Back to Authors

Win, Aung K

0000-0002-2794-5261

Mayo Clinic

Seoul National University

Citations 41

Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score for Colorectal Cancer to Predict Risk of Lynch Syndrome Colorectal Cancer
Lai, John , Makalic, Enes , Win, Aung Ko , Winship, Ingrid , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Peters, Ulrike , Gallinger, Steven , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Pai, Rish K. , Jenkins, Mark A , Makalic, Enes , Winship, Ingrid M , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Dite, Gillian S. , Clendenning, Mark , Hayes, Richard B. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Church, James M. , Casey, Graham , Hopper, John L.

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | March 5, 2021 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkab022 Get It

Abstract It was not known whether the polygenic risk scores (PRSs) that predict colorectal cancer could predict colorectal cancer for people with inherited pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes—people with Lynch syndrome. We tested a PRS comprising 107 established single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with colorectal cancer in European populations for 826 European-descent carriers of pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes (293 MLH1, 314 MSH2, 126 MSH6, 71 PMS2, and 22 EPCAM) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry, of whom 504 had colorectal cancer. There was no evidence of an association between the PRS and colorectal cancer risk, irrespective of which DNA mismatch repair gene was mutated, or sex (all 2-sided P > .05). The hazard ratio per standard deviation of the PRS for colorectal cancer was 0.97 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 1.06; 2-sided P = .51). Whereas PRSs are predictive of colorectal cancer in the general population, they do not predict Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer.
Potential impact of family history–based screening guidelines on the detection of early‐onset colorectal cancer
Gupta, Samir , Bharti, Balambal, Ahnen, Dennis J. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Win, Aung Ko , Figueiredo, Jane C , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Win, Aung K , Haile, Robert W , Gupta, Samir , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Cheng, Iona C. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Macrae, Finlay , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A.

Cancer | April 20, 2020 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 3013-3020

10.1002/cncr.32851 Get It

Background Initiating screening at an earlier age based on cancer family history is one of the primary recommended strategies for the prevention and detection of early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), but data supporting the effectiveness of this approach are limited. The authors assessed the performance of family history–based guidelines for identifying individuals with EOCRC. Methods The authors conducted a population‐based, case‐control study of individuals aged 40 to 49 years with (2473 individuals) and without (772 individuals) incident CRC in the Colon Cancer Family Registry from 1998 through 2007. They estimated the sensitivity and specificity of family history–based criteria jointly recommended by the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on CRC, and the American College of Radiology in 2008 for early screening, and the age at which each participant could have been recommended screening initiation if these criteria had been applied. Results Family history–based early screening criteria were met by approximately 25% of cases (614 of 2473 cases) and 10% of controls (74 of 772 controls), with a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 90% for identifying EOCRC cases aged 40 to 49 years. Among 614 individuals meeting early screening criteria, 98.4% could have been recommended screening initiation at an age younger than the observed age of diagnosis. Conclusions Of CRC cases aged 40 to 49 years, 1 in 4 met family history–based early screening criteria, and nearly all cases who met these criteria could have had CRC diagnosed earlier (or possibly even prevented) if earlier screening had been implemented as per family history–based guidelines. Additional strategies are needed to improve the detection and prevention of EOCRC for individuals not meeting family history criteria for early screening.
Mendelian Randomization of Circulating Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Khankari, Nikhil K. , Banbury, Barbara L. , Borges, Maria Carolina , Haycock, Philip , Arndt, Volker , Berndt, Sonja I. , Brenner, Hermann , Casey, Graham , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Conti, David V. , English, Dallas R. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Giovannucci, Edward L. , Gunter, Marc J. , Hampe, Jochen , Hoffmeister, Michael , Joshi, Amit D. , Lemire, Mathieu , Li, Li , Lindblom, Annika , Martín, Vicente , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Offit, Kenneth, Rennert, Gad , Schafmayer, Clemens , Schmit, Stephanie L. , Slattery, Martha L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Weinstein, Stephanie J. , Win, Aung Ko , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Murff, Harvey J. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Peters, Ulrike , Brenner, Hermann , Borges, Maria C , Arndt, Volker , Brenner, Hermann , Chang-Claude, Jenny , English, Dallas R , Giles, Graham G , Hoffmeister, Michael , Martín, Vicente , Moreno, Victor , Pharoah, Paul D P , Rennert, Gad , Sakoda, Lori C , Slattery, Martha L , Weinstein, Stephanie J , Win, Aung K , Wolk, Alicja , Denny, Joshua C , Gunter, Marc J , Haycock, Philip , Brenner, Hermann , Hampe, Jochen , Conti, David V , Lindblom, Annika , Albanes, Demetrius , Bezieau, Stéphane , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Giles, Graham G. , Hopper, John L. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Li, Christopher I , Newcomb, Polly A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Sakoda, Lori C. , Song, Mingyang , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , White, Emily , Wolk, Alicja , Cai, Qiuyin , Denny, Joshua C. , Edwards, Todd L. , Zheng, Wei

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | February 12, 2020 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 860-870

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0891 Get It

Abstract Background: Results from epidemiologic studies examining polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and colorectal cancer risk are inconsistent. Mendelian randomization may strengthen causal inference from observational studies. Given their shared metabolic pathway, examining the combined effects of aspirin/NSAID use with PUFAs could help elucidate an association between PUFAs and colorectal cancer risk. Methods: Information was leveraged from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) regarding PUFA-associated SNPs to create weighted genetic scores (wGS) representing genetically predicted circulating blood PUFAs for 11,016 non-Hispanic white colorectal cancer cases and 13,732 controls in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). Associations per SD increase in the wGS were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Interactions between PUFA wGSs and aspirin/NSAID use on colorectal cancer risk were also examined. Results: Modest colorectal cancer risk reductions were observed per SD increase in circulating linoleic acid [ORLA = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93–0.98; P = 5.2 × 10−4] and α-linolenic acid (ORALA = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92–0.97; P = 5.4 × 10−5), whereas modest increased risks were observed for arachidonic (ORAA = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.03–1.08; P = 3.3 × 10−5), eicosapentaenoic (OREPA = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01–1.07; P = 2.5 × 10−3), and docosapentaenoic acids (ORDPA = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01–1.06; P = 1.2 × 10−2). Each of these effects was stronger among aspirin/NSAID nonusers in the stratified analyses. Conclusions: Our study suggests that higher circulating shorter-chain PUFAs (i.e., LA and ALA) were associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk, whereas longer-chain PUFAs (i.e., AA, EPA, and DPA) were associated with an increased colorectal cancer risk. Impact: The interaction of PUFAs with aspirin/NSAID use indicates a shared colorectal cancer inflammatory pathway. Future research should continue to improve PUFA genetic instruments to elucidate the independent effects of PUFAs on colorectal cancer.
A New Comprehensive Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Family History, Personal Characteristics, and Environmental Factors
Zheng, Yingye , Hua, Xinwei , Win, Aung Ko , MacInnis, Robert J. , Gallinger, Steven , Lindor, Noralane M. , Baron, John A. , Dowty, James G., Antoniou, Antonis C. , Zheng, Jiayin , Win, Aung K , Baron, John A , Antoniou, Antonis C , Maclnnis, Robert , Zheng, Yingye , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hopper, John L. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Newcomb, Polly A.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 13, 2020 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 549-557

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0929 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality through early detection would improve efficacy if targeted. We developed a colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating personal, family, genetic, and environmental risk factors to enhance prevention. Methods: A familial risk profile (FRP) was calculated to summarize individuals' risk based on detailed cancer family history (FH), family structure, probabilities of mutation in major colorectal cancer susceptibility genes, and a polygenic component. We developed risk models, including individuals' FRP or binary colorectal cancer FH, and colorectal cancer risk factors collected at enrollment using population-based colorectal cancer cases (N = 4,445) and controls (N = 3,967) recruited by the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC). Model validation used CCFRC follow-up data for population-based (N = 12,052) and clinic-based (N = 5,584) relatives with no cancer history at recruitment to assess model calibration [expected/observed rate ratio (E/O)] and discrimination [area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC)]. Results: The E/O [95% confidence interval (CI)] for FRP models for population-based relatives were 1.04 (0.74–1.45) for men and 0.86 (0.64–1.20) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 1.15 (0.87–1.58) for men and 1.04 (0.76–1.45) for women. The age-adjusted AUCs (95% CI) for FRP models for population-based relatives were 0.69 (0.60–0.78) for men and 0.70 (0.62–0.77) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 0.77 (0.69–0.84) for men and 0.68 (0.60–0.76) for women. The incremental values of AUC for FRP over FH models for population-based relatives were 0.08 (0.01–0.15) for men and 0.10 (0.04–0.16) for women, and for clinic-based relatives were 0.11 (0.05–0.17) for men and 0.11 (0.06–0.17) for women. Conclusions: Both models calibrated well. The FRP-based model provided better risk stratification and risk discrimination than the FH-based model. Impact: Our findings suggest detailed FH may be useful for targeted risk-based screening and clinical management.
Abstract B04: Development of a comprehensive colorectal cancer risk prediction tool (CRiPT) incorporating known and unknown major genes and polygenes
Win, Aung Ko , Jenkins, Mark A. , Dowty, James G., Antoniou, Antonis C. , Zheng, Yingye , Lindor, Noralane M. , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Lee, Andrew , Zheng, Yingye , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , MacInnis, Robert J.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 9, 2019 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: B04-B04

10.1158/1538-7755.carisk16-b04 Get It

Abstract This abstract is being presented as a short talk in the scientific program. A full abstract is printed in the Proffered Abstracts section (PR10) of the Conference Proceedings. Citation Format: Aung Ko Win, Mark A. Jenkins, James G. Dowty, Antonis C. Antoniou, Andrew Lee, Yingye Zheng, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, John L. Hopper, Robert J. MacInnis. Development of a comprehensive colorectal cancer risk prediction tool (CRiPT) incorporating known and unknown major genes and polygenes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr B04.
Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer-Related Mortality in Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X and Lynch Syndrome Families
Choi, Yun‐Hee , Lakhal‐Chaieb, Lajmi , Król, Agnieszka , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Win, Aung Ko , Jenkins, Mark A. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Briollais, Laurent , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Yu, Bing , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | August 22, 2018 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 675-683

10.1093/jnci/djy159 Get It

Abstract Background The risk of cancers is well characterized in Lynch syndrome (LS) families but has been less studied in familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCTX) families. Methods In this article, we compare the risk estimates of first and second colorectal cancers (CRCs) in 168 FCTTX and 780 LS families recruited through the Colon Cancer Family Registry as well as the risk of cancer-related deaths and disease-free survival (DFS) after a first CRC. Our methodology is based on a survival analysis approach, developed specifically to model the occurrence of successive cancers (ie, first and second CRCs) in the presence of competing risk events (ie, death from any causes). Results We found an excess risk of first and second CRC in individuals with LS compared to FCCTX family members. However, for an average age at first CRC of 60 years in FCCTX families and 50 years in LS families, the DFS rates were comparable in men but lower in women from FCCTX vs LS families, eg , 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.0% to 80.9%) vs 78.9% (95% CI = 76.3% to 81.3%) for the 10-year DFS. The 10-year risk of cancer-related death was higher in FCCTX families vs LS families, eg, 15.4% in men (95% CI = 10.9% to 19.8%) and 19.3% in women (95% CI = 13.6% to 24.7%) vs 8.9% (95% CI = 7.5% to 11.4%) and 8.7% (95% CI = 7.1% to 10.8%), respectively. Conclusions Individuals with CRCs arising in the context of FCCTX do not experience the same improved DFS and overall survival of those with LS, and that difference may be relevant in management decisions.
Physical activity and the risk of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome
Dashti, S. Ghazaleh , Win, Aung Ko , Hardikar, Sheetal , Glombicki, Stephen, Mallenahalli, Sheila , Thirumurthi, Selvi , Peterson, Susan K. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Lindor, Noralane M. , Haile, Robert W. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Lynch, Patrick M. , Buchanan, Daniel D , Pande, Mala , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , You, Y. Nancy , Campbell, Peter T. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Potter, John D. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hopper, John L. , Basen-Engquist, Karen M. , Pande, Mala

International Journal of Cancer | June 15, 2018 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2250-2260

10.1002/ijc.31611 Get It

Greater physical activity is associated with a decrease in risk of colorectal cancer for the general population; however, little is known about its relationship with colorectal cancer risk in people with Lynch syndrome, carriers of inherited pathogenic mutations in genes affecting DNA mismatch repair (MMR). We studied a cohort of 2,042 MMR gene mutations carriers (n = 807, diagnosed with colorectal cancer), from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Self‐reported physical activity in three age‐periods (20–29, 30–49 and ≥50 years) was summarized as average metabolic equivalent of task hours per week (MET‐hr/week) during the age‐period of cancer diagnosis or censoring (near‐term exposure) and across all age‐periods preceding cancer diagnosis or censoring (long‐term exposure). Weighted Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between physical activity and colorectal cancer risk. Near‐term physical activity was associated with a small reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer (HR ≥35 vs. <3.5 MET‐hr/week, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53–0.96). The strength and direction of associations were similar for long‐term physical activity, although the associations were not nominally significant. Our results suggest that physical activity is inversely associated with the risk of colorectal cancer for people with Lynch syndrome; however, further confirmation is warranted. The potential modifying effect of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk in people with Lynch syndrome could be useful for risk prediction and support counseling advice for lifestyle modification to reduce cancer risk.
Novel Common Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Cancer
Schmit, Stephanie L. , Edlund, Christopher K., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Qu, Chenxu, Melas, Marilena , Berg, David Van Den , Wang, Hansong, Tring, Stephanie, Plummer, Sarah J. , Alonso, M. Henar , Anton, Kristen , Aragaki, Aaron K. , Arndt, Volker , Barry, Elizabeth L. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bloomer, Amanda M. , Boehm, Juergen , Brenner, Hermann , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Butterbach, Katja, Caan, Bette J. , Carlson, Christopher S. , Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Cheng, Ya‐Wen , Chin, Lee Soo, Church, Timothy R. , Correa, Marcia Cruz, Curtis, Keith R. , Duggan, David , Easton, Douglas F. , English, Dallas R. , Fischer, Rocky, Fritsche, Lars G. , Fuchs, Charles S. , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gala, Manish , Gallinger, Steven , Gauderman, W. James, Giovannucci, Edward L. , Gogarten, Stephanie M. , González‐Villalpando, Clicerio, Gonzalez-Villalpando, Elena M., Greenson, Joel K. , Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hampe, Jochen , Harlid, Sophia , Harju, John F., Hayes, Richard B. , Hofer, Philipp , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huang, Shu-Chen, Huerta, José María , Hunter, David J., Idos, Gregory , Jackson, Rebecca D. , Jacobs, Eric J. , Jee, Sun Ha , Jenkins, Mark A. , Jia, Wei-Hua , Jiao, Shuo , Joshi, Amit D. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Kono, Suminori , Krogh, Vittorio , Küehn, Tilman, Küry, Sébastien , LaCroix, Andrea Z. , Laurie, Cecelia , Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lemire, Mathieu , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Levine, David , Li, Li , Lindor, Noralane M. , Liu, Yun-Ru, Lu, Yingchang , Luh, Frank , Ma, Jing , Mancao, Christoph , Manion, Frank J. , Markowitz, Sanford D. , Martín, Vicente , Matsuo, Keitaro , McDonnell, Kevin , McNeil, Caroline E, Murphy, Neil , Offit, Kenneth, Omichessan, Hanane , Cotoré, Jesús Paredes, Pérez‐Mayoral, Julyann, Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Hedy S., Riggs, Bridget M., Schafmayer, Clemens, Sellers, Thomas A. , Seminara, Daniela, Shibata, David , Siegel, Erin M. , Slattery, Martha L. , Stintzing, Sebastian , Taverna, Darin, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Thomas, Duncan C. , Trichopoulou, Antonia , Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Guelpan, Bethany van, Virtamo, Jarmo, Weinstein, Stephanie J. , Win, Aung Ko , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Wu, Kana , Xiang, Yong-Bing , Zanke, Brent W., Zeng, Yi-Xin , Zhang, Ben , Zubair, Niha, Figueiredo, Jane C. , Lindblom, Annika , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Peters, Ulrike , Conti, David V. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Kühn, Tilman , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Rennert, Gad , Hoffmeister, Michael , Arndt, Volker , English, Dallas R , Martín, Vicente , Moreno, Victor , Gunter, Marc J , Jenkins, Mark A , Van Den Berg, David J , Harrison, Tabitha A , Matsuo, Keitaro , Kury, Sebastien , Brenner, Hermann , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , Hampe, Jochen , Murphy, Neil , Hayes, Richard B , Brezina, Stefanie , Conti, David V , Gong, Jian Feng , Albanes, Demetrius , Amos, Christopher I. , Bezieau, Stéphane , Bien, Stephanie A. , Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Cheng, Iona C. , Church, James M. , Coetzee, Gerhard A. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Feskens, Edith J. M. , FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Fortini, Barbara K. , Giles, Graham G. , Grady, William M. , Hopper, John L. , Hudson, Thomas J , Iwasaki, Motoki , Kooperberg, Charles , Li, Christopher I , Lieb, Wolfgang , Lin, Yi , Liu, Yun‐Ru , Loupakis, Fotios , Matsuda, Koichi , McNeil, Caroline E, Milne, Roger L. , Molina, Antonio José , Mukherjee, Bhramar , Newcomb, Polly A. , Palli, Domenico , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Potter, John D. , Qu, Conghui , Raskin, Leon , Schoen, Robert E. , Severi, Gianluca , Shi, Wei , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Stadler, Zsofia , Stern, Mariana Carla , Tsugane, Shoichiro , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Vijai, Joseph , White, Emily E. , Wolk, Alicja , Yen, Yun , Kweon, Sun-Seog , Zheng, Wei , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Casey, Graham , Church, Timothy R , Caan, Bette J , Lindblom, Annika

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 30, 2018 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 146-157

10.1093/jnci/djy099 Get It

Abstract Background Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 42 loci (P < 5 × 10−8) associated with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded consortium efforts facilitating the discovery of additional susceptibility loci may capture unexplained familial risk. Methods We conducted a GWAS in European descent CRC cases and control subjects using a discovery–replication design, followed by examination of novel findings in a multiethnic sample (cumulative n = 163 315). In the discovery stage (36 948 case subjects/30 864 control subjects), we identified genetic variants with a minor allele frequency of 1% or greater associated with risk of CRC using logistic regression followed by a fixed-effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. All novel independent variants reaching genome-wide statistical significance (two-sided P < 5 × 10−8) were tested for replication in separate European ancestry samples (12 952 case subjects/48 383 control subjects). Next, we examined the generalizability of discovered variants in East Asians, African Americans, and Hispanics (12 085 case subjects/22 083 control subjects). Finally, we examined the contributions of novel risk variants to familial relative risk and examined the prediction capabilities of a polygenic risk score. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The discovery GWAS identified 11 variants associated with CRC at P < 5 × 10−8, of which nine (at 4q22.2/5p15.33/5p13.1/6p21.31/6p12.1/10q11.23/12q24.21/16q24.1/20q13.13) independently replicated at a P value of less than .05. Multiethnic follow-up supported the generalizability of discovery findings. These results demonstrated a 14.7% increase in familial relative risk explained by common risk alleles from 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9% to 13.7%; known variants) to 11.9% (95% CI = 9.2% to 15.5%; known and novel variants). A polygenic risk score identified 4.3% of the population at an odds ratio for developing CRC of at least 2.0. Conclusions This study provides insight into the architecture of common genetic variation contributing to CRC etiology and improves risk prediction for individualized screening.
Cohort Profile: The Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort (CCFRC)
Jenkins, Mark A. , Win, Aung Ko , Templeton, Allyson , Angelakos, Maggie S, Buchanan, Daniel D. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Gallinger, Steven, Lindor, Noralane M. , Haile, Robert W. , Investigators, Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Ahnen, Dennis J. , Anton, Kristen , Arnold, Julie, Aronson, Melyssa , Aujard, Kelly, Bapat, Bharati , Barker, Melissa, Bickerstaffe, Adrian , Burnett, Terrilea, Daftary, Darshana, DeRycke, Melissa S. , Dicks, Elizabeth , Diep, Anh, Duggan, Dave , Fisher, Douglass, Fox, Samantha , French, Amy J. , Glanz, Karen, Goldblatt, Jack, Goldberg, Richard M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Greenberg, Cary, Green, Jane , Green, Roger, Grove, John H. , Gryfe, Robert, Harmon, Patricia, Holowaty, Eric J., Holter, Spring, Kim, Hyeja, Kirk, Judy, Lance, Peter , Laurino, Mercy , Leggett, Barbara , Levine, A. Joan, Lowery, Jan T. , Lydum, Laurie, Madlensky, Lisa , Makar, Karen , Maskiell, Judi, McAllister, Pamela K., McGannon, Ellen, McKeown‐Eyssen, Gail, McLaughlin, John, Miller-Pakvasa, Heide, Nguyen, Nathalie , Nigon, Sandy, Parafrey, Patrick, Parry, Susan, Peterson, Susan K. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Redston, Mark , Rogers, Scott O., Schully, Sheri D. , Selander, Teresa, Seminara, Daniella, Shiovitz, Stacey, Siegmund, Kim, Smyrk, Thomas C. , Snazel, Douglas, Stubbs, John, Suthers, Graeme , Thomas, Duncan C. , West, D. P., Woods, Michael O. , Younghusband, Ban, Young, Joanne , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Baron, John A. , Potter, John D. , Hopper, John L. , Casey, Graham , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Newcomb, Polly A. , Investigators, Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort, Cheng, Iona C. , Church, James M. , Church, Timothy R. , Clendenning, Mark , Esplen, Mary Jane , Giles, Graham G. , Grady, William M. , Keogh, Louise Anne , Limburg, Paul J. , Macrae, Finlay , Malen, Rachel C. , McLaughlin, John, Möslein, Gabriela , Pollett, Aaron F. , Sandler, Robert David , Southey, Melissa C. , Tucker, Kathy

International Journal of Epidemiology | January 16, 2018 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 387-388i

10.1093/ije/dyy006 Get It

Long‐term weight loss after colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with lower survival: The Colon Cancer Family Registry
Kocarnik, Jonathan , Hua, Xinwei , Hardikar, Sheetal , Lindor, Noralane M. , Win, Aung Ko , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Cotterchio, Michelle , Adams, Scott V. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Kocarnik, Jonathan M , Figueiredo, Jane C , Newcomb, Polly A. , Win, Aung K , Robinson, Jamaica R.M. , Hopper, John L. , Potter, John D. , Campbell, Peter T. , Cohen, Stacey A.

Cancer | August 25, 2017 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 4701-4708

10.1002/cncr.30932 Get It

BACKGROUNDBody weight is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and survival, but to the authors' knowledge, the impact of long‐term postdiagnostic weight change is unclear. Herein, the authors investigated whether weight change over the 5 years after a diagnosis of CRC is associated with survival.METHODSCRC cases diagnosed from 1997 to 2008 were identified through 4 population‐based cancer registry sites. Participants enrolled within 2 years of diagnosis and reported their height and weight 2 years prior. Follow‐up questionnaires were administered approximately 5 years after diagnosis. Associations between change in weight (in kg) or body mass index (BMI) with overall and CRC‐specific survival were estimated using Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease, baseline BMI, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use, smoking, time between diagnosis and enrollment, and study site.RESULTSAt the 5‐year postdiagnostic survey, 2049 participants reported higher (53%; median plus 5 kg), unchanged (12%), or lower (35%; median ‐4 kg) weight. Over a median of 5.1 years of subsequent follow‐up (range, 0.3‐9.9 years), 344 participants died (91 of CRC). Long‐term weight loss (per 5 kg) was found to be associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.07‐1.21) and CRC‐specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.13‐1.39). Significantly lower survival was similarly observed for relative weight loss (>5% vs ≤5% change), BMI reduction (per 1 unit), or BMI category change (overweight to normal vs remaining overweight).CONCLUSIONSWeight loss 5 years after a diagnosis of CRC was found to be significantly associated with decreased long‐term survival, suggesting the importance of avoiding weight loss in survivors of CRC. Future research should attempt to further evaluate this association, accounting for whether this weight change was intentional or represents a marker of declining health. Cancer 2017;123:4701‐4708. © 2017 American Cancer Society.