McGee, Kiaran

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues.Evidence Level5Technical EfficacyStage 5

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a new, highly flexible radiofrequency (RF) coil system for imaging patients undergoing MR simulation. Methods: Volumetric phantom and in vivo images were acquired with a commercially available and prototype RF coil set. Phantom evaluation was performed using a silicone-filled humanoid phantom of the head and shoulders. In vivo assessment was performed in five healthy and six patient subjects. Phantom data included T1-weighted volumetric imaging, while in vivo acquisitions included both T1- and T2-weighted volumetric imaging. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity metrics were calculated in the phantom data, while SNR values were calculated in vivo. Statistical significance was tested by means of a non-parametric analysis of variance test. Results: At a threshold of p = 0.05, differences in measured SNR distributions within the entire phantom volume were statistically different in two of the three paired coil set comparisons. Differences in per slice average SNR between the two coil sets were all statistically significant, as well as differences in per slice image uniformity. For patients, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in four of the nine comparisons and seven of the nine comparisons performed on the per slice average SNR values. For healthy subjects, SNRs within the entire imaging volume were statistically significantly different in seven of the nine comparisons and eight of the nine comparisons when per slice average SNR was tested. Conclusions: Phantom and in vivo results demonstrate that image quality obtained from the novel flexible RF coil set was similar or improved over the conventional coil system. The results also demonstrate that image quality is impacted by the specific coil configurations used for imaging and should be matched appropriately to the anatomic site imaged to ensure optimal and reproducible image quality.

BackgroundLocalized regions of left–right image intensity asymmetry (LRIA) were incidentally observed on T2‐weighted (T2‐w) and T1‐weighted (T1‐w) diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Suspicion of herpes encephalitis resulted in unnecessary follow‐up imaging. A nonbiological imaging artifact that can lead to diagnostic uncertainty was identified.PurposeTo investigate whether systematic LRIA exist for a range of scanner models and to determine if LRIA can introduce diagnostic uncertainty.Study TypeA retrospective study using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) data base.SubjectsOne thousand seven hundred fifty‐three (median age: 72, males/females: 878/875) unique participants with longitudinal data were included.Field Strength3T.SequencesT1‐w three‐dimensional inversion‐recovery spoiled gradient‐echo (IR‐SPGR) or magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo (MP‐RAGE) and T2‐w fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) long tau fast spin echo inversion recovery (LT‐FSE‐IR). Only General Electric, Philips, and Siemens' product sequences were used.AssessmentLRIA was calculated as the left–right percent difference with respect to the mean intensity from automated anatomical atlas segmented regions. Three neuroradiologists with 37 (**), 32 (**), and 3 (**) years of experience rated the clinical impact of 30 T2‐w three‐dimensional FLAIR exams with LRIA to determine the diagnostic uncertainty. Statistical comparisons between retrospective intensity normalized T1m and original T1‐w images were made.Statistical TestsFor each image type, a linear mixed effects model was fit using LRIA scores from all scanners, regions, and participants as the outcome and age and sex as predictors. Statistical significance was defined as having a P‐value <0.05.ResultsLRIA scores were significantly different from zero on most scanners. All clinicians were uncertain or recommended definite diagnostic follow‐up in 62.5% of cases with LRIA >10%. Individuals with acute brain pathology or focal neurologic deficits are not enrolled in ADNI; therefore, focal signal abnormalities were considered false positives.Data ConclusionLRIA is system specific, systematic, creates diagnostic uncertainty, and impacts IR‐SPGR, MP‐RAGE, and LT‐FSE‐IR product sequences.Level of Evidence: 2Technical Efficacy Stage: 3

The use of dedicated magnetic resonance simulation (MR‐SIM) platforms in Radiation Oncology has expanded rapidly, introducing new equipment and functionality with the overall goal of improving the accuracy of radiation treatment planning. However, this emerging technology presents a new set of challenges that need to be addressed for safe and effective MR‐SIM implementation. The major objectives of this report are to provide recommendations for commercially available MR simulators, including initial equipment selection, siting, acceptance testing, quality assurance, optimization of dedicated radiation therapy specific MR‐SIM workflows, patient‐specific considerations, safety, and staffing. Major contributions include guidance on motion and distortion management as well as MRI coil configurations to accommodate patients immobilized in the treatment position. Examples of optimized protocols and checklists for QA programs are provided. While the recommendations provided here are minimum requirements, emerging areas and unmet needs are also highlighted for future development.

Abstract Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that present significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Patient stratification based on tumor aggressiveness and early therapeutic response based on quantitative imaging may improve prediction of treatment response and the evaluation of new treatment strategies in clinical trials. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the technical feasibility of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the evaluation of sarcoma stiffness and perfusion in 9 patients with histologically confirmed sarcoma. Additionally, we assessed the feasibility of utilizing MRE and DCE-MRI for the early evaluation of response to radiation therapy in 4 patients to determine the utility of further evaluation in a larger cohort study. Tumor size, stiffness, and perfusion parameters all decreased from baseline at the time of the pre-surgery or follow-up MRI, and results were compared to pathology or conventional imaging. MRE and DCE-MRI may be useful for the quantitative evaluation of tumor stiffness and perfusion, and therapy response assessment in soft tissue sarcomas.