Back to Authors

Galderisi, Alfonso

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-3056

Mayo Clinic

University of Padua

Citations 2

A New Index of Insulin Sensitivity from Glucose Sensor and Insulin Pump Data: In Silico and In Vivo Validation in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes
Schiavon, Michele , Galderisi, Alfonso , Basu, Ananda , Kudva, Yogish C. , Man, Chiara Dalla , Dalla Man, Chiara , Schiavon, Michele , Cengiz, Eda

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | January 17, 2023 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 270-278

10.1089/dia.2022.0397 Get It

Background: Estimation of insulin sensitivity (S I ) and its daily variation are key for optimizing insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We recently developed a method for S I estimation from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) data in adults with T1D (S I SP ) and validated it under restrained experimental conditions. Herein, we validate in vivo a new version of S I SP performing well in daily life unrestrained conditions. Methods: The new S I SP was tested in both simulated and real data. The simulated dataset consists of 100 virtual adults of the UVa/Padova T1D Simulator monitored during an open-loop experiment, whereas the real dataset consists of 10 youths with T1D monitored during a hybrid closed-loop meal study. In both datasets, participants underwent two consecutive meals (breakfast and lunch, at 7 and 11 am) with the same carbohydrate content (70 g). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured during each meal to estimate the oral glucose minimal model S I (S I MM ). CGM and CSII data were used for S I SP calculation, which was then validated against the gold standard S I MM . Results: S I SP was estimated with good precision (median coefficient of variation <20%) in 100% of the real and 91% of the simulated meals. S I SP and S I MM were highly correlated, both in the simulated and real datasets ( R = 0.82 and R = 0.83, P < 0.001), and exhibited a similar intraday pattern. Conclusions: S I SP is suitable for estimating S I in both closed- and open-loop settings, provided that the subject wears a CGM sensor and a subcutaneous insulin pump.
Inhibition of 11β‐Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase‐1 with AZD4017 in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase
Yadav, Yogesh , Dunagan, Kelly T., Khot, Rachita , Venkatesh, Sudhakar K. , Wegner, Craig D., Basu, Ananda , Carter, Rickey E. , Basu, Rita , Dunagan, Kelly, Basu, Ananda , Carter, Rickey, Basu, Rita , Carter, Rickey E , Venkatesh, Sudhakar K , Port, John D. , Galderisi, Alfonso , Cobelli, Claudio

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism | January 11, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 881-890

10.1111/dom.14646 Get It

Abstract Aim To evaluate whether short‐term treatment with a selective 11β‐Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase‐1 (11β‐HSD1) inhibitor, AZD4017, would block hepatic cortisol production and thereby decrease hepatic fat in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 study conducted at two sites. Key inclusion criteria were the presence of NAFLD or NASH on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or recent biopsy positive for NASH. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to AZD4017 or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were between‐group differences in mean change from baseline to week 12 in liver fat fraction (LFF) and conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol in the liver. Results A total of 93 patients were randomized; 85 patients completed treatment. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in LFF was −0.667 (5.246) and 0.139 (4.323) in the AZD4017 and placebo groups ( P = 0.441). For patients with NASH and T2D, the mean (SD) change in LFF was significantly improved in the AZD4017 versus the placebo group (−1.087 [5.374] vs. 1.675 [3.318]; P = 0.033). Conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol was blocked in all patients in the AZD4017 group. There were no significant between‐group differences (AZD4017 vs. placebo) in changes in fibrosis, weight, levels of liver enzymes or lipids, or insulin sensitivity. Conclusion Although the study did not meet one of the primary outcomes, AZD4017 blocked the conversion of 13 C cortisone to 13 C cortisol in the liver in all patients who received the drug. In patients with NASH and T2D, AZD4017 improved liver steatosis versus placebo.