Back to Authors

Posadas, Edwin M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1346

Mayo Clinic

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Citations 8

Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part II: Treatment Delivery for Non-metastatic Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Radical Prostatectomy
Morgan, Todd M. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chapin, Brian F. , Chen, David Y.T. , Jacene, Heather A. , Kim, Sennett K., Kirkby, Erin, Nathanson, B.J., Posadas, Edwin M. , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H. , Chou, Roger , Kamran, Sophia C. , Luckenbaugh, Amy N. , Nathanson, Ben J., Nyame, Yaw A. , Tran, Phuoc T , Chen, Ronald C.

Journal of Urology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 211 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 518-525

10.1097/ju.0000000000003891 Get It

Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part I: Introduction and Treatment Decision-Making at the Time of Suspected Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
Morgan, Todd M. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chapin, Brian F. , Chen, David Y.T. , Jacene, Heather A. , Kim, Sennett K., Kirkby, Erin, Nathanson, B.J., Posadas, Edwin M. , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H. , Chou, Roger , Kamran, Sophia C. , Luckenbaugh, Amy N. , Nathanson, Ben J., Nyame, Yaw A. , Tran, Phuoc T , Chen, Ronald C.

Journal of Urology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 211 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 509-517

10.1097/ju.0000000000003892 Get It

Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part III: Salvage Therapy After Radiotherapy or Focal Therapy, Pelvic Nodal Recurrence and Oligometastasis, and Future Directions
Morgan, Todd M. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chapin, Brian F. , Chen, David Y.T. , Jacene, Heather A. , Kim, Sennett K., Kirkby, Erin, Nathanson, B.J., Posadas, Edwin M. , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H. , Chou, Roger , Kamran, Sophia C. , Luckenbaugh, Amy N. , Nathanson, Ben J., Nyame, Yaw A. , Tran, Phuoc T , Chen, Ronald C.

Journal of Urology | February 29, 2024 | Volume: 211 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 526-532

10.1097/ju.0000000000003890 Get It

NRG-GU011: A phase II double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of prostate oligometastatic radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer (NRG PROMETHEAN).
Karrison, Theodore , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Posadas, Edwin M. , Hall, William A. , Rodgers, Joseph P., Feng, Felix Y. , Koontz, Bridget F. , Ballas, Leslie , Berlin, Alejandro , Tran, Phuoc T , O'Daniel, Jennifer C , Hope, Thomas A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 14, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: TPS283-TPS283

10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps283 Get It

TPS283 Background: There is no clear standard of care for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) with positron emission tomography (PET)-detected oligometastases and normal conventional imaging (CIM). Phase II trials show that stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) to oligometastases may delay cancer progression and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and its untoward effects. ADT with radiation prolongs survival in locally advanced PCa and in CIM metastatic PCa. However, there is a knowledge gap about timing and benefit vs toxicity of ADT with SABR in early oligometastatic PCa. NRG GU011 (PROMETHEAN) is a randomized phase II trial of SABR with or without relugolix for early PET-detected recurrent oligometastatic PCa. This study aims to evaluate the impact of relugolix, a novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, when combined with SABR to oligometastases. Relugolix allows for rapid testosterone recovery and is associated with fewer cardiovascular events when compared to leuprolide and is hypothesized to have low late ADT toxicity. GU011 will provide patients and their physicians data on the relative risks and benefits of early or delayed ADT in this setting. Methods: NRG-GU011 NCT# 05053152 is a randomized phase II double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with randomization to SABR + 6 months placebo vs SABR + 6 months relugolix. Eligible patients have biochemical recurrence after prior curative intent radiation or surgery for localized PCa, PSA < 10 ng/mL, negative CIM and 1-5 PET-evident metastases (≥1 extrapelvic). SABR is delivered in 1-5 fractions to BED >100 Gy1.5, followed by placebo or relugolix 120mg daily for 6 months. Patients will then be followed with imaging at time of biochemical recurrence. The planned sample size of 260 patients (130 per arm) will provide 85% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.65 for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), based on a one-sided test at alpha 0.10. Planned enrollment is predicted at 8 patients per month with an estimated study completion date of late 2026. The primary endpoint is CIM rPFS. Secondary endpoints include PET-based rPFS, sexual and hormonal quality of life (QoL) assessed by EPIC-26, other QoL measures from EQ5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-30 and PROMIS Fatigue, and between-group comparisons of time to salvage therapy, castration-resistance, local progression (SABR-targeted lesion), biochemical progression, distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. We also aim to determine adverse event rates for both treatment arms and evaluate genomic and blood markers of treatment response. This study opened in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05053152 .
Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells and Their Implications as a Biomarker for Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Therapeutic Monitoring in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ahn, Joseph , Teng, Pai‐Chi , Chen, Pin‐Jung , Posadas, Edwin M. , Tseng, Hsian‐Rong , Lu, Shelly C. , Yang, Ju Dong , Ahn, Joseph C , Yang, Ju Dong

Hepatology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 422-436

10.1002/hep.31165 Get It

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the leading causes of worldwide cancer‐related morbidity and mortality. Poor prognosis of HCC is attributed primarily to tumor presentation at an advanced stage when there is no effective treatment to achieve the long term survival of patients. Currently available tests such as alpha‐fetoprotein have limited accuracy as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for HCC. Liver biopsy provides tissue that can reveal tumor biology but it is not used routinely due to its invasiveness and risk of tumor seeding, especially in early‐stage patients. Liver biopsy is also limited in revealing comprehensive tumor biology due to intratumoral heterogeneity. There is a clear need for new biomarkers to improve HCC detection, prognostication, prediction of treatment response, and disease monitoring with treatment. Liquid biopsy could be an effective method of early detection and management of HCC. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells in circulation derived from the original tumor or metastatic foci, and their measurement by liquid biopsy represents a great potential in facilitating the implementation of precision medicine in patients with HCC. CTCs can be detected by a simple peripheral blood draw and potentially show global features of tumor characteristics. Various CTC detection platforms using immunoaffinity and biophysical properties have been developed to identify and capture CTCs with high efficiency. Quantitative abundance of CTCs, as well as biological characteristics and genomic heterogeneity among the CTCs, can predict disease prognosis and response to therapy in patients with HCC. This review article will discuss the currently available technologies for CTC detection and isolation, their utility in the clinical management of HCC patients, their limitations, and future directions of research.
Luminal and basal subtyping of prostate cancer.
Feng, Felix Y. , Zhao, Shuang G. , Erho, Nicholas , Lehrer, Jonathan , Alshalalfa, Mohammed , Ryan, Charles J. , Freedland, Stephen J. , Posadas, Edwin M. , Ross, Ashley E. , Karnes, Jeffrey , Zhao, Shuang G , Chang, S. Laura , Cooperberg, Matthew R , Kim, Won Bae , Den, Robert B. , Klein, Eric A. , Davicioni, Elai , Schaeffer, Edward M. , Nguyen, Paul L. , Carroll, Peter R , Spratt, Daniel E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 29, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 3-3

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.3 Get It

3 Background: There is a clear need to develop a clinically relevant molecular subtyping approach for prostate cancer. We hypothesized that prostate cancer can be subtyped based on luminal versus basal lineage. Methods: We applied the PAM50 classifier, which is used clinically to identify luminal and basal cancers in breast cancer, to subtype a total of 3,782 prostate cancer samples using a high-density microarray platform run in a CLIA-certified laboratory. We examined the associations of these subtypes and clinical outcomes. Results: We demonstrate that PAM50 segregates prostate cancer into three reproducible subtypes in both retrospective cohorts and on prospective validation: luminal A (33.3%-34.3%), luminal B (28.5%-32.6%), and basal (34.1%-37.1%). Luminal B prostate cancers exhibited the worst clinical prognoses, followed by basal and luminal A subtypes (10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival: 29/39/41%; distant metastasis-free survival: 53/73/73%; prostate cancer-specific survival: 78/86/89%; overall survival: 69/80/82% respectively) on both univariable and multivariable analyses accounting for standard clinicopathologic prognostic factors. Known luminal lineage markers, such as NKX3.1 and KRT18, and the basal lineage CD49f signature, were enriched in luminal- and basal-like cancers respectively, demonstrating the connection between these subtypes and established prostate cancer biology. While both luminal-like subtypes were associated with increased AR expression and signaling, only luminal B prostate cancers were significantly associated with post-operative response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a subset analysis matching patients based on clinicopathologic variables (interaction p = 0.006, luminal B 10-year metastasis: 33% (treated) vs. 55% (untreated), non-luminal B: 37% (treated) vs. 21% (untreated)). Conclusions: These findings contribute novel insight into the biology of prostate cancer, and provide translatable clinical tools for personalizing post-operative ADT for patients with prostate cancer. Similar to breast cancer, these findings suggest that luminal/basal subtyping may be useful in treatment selection in prostate cancer.