Summers, Elizabeth

Abstract Background Meningiomas lack effective therapies for recurrent or aggressive disease. NF2 inactivation, commonly in meningioma, may sensitize tumors to FAK inhibition and interact with MAPK signaling. This study investigated the therapeutic activity of defactinib (FAK inhibitor) and avutometinib (RAF/MEK inhibitor) alone and in combination in preclinical meningioma models. Methods MAPK-altered meningioma cell lines, IOMM-Lee (NF2 wild-type, BRAF p.V600E) and CH157-MN (NF2 mutant, NRAS p.Q61K), BenMen-1 (NF2 mutant, MAPK wild-type), and three patient-derived NF2 mutant cell lines were cultured in matrigel and treated with defactinib and avutometinib in 3D cell viability assays. In vivo, flank and intracranial xenograft models of IOMM-Lee and CH157-MN were treated with VS-4718 (FAK inhibitor, superior pharmokinetics in mice), avutometinib, or combination. Tumor growth, survival, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties were assessed. Results In vitro, combination therapy showed synergistic or additive effects in CH157-MN and IOMM-Lee cells, respectively. Defactinib alone demonstrated activity in NF2-mutant patient-derived and BenMen-1 cells, while avutometinib did not. In vivo, avutometinib monotherapy suppressed tumor growth and extended survival in both flank and intracranial xenograft models, with evidence of favorable pharmacokinetic properties and target pathway inhibition in intracranial tumors. Combination therapy provided enhanced and sustained control of flank CH157-MN meningioma compared to avutometinib alone but did not significantly improve survival over avutometinib alone in intracranial models. Conclusions Avutometinib demonstrated robust anti-tumor effects in flank and intracranial models of MAPK-altered meningioma. Combination benefits were context dependent. Defactinib activity in NF2-mutant patient-derived cells without targetable MAPK-kinase alterations highlights the importance of genomic biomarkers to guide personalized strategies.

Abstract BACKGROUND New therapies are needed for meningioma since treatment options are limited once patients have exhausted surgery and radiation. FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK represent potential targets because of synthetic lethality with NF2, loss of CDKN2A, and activation of MAPK signaling pathway in meningioma, respectively. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeting FAK, CDK4/6 and RAF/MEK as monotherapies and combination therapies in traditional and patient-derived cell lines and xenografts. METHODS In vitro, cell viability and proliferation assays were used to test abemaciclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor), defactinib (FAK inhibitor) and VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor) as monotherapy and in combination. To better recapitulate the meningioma microenvironment, targeted agents were evaluated with Matrigel, an artificial extracellular matrix. The efficacy of VS-4718 (in vivo formulation of defactinib) and abemaciclib were evaluated in a subcutaneous IOMM-lee meningioma model (having CDKN2A loss) in nude mice. Furthermore, we are establishing cell cultures and patient-derived cell and xenograft (PDX) models using freshly-resected tissue from patients with recurrent or high-grade (WHO grade 2-3) meningiomas. RESULTS In vitro evaluation identified the combination of defactinib with abemaciclib resulted in a synergistic decrease in cell viability relative to each monotherapy alone, while the combination of defactinib+VS-6766 was not beneficial. The presence of Matrigel enhanced the sensitivity of all three agents. In vivo, we observed improved survival in mice treated with abemaciclib vs control (45 days vs 26 days; p=0.03), as well as combination of VS-4718 + abemaciclib vs control (44 days vs 26 days; p=0.04, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). We did not observe survival extension with VS-4718 monotherapy. Lastly, we successfully established an orthotopic meningioma PDX using a WHO Grade 3 tumor for evaluation of novel therapies in meningioma. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib showed promising efficacy in preclinical meningioma xenografts with CDKN2A loss. Studies to evaluate these therapies in other orthotopic models are underway.