Yang, Ju Dong

Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could be affected by lack of or delayed therapy. We aimed to characterize the prevalence, correlates, and clinical impact of therapeutic underuse and delay in patients with HCC. Patients with HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 were analyzed from the United States National Cancer Database. Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with no and delayed (>90 days after diagnosis) HCC treatment. Cox proportional hazards regression with landmark analysis assessed the association between therapeutic delay and overall survival (OS), accounting for immortal time bias. Of 116,299 patients with HCC, 24.2% received no treatment and 18.4% of treated patients had delayed treatment. Older age, Black, Hispanic, lower socioeconomic status, earlier year of diagnosis, treatment at nonacademic centers, Northeast region, increased medical comorbidity, worse liver dysfunction, and higher tumor burden were associated with no treatment. Among treated patients, younger age, Hispanic, Black, treatment at academic centers, West region, earlier tumor stage, and receipt of noncurative treatment were associated with treatment delays. In multivariable Cox regression with a landmark of 150 days, patients with and without treatment delays had similar OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98‐1.04) with a median survival of 33.7 vs. 32.1 months, respectively. However, therapeutic delay was associated with worse OS in patients who had tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM) stage 1 (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.11) or received curative treatment (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05‐1.18). Conclusion: One‐fourth of patients with HCC receive no therapy and one‐fifth of treated patients experience treatment delays. Both were associated with demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics of patients as well as facility type and region. The association between therapeutic delay and survival was stage and treatment dependent.

Background and Aims Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the most common primary liver cancers (PLCs). Differences in their clinical features and outcomes are open for investigation in a large‐scale study. We aim to investigate the differences in clinical features and outcomes between iCCA and HCC. Approach and Results The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 18 Database (2000‐2017) was used to extract demographic and clinical features of HCC and iCCA patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with iCCA diagnosis versus HCC. Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors affecting overall survival (OS). There were 13,611 iCCA and 96,151 HCC patients. Half of iCCA (50.7%) and three quarters of HCC (76.3%) patients were male. Diagnosis in recent year, age (<50 or ≥65), female sex, non‐Hispanic White race, higher income, rural area, and higher tumor burden were independently associated with iCCA diagnosis versus HCC. Patients with iCCA had worse OS than those with HCC (9 vs. 13 months; P < 0.001). However, OS was comparable between iCCA and HCC in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.99‐1.05). In subgroup analyses, iCCA was associated with better OS than HCC in patients with tumor ≥5 cm (aHR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.80‐0.86), lymph node involvement (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.72‐0.81), distant metastasis (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.73‐0.79), poorly/undifferentiated tumors (aHR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.83‐0.94), and those receiving noncurative treatment (aHR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93‐0.98). Conclusions We identified the demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical features associated with iCCA diagnosis over HCC among patients with PLC. Although iCCA patients presented at an advanced stage, OS was similar between iCCA and HCC in multivariable analysis. iCCA was associated with longer OS for subgroups with poor prognostic features.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has poor prognosis due to late‐stage, symptomatic presentation. Altered DNA methylation markers may improve diagnosis of CCA. Reduced‐representation bisulfite sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from frozen CCA tissues and matched to adjacent benign biliary epithelia or liver parenchyma. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) identified from sequenced differentially methylated regions were selected for biological validation on DNA from independent formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded CCA tumors and adjacent hepatobiliary control tissues using methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction. Selected MDMs were then blindly assayed on DNA extracted from independent archival biliary brushing specimens, including 12 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 4 distal cholangiocarcinoma cases, and 18 controls. Next, MDMs were blindly assayed on plasma DNA from patients with extrahepatic CCA (eCCA), including 54 perihilar CCA and 5 distal CCA cases and 95 healthy and 22 primary sclerosing cholangitis controls, balanced for age and sex. From more than 3,600 MDMs discovered in frozen tissues, 39 were tested in independent samples. In the clinical pilot of 16 MDMs on cytology brushings, methylated EMX1 (empty spiracles homeobox 1) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95‐1.0). In the clinical pilot on plasma, a cross‐validated recursive partitioning tree prediction model from nine MDMs was accurate for de novo eCCA (AUC, 0.88 [0.81‐0.95]) but not for primary sclerosing cholangitis–associated eCCA (AUC, 0.54 [0.35‐0.73]). Conclusion : Next‐generation DNA sequencing yielded highly discriminant methylation markers for CCA. Confirmation of these findings in independent tissues, cytology brushings, and plasma supports further development of DNA methylation to augment diagnosis of CCA.

Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are highly effective for the treatment of hepatitis C (HCV), although there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of DAA therapy in hepatitis C-positive individuals awaiting liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HCV-positive patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC at 3 liver transplant centers across the United States from 2014 to 2017 with follow-up to July 2018. Transplant recipients who received DAA before transplant were compared with those who did not (DAA naive) for posttransplant HCC recurrence rate, sustained virological response (SVR), allograft failure, and death using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 171 HCV-HCC transplant recipients (99 pretransplant DAA; 72 DAA naive controls) were included, with a median follow-up of 24 months. The overall posttransplant HCC recurrence rate was 9% (15/171). Pretransplant DAA was not associated with HCC recurrence (5% versus 14%; P = 0.07), graft failure (7% versus 3%; P = 0.21), or death (12% versus 19%; P = 0.19) as compared with DAA naive patients. SVR rates were significantly lower (P < 0.01) with pretransplant DAA (75%, 39/52) than posttransplant DAA (97%, 59/61) therapies. Those who received pretransplant DAA and those who did not were not statistically different in age, gender, alpha fetal protein levels, model for end-stage liver disease scores, or transplant wait time. Conclusions: Pretransplant DAA for HCV was not associated with an increased risk of posttransplant HCC recurrence, though pretransplant DAA had lower efficacy than posttransplant DAA in HCV-HCC transplant recipients.

Abstract Background & Aims The epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection differs between Asians and non‐Asians, but little is known regarding the effect of ethnicity on outcomes of HBV‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to characterize the presentation and survival outcomes in Asian and non‐Asian patients with HBV‐related HCC. Methods We analyzed the baseline characteristics and long‐term survival of 613 Asian and 410 non‐Asian patients with HBV‐related HCC from three US and one Spanish centre. Results Overall, non‐Asian patients were more likely to have HIV or hepatitis C co‐infection, cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease and advanced BCLC stage (all P ≤ .04). Compared with Asians, non‐Asians were more likely to be listed for transplantation ( P < .0001) and undergo HCC treatment with curative intent ( P = .003). Propensity‐score matching on HCC diagnosis year, gender and age was performed to balance the two groups for survival analysis and yielded 370 pairs of patients. There was no significant difference in survival overall ( P = .43) and among patients with cirrhosis ( P = .57). Among patients without cirrhosis, non‐Asians had poorer 5‐year survival compared with Asians (37.6% vs 53.7%, P = .01), and was associated with poorer survival after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, alcohol, co‐infections, diagnosis date, antiviral therapy, BCLC stage and HCC treatment (adjusted HR 2.01 [95% CI 1.07‐3.74], P = .03). Conclusion Among HBV‐related HCC patients, non‐Asians presented with more advanced BCLC stage compared to Asians. Non‐Asian ethnicity was independently associated with twice the risk of mortality among patients without cirrhosis, but not among those with cirrhosis. Additional studies are needed to clarify this disparity.

Abstract Background and Aims: For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vascular invasion, systemic treatment is recommended but transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is often used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the current usage of TARE vs. systemic therapy as a first-line treatment for HCC with vascular invasion in the United States (US). Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which represents more than 70 percent of newly diagnosed cancer cases nationwide. All HCC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with the tumor stage of T3BN0M0 according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system (tumor involving a major branch of a large vein of the liver without lymph nodes or extrahepatic metastasis) and received TARE or systemic treatment as a first-line treatment were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with the utilization of TARE vs. systemic therapy. Results: A total of 1979 patients who received systemic treatment and 524 patients who received TARE were included. The proportion of patients receiving TARE increased from 15.7% in 2010 to 31.4% in 2015 (P&lt;0.01). The median tumor size of the largest lesion was comparable (7.0cm for TARE vs. 7.1 cm for systemic treatment, P=0.43). Factors independently associated with increased likelihood of receiving TARE over systemic treatment were: advanced age (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 - 1.03, p=0.005), insurance status: private (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.61 - 5.65, p&lt;0.001), Medicaid/Medicare (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.52 - 5.31, p&lt;0.001), others (OR: 4.85, 95% CI: 1.90 - 11.62, p&lt;0.001) vs. no insurance, and receiving care in the Midwest vs. Northeast region of the US (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.38 - 2.53, p&lt;0.001). Patients were significantly less likely to receive TARE if receiving treatment at community cancer program (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.098 - 0.49, p&lt;0.001) or comprehensive community cancer program (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48 - 0.82, p&lt;0.001) vs. academic cancer program. Larger tumor size (OR per 1cm: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.00, p=0.03) and higher Charlson comorbidity index of ≥3 vs. 0 (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38 - 0.73, p&lt;0.001) were inversely associated with receiving TARE. Recent HCC diagnosis year was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving TARE (OR: 1.23, 95% CI:1.16 - 1.32, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The proportion of patients receiving TARE as a first-line treatment for HCC with macrovascular invasion has been increasing in the US. Age, comorbidities, insurance status, tumor size, and the type and location of cancer centers are associated with the usage of TARE vs. systemic treatment in HCC patients with vascular invasion. Citation Format: Joseph C. Ahn, Michael Luu, Walid Ayoub, Alexander Kuo, Andrew Hendifar, Jun Gong, Kambiz Kosari, Shelly Lu, Nicholas Nissen, Ju Dong Yang. Transarterial radioembolization versus systemic treatment for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: Analysis of the US National Cancer Database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2350.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the leading causes of worldwide cancer‐related morbidity and mortality. Poor prognosis of HCC is attributed primarily to tumor presentation at an advanced stage when there is no effective treatment to achieve the long term survival of patients. Currently available tests such as alpha‐fetoprotein have limited accuracy as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for HCC. Liver biopsy provides tissue that can reveal tumor biology but it is not used routinely due to its invasiveness and risk of tumor seeding, especially in early‐stage patients. Liver biopsy is also limited in revealing comprehensive tumor biology due to intratumoral heterogeneity. There is a clear need for new biomarkers to improve HCC detection, prognostication, prediction of treatment response, and disease monitoring with treatment. Liquid biopsy could be an effective method of early detection and management of HCC. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells in circulation derived from the original tumor or metastatic foci, and their measurement by liquid biopsy represents a great potential in facilitating the implementation of precision medicine in patients with HCC. CTCs can be detected by a simple peripheral blood draw and potentially show global features of tumor characteristics. Various CTC detection platforms using immunoaffinity and biophysical properties have been developed to identify and capture CTCs with high efficiency. Quantitative abundance of CTCs, as well as biological characteristics and genomic heterogeneity among the CTCs, can predict disease prognosis and response to therapy in patients with HCC. This review article will discuss the currently available technologies for CTC detection and isolation, their utility in the clinical management of HCC patients, their limitations, and future directions of research.

INTRODUCTION: The discontinuous BALAD and continuous BALAD-2 scores derived from bilirubin, albumin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) are effective in predicting HCC patient mortality, but have not been validated in North America. We validated the BALAD and BALAD-2 scores in North America. METHODS: Data from 148 HCC patients seen from 2000–2015 with results for all five biomarkers at diagnosis were abstracted. Hazard ratios (HR) and C-statistics were calculated. RESULTS: 75 of the 148 patients died during a median follow-up of 33 months (0.3-145 months),. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 70.8% and 47.6%, respectively. 114 (77%) patients had cirrhosis with a median MELD of 9.5 (range 6.4-29.5). HCC etiologies were HCV (34%), NASH (34%), alcohol (14%), and HBV (10%). Primary treatments were liver transplant, 21 (14%), surgical resection, 32 (22%), local ablation, 10 (7%), transarterial chemoembolization or radioembolization, 47 (32%), chemotherapy, 11 (7%), best supportive care, 9 (6%), and unknown treatment, 18 (12%). MELD, tumor size (cm), ≥2 tumors, tumor number, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >4 significantly increased mortality with HR (95%CI) of 1.12 (1.06–1.18) per unit increase in MELD, 1.06 (1.0004–1.12) per cm increase in size, 1.21 (1.03–1.43) per number of tumor, and 1.93 (1.16–3.24). For the BALAD score analysis, 12, 49, 40, 31, 16 and 0 patients had BALAD scores of 0–5 respectively. The HR (95%CI) for death were 1.24 (0.42–3.67), 1.79 (0.61–5.26), 2.83 (0.95–8.38), and 7.19 (2.26–22.91) for BALAD scores 1, 2, 3, and 4 vs. BALAD 0. For the BALAD-2 analysis, 58, 35, 33, and 22 patients were BALAD-2 classes 1, 2, 3, and 4. The HR (95%CI) for death were 1.25 (0.65–2.40), 1.75 (0.94–3.23), and 6.20 (3.29–11.68) for BALAD-2 classes 2, 3, and 4 vs. BALAD-2 class 1. A multivariate model incorporating maximal tumor diameter, tumor number, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and BALAD had HR of 1.43 (1.14–1.81) per increase of 1 BALAD score. A similar multivariate model with BALAD-2 had HR of 1.50 (1.18–1.90) per increase of 1 BALAD-2 class. BALAD, BALAD-2 and BCLC had similar C-statistics of 0.69, 0.68, and 0.67. CONCLUSION: The BALAD score and BALAD-2 class at HCC diagnosis can predict survival of HCC patients in North America. AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP in the BALAD models incorporate HCC tumor biology and make the BALAD model distinguish from other previous predictive models.