Citations

Cutaneous metastases occur in up to 20% of patients with advanced melanoma and can be difficult to manage with systemic therapy alone. Pembrolizumab is a standard therapy with limited local treatment options for cutaneous manifestations. Imiquimod has shown activity in other skin cancers but is less well studied in melanoma. We conducted a pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of combining topical imiquimod with intravenous pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable melanoma with cutaneous metastases. This was a single-center, open-label, non-randomized interventional study (NCT03276832). Eligible patients received pembrolizumab IV every 21 days plus topical imiquimod 5% applied Monday–Friday each cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, and safety. In this study, seven patients were enrolled, five were male and two females; one was Hispanic and six were non-Hispanic White. Median treatment exposure was 8 cycles. ORR was 57.1%, with 3 patients (42.9%) achieving complete response, 1 partial response, and 2 stable disease. The 7-month PFS rate was 57.1%. At study closure, 4 patients remained alive without progression, 2 were alive following progression, and 1 had died of disease. Toxicities were mostly grade 1, with fatigue and anemia most common with minimal grade 2 events. The combination of topical imiquimod and pembrolizumab was feasible, safe, and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in unresectable cutaneous melanoma. A 42.9% CR rate in this small elderly cohort supports further evaluation of local immune modulation with systemic PD-1 blockade for cutaneous melanoma.

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.

PURPOSE This study sought to determine the prognostic significance of the WHO-defined glioma molecular subgroups along with additional alterations, including MGMT promoter methylation and mutations in ATRX, CIC, FUBP1, TERT, and TP53, in NRG/RTOG 0424 using long-term follow-up data. METHODS Mutations were determined using an Ion Torrent sequencing panel. 1p/19q co-deletion and MGMT promoter methylation were determined by Affymetrix OncoScan and Illumina 450K arrays. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) included patient pretreatment characteristics. RESULTS We obtained complete molecular data to categorize 80/129 eligible patients within the WHO subgroups. Of these, 26 (32.5%) were IDHmutant/co-deleted, 28 (35%) were IDHmutant/non-co-deleted, and 26 (32.5%) were IDHwild-type. Upon single-marker MVA, both IDHmutant subgroups were associated with significantly better OS and PFS ( P values < .001), compared with the IDHwild-type subgroup. MGMT promoter methylation was obtained on 76 patients, where 58 (76%) were methylated and 18 (24%) were unmethylated. Single-marker MVAs demonstrated that MGMT promoter methylation was statistically significant for OS ( P value < .001) and PFS ( P value = .003). In a multimarker MVA, one WHO subgroup comparison ( IDHmutant/co-deleted v IDHwild-type) was significant for OS ( P value = .045), whereas MGMT methylation did not retain significance. CONCLUSION This study reports the long-term prognostic effect of the WHO molecular subgroups, MGMT promoter methylation, and other mutations in NRG/RTOG 0424. These results demonstrate that the WHO molecular classification and MGMT both serve as strong prognostic indicators, but that MGMT does not appear to add statistically significant prognostic value to the WHO subgrouping, above and beyond IDH and 1p/19q status.

335 Background: Systematic reviews are outdated quickly when the evidence is rapidly evolving as the process is laborious and there is little incentive for primary author team of an index SRMA to update the evidence. Consequently, there is an epidemic of redundant SRMAs performed by different teams—sometimes with conflicted results—for treatment of first line mRCC. Methods: We have created a living, interactive systematic review (LISR)and network meta-analysis(LINMA) for the treatment of first line mRCC using an Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted framework for evidence synthesis (Living, Interactive evidence synthesis framework) (LIvE) . The framework is implemented in five-layered architecture (application layer, shared module layer, core service layer, middleware layer, and storage layer) which work together to automate the identification of new studies and analysis and semi-automate the screening and data extraction. Dynamic features such as interactive tables, figures and evidence maps are enabled using Python and JavaScript programming languages. Results: We have maintained a living, interactive evidence profile for the first line treatment mRCC since September 2019 ( LIVING WEBSITE) . Living search strategy identifies new studies as they become available. As of October 13, 2020 LISR, includes data 14 clinical trials ( PRISMA ). Baseline characteristics are summarized in an interactive table ( TABLE) . Cabozantinib& Nivolumab (Cabo-Nivo) is the highest ranked drug for improving Overall Response (OR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) whereas Ipilimumab in combination with Nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo) is highest ranked drug for achieving complete response (CR). Ipi-Nivo and Atezolizumab & Bevacizumab (Ate-Bev) ranked highest and Cabo-Nivo ranked lowest for treatment related Adverse events (TRAEs). Results of network meta-analysis are summarized as interactive tables and plots ( NMA ), summary of findings tables ( MULTIPLE COMAPRISONS ) and evidence maps ( MAP ). Conclusions: LISRs can potentially reduce redundancy, increase transparency, reproducibility, enable shared-decision making (at a guideline level, or in a patient-clinician dyad) and support living guidelines.

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.

Objective To evaluate patient‐reported outcome (PRO) data from the IMmotion150 study. The phase 2 IMmotion150 study showed improved progression‐free survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1)+ tumours and suggested activity of atezolizumab monotherapy in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and methods Patients with previously untreated mRCC were randomised to atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks ( n = 103), the atezolizumab regimen plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks ( n = 101), or sunitinib 50 mg orally daily (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off; n = 101). The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) were administered on days 1 and 22 of each 6‐week cycle. Time to deterioration (TTD), change from baseline in MDASI core and RCC symptom severity, interference with daily life, and BFI fatigue severity and interference scores were reported for all comers. The TTD was the first ≥2‐point score increase over baseline. Absolute effect size ≥0.2 suggested a clinically important difference with checkpoint inhibitor therapy vs sunitinib. Results Completion rates were >90% at baseline and ≥80% at most visits. Delayed TTD in core and RCC symptoms, symptom interference, fatigue, and fatigue‐related interference was observed with atezolizumab (both alone and in combination) vs sunitinib. Improved TTD (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) was more pronounced with atezolizumab monotherapy: core symptoms, 0.39 (0.22–0.71); RCC symptoms, 0.22 (0.12–0.41); and symptom interference, 0.36 (0.22–0.58). Change from baseline by visit, evaluated by the MDASI, also showed a trend favouring atezolizumab monotherapy vs sunitinib. Small sample sizes may have limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Conclusion PROs suggested that atezolizumab alone or with bevacizumab maintained daily function compared with sunitinib. Notably, symptoms were least severe with atezolizumab alone vs sunitinib (IMmotion150; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984242).

9096 Background: HD IL-2 is an approved immunotherapy that can achieve durable cures in MM pts. Due to toxicity and low ORR, identification of predictors of clinical benefit would enhance pt selection and outcomes with HD IL-2. Recent research identified a positive correlation for ALC ≥ 1000 (either at baseline or at dose 3) with OS among MM pts treated with the immunotherapy agent ipilimumab. We tested the hypothesis that ALC (≥ 1000) or other hematological parameters correlates with clinical benefit from HD IL2. Methods: Results of hematologic testing in patients (n=98) treated with HD IL2 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were collected, including absolute levels of neutrophils (ANC), lymphocytes (ALC), monocytes (AMC), eosinophils (AEC), and platelets (APC) at baseline, after cycle 1 (C1), and after cycle 2 (C2) of HD IL-2; changes in each parameter for each interval were also calculated. Hematologic values were assessed as categorical (for ALC, ≥ 1000 Yes/No; other parameters, above upper limit of normal [ULN] Yes/No) and continuous variables. Associations between these parameters and PFS and ORR were analyzed. Results: ALC was≥ 1000 in 75 pts (76%) at baseline, in 81 (83%) after C1, and in 80 of 86 pts (93%) after completion of C2 of HD IL-2. PFS was not significantly associated with ALC ≥ 1000 at baseline (HR 0.69, p=0.13), after C1 (HR 1.32, p=0.33), or after C2 (HR 1.01, p=0.98). ALC ≥ 1000 at each timepoint was not significantly associated with ORR or OS. There was no significant difference in the change in ALC with HD IL2 treatment among responders versus non-responders. Among baseline hematological factors, APC > ULN was significantly associated with PFS (p=0.001), but it was rare (2/98 patients). Exploratory analyses identified significantly shorter PFS for patients with baseline APC > 300 (11%, HR 2.75, p=0.002). Analysis of hematologic factors as continuous values identified significant associations with PFS for AMC (HR 2.42, p=0.03) and AEC (HR 1.73, p=0.009) after C2. Conclusions: ALC ≥ 1000 did not correlate with PFS, ORR, or OS with HD IL-2 therapy in this cohort of metastatic melanoma pts.

9009 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory T-cell co-receptor that may lead to suppression of antitumor immunity. Lambrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody against PD-1. This study explored the safety and clinical activity of lambrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL). Methods: In this ongoing phase 1b expansion study of MEL pts with or without previous ipilimumab (IPI) treatment, lambrolizumab was administered IV every 2 or 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks by independent, central, blinded radiographic review per immune-related response criteria and RECIST 1.1. Results: As of December 1, 2012, 294 pts with MEL were enrolled, including 179 IPI-naive and 115 IPI-pretreated. Pts received lambrolizumab 10 mg/kg (n = 183) or 2 mg/kg (n = 111). Preliminary data from the first 85 consecutive pts dosed before April 25, 2012, who had independent radiologic review available as of December 3, 2012, indicate a confirmed overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 of greater than 35%, pooled across all doses and schedules and including both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated patients. The median duration of response has not been reached as only 2 pts who had initial response discontinued due to disease progression, but the duration of confirmed responses range from 28+ to 240+ days (up to 8+ months). Among 133 pts who were dosed with lambrolizumab before July 31, 2012, and evaluable for adverse events (AEs) as of September 28, 2012, fatigue (22%), rash (18%), and pruritus (14%) were the most common drug-related AEs (mostly grade 1/2). The incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 AEs was 10% (24% regardless of attribution). Four drug-related cases of pneumonitis were reported, all of grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 drug-related hypothyroidism (n = 1) and hyperthyroidism (n = 1) were noted. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that lambrolizumab has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated with manageable side effects in both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated MEL pts. These data have led to an ongoing, international, randomized study of lambrolizumab versus chemotherapy in IPI-pretreated MEL. Clinical trial information: NCT01295827.

4567 Background: Trials combining anti-PDL1 and anti-VEGF therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are underway; however the relationship between the expression of PDL1 and genes in the VEGF pathway is poorly understood. Using the Affymetrix platform, we observed an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway. Herein, we validate this inverse association using an independent set of 100 primary ccRCC tumors. Methods: From our registry database we sampled 100 ccRCC tumors with varying PDL1 protein expression (0%-100%) determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We extracted RNA from FFPE slides and performed RT-PCR to quantify gene expression of PDL1, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. All genes were normalized to the POLR2a gene. We evaluated the association of PDL1 protein expression and VEGF gene expression using Spearman rank correlation. In addition, we employed a linear mixed effects model to compare the fold-change in expression of VEGF genes between PDL1 low (0-5%, n=68) and PDL1 high (>5%, n=32) tumors. Results: As expected, PDL1 protein expression positively correlates with PDL1 geneexpression (corr=0.42, p<0.001). Validating our array data, PDL1 protein expression inversely correlates with expression of key VEGF genes: VEGF (corr=-0.23, p=0.01), VEGFR1 (corr=-0.34, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (corr=-0.23, p=0.01). In our dichotomized analysis, we noted significantly higher expression of VEGF genes in the PDL1 low compared to the PDL1 high group: VEGF (fold change=1.82, p<0.001), VEGFR1 (FC=2.63, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (FC=2.13, p=0.001). Conclusions: We independently validate an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway in primary ccRCC. If validated further in larger studies, the existence of an immune evasive and an angiogenic phenotype within ccRCC could inform current clinical trials targeting these two pathways. Ultimately, whether VEGF signaling affects PDL1 expression, or whether angiogenic or immune evasive phenotypes predict response to anti-PDL1, anti-VEGF, or a combination of the two therapies remains unclear.

e15539 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 1,380 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/16/1990 and 4/14/2009. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher MayoSSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001), and this association remained strong after after multivariate adjustment for well-known predictors of RCC aggressiveness. Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.62 95% CI 1.95-3.54; p<0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.48 95% CI 1.56-7.76; p =0.002). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.