Senecal, Francis M.

PURPOSE Patients with progressive or recurrent meningiomas have limited systemic therapy options. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibition has a synthetic lethal relationship with NF2 loss. Given the predominance of NF2 mutations in meningiomas, we evaluated the efficacy of GSK2256098, a FAK inhibitor, as part of the first genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive grade 1-3 meningiomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients whose tumors screened positively for NF2 mutations were treated with GSK2256098, 750 mg orally twice daily, until progressive disease. Efficacy was evaluated using two coprimary end points: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate by Macdonald criteria, where PFS6 was evaluated separately within grade-based subgroups: grade 1 versus 2/3 meningiomas. Per study design, the FAK inhibitor would be considered promising in this patient population if either end point met the corresponding decision criteria for efficacy. RESULTS Of 322 patients screened for all mutation cohorts of the study, 36 eligible and evaluable patients with NF2 mutations were enrolled and treated: 12 grade 1 and 24 grade 2/3 patients. Across all grades, one patient had a partial response and 24 had stable disease as their best response to treatment. In grade 1 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 83% (10/12 patients; 95% CI, 52 to 98). In grade 2/3 patients, the observed PFS6 rate was 33% (8/24 patients; 95% CI, 16 to 55). The study met the PFS6 efficacy end point both for the grade 1 and the grade 2/3 cohorts. Treatment was well tolerated; seven patients had a maximum grade 3 adverse event that was at least possibly related to treatment with no grade 4 or 5 events. CONCLUSION GSK2256098 was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6 rate in patients with recurrent or progressive NF2-mutated meningiomas, compared with historical controls. The criteria for promising activity were met, and FAK inhibition warrants further evaluation for this patient population.

Background: Here we describe an online network of patients with cancer, clinicians and researchers, layered on top of a comprehensive real world database of treatments and outcomes, continuously updated in near real time, and initially focused on multiple myeloma. Methods: Patients with multiple myeloma register at www.all4cure.com and sign HIPAA release forms to provide access to all of their medical records from all of the institutions from which they have received care. From the medical records, a structured dataset of treatments and lab results is extracted by a myeloma-dedicated team for display on each patient's de-identified, personalized dashboard. A discussion panel allows more than 1200 participating patients, clinicians and researchers to post comments or questions regarding each patient's specific circumstances. For each patient, lines of therapy and responses are determined according to IMWG and published criteria (Blood [2015] 126: 921-922). Here we report initial results from the treatments and responses among patients with multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. Results: A total of 493 patients includes 26 with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 51 with smoldering myeloma, 408 with multiple myeloma, and 8 with primary plasma cell leukemia. Among patients with multiple myeloma, 42 (10.3%) had antecedent MGUS and/or smoldering myeloma. The average age is 65.6 (+/- 9.7). 50.9% are male and 49.1% are female. 42 states in the U.S. and 8 other countries are represented. Two patients with multiple myeloma had not started treatment by the time of this report. The remaining 414 patients with multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia received 1 to 16 lines of therapy. Among the 414 patients that received at least one line of therapy, a remarkable 89 distinct first line therapies were administered. The most common first line therapies were lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (n=92), cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (n=50), lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone + autologous stem cell transplant + lenalidomide maintenance (n=41), lenalidomide and dexamethasone (n=29), and bortezomib and dexamethasone (n=22). 62 patients received a first line therapy that was not received by any other patient in our database. This variation was attributable to participation in clinical trials, variation in the availability of drugs over time and different geographic locations, and the very large number of distinct combinations associated with multi-agent regimens. Seventy six percent of patients with multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia received a second line of therapy, 52% received a third line of therapy, 34% received a fourth line of therapy, 23% received a fifth line of therapy, and 18% received a sixth line of therapy. We observed a trend toward a decline in favorable responses with successive lines of therapy (Table 1) consistent with previous reports, with a correlation coefficient between the line of therapy and overall response rate of -0.74. Among the 76 patients who received 6 or more lines of therapy (247 lines of therapy in total), only 7 achieved stringent complete responses (sCRs), of which 5 were associated with a CAR-T therapy. Table 1 also shows a trend toward more rapid changes in treatment associated with later lines of therapy. 57 of 493 patients (12%) are deceased. Conclusions: Our findings reveal remarkable variation in the treatment of myeloma and provide a potentially valuable resource of up to date and current clinical features, prognosis, treatments, side effects, and outcomes of patients with myeloma in the real world. Table 1. Summary of lines of therapy and outcomes across 414 patients with multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. The percentages of patients achieving sCR, ≥ PR (overall response rate - ORR), and ≥MR (clinical benefit rate - CBR) are shown for each line of therapy. Also depicted is the interval mortality and the mean and median number of days between the beginning of a line therapy and the beginning of the next line of therapy. Table Disclosures Richter: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; X4 pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Adaptive biotechnologies: Consultancy; Secura bio: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Antengene: Consultancy. Chhun:All4Cure: Current Employment. Zheng:All4Cure: Current Employment. Piboonvaranggoon:All4Cure: Current Employment. Mallick:All4Cure: Current Employment. Wren:All4Cure: Current Employment. Nam:All4Cure: Current Employment. Lopez Barquilla:All4Cure: Current equity holder in private company. Blau:All4Cure: Current equity holder in private company. Cowan:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Bensinger:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kumar:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; MedImmune: Research Funding; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Other; Sanofi: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Richardson:Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Anderson:Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.: Other: Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blau:All4Cure: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company.

Background:Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is characterized by haemolysis mediated by autoantibodies directed against red blood cells (RBCs). Warm antibody (wAIHA; 60%>70%) and cold agglutinin disease (CAD; 20%>25%) subclasses are defined by the immunoglobulin (Ig) isotype involved and its thermal optimum for binding RBCs. wAIHA is mediated by IgG while 90% of CAD is mediated by IgM isotypes. CAD and wAIHA outcomes can be life‐threatening, but no therapies are approved. Complement C3b deposition on RBCs plays a central role in AIHA, accelerating phagocytosis in the liver and/or spleen (extravascular haemolysis) and forming membrane attack complexes (intravascular haemolysis). By blocking formation of C3b, APL‐2, a cyclic peptide, has potential as a novel therapeutic for AIHA.Aims:To assess whether inhibiting complement C3 with daily subcutaneous (SC) doses of APL‐2 (270 mg/day or 360 mg/day) prevents intra‐ and extravascular haemolysis in AIHA subjects, reducing anaemia associated signs and symptoms.Methods:Subjects with primary AIHA were eligible for this Ph 2 open‐label study to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of APL‐2. Subjects had haemoglobin (Hb) levels < 11 g/dL, signs of haemolysis, and a positive direct agglutinin test (DAT) for IgG and/or complement C3. Twenty‐four subjects (13 CAD, 11 wAIHA) were recruited and will be treated with APL‐2 for 48 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by change from baseline in Hb, transfusion requirements, absolute reticulocyte counts (ARC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), haptoglobin, indirect bilirubin (INDBIL), and Functional Assessment of Illness Therapy (FACIT) fatigue score. Data are reported after 16 weeks (Day 112).Results:Two of 13 CAD subjects withdrew; 7 of 11 remaining subjects reached Day 112. Mean Hb (standard error [SE]) increased from 8.9 (0.4) [n = 13] to 11.6 (0.5) [n = 7] g/dL, and mean LDH, ARC, and INDBIL returned within normal range. Mean FACIT scores (SE) increased 9.9 (3.4) points from baseline. Two subjects had pre‐study and 1 had on‐study transfusions (normalized to 112 days). All 13 CAD experienced ≥1 treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE), mainly Grade 1–2 and unrelated. Four subjects reported 10 unrelated serious adverse events (SAEs) (6 SAEs in 1 subject). Three subjects experienced 3 unrelated Grade 3 TEAEs (pneumonia, dyspnoea, hypertension); 1 subject reported 2 unrelated Grade 4 TEAEs (high calcium, high creatinine) and withdrew.Eight of 11 wAIHA subjects were DATmonoC3+ and 3 were DATmonoC3‐. Two of 3 DATmonoC3‐ withdrew for lack of response and efficacy data are reported for 8 DATmonoC3+ subjects. Six of these reached Day 112. Mean Hb (SE) increased from 9.2 (0.3) [n = 8] to 10.8 (0.5) [n = 6] g/dL, and mean ARC and INDBIL returned within normal. Mean FACIT scores (SE) increased 2.7 (2.8) points from baseline. One subject had pre‐study and 2 had on‐study transfusions (normalized to 112 days). Ten of 11 wAIHA (C3+ and C3‐) experienced ≥1 TEAE, mainly Grade 1–2 and unrelated. Five subjects reported 8 unrelated SAEs. Five subjects experienced 13 unrelated Grade 3 TEAEs (oral squamous cell carcinoma, haemolytic flare, purpura, acute kidney injury, dyspnoea, chest pain); 1 subject reported 1 unrelated Grade 4 TEAE (haemolytic flare) and withdrew. Six‐month data for 10 CAD and 6 wAIHA C3+ is planned for June 2019.Summary/Conclusion:APL‐2 increases Hb values in CAD and wAIHA C3+ within the first weeks of treatment with sustained benefit with longer exposure. APL‐2 reduces intra‐ and extravascular haemolysis shown by reductions in LDH, INDBIL, and ARC. APL‐2 appears to be safe and well‐tolerated.