients (57%) had documented weight loss. Following olanzapine, 50% (n=17) gained weight (median increase: 6.1 kg; range: 2.0 - 10.7 kg), 26% (n=9) stabilized their weight (±1 kg), and 24% (n=8) continued to lose weight. Clinicians utilized a TKI dose reduction within one week of olanzapine initiation in 5 cases (8.3%), and 3 of these patients could resume the higher dose of TKI after starting olanzapine. Only 4 patients (7%) discontinued olanzapine within 3 months due to perceived side effects. Conclusions: Olanzapine appears to be effective in treating TKI-induced nausea, vomiting, anorexia, insomnia, and weight loss. Prospective randomized placebo-controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings. Improvedn (%) Worsened n (%) Stablen (%) Missing Datan (%) Nausea without emesis 32 (84) 3 (8) 1 (3) 2 (5) Nausea with emesis 13 (93) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (7) Anorexia 26 (74) 2 (6) 4 (11) 3 (9) Insomnia 11 (85) 0 (0) 2 (15) 0 (0)

Abstract Background The overall survival of patients with advanced thyroid cancers that have progressed following targeted therapies is limited, indicating a strong need for salvage treatments. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with refractory advanced thyroid cancer treated with pemetrexed‐carboplatin (PC) at Mayo Clinic since 2019. Results Eleven patients, three with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), seven with differentiated or poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and one with oncocytic carcinoma of the thyroid, were treated with novel salvage PC. Patients with DTC ( n = 7) had durable responses with a median progression‐free survival of 29 months. One responder included a patient with ATC whose disease progressed following pembrolizumab/axitinib, lenvatinib, and dabrafenib/trametinib. On this fourth line treatment, the patient remains on therapy to date, over 12 months after initial response. Conclusions This case series reinforces prior published phase I clinical trial data and shows that pemetrexed can have potent efficacy in the treatment of the most advanced thyroid cancers.

Objective: Redifferentiation therapy (RDT) can restore radioactive iodine (RAI) uptake in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) cells to enable salvage 131 I therapy for previously RAI refractory (RAIR) disease. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RDT and identified clinicopathologic characteristics predictive of RAI restoration following RDT. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 33 patients with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-progressive metastatic RAIR-DTC who underwent RDT between 2017 and 2022 at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). All patients underwent genomic profiling and received MEK, RET or ALK inhibitors alone, or combination BRAF -MEK inhibitors for 4 weeks. At week 3, those with increased RAI avidity in metastatic foci received high-dose 131 I therapy. Baseline and clinicopathologic outcomes were comprehensively reviewed. Results: Of the 33 patients, 57.6% had restored RAI uptake following RDT (Redifferentiated subgroup). 42.1% (8/19) with papillary thyroid cancers (PTC), 100% (4/4) with invasive encapsulated follicular variant PTCs (IEFV-PTCs), and 100% (7/7) with follicular thyroid cancers (FTC) redifferentiated. All (11/11) RAS mutant tumors redifferentiated compared with 38.9% (7/18) with BRAF mutant disease (6 PTC and 1 IEFV-PTC). 76.5% (13/17) of redifferentiated and 66.7% (8/12) of non-redifferentiated patients achieved a best overall RECIST response of stable disease (SD) or non-complete response/non-progressive disease. Both subgroups had a median 12% tumor shrinkage at 3 weeks on drug(s) alone. The redifferentiated subgroup, following high-dose 131 I therapy, achieved an additional median 20% tumor reduction at 6 months after RDT. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in progression free survival (PFS), time to initiation of systemic therapy, and time to any additional therapy. Of the entire cohort, 6.1% (2/33) experienced histologic transformation to anaplastic thyroid cancer, 15.1% (5/33) died, and all had redifferentiated following RDT and received 131 I therapy. Conclusion: RDT has the potential to restore RAI avidity and induce RECIST responses following 131 I therapy in select patients with RAIR-DTC, particularly those with RAS -driven “follicular” phenotypes. In patients with PTC, none of the evaluated clinical outcomes differed statistically between the redifferentiated and non-redifferentiated subgroups. Further studies are needed to better characterize the long-term survival and/or safety outcomes of high-dose RAI following RDT, particularly whether it could be associated with histologic anaplastic transformation.

Abstract Disclosure: D. Toro-Tobon: None. J.C. Morris: None. C. Hilger: None. C.S. Peskey: None. D.M. Jolanta: None. M.M. Ryder: None. Objective: Patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) that are radioactive iodine (RAI) refractory (RAIR) have a poor prognosis. Redifferentiation therapy (RDT) has emerged as a potential approach to restore RAI avidity in this disease. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and predictors of RAI restoration in RAIR disease, as well as examine the outcomes of patients re-treated with high dose RAI following RDT. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 33 patients with RECIST-progressive metastatic RAIR-DTC who underwent RDT between 2017 and 2022 at the Mayo Clinic. All patients underwent genomic profiling, and either MEK inhibitor alone or combination BRAF-MEK inhibitors were prescribed for 4 weeks. At week 3, Thyrogen-stimulated I-123 whole body scans were performed. Those with increased RAI avidity in metastatic foci received high dose I-131 therapy using a previously published modified dosimetry protocol. Baseline and clinicopathologic outcomes were comprehensively reviewed. Results: Of the 33 patients, 12 of 23 (52%) with papillary thyroid cancers (PTC), 4 of 4 (100%) with follicular variant PTCs (FV-PTC), and 7 of 7 (100%) with follicular thyroid cancers (FTC) had restored RAI avidity following RDT using dabrafenib/trametinib (7 for BRAF mutant disease) or trametinib monotherapy (12 for RAS mutant disease). All 11 (100%) RAS mutant tumors (2 PTC, 3 FV-PTC, and 6 FTC) had RAI avidity restoration compared to 7 (36%) with BRAF mutant disease (6 PTC, and 1 FV-PTC). Of the 19 patients (57%) with restored RAI avidity (responders), 18 (94%) received I-131 with a median dose of 294 mCi. The median thyroglobulin (Tg) in responders was 294 mIU/L as compared to 29 mIU/L in non-responders. Following RDT-facilitated I-131 treatment, 94.7% achieved RECIST defined objective response (complete or partial response, stable disease, non-complete response/non-progressive disease) with a median progression free survival of 18 months and an overall survival of 30 months. Overall, patients with FTC (p=0.01), RAS mutation (p<0.001), Tg of 294 mIU/L or more (p=0.03), largest tumor diameter of 1.7 cm or less (p=0.05), bone metastasis (p=0.007), and without locoregional nodal disease (p=0.04), were more likely to demonstrate restored RAI avidity following RDT. Of the entire cohort, 2 (6%) patients experienced histologic transformation to anaplastic thyroid cancer and 5 (15%) patients died, all had had RAI restoration and received high-dose RAI following RDT. Conclusion: RDT has the potential to restore RAI avidity and induce RECIST responses following I-131 therapy in select patients with RAIR-DTC, particularly those with RAS mutations and ‘follicular’ phenotypes. Further studies are needed to better characterize the long-term survival and/or safety outcomes of high-dose RAI following RDT, particularly whether it could be associated with histologic transformation. Presentation Date: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Abstract Background L-asparaginase (LASP) depletion of asparagine reduces antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen and is associated with thromboembolic (TE) and hemorrhagic events (HE). AT replacement in pediatric ALL patients demonstrated safety and potential benefit as thromboprophylaxis in a prospective, randomized trial.(Mitchell et al, 2003) Current consensus supports AT replacement when AT activity is below 60%.(Stock et al, 2011) The incidence of TE and HE in adults receiving AT repletion during LASP or pegylated asparaginase (PEGASP) requires further investigation. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LASP or PEGASP containing chemotherapy regimens between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients with documented thrombophilia and pre-existing TE or HE were excluded. Patients receiving AT concentrate (ATC) compared to those that did not and were evaluated up to 60 days after the last LASP or PEGASP dose for objectively confirmed TE and HE. Results Of the 74 patients screened, 54 (73%) met inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (87%) received ATC and were evaluable. The remaining 7 (13%) did not meet follow up duration and were excluded from further analysis. Twenty-three (49%) patients received LASP, 20 (42%) received PEGASP and 4 (9%) received both. Distribution per treatment protocols was; CALGB 9111 (n=16 (34%), Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=12 (25%), Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=8 (17%), NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=6 (13%), Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented HyperCVAD (n=5 (11%), Faderl et al, 2011). A total of 1465 AT activity levels were analyzed, resulting in 378 doses of ATC. Ten patients (21%) experienced a clinical event, with all events occurring during cycle 1 of chemotherapy (table 1). Median time from last LASP or PEGASP dose to TE was 13 days (range 3-56) with a median of 4 days (range 3-13) from last ATC dose to TE. Median AT activity level at time of TE was 56% (range 47-72). Thrombotic events included; line-related deep vein thrombosis (LRDVT, n=7), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST, n=1) and pulmonary embolism (PE, n=1). One patient with cerebral hemorrhage constituted the only HE. All LRDVT occurred in central venous catheters and management included; line removal (n=3), anticoagulation (n=1), line removal and anticoagulation (n=2) and no intervention (n=1). The single case of PE was managed with anticoagulation. Two patients had a recurrent LRDVT in different locations during subsequent chemotherapy in spite of ongoing ATC supplementation. Conclusions The incidence of TE in adult ALL patients receiving LASP or PEGASP during induction chemotherapy with AT thromboprophylaxis was 19%. LRDVT was the most common TE with a comparable incidence to adult ALL patients not receiving ATC (15%) (Grace et al 2011). There was a small incidence of non-LRDVT (4%) and HE (2%). As induction-phase chemotherapy and placement of central lines are independent risk factors for thrombosis, the cost-effectiveness of AT replacement for prevention of TE during adult ALL treatment requires prospective evaluation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background L-asparaginase (LASP) therapy in adults is associated with frequent hepatic and metabolic side effects, often resulting in dose adjustments and omissions. Pegylated asparaginase (PEGASP) substituted for LASP improves convenience of administration with comparable efficacy; however, adverse event (AE) management remains challenging. The incidence and management of LASP- and PEGASP-induced metabolic and hepatic complications in adult ALL patients is not well defined. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LASP or PEGASP containing chemotherapy regimens between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients were followed up to 60 days after the last LASP or PEGASP dose for development of biochemical and clinical pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia and hepatotoxicity. Hyperglycemia was not analyzed due to confounding variables, such as concomitant corticosteroid administration. AEs were graded as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) version 4.03. Analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard models with odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) reported to demonstrate the strength of association between group and AE rate. Results Of 74 adult patients, 54 (73%) met inclusion criteria. History of dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, cholelithiasis and coronary artery disease was documented at baseline in 13 (24%), 4 (7%), 4 (7%) and 10 (19%) patients, respectively. Twenty eight (52%) patients received LASP, 22 (41%) received PEGASP and 4 (7%) received both. A total of 399 doses including 335 (84%) LASP and 64 (16%) PEGASP were administered. Distribution based on treatment schedules was as follows; CALGB 9111 (n=20 (37%), Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=13 (24%), Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=9 (17%), NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=7 (13%), Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented Hyper-CVAD (n=5 (9%), Faderl et al,2011). Six (11%), 20 (37%), and 53 (98%) patients experienced pancreatic, lipid (hypertriglyceridemia) and hepatic adverse events, respectively. In this group, CTCAE grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 0 (0%), 8 (15%), and 28 (52%) patients, respectively. No deaths were directly related to these complications. Patients receiving PEGASP were more likely to experience AE of any CTCAE grade (OR 11.5, 95% CI 4.4-30.3, p < 0.0001), including grade3/4 AEs (OR 27.9, 95% CI 11.4-68.2, p < 0.0001) in comparison to those receiving LASP. All cases of pancreatitis manifested as biochemical elevation in pancreatic enzymes, and were either grade 1 (n=4, 67%) or grade 2 (n=2, 33%). All patients were managed conservatively. Management of hypertriglyceridemia was heterogeneous across all grades and included observation (n=11, 55%), non-pharmacologic interventions (n=1, 5%), medication management (n=4, 20%) and combined strategies (n=4, 20%). The most common practice was a combination of fibrate derivatives (fenofibrate) and fish oil (n= 5). One patient with a peak triglyceride level of 2285 mg/dL was placed on an insulin/dextrose infusion for 4 days. Hepatic toxicity manifested as CTCAE grade 3/4 transaminitis in 13 (24%) patients, hyperbilirubinemia in 4 (7%) patients and both in 11 (20%) patients. Temporal correlation was used to best distinguish confounding variables including possible hepatoxicity from azole antifungals and other drugs. Management of hepatic toxicity included delay in dosing, subsequent LASP or PEGASP dose reduction and laboratory monitoring until resolution. Overall, deviations in LASP or PEGASP administration were documented in 18 (33%) patients due to metabolic or hepatic AEs. Eight (15%) patients required omission of at least 1 dose, 7 (13%) experienced delays of administration and 7 (13%) needed a dose reduction. Conclusion PEGASP administration resulted in significantly higher AE rates in comparison to LASP and this significance was retained when comparing AEs of CTCAE grade 3 and 4. Given the growing trend of using PEGASP combination chemotherapy in adults with ALL, a detailed analysis looking at the increase in side effects, their consequences (delayed tereatment and dose reductions) and the impact of these factors on disease remission and survival is needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction L-asparaginase therapy results in systemic depletion of antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen (FG), resulting in thrombotic (TE) and hemorrhagic events (HE). Prophylactic correction of coagulation disturbances have been inconclusive with regard to cost effectiveness, and specifically cost effectiveness of antithrombin concentrate (ATC) replacement has not been evaluated. (Abbott et al, 2009, Mitchell et al, 2003). Currently, AT repletion is recommended for levels less than 60%. (Stock et al, 2012) Several treatment protocols with distinctly different L-asparaginase (LAS) or pegaspargase (PEG) doses complicate the frequency and intensity of ATC replacement. We carried out this study to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ATC replacement, based on our institutional practice. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LAS or PEG between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients with hereditary or acquired thrombophilias or pre-existing TE or HE, were excluded. Per institutional guidelines, ATC was administered if levels were less than 70%. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) single drug historical pricing guide was utilized for 2000-2004. ATC cost beginning January 1, 2005, was derived from the CMS average sales price, reported quarterly. To adjust for price differences due to regimen utilization trends, each dose was also calculated at the final 2012 cost of 3.05/unit. ATC repletion practices and estimated expenditures were compared between regimens. Results Fifty four patients were treated with LAS or PEG containing regimens. Of these, 47 (87%) received ATC. Twenty-eight patients received LASP, 22 received PEGASP and 4 received both. Distribution across protocols was; CALGB 9111 (n=20, Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=13, Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=9, NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=7, Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented HyperCVAD (n=5, Faderl et al, 2005). PEG and LAS dosing schemes are outlined in table 1 . LAS doses were converted to PEG upon specific protocol revision or at discontinuation of LAS availability in 2012. Regimens specified a dose cap with the exception of C10403. A total of 399 LAS and PEG doses resulted in 378 instances of ATC repletion. The reimbursement price of ATC in 2000 was estimated at 1.50/unit U.S. dollars (USD) and 3.04/unit USD by the fourth quarter of 2012. The total estimated average sales price was 2,471,745 USD over the study period. C10403 resulted in the highest median number of PEG doses per patient (n = 5) and a median of 17 ATC doses per dose of PEG. This resulted in C10403 being the most expensive regimen with the median expense for ATC replacement being 118,064 USD (chart 1). This conclusion was also seen after comparing different regimens using the most recent 2012 cost estimates. The overall incidence of TE or HE was 17% and equally distributed between regimens (please see accompanying abstract). Conclusions Repletion of ATC in patients receiving asparaginase containing chemotherapy regimens is very expensive and continues to add to costs at many centers, without clear benefit, especially with regards to TE and HE. A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial looking to answer this question is the need of the hour. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.