Brastianos, Priscilla K.

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause significant clinical sequelae. Treatment using surgery, radiation, or both often entails significant morbidity. In prior work, we demonstrated that ninety-five percent of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) harbor BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). In this multicenter National Cancer Institute cooperative group trial (Alliance A071601), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCP without prior irradiation. METHODS Eligible patients, with measurable disease and whose PCP screened positively for BRAF mutations, without prior radiation, received the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib/cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of objective response rate at 4 months based on centrally determined volumetric data was evaluated in 16 patients on this single arm phase 2 trial. RESULTS Based on volumetric response criteria by central radiology review, 15 of 16 patients (94%; 95% CI: 70% to 100%) had a durable objective partial response to therapy. Thus, this study met primary endpoint for overall response rate. The median tumor reduction was 91% (range of 68% to 99%). Median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI: 19 to 30 months) and median number of treatment cycles was 8. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were not yet reached. Three patients progressed during follow-up after therapy was discontinued; none have died. The sole non-responder stopped treatment after eight days due to toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients (rash in 6 patients). Grade 4 toxicities were observed in two patients: hyperglycemia (n=1) and increased creatine phosphokinase (n=1). Three patients discontinued treatment for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that BRAF/MEK inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for PCP without prior irradiation. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180868 (NRG); Genentech; . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03224767.

Abstract BACKGROUND New therapies are needed for meningioma since treatment options are limited once patients have exhausted surgery and radiation. FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK represent potential targets because of synthetic lethality with NF2, loss of CDKN2A, and activation of MAPK signaling pathway in meningioma, respectively. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeting FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK as monotherapies and combination therapies in traditional and patient-derived cell lines and xenografts. METHODS In vitro, cell viability and proliferation assays were used to test abemaciclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor), defactinib (FAK inhibitor) and VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor) as monotherapy and in combination. To better recapitulate the meningioma microenvironment, targeted agents were evaluated with Matrigel, an artificial extracellular matrix. The efficacy of VS-4718 (in vivo formulation of defactinib) and abemaciclib were evaluated in a subcutaneous IOMM-lee meningioma model (having CDKN2A loss) in nude mice. Furthermore, we are establishing cell cultures and patient-derived cell and xenograft (PDX) models using freshly-resected tissue from patients with recurrent or high-grade (WHO grade 2-3) meningiomas. RESULTS In vitro evaluation identified the combination of defactinib with abemaciclib resulted in a synergistic decrease in cell viability relative to each monotherapy alone, while the combination of defactinib+VS-6766 was not beneficial. The presence of Matrigel enhanced the sensitivity of all three agents. In vivo, we observed improved survival in mice treated with abemaciclib vs control (45 days vs 26 days; p=0.03), as well as combination of VS-4718 + abemaciclib vs control (44 days vs 26 days; p=0.04, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). We did not observe survival extension with VS-4718 monotherapy. Lastly, we successfully established an orthotopic meningioma PDX using a WHO Grade 3 tumor for evaluation of novel therapies in meningioma. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib showed promising efficacy in preclinical meningioma xenografts with CDKN2A loss. Studies to evaluate these therapies in other orthotopic models are underway.

Abstract BACKGROUND Adequate treatment options are limited for patients with meningiomas once they have exhausted surgery and radiation. As our molecular understanding of meningiomas and their progression has improved, CDK, FAK, and RAF/MEK pathways have emerged as potential avenues for therapeutic intervention. However, patient-derived cell and xenograft models of meningiomas are difficult to establish, presenting a challenge in preclinical testing and validation of new therapeutic targets. The objective of this study is to develop informative preclinical models of meningiomas and use those to evaluate the activity of potent and selective inhibitors of CDK4/6, FAK, and RAF/MEK. METHODS We used CellTiter-Glo assay to assess the anti-tumor effects of CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib, FAK inhibitor defactinib (VS-6063) and dual RAF/MEK inhibitor RO5126766 (VS-6766) in BEN-MEN-1 (WHO Grade I, NF2-mutant), CH157-MN (WHO Unknown, NF2-mutant), and IOMM-Lee (WHO Grade III, CDKN2A loss) cell lines. Additionally, we used CyQUANT assays to quantify anti-proliferation activity of these inhibitors in a newly established patient-derived cell line MN14 (WHO Grade II, NF2 mutant). In parallel, we continue our attempts to establish patient-derived cell and xenograft models using freshly isolated surgical specimens of progressive meningioma. RESULTS Defactinib monotherapy significantly decreased cell viability across a 10nM-10μM range for all three established cell lines. RO5126766 showed improved efficacy (by 10-fold) in IOMM-Lee, compared to CH157-MN and Ben-Men-1. Abemaciclib showed potent effects at 10nM in IOMM-Lee and BEN-MEN-1, compared to 100nM for CH157-MN. In the MN14 patient-derived cell line, established from an NF2-mutant atypical meningioma, we observed a significant decrease in cell proliferation with defactinib. A decrease in cell proliferation was also observed with RO5126766 and abemaciclib. CONCLUSION Selective inhibitors of CDK4/6, FAK, and RAF/MEK showed anti-meningioma activity against traditional and patient-derived cell models in vitro. Molecular characterization and establishment of patient-derived models that encompass the diversity of clinical meningiomas are ongoing.

Abstract Meningeal solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare tumor with high propensity to recur and metastasize, even late in the course of disease. The WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumors divides SFT in 3 grades, based on mitotic index and necrosis. We re-examined our cohort of 126 patients (57 F, 69 M; mean age 53.0 years) with SFT, confirmed by STAT6 nuclear positivity and/or NAB2::STAT6 fusion, with extended follow-up (median 7.6 years; range 4 days-26.6 years). Tumors included 76 grade 1, 36 grade 2 and 14 grade 3 according to 2021 WHO criteria, evaluated at primary resection (n=90), recurrence (n=35), or metastasis (n=1). Fifty-six patients had one or more post-surgical events, the earliest event being local recurrence (n=41) or metastasis (n=15). Forty patients died (29 of disease; 9 of other causes; 2 unknown). Overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS, recurrence and/or metastasis) from time of primary resection (n=90) were not significantly associated with grade; however, risk of metastasis differed significantly (5-year estimates: 4.1%, 15.3%, and 37.8% for grades 1, 2, and 3 SFT, respectively; p=0.005). NAB2::STAT6 fusion status was known in 101 cases (51 = ex5-7-ex16-17, 26 = ex4_ex2-3; 12 = ex2-3_exANY/other and 12 =no fusion). Disease specific 5-year survival in primary tumors with molecular data (n = 75) was 80.0% in patients whose tumors harbored ex5-7_ex16-17 compared to 93.3% in all others combined (p=0.014). Targeted TERT promoter mutation testing was performed in 98 patients, revealing patients with tumors lacking TERT promoter mutation (n = 88) were younger at time of surgery than those harboring a mutation (n=10; p = 0.022), and none with a mutation harboring concurrent ex5-7_ex16-17 fusion (p = 0.0009). In summary, WHO 2021 grade is associated with risk of metastasis. Patients whose tumors harbor ex5-7_ex16-17 fusion have a higher risk of dying from the disease.

PURPOSE Patients with progressive or recurrent meningiomas have limited systemic therapy options. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibition has a synthetic lethal relationship with NF2 loss. Given the predominance of NF2 mutations in meningiomas, we evaluated the efficacy of GSK2256098, a FAK inhibitor, as part of the first genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive grade 1-3 meningiomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients whose tumors screened positively for NF2 mutations were treated with GSK2256098, 750 mg orally twice daily, until progressive disease. Efficacy was evaluated using two coprimary end points: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate by Macdonald criteria, where PFS6 was evaluated separately within grade-based subgroups: grade 1 versus 2/3 meningiomas. Per study design, the FAK inhibitor would be considered promising in this patient population if either end point met the corresponding decision criteria for efficacy. RESULTS Of 322 patients screened for all mutation cohorts of the study, 36 eligible and evaluable patients with NF2 mutations were enrolled and treated: 12 grade 1 and 24 grade 2/3 patients. Across all grades, one patient had a partial response and 24 had stable disease as their best response to treatment. In grade 1 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 83% (10/12 patients; 95% CI, 52 to 98). In grade 2/3 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 33% (8/24 patients; 95% CI, 16 to 55). The study met the PFS6 efficacy end point both for the grade 1 and the grade 2/3 cohorts. Treatment was well tolerated; seven patients had a maximum grade 3 adverse event that was at least possibly related to treatment with no grade 4 or 5 events. CONCLUSION GSK2256098 was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6 rate in patients with recurrent or progressive NF2-mutated meningiomas, compared with historical controls. The criteria for promising activity were met, and FAK inhibition warrants further evaluation for this patient population.

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.

PURPOSE American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS “Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline” 2 was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published May 6, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses “Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.” 2 RECOMMENDATIONS Within the guideline, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and up to four intact brain metastases, and conditionally recommended for patients with up to 10 intact brain metastases. The guideline provides detailed dosing and fractionation recommendations on the basis of the size of the metastases. For patients with resected brain metastases, radiation therapy (SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT]) is recommended to improve intracranial disease control; if there are limited additional brain metastases, SRS is recommended over WBRT. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases ineligible for surgery and/or SRS, WBRT is recommended with hippocampal avoidance where possible and the addition of memantine is recommended. For patients with brain metastases, limiting the single-fraction V 12Gy to brain tissue to ≤ 10 cm 3 is conditionally recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines .

Abstract Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Abstract Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. Recommendations Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.