Kuo, Alexander

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been associated with excellent post-liver transplant (LT) outcomes at 1 year; however, the impact of alcohol as ACLF precipitant, specifically alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), and as etiology of chronic liver disease remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effect of alcohol as ACLF precipitant and chronic liver disease etiology (alcohol-associated liver disease vs. non–alcohol-associated liver disease) on posttransplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective study using the Multi-Organ Dysfunction and Evaluation for LT Consortium database and included 640 patients with ACLF who underwent LT across 15 transplant centers in North America. The primary outcome was 1-year posttransplant survival. We used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards to compare posttransplant survival, mortality risk, and health care utilization, adjusting for age, ACLF grade, comorbid diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and HCC. The median follow-up from LT was 2.8 years (P25–P75, 2.2–5.5 y) for patients with AH-ACLF (n=42) and 3.1 years (P25–P75, 1.6–4.9 y) for patients without AH (n=598). No significant difference was observed in 1-year survival after LT in patients with AH-ACLF versus those without AH ( p =0.36). Patients with AH had significantly higher health care utilization evidenced by greater length of stay (28.5 vs. 19.0 d, p =0.004; adjusted linear estimate 16.89, 95% CI: 7.66–26.11, p <0.001), higher rates of rehabilitation placement (71.4% vs. 41.8%, p =0.002; adjusted odds ratio: 4.13, 95% CI: 2.04–8.89, p <0.001), and non-ambulatory status (39.0% vs. 21.0%, p =0.005; adjusted odds ratio: 4.54, 95% CI: 1.90–10.79, p <0.001). Compared with other etiologies, alcohol-associated liver disease was not associated with differences in 1-year mortality, mortality risk over time, or health care utilization, after excluding patients with AH as ACLF precipitant. While there were no differences in 1-year survival, AH-ACLF was associated with higher health care resource utilization compared with other ACLF precipitants. LT centers should ensure adequate resources are allocated for the management of these patients.

Background and Aims: Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for advanced HCC. We aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of immunotherapy compared to lenvatinib in HCC. Approach and Results: From the TriNetX database, we used a target trial emulation framework and identified patients with HCC who received first-line treatment with immunotherapy (atezolizumab/bevacizumab or tremelimumab/durvalumab) or lenvatinib between or between August 2018 and December 2023. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. After propensity score matching, 1203 patients were included in each group. Immunotherapy was associated with improved OS versus lenvatinib (median survival: 545 vs. 425 d; HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76–0.97). Regarding treatment type, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab showed improved survival compared to lenvatinib (n=1070 in each group; HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77–0.99), while the point estimate favored durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus lenvatinib (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59–1.12), though this difference was not statistically significant, likely due to small sample size. Regarding etiology, immunotherapy had improved OS compared to lenvatinib in viral hepatitis (n=510 in each group; HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61–0.89) and alcohol-associated liver disease (n=190 in each group; HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.87), but not in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver diseases (n=156 in each group; HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70–1.31). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, immunotherapy was associated with improved OS compared to lenvatinib in advanced HCC, with consistent benefit across most subgroups. These findings support the use of immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

573 Background: Immunotherapy has shown great efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No clear consensus exists on when to stop the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after complete response (CR), and clinical course after stopping ICI remains unknown. Methods: We identified 138 HCC patients who received ICI at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2016-2023. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used to assess treatment response. We further described the clinical course of patients who achieved CR after ICI discontinuation, including cancer recurrence, subsequent treatment, liver transplantation (LT) listing and outcomes. Results: The median age at ICI initiation was 68 years; 79% were male; 55.9% were white; 51.5% were BCLC stage C. 9.4% CRs, 25.4% partial responses, 39.9% stable diseases, and 25.4% progressive disease. Hepatitis C etiology was associated with higher likelihood of CR (P=0.005). Among 13 patients who achieved CR, 10 stopped ICI (60% for LT evaluation, 40% for toxicity). After stopping ICI, 40% had recurrence (Table). 3 patients underwent local therapy for recurrent HCC within Milan criteria and 1 patient restarted ICI for recurrence beyond Milan criteria. Among CR patients, 9 patients underwent LT evaluation after stopping ICI and 7 patients were waitlisted. After listing, 3 dropouts were observed, due to recurrent HCC beyond Milan criteria, sepsis leading to death, and personal preference. 4 patients underwent LT. 2 patients underwent local therapy before LT for recurrent HCC (Table). All transplanted patients had the last dose of ICI more than 1 year before LT (12, 21, 24, and 29 months). On explanted livers, 2 patients had no residual viable tumor and 2 patients had residual HCC within Milan criteria. 1 patient developed acute cellular rejection and was treated with immunosuppressants and maintained stable graft function. None had graft loss or evidence of HCC recurrence in the follow-up period at 8, 20, 28, and 51 months. Conclusions: Immunotherapy demonstrated excellent effects on a subset of HCC patients, including 9.4% who achieved CR. After stopping ICI, 40% had cancer recurrence but 3 out of 4 were within Milan criteria. 4 underwent successful LTs (2.9%) with excellent post LT outcome. Larger prospective data is needed to establish a protocol for ICI use, especially to determine the optimal timing for ICI discontinuation after CR. BCLC at ICI initiation ICI cycles before stopping, ICI Recurrence after last ICI (days) Within Milan at recurrence Treatment(s) received after recurrence and outcomes OS (days) Patient 1 B 7, Nivolumab 730 No Nivolumab. Died from GI bleeding 1065 Patient 2 B 64, Atezo/Bev 149 Yes TACE with CR, followed by LT without recurrence. 1203 Patient 3 A 8, Nivolumab 1393 Yes Y90 with CR. No recurrence. 1984 Patient 4 C NA, Pembrolizumab 407 Yes TACE and MWA with CR, followed by LT without recurrence. 1722

The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.

Abstract Background and Aims Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with advanced‐stage HCC. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced HCC in a nationwide cohort and racial and ethnic disparities in access to immunotherapy. Approach and Results We used the US National Cancer Database to identify patients with tumor‐node‐metastasis stage 3 or 4 HCC between 2017 and 2018. We performed multivariable Cox regression to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) and logistic regression to identify factors associated with receipt of immunotherapy. Of the 3,990 patients treated for advanced HCC, 3,248 (81.4%) patients received chemotherapy and 742 (18.6%) patients received immunotherapy as a first‐line treatment. Immunotherapy was associated with improved OS compared with chemotherapy (adjusted HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65–0.88) after adjusting for covariates. There were racial and ethnic disparities in access to immunotherapy, with Hispanic (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46–0.83) and Black patients (aOR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.89) less likely to receive immunotherapy compared with White patients. There was a significant interaction between race‐ethnicity and facility type, with higher disparity observed in nonacademic centers (interaction p = 0.004). Conclusions Immunotherapy was associated with improved OS compared with chemotherapy in advanced HCC. There are significant disparities in early access to immunotherapy, likely due to differential access to clinical trials and experimental therapies. A comprehensive approach to monitoring and eliminating racial‐ethnic disparities in the management of advanced HCC is urgently needed.

Abstract The burden of HCC is substantial. To address gaps in HCC care, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) aimed to develop a standard set of process‐based measures and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) along the HCC care continuum. We identified candidate process and outcomes measures for HCC care based on structured literature review. A 13‐member panel with content expertise across the HCC care continuum evaluated candidate measures on importance and performance gap using a modified Delphi approach (two rounds of rating) to define the final set of measures. Candidate PROs based on a structured scoping review were ranked by 74 patients with HCC across 7 diverse institutions. Out of 135 measures, 29 measures made the final set. These covered surveillance (6 measures), diagnosis (6 measures), staging (2 measures), treatment (10 measures), and outcomes (5 measures). Examples included the use of ultrasound (± alpha‐fetoprotein [AFP]) every 6 months, need for surveillance in high‐risk populations, diagnostic testing for patients with a new AFP elevation, multidisciplinary liver tumor board (MLTB) review of Liver Imaging‐Reporting and Data System 4 lesions, standard evaluation at diagnosis, treatment recommendations based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging, MLTB discussion of treatment options, appropriate referral for evaluation of liver transplantation candidacy, and role of palliative therapy. PROs include those related to pain, anxiety, fear of treatment, and uncertainty about the best individual treatment and the future. The AASLD PMC has developed a set of explicit quality measures in HCC care to help bridge the gap between guideline recommendations and measurable processes and outcomes. Measurement and subsequent implementation of these metrics could be a central step in the improvement of patient care and outcomes in this high‐risk population.

Abstract Background and Aims: For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vascular invasion, systemic treatment is recommended but transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is often used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the current usage of TARE vs. systemic therapy as a first-line treatment for HCC with vascular invasion in the United States (US). Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which represents more than 70 percent of newly diagnosed cancer cases nationwide. All HCC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with the tumor stage of T3BN0M0 according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system (tumor involving a major branch of a large vein of the liver without lymph nodes or extrahepatic metastasis) and received TARE or systemic treatment as a first-line treatment were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with the utilization of TARE vs. systemic therapy. Results: A total of 1979 patients who received systemic treatment and 524 patients who received TARE were included. The proportion of patients receiving TARE increased from 15.7% in 2010 to 31.4% in 2015 (P&lt;0.01). The median tumor size of the largest lesion was comparable (7.0cm for TARE vs. 7.1 cm for systemic treatment, P=0.43). Factors independently associated with increased likelihood of receiving TARE over systemic treatment were: advanced age (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 - 1.03, p=0.005), insurance status: private (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.61 - 5.65, p&lt;0.001), Medicaid/Medicare (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.52 - 5.31, p&lt;0.001), others (OR: 4.85, 95% CI: 1.90 - 11.62, p&lt;0.001) vs. no insurance, and receiving care in the Midwest vs. Northeast region of the US (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.38 - 2.53, p&lt;0.001). Patients were significantly less likely to receive TARE if receiving treatment at community cancer program (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.098 - 0.49, p&lt;0.001) or comprehensive community cancer program (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48 - 0.82, p&lt;0.001) vs. academic cancer program. Larger tumor size (OR per 1cm: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 - 1.00, p=0.03) and higher Charlson comorbidity index of ≥3 vs. 0 (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38 - 0.73, p&lt;0.001) were inversely associated with receiving TARE. Recent HCC diagnosis year was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving TARE (OR: 1.23, 95% CI:1.16 - 1.32, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The proportion of patients receiving TARE as a first-line treatment for HCC with macrovascular invasion has been increasing in the US. Age, comorbidities, insurance status, tumor size, and the type and location of cancer centers are associated with the usage of TARE vs. systemic treatment in HCC patients with vascular invasion. Citation Format: Joseph C. Ahn, Michael Luu, Walid Ayoub, Alexander Kuo, Andrew Hendifar, Jun Gong, Kambiz Kosari, Shelly Lu, Nicholas Nissen, Ju Dong Yang. Transarterial radioembolization versus systemic treatment for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: Analysis of the US National Cancer Database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2350.