Basu, Ananda

Early postprandial glucagon concentrations are higher in type 1 diabetes (T1D) than in individuals with no diabetes (ND). To determine the cause, we infused stable [13C9, 15N1]glucagon before, during, and after a mixed meal in 16 ND and 16 T1D individuals to measure glucagon turnover. In a subcohort of 9 ND and 12 T1D individuals, we estimated [13C9, 15N1]glucagon kinetics during steady state. A linear, single-compartment model described [13C9, 15N1]glucagon kinetics and allowed precise estimation of the volume of distribution (VD) and clearance rate (CL). Model parameters were similar between groups, with the VD of [13C9, 15N1]glucagon at 42.1 ± 3.3 mL/kg, implying that [13C9, 15N1]glucagon distributes in a single compartment and with VD approximating the plasma volume and CL at 10.6 ± 0.9 mL/kg/min. Higher early (0–120 min after meal ingestion) postprandial glucagon concentrations (1,907.9 ± 373.4 vs. −93.6 ± 240.5 pg/mL · 120 min P < 0.001) observed in T1D was due to higher rates of glucagon appearance (3.39 ± 2.8 vs. −3.95 ± 2.0 ng/kg · 120 min, P < 0.04) and disappearance (2.13 ± 2.6 vs. −5.28 ± 2.1 ng/kg · 120 min, P < 0.04) compared with ND. We have determined postprandial glucagon turnover in humans and have demonstrated that changes in postprandial glucagon concentrations in T1D are due to increased rates of glucagon turnover during the early postprandial period. Article Highlights This study was conducted to determine postprandial glucagon metabolism in people with and without type 1 diabetes. We wanted to determine the cause for higher early postprandial glucagon concentrations in type 1 diabetes. We found that higher early postprandial glucagon turnover is the cause of higher early postprandial glucagon concentrations in type 1 diabetes Strategies that decrease early post prandial glucagon fluxes could improve postprandial glucose concentrations in type 1 diabetes.

Circulating glucagon concentrations differ between individuals with no diabetes (ND) and those with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We combined an isotope dilution technique using stable tracers [6,22-13C9,15N1]glucagon and [6,14,19,22-13C9,15N1]glucagon with splanchnic and leg catheterization in participants with ND (n = 8; age 23.1 ± 2.9 years, BMI 26.6 ± 3.5 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.0 ± 0.2% [31 ± 2 mmol/mol]) and T1D (n = 6; 29.0 ± 8.8 years, BMI 26.3 ± 5.0 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.9 ± 0.8% [63 ± 8 mmol/mol]) in the overnight fasted state. After baseline period, exogenous glucagon was infused at rates designed to achieve plasma glucagon concentrations spanning the physiological ranges, to determine the effects of rising glucagon concentrations on splanchnic and leg glucagon balance. At baseline, splanchnic glucagon extraction (SGE) was similar (30.7 ± 2.7 vs. 29.1 ± 2.9%) but leg glucagon extraction (LGE) was lower (27.0 ± 4.2 vs. 40.6 ± 3.1%) in participants with T1D versus those with ND. However, with increasing plasma glucagon concentrations, while SGE remained unchanged within and between groups, LGE fell in participants with ND (41 vs. 31 vs. 24%) but did not change in those with T1D. Despite a numerically lower net splanchnic glucagon production in participants with T1D than in those with ND, no changes were observed with increasing glucagon concentrations within the physiological range in both groups. This is the first human study applying novel glucagon isotopes that describes regional glucagon metabolism in participants with ND and T1D. Our observations provide translational relevance for dual hormone closed-loop systems and provide tools for probing the effects of GLP-1, dual, and triple receptor agonists on pancreatic α-cell functions. Article Highlights This study was conducted to assess splanchnic and leg glucagon metabolism in humans using stable glucagon isotopes. We wanted to evaluate whether splanchnic and leg glucagon metabolism differed between participants with no diabetes (ND) and those with type 1 diabetes (T1D) at glucagon concentrations spanning the physiological range. Whereas splanchnic glucagon extraction did not differ between participants with ND and those with T1D, leg glucagon extraction fell in those with ND but did not change in those with T1D as glucagon concentrations increased. Net splanchnic glucagon production did not change with exogenous glucagon infusion. Our study has implications for dual hormone closed-loop control in T1D where glucagon is infused for prevention of hypoglycemia and for investigating the effects of emerging GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and glucagon receptor agonists on endogenous glucagon secretion and clearance.

Glucose production is inappropriately increased in people with type 2 diabetes both before and after food ingestion. Excessive postprandial glucose production occurs in the presence of decreased and delayed insulin secretion and lack of suppression of glucagon release. These abnormalities in hormone secretion, coupled with impaired insulin-induced suppression of glucose production and stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake, likely account in large part for the excessive amounts of glucose that reach the systemic circulation for disposal by peripheral tissues following food ingestion. In contrast, when adequate basal insulin concentrations are present, neither glucagon-induced stimulation of glucose production nor glucose-induced suppression of glucose production differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects matched for gender, age, and degree of obesity. However, when insulin secretion is defective, lack of suppression of glucagon can cause substantial hyperglycemia by enhancing rates of glucose production. Therefore, normalization of hepatic glucose metabolism in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus likely will require normalization of insulin and glucagon secretion as well as hepatic insulin action.

Background: Estimation of insulin sensitivity (S I ) and its daily variation are key for optimizing insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We recently developed a method for S I estimation from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) data in adults with T1D (S I SP ) and validated it under restrained experimental conditions. Herein, we validate in vivo a new version of S I SP performing well in daily life unrestrained conditions. Methods: The new S I SP was tested in both simulated and real data. The simulated dataset consists of 100 virtual adults of the UVa/Padova T1D Simulator monitored during an open-loop experiment, whereas the real dataset consists of 10 youths with T1D monitored during a hybrid closed-loop meal study. In both datasets, participants underwent two consecutive meals (breakfast and lunch, at 7 and 11 am) with the same carbohydrate content (70 g). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured during each meal to estimate the oral glucose minimal model S I (S I MM ). CGM and CSII data were used for S I SP calculation, which was then validated against the gold standard S I MM . Results: S I SP was estimated with good precision (median coefficient of variation <20%) in 100% of the real and 91% of the simulated meals. S I SP and S I MM were highly correlated, both in the simulated and real datasets ( R = 0.82 and R = 0.83, P < 0.001), and exhibited a similar intraday pattern. Conclusions: S I SP is suitable for estimating S I in both closed- and open-loop settings, provided that the subject wears a CGM sensor and a subcutaneous insulin pump.

To assess the diurnal patterns of postprandial glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, 19 subjects with type 2 diabetes (8 women; 60 ± 11 years; BMI 32 ± 5 kg/m2) and 19 anthropometrically matched subjects with no diabetes (ND; 11 women; 53 ± 12 years; BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m2) were studied during breakfast (B), lunch (L), and dinner (D) with identical mixed meals (75 g carbohydrates) on 3 consecutive days in a randomized Latin square design. Three stable isotopes of glucose were ustilized to estimate meal fluxes, and mathematical models were used in estimating indices of insulin action and β-cell function. Postmeal glucose excursions were higher at D versus B and at D versus L in type 2 diabetes (P &lt; 0.05), while in ND they were higher at D versus B (P = 0.025) and at L versus B (P = 0.04). The insulin area under the curve was highest at B compared with L and D in type 2 diabetes, while no differences were observed in ND. Disposition index (DI) was higher at B than at L (P &lt; 0.01) and at D (P &lt; 0.001) in ND subjects, whereas DI was low with unchanging pattern across B-L-D in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, between-meal differences in β-cell responsivity to glucose (F) and insulin sensitivity (SI) were concurrent with changes in the DI within groups. Fasting and postmeal glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations, along with estimates of endogenous glucose production (EGP), Rd, SI, F, hepatic extraction of insulin, insulin secretion rate, extracted insulin, and DI, were altered in type 2 diabetes compared with ND (P &lt; 0.011 for all). The data show a diurnal pattern of postprandial glucose tolerance in overweight otherwise glucose-tolerant ND individuals that differs from overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes. The results not only provide valuable insight into management strategies for better glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, but also improved understanding of daytime glucose metabolism in overweight individuals without impaired glucose tolerance or overt diabetes.

Abstract Aim To evaluate whether short‐term treatment with a selective 11β‐Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase‐1 (11β‐HSD1) inhibitor, AZD4017, would block hepatic cortisol production and thereby decrease hepatic fat in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 study conducted at two sites. Key inclusion criteria were the presence of NAFLD or NASH on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or recent biopsy positive for NASH. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to AZD4017 or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were between‐group differences in mean change from baseline to week 12 in liver fat fraction (LFF) and conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol in the liver. Results A total of 93 patients were randomized; 85 patients completed treatment. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in LFF was −0.667 (5.246) and 0.139 (4.323) in the AZD4017 and placebo groups ( P = 0.441). For patients with NASH and T2D, the mean (SD) change in LFF was significantly improved in the AZD4017 versus the placebo group (−1.087 [5.374] vs. 1.675 [3.318]; P = 0.033). Conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol was blocked in all patients in the AZD4017 group. There were no significant between‐group differences (AZD4017 vs. placebo) in changes in fibrosis, weight, levels of liver enzymes or lipids, or insulin sensitivity. Conclusion Although the study did not meet one of the primary outcomes, AZD4017 blocked the conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol in the liver in all patients who received the drug. In patients with NASH and T2D, AZD4017 improved liver steatosis versus placebo.

Carotid bodies (CB) are desensitized by hyperoxia/hyperglycemia and sensitized by hypoxia/hypoglycemia. We have reported in healthy humans that CB chemoreceptors secrete counterregulatory hormones in response to normoxia and hypoglycemia. While the role of central nervous system in glucose counterregulation is known, it is unknown whether alteration in CB response to glucose contributes to the pathogenesis of hypoglycema in T1D. We hypothesized that glucose counterregulation is impaired in T1D due to reduced sensitization of CB. 10 T1D and 12 healthy subjects (ND), matched for BMI (23 ± 3 vs 26 ± 5 kg/m 2 ) underwent a 180 min hyperinsulinemic (2 mU/kg TBW/min), hypoglycemic clamp (~3.3mM) under normoxic conditions (SpO2 98 ± 1%). T1D subjects did not report autonomic symptoms. [3‐ 3 H] glucose was infused to measure glucose turnover. Results were compared using means of last forty minutes of clamp data. Statistical analyses were done using unpaired t‐tests and p<0.05 was considered significant. In the presence of matched glucose (3.3±0.1 vs.3.3±0.1 mM) and insulin concentrations (783±106 vs. 812±185 pM;p=0.66), counterregulatory hormonal responses epinephrine (274 ± 165 vs. 742 ± 279 pg/ml) and glucagon (30 ± 11 vs 105 ± 31pg/ml) to hypoglycemia were significantly lower (p<0.001) in T1D vs. ND respectively. The glucose infusion rate required to maintain hypoglycemia was significantly higher (36 ± 1 vs.28 ± 0 µmol/kg/min, p <0.001) and endogenous glucose production was significantly lower (10 ± 3 vs.14 ± 4 µmol/kg/min, p<0.05) in T1D vs. ND with unchanged insulin stimulated glucose uptake. We conclude that in T1D the CB sensitivity to hypoglycemia is impaired and may contribute to increased risk of hypoglycemia in these individuals. Future studies are required to evaluate CB response in hypoglycemia unaware individuals with T1D. Grant Funding Source : DK90541

OBJECTIVE To distinguish the effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on exercise-induced increases in Rd and endogenous glucose production (EGP) in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied six participants without diabetes and six participants with type 1 diabetes on three visits in random order for the following: euglycemia, low insulin (EuLoI); euglycemia, high insulin (EuHiI); and hyperglycemia, low insulin (HyLoI). Glucose fluxes were measured using [6,6-2H2] glucose before, during, and after 60 min of exercise. RESULTS Rd increased (P &lt; 0.01) with exercise within groups, while peak Rd during exercise was lower (P &lt; 0.01) in participants with type 1 diabetes than participants without diabetes during all visits. In type 1 diabetes participants, EGP increased (P &lt; 0.001) with exercise during EuLoI and HyLoI but not during EuHiI. This demonstrates that hyperinsulinemia, but not hyperglycemia, blunts the compensatory exercise-induced increase in EGP in type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The data from this pilot study indicate that 1) exercise-induced compensatory increase in EGP was inhibited in participants with type 1 diabetes with hyperinsulinemia but not with hyperglycemia; 2) in contrast, in participants without diabetes, exercise-induced increase in EGP was inhibited only during combined hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Taken together, these results suggest that low insulin coupled with euglycemia or modest hyperglycemia appear to be the most favorable milieu for type 1 diabetes during exercise.