Hansel, Stephanie L.

Background Due to their easy accessibility, CT scans have been increasingly used for investigation of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Purpose To estimate the performance of a dual-phase, dual-energy (DE) GI bleed CT protocol in patients with overt GI bleeding in clinical practice and examine the added value of portal phase and DE images. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with GI bleeding underwent a two-phase DE GI bleed CT protocol. Two gastroenterologists established the reference standard. Performance was estimated using clinical CT reports. Three GI radiologists rated confidence in GI bleeding in a subset of 62 examinations, evaluating first mixed kV arterial images, then after examining additional portal venous phase images, and finally after additional DE images (virtual non-contrast and virtual monoenergetic 50 keV images). Results 52 of 176 patients (29.5%) had GI bleeding by the reference standard. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the CT GI bleed protocol for detecting GI bleeding were 65.4%, 89.5%, 72.3%, and 86.0%, respectively. In patients with GI bleeding, diagnostic confidence of readers increased after adding portal phase images to arterial phase images ( p = 0.002), without additional benefit from dual energy images. In patients without GI bleeding, confidence in luminal extravasation appropriately decreased after adding portal phase, and subsequently DE images ( p = 0.006, p = 0.018). Conclusion A two-phase DE GI bleed CT protocol had high specificity and negative predictive value in clinical practice. Portal venous phase images improved diagnostic confidence in comparison to arterial phase images alone. Dual-energy images further improved radiologist confidence in the absence of bleeding.

Abstract Background and Aims Our goal was to determine the importance of ileal inflammation at computed tomography or magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn’s disease patients with normal ileoscopy. Methods Patients with negative ileoscopy and biopsy within 30 days of CT or MR enterography showing ileal inflammation were included. The severity [0–3 scale] and length of inflammation within the distal 20 cm of the terminal ileum were assessed on enterography. Subsequent medical records were reviewed for ensuing surgery, ulceration at ileoscopy, histological inflammation, or new or worsening ileal inflammation or stricture on enterography. Imaging findings were classified as: Confirmed Progression [subsequent surgery or radiological worsening, new ulcers at ileoscopy or positive histology]; Radiologic Response [decreased inflammation with medical therapy]; or Unlikely/Unconfirmed Inflammation. Results Of 1471 patients undergoing enterography and ileoscopy, 112 [8%] had imaging findings of inflammation with negative ileoscopy, and 88 [6%] had negative ileoscopy and ileal biopsy. Half [50%; 44/88] with negative biopsy had moderate/severe inflammation at enterography, with 45%, 32% and 11% having proximal small bowel inflammation, stricture or fistulas, respectively. Two-thirds with negative biopsy [67%; 59/88] had Confirmed Progression, with 68%, 70% and 61% having subsequent surgical resection, radiological worsening or ulcers at subsequent ileoscopy, respectively. Mean length and severity of ileal inflammation in these patients was 10 cm and 1.6. Thirteen [15%] patients had Radiologic Response, and 16 [18%] had Unlikely/Unconfirmed Inflammation. Conclusion Crohn’s disease patients with unequivocal imaging findings of ileal inflammation at enterography despite negative ileoscopy and biopsy are likely to have active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. Disease detected by imaging may worsen over time or respond to medical therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Primary lung cancers infrequently metastasize to the gastrointestinal tract. We describe one case of isolated colonic metastasis identified at diagnosis of the primary lung malignancy and the associated immunohistochemical pattern. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: An 80-year-old man presented for evaluation of subacute onset shortness of breath. CT imaging showed a spiculated mass with associated ipsilateral intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. PET-CT was performed for staging and revealed a hypermetabolic focus in the left colon with recommendation for follow up colonoscopy. No other significant lesions or evidence of distant metastatic disease were seen and subsequent biopsy of a subcarinal lymph node demonstrated primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The colonoscopy visualized a sessile 12 mm polyp in the recto-sigmoid colon (Figure 1). Prior colonoscopy within 5 years of presentation was normal. Colon polyp morphology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining of resected polyp was positive for TTF-1 and negative for CDX2. Oncology recommended tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for Stage IV disease and alectinib was initiated with good response at 6 month follow up. DISCUSSION: Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic to the colon is uncommon but can present as a spectrum from asymptomatic mucosal involvement to bulky obstructive disease. Autopsy series and published case reports suggest broad estimates of asymptomatic involvement in between 1-10% of lung primaries, with symptomatic gastrointestinal involvement in <1% of cases. 1 Endoscopic presentation of metastatic disease to the gastrointestinal tract is often non-characteristic and differentiating adenocarcinoma tissue of origin is aided by immunohistochemical staining. TTF-1 staining has been shown to be highly specific to pulmonary adenocarcinomas. 2 CDX2 expression is an important intestine-specific transcription factor, and CDX2 negativity suggests adenocarcinoma of non-GI origin. 3 Used in conjunction, distant metastatic disease to the GI tract can be identified.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of musculoskeletal (MSK) injury among gastroenterologists are estimated to be as high as 75%, exceeding rates of 35% among non-proceduralists. Specific ergonomic/procedural factors influencing these injuries have yet to be defined. We sought to characterize potential risk factors for MSK injury by analyzing the physical traits and technical procedural data of a cohort of endoscopists. METHODS: The QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) survey was sent to all gastroenterologists across a large tertiary care system. Added questions assessed injury characteristics, glove size, and other demographic data. Endpoints defining affected vs. unaffected groups include self-reported function-limiting upper extremity or back pain, injury necessitating limiting/stopping endoscopy, and trends toward higher QuickDash, Work Impairment, or Sport/Instrument Disability scores. A procedural database capturing all endoscopic activities of each respondent from 2011 to 2018 was queried to gather procedural types, volumes, durations, and insertion times; scope types; and polyp detection rates. RESULTS: 64 surveys were completed (28.1% female, mean age 44.4 ±10.8 yrs). The average time in practice was 18.9 (±10.8) years. 51% (n = 33) of respondents reported significant activity-limiting pain, including hand/wrist (n = 31), arm/elbow (n = 12), shoulder (n = 19), and back (n = 24) pain. Characteristics between affected and non-affected groups are detailed in Table 1 with further exploratory analyses found in Table 2. Those needing to limit/stop endoscopy due to pain more frequently used pediatric scopes (31% vs. 19%, P = 0.037), took longer to perform colonoscopy (25.3 vs. 22.1 minutes, P = 0.035) and had lower yearly procedural volumes (532 vs. 807, P = 0.009). Those with hand/wrist pain had longer colonoscopy insertion times (9.35 vs. 8.21 minutes, P = 0.03) and less colonoscopy hands-on scope hours per year (81.2 vs. 111.7 hours, P = 0.039). Females had more severe shoulder pain ( P = 0.04), but there were no other associations with sex or small glove size. CONCLUSION: Activity-limiting MSK injuries affect over 50% of endoscopists. MSK symptoms were associated with longer procedure times and higher EGD or push enteroscopy volumes. Symptomatic subjects were more likely to use pediatric colonoscopes. Hand/wrist pain is the most common and (presumably) the most limiting type of injury. Further prospective monitoring is warranted to better elucidate which variables are causative versus compensatory responses to injury.

Abstract Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. Methods Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment. Results Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all P &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (P = 0.69), mean gastric (P = 0.10) or small-bowel transit time (P = 0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; P = 0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; P = 0.01). Conclusions Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736).