Kudva, Yogish C.

Objective: To analyze insulin delivery and glycemic metrics throughout the menstrual cycle for women with type 1 diabetes using closed loop control (CLC) insulin delivery. Methods: Menstruating women using a CLC system in a clinical trial were invited to record their menstrual cycles through a cycle-tracking application. Sixteen participants provided data for this secondary analysis over three or more complete cycles. Insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were analyzed in relation to reported cycle phases. Results: Insulin delivery and CGM metrics remained consistent during cycle phases. Intraparticipant variability of CGM metrics and weight-based insulin delivery did not change through cycle phases. Conclusions: For this sample of menstruating women with type 1 diabetes using a CLC system, insulin delivery and glycemic metrics remained stable throughout menstrual cycle phases. Additional studies in this population are needed, particularly among women who report variable glycemic control during their cycles. Trial Registration: NCT03591354.

Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have not been evaluated in the context of psychological and pharmacological stress in type 1 diabetes. Our objective was to determine glycemic control and insulin use with Zone Model Predictive Control (zone-MPC) AID system enhanced for states of persistent hyperglycemia versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) during outpatient use, including in-clinic induced stress. Materials and Methods: Randomized, crossover, 2-week trial of zone-MPC AID versus SAP in 14 adults with type 1 diabetes. In each arm, each participant was studied in-clinic with psychological stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test [TSST] and Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test [SECPT]), followed by pharmacological stress induction with oral hydrocortisone (total four sessions per participant). The main outcomes were 2-week continuous glucose monitor percent time in range (TIR) 70–180 mg/dL, and glucose and insulin outcomes during and overnight following stress induction. Results: During psychological stress, AID decreased glycemic variability percentage by 13.4% ( P = 0.009). During pharmacological stress, including the following overnight, there were no differences in glucose outcomes and total insulin between AID and physician-assisted SAP. However, with AID total user-requested insulin was lower by 6.9 U ( P = 0.01) for pharmacological stress. Stress induction was validated by changes in heart rate and salivary cortisol levels. During the 2-week AID use, TIR was 74.4% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.001) and overnight TIR was 78.3% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.004). There were no adverse events. Conclusions: Zone-MPC AID can reduce glycemic variability and the need for user-requested insulin during pharmacological stress and can improve overall glycemic outcomes. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT04142229.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause pituitary dysfunction due to hypophysitis. We aimed to characterize ICI-induced hypophysitis and examine its association with overall survival in this single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with cancer who received an ICI from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016. A total of 896 patients were identified who received ipilimumab alone (n=120); ipilimumab and nivolumab (n=50); ipilimumab before or after pembrolizumab (n=70); pembrolizumab alone (n=406); and nivolumab alone (n=250). Twenty-six patients (2.9%) developed hypophysitis after a median of 2.3 months. Median age at the start of ICI was 57.9 years and 54% were men. Hypophysitis occurred in 7.9% of patients receiving ipilimumab alone or in combination or sequence with a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor; 1.7% after pembrolizumab alone, never after nivolumab alone. Secondary adrenal insufficiency occurred in all hypophysitis cases. Use of ipilimumab alone or in combination was associated with pituitary enlargement on imaging and mass effects more frequently than pembrolizumab alone. Occurrence of hypophysitis was associated with improved overall survival by univariate analysis (median 50.7 vs 16.5 months; p=0.015) but this association was not observed in multivariable landmark survival analysis (HR for mortality 0.75; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.30; p=0.34) after adjusting for age, sex and malignancy type. To conclude, hypophysitis occurred most frequently after ipilimumab and manifested as anterior hypopituitarism affecting the corticotrophs more commonly than thyrotrophs and gonadotrophs. Mass effects and pituitary enlargement occurred more frequently in ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis. The association of hypophysitis with overall survival needs further investigation.