Dalla Man, Chiara

Hyperglycemia in prediabetes is accompanied by increased amino acid (AA) concentrations and impaired suppression of glucagon secretion by glucose. It is unknown whether an abnormal response to AA contributes or hepatic steatosis exacerbates α-cell dysfunction. Therefore, lean participants and participants with obesity (with and without hepatic steatosis) were studied on two occasions in random order using a graded glucose infusion. Saline or an AA mixture was infused. The glucagon secretion rate (GSR) was derived from peripheral glucagon concentrations, and the change in glucose required to reduce GSR by 50% (G50) was calculated for each participant. AAs were measured during the experiment. On both occasions, experimental conditions produced a progressive rise in insulin secretion and an inverse exponential suppression of glucagon. G50 did not differ between groups in response to glucose alone. AA infusion did not change G50 in lean participants. G50 increased during AA infusion in participants with obesity with and without hepatic steatosis, leading us to report these participants as a single group. The relative change in AA concentrations across study days was generally similar between groups. We conclude that despite a normal response to glucose, obesity increases α-cell responses to AA in humans. Article Highlights The aim of this study was to understand the pathogenesis of α-cell dysfunction in prediabetes. The primary hypothesis was that α-cell responsivity to glucose (reduction of the glucagon secretion rate by 50%) is impaired by amino acid (AA) infusion. A secondary hypothesis was that this abnormal response is exacerbated by hepatic steatosis. AA infusion impaired α-cell suppression in response to rising glucose in participants with obesity, but not in lean participants, despite a normal response to glucose alone. This abnormal response was unaffected by the presence or absence of hepatic steatosis. It seems likely that an abnormal α-cell response to AAs precedes an abnormal response to glucose alone.

OBJECTIVE Genetic variation in the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) has been implicated in type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and treatment response. We investigated whether GLP1R R131Q, which was previously reported as a T2D-protective variant in genome-wide association studies, alters receptor signaling, β-cell function, and response to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Trajectory of β-cell function was evaluated in a 20-year community-based prospective cohort in Korea (n = 6,373), where participants underwent biennial 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests, and disposition index was used as surrogate marker. Pharmacogenetic response to GLP-1RAs was assessed in a hospital-based T2D cohort in Korea (n = 177). Hyperglycemic clamp studies (n = 17), human islet experiments (n = 21), and in vitro assays were conducted to characterize GLP1R R131Q effects on receptor signaling and islet function. RESULTS GLP1R R131Q was associated with slower decline in disposition index in individuals without T2D, with reductions from baseline of 30% in homozygous carriers, 35% in heterozygotes, and 37% in wild-type individuals. In people with T2D, each allele conferred an additional 0.53% or 5.8 mmol/mol reduction in HbA1c after 6 months of GLP-1RA treatment (P = 5.8 × 10−4). Hyperglycemic clamp and human islet experiments demonstrated allele-dependent enhancement of GLP-1RA–stimulated insulin secretion (P = 0.050 and P = 0.037, respectively). In vitro, GLP1R R131Q increased GLP-1RA–stimulated cAMP production with directional observations consistent with pathway bias. CONCLUSIONS GLP1R R131Q is a gain-of-function variant associated with preservation of β-cell function and enhanced glycemic response to GLP-1RA treatment, supporting further investigation as a candidate pharmacogenetic marker for precision diabetes care.

In this study, we propose two new mathematical models able to quantify glucagon secretion during a graded glucose infusion, in the presence and absence of amino acids. The models provide an index of α-cell responsivity, G 50 , i.e., the glucose increase required to suppress glucose secretion rate (GSR) by 50%. Results show that the presence of amino acids reduced α-cell responsivity to glucose.

Early postprandial glucagon concentrations are higher in type 1 diabetes (T1D) than in individuals with no diabetes (ND). To determine the cause, we infused stable [13C9, 15N1]glucagon before, during, and after a mixed meal in 16 ND and 16 T1D individuals to measure glucagon turnover. In a subcohort of 9 ND and 12 T1D individuals, we estimated [13C9, 15N1]glucagon kinetics during steady state. A linear, single-compartment model described [13C9, 15N1]glucagon kinetics and allowed precise estimation of the volume of distribution (VD) and clearance rate (CL). Model parameters were similar between groups, with the VD of [13C9, 15N1]glucagon at 42.1 ± 3.3 mL/kg, implying that [13C9, 15N1]glucagon distributes in a single compartment and with VD approximating the plasma volume and CL at 10.6 ± 0.9 mL/kg/min. Higher early (0–120 min after meal ingestion) postprandial glucagon concentrations (1,907.9 ± 373.4 vs. −93.6 ± 240.5 pg/mL · 120 min P < 0.001) observed in T1D was due to higher rates of glucagon appearance (3.39 ± 2.8 vs. −3.95 ± 2.0 ng/kg · 120 min, P < 0.04) and disappearance (2.13 ± 2.6 vs. −5.28 ± 2.1 ng/kg · 120 min, P < 0.04) compared with ND. We have determined postprandial glucagon turnover in humans and have demonstrated that changes in postprandial glucagon concentrations in T1D are due to increased rates of glucagon turnover during the early postprandial period. Article Highlights This study was conducted to determine postprandial glucagon metabolism in people with and without type 1 diabetes. We wanted to determine the cause for higher early postprandial glucagon concentrations in type 1 diabetes. We found that higher early postprandial glucagon turnover is the cause of higher early postprandial glucagon concentrations in type 1 diabetes Strategies that decrease early post prandial glucagon fluxes could improve postprandial glucose concentrations in type 1 diabetes.

The model can be used to quantify hepatic glucagon and insulin sensitivity, accounting also for glucagon evanescence over time. The ability to quantify glucagon effects on postprandial glucose metabolism will further our understanding of its role in the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes. These findings can also be used in the design of novel glucagon-based therapies where accurate modeling of glucagon action is required to meet efficacy and safety standards.

The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI G ) was developed and validated against a reference. DI G can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.

Circulating glucagon concentrations differ between individuals with no diabetes (ND) and those with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We combined an isotope dilution technique using stable tracers [6,22-13C9,15N1]glucagon and [6,14,19,22-13C9,15N1]glucagon with splanchnic and leg catheterization in participants with ND (n = 8; age 23.1 ± 2.9 years, BMI 26.6 ± 3.5 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.0 ± 0.2% [31 ± 2 mmol/mol]) and T1D (n = 6; 29.0 ± 8.8 years, BMI 26.3 ± 5.0 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.9 ± 0.8% [63 ± 8 mmol/mol]) in the overnight fasted state. After baseline period, exogenous glucagon was infused at rates designed to achieve plasma glucagon concentrations spanning the physiological ranges, to determine the effects of rising glucagon concentrations on splanchnic and leg glucagon balance. At baseline, splanchnic glucagon extraction (SGE) was similar (30.7 ± 2.7 vs. 29.1 ± 2.9%) but leg glucagon extraction (LGE) was lower (27.0 ± 4.2 vs. 40.6 ± 3.1%) in participants with T1D versus those with ND. However, with increasing plasma glucagon concentrations, while SGE remained unchanged within and between groups, LGE fell in participants with ND (41 vs. 31 vs. 24%) but did not change in those with T1D. Despite a numerically lower net splanchnic glucagon production in participants with T1D than in those with ND, no changes were observed with increasing glucagon concentrations within the physiological range in both groups. This is the first human study applying novel glucagon isotopes that describes regional glucagon metabolism in participants with ND and T1D. Our observations provide translational relevance for dual hormone closed-loop systems and provide tools for probing the effects of GLP-1, dual, and triple receptor agonists on pancreatic α-cell functions. Article Highlights This study was conducted to assess splanchnic and leg glucagon metabolism in humans using stable glucagon isotopes. We wanted to evaluate whether splanchnic and leg glucagon metabolism differed between participants with no diabetes (ND) and those with type 1 diabetes (T1D) at glucagon concentrations spanning the physiological range. Whereas splanchnic glucagon extraction did not differ between participants with ND and those with T1D, leg glucagon extraction fell in those with ND but did not change in those with T1D as glucagon concentrations increased. Net splanchnic glucagon production did not change with exogenous glucagon infusion. Our study has implications for dual hormone closed-loop control in T1D where glucagon is infused for prevention of hypoglycemia and for investigating the effects of emerging GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and glucagon receptor agonists on endogenous glucagon secretion and clearance.

In this study, we propose a new mathematical model able to quantify C-peptide secretion and β-cell responsivity in response to a glucagon bolus in individuals without and with type 2 diabetes. We show that individuals with type 2 diabetes exhibit reduced β-cell responsivity to glucagon.

Abstract Context Defects in insulin secretion and action contribute to the progression of prediabetes to diabetes. However, the contribution of α-cell dysfunction to this process has been unclear. Objective This work aimed to understand the relative contributions of α-cell and β-cell dysfunction to declining glucose tolerance. Methods A longitudinal, community-based observational study was conducted at a clinical research unit at an academic medical center. We studied 96 individuals without diabetes (age 55 ± 1 years; body mass index 27.7 ± 0.4) on 2 occasions, 3 years apart using an oral 75-g glucose challenge. Indices for insulin secretion and action were estimated using the oral minimal model. Glucagon secretion rate (GSR) was estimated by deconvolution from peripheral glucagon concentrations. Main outcome measures included glucose tolerance status (categorical variable) and then symmetrical percentage change in peak and 120-minute glucose (post oral glucose tolerance test) concentrations (continuous variables). Results A total of 32 individuals progressed from normal to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or from IGT to type 2 diabetes. The disposition index (DI) declined in the progressors (568 ± 98 vs 403 ± 65 10−4 dL/kg/min per μU/mL, baseline vs 3 years; P = .04). α-Cell suppression by glucose (δGSR/δglucose) did not change in the nonprogressors (1.5 ± 0.1 vs 1.3 ± 0.1 nmol/min/L; P = .37) but decreased (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 0.8 ± 0.2 nmol/min/L; P < .01) in those who progressed. Analysis of the entire cohort showed that DI and δGSR/δglucose were independently and inversely correlated with an increase in glycemic excursion. Conclusion These data show that α-cell dysfunction accompanies a decline in β-cell function as IGT or overt type 2 diabetes develops.

We describe a method that lowers the limit of quantification of a glucagon immunoassay thereby enhancing the ability to differentiate between normal and abnormal α-cell responsiveness to glucagon.