Back to Authors

Agarwalla, Pankaj K.

Mayo Clinic

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Citations 4

CTNI-73. ALLIANCE A071601: PHASE II TRIAL OF BRAF/MEK INHIBITION IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAPILLARY CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS
Twohy, Erin , Geyer, Susan, Gerstner, Elizabeth R. , Kabat, Brian, Thierauf, Julia , Ruff, Michael W. , Reardon, David A. , Cohen, Adam L. , Fuente, Macarena de la, Lesser, Glenn J. , Campian, Jian , Agarwalla, Pankaj K., Kumthekar, Priya , Mann, Bhupinder, Vora, Shivangi, Knopp, Michael, Iafrate, A. John , Brown, Paul D. , Barker, Frederick G., Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Tabrizi, Shervin , Bota, Daniela A. , Knopp, Michael V. , Curry, William T. , Cahill, Daniel P. , Shih, Helen A. , Santagata, Sandro , Galanis, Evanthia

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2023 | Volume: 25 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v94-v94

10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0355 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause significant clinical sequelae. Treatment using surgery, radiation, or both often entails significant morbidity. In prior work, we demonstrated that ninety-five percent of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) harbor BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). In this multicenter National Cancer Institute cooperative group trial (Alliance A071601), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCP without prior irradiation. METHODS Eligible patients, with measurable disease and whose PCP screened positively for BRAF mutations, without prior radiation, received the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib/cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of objective response rate at 4 months based on centrally determined volumetric data was evaluated in 16 patients on this single arm phase 2 trial. RESULTS Based on volumetric response criteria by central radiology review, 15 of 16 patients (94%; 95% CI: 70% to 100%) had a durable objective partial response to therapy. Thus, this study met primary endpoint for overall response rate. The median tumor reduction was 91% (range of 68% to 99%). Median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI: 19 to 30 months) and median number of treatment cycles was 8. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were not yet reached. Three patients progressed during follow-up after therapy was discontinued; none have died. The sole non-responder stopped treatment after eight days due to toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients (rash in 6 patients). Grade 4 toxicities were observed in two patients: hyperglycemia (n=1) and increased creatine phosphokinase (n=1). Three patients discontinued treatment for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that BRAF/MEK inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for PCP without prior irradiation. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180868 (NRG); Genentech; . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03224767.
CTNI-53. RADIATION TREATMENT VOLUMES BEFORE AND AFTER BRAF/MEK THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAPILLARY CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS: A CORRELATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ALLIANCE A071601 PHASE II TRIAL
Kabat, Brian, Twohy, Erin , Geyer, Susan M. , Vora, Shivangi, Gerstner, Elizabeth R. , Ruff, Michael W. , Reardon, David A. , Cohen, Adam L. , Bota, Daniela A. , Agarwalla, Pankaj K., Fuente, Macarena de la, Lesser, G. J., Campian, Jian , Kumthekar, Priya , Knopp, Michael, Barker, Fred G., Brown, Paul D. , Shih, Helen A. , Tabrizi, Shervin , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Knopp, Michael V. , Cahill, Daniel P. , Santagata, Sandro , Galanis, Evanthia , Brastianos, Priscilla K.

Neuro-Oncology | November 18, 2021 | Volume: 23 | Issue: Supplement_6 | Pages: vi72-vi72

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.278 Get It

Abstract PURPOSE Standard of care for craniopharyngiomas is surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). Cohort A of Alliance A071601 evaluated the efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition with vemurafenib/cobimetinib in patients with previously untreated papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP), which carry the BRAF V600E mutation. Cohort B is currently enrolling patients with recurrence after RT. In a correlative analysis, we examined changes in RT volumes after BRAF/MEK therapy in Cohort A. METHODS Previously unirradiated patients with BRAF-mutated PCP were treated with vemurafenib/cobimetinib. Sixteen patients had scans available before starting vemurafenib/cobimetinib (“pre-therapy”) and after completing therapy (“post-therapy”). Two patients went off study treatment after 8 and 9 days due to side-effects and were excluded for this analysis. Gross target volumes (GTV) were contoured on pre-therapy and post-therapy scans. On post-therapy scans, an additional target comprising gross disease and at-risk regions for microscopic residual disease (GTV-micro) was defined and considered the treatment volume. Clinical target volume (CTV) was a 5-mm uniform expansion on pre-therapy GTV and post-therapy GTV-micro. Volumes were independently reviewed by two radiation oncologists. Changes in volumes from pre- versus post-therapy were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS In 14 patients evaluated, 57% were female and median age at enrollment was 49.5 years (range 33-83). Median time on treatment was 8.9 months (range 4.0-18.0). Median GTV pre-therapy was 3.8 mL (range 0.2-23.4) versus 0.3 mL (range 0.0-3.2) post-therapy (p=0.0001) and 1.7 mL (range 0.1-8.0) post-therapy GTV-micro (p=0.0001). Median CTV pre-therapy was 13.7 mL (range 2.8-51.8) versus 9.1 mL (range 2.2-27.5) post-therapy (p=0.0001). All tumors abutted the optic chiasm pre-therapy, only 6 did post-therapy. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib/cobimetinib resulted in smaller RT volumes. BRAF/MEK inhibitors could reduce RT volumes and spare dose to surrounding normal structures. Enrollment to Cohort B of Alliance A071601 should be considered for patients with recurrent tumors after RT. SUPPORT https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org
Alliance A071601: Phase II trial of BRAF/MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas.
Twohy, Erin , Geyer, Susan, Gerstner, Elizabeth R. , Ruff, Michael W. , Bota, Daniela A. , Reardon, David A. , Cohen, Adam L. , Fuente, Macarena I. de la, Lesser, Glenn J. , Campian, Jian , Agarwalla, Pankaj K., Kumthekar, Priya , Brown, Paul D. , Barker, Frederick G., Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Cahill, Daniel P. , Shih, Helen A. , Santagata, Sandro , Galanis, Evanthia

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2000-2000

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2000 Get It

2000 Background: Craniopharyngiomas, a rare brain tumor along the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause significant clinical sequelae. Surgery and radiation, the only effective treatments, can cause significant morbidity. Genetic analysis of craniopharyngiomas revealed that 95% of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) have BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). We evaluated the efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients (pts) with previously untreated PCP. Methods: Eligible pts without prior radiation whose PCP screened positively for BRAF mutations were treated with oral vemurafenib/cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of response rate (RR) based on centrally determined volumetric data was evaluated in 16 pts, where a partial response was defined as >20% decrease in volume. This single arm, Simon two-stage phase 2 trial had 89% power to detect a true RR of at least 30% (vs. the null RR 5%; alpha=0.04). In this design, 3 or more observed volumetric responses in 16 evaluable pts would be considered promising activity. Results: In the 16 pts evaluated, 56% were female, and the median age was 49.5 years. Median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI: 16-26.5) and median number of treatment cycles was 8. Three patients progressed after therapy was discontinued and none have died. Based on volumetric response criteria, 14 of 15 pts with volumetric data available for central review had response to therapy (93%; 95% CI: 68% to 99.8%). Of 16 patients evaluable based on local review, 15 had response to therapy (93.75%; 95% CI: 70% to 99.8%). The median tumor reduction was -83% (range: -52% to -99%). The one nonresponder received 2 days of treatment before coming off therapy due to toxicity. Median progression-free survival was not reached. Grade 3 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 pts (rash in 6 pts). Grade 4 toxicities were observed in two pts: hyperglycemia (n=1) and increased CPK (n=1). Three pts discontinued treatment for adverse events. Conclusions: Vemurafenib/cobimetinib resulted in an objective response in all pts who received 1 or more cycles of therapy. Our study indicates that BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be a powerful tool in the treatment of previously untreated PCP and warrants further evaluation in larger studies. A second arm of this study is enrolling pts with progressive PCP after prior radiotherapy. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180868 (NRG); Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT03224767.