Hogan, William

Abstract Introduction: Inherited & acquired bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS) have “stress erythropoiesis” with macrocytic anemia, elevated fetal hemoglobin (HbF) & erythropoietin (EPO) levels. The degree of HbF elevation & its capacity to discriminate between patients with inherited & acquired BMFS needs to be systemically studied. Genetic testing is often delayed & it is important to establish an early clinical diagnosis to make clinical decisions such as initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Methods: After institutional review board approval, we compiled a clinically & genetically well-annotated cohort of patients with BMFS evaluated at Mayo Clinic. All patients were required to have at least cytopenia(s) & evidence of low or variable bone marrow cellularity upon a bone marrow evaluation. Patients with pre-clonal or malignant disorders were excluded. Clinical diagnoses were independently verified for accuracy. Detailed clinical & laboratory features were recorded. Germline genetic testing was performed as clinically appropriate on peripheral blood or bone marrow samples through targeted panels. Distribution of continuous variables was statistically compared using nonparametric (Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis) tests, while nominal variables were compared using the Chi-Square test. Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) was computed from the date of diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up (also censored at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Results: Between years 1998 - 2023, 129 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study. Among these, clinical diagnoses included immune-mediated aplastic anemia (AA, n=56, 43%, 21% severe or very severe as per the Camitta criteria), telomere biology disorders (TBD, n=37, 29%), Fanconi anemia (n=10, 8%), GATA2 haploinsufficiency (n=8, 6%), Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA, n=2, 2%), deficiency of adenosine deaminase-2 (DADA2, n=2, 2%), congenital dyserythropoietic anemia (CDA, n=1, 1%), congential amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT, n=1, 1%), Schwachman-Diamond syndrome (n=1, 1%) & undefined (n=11, 9%). Among the inherited group, 63% had an identifiable germline pathogenic variant (most commonly, TERT/TERC 30%, FANC group 25% & GATA2 15%) with the rest diagnosed on a clinical basis. Elevated HbF >1% was noted in 79% of all BMFS patients; 83% AA, 70% TBD, 50% in DADA2 & 67% in undefined patients (no data was available for other inherited subtypes). In patients with an elevated HbF, absolute monocyte count (p=0.04) was significantly higher; however, there were no other significant associations with variables at diagnosis such as hemoglobin (p=0.5), white blood cell count (WBC, p=0.14), absolute neutrophil count (p=0.5), platelet count (p=0.7), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, p=0.2), absolute lymphocyte count (p=0.1), absolute reticulocyte count (p=0.4), EPO level (p=0.3), presence of a PNH clone (p=0.2), or presence of a germline variant (p=0.3). When diseases were grouped into inherited & acquired (AA) subgroups, median HbF was not significantly different (median%, 4.5 versus 2.3, p=0.4), with elevated HbF (>1%) in 75% versus 83% (p=0.6) patients respectively. On the other hand, minor PNH clone (>0.1% in at least two cell types) was detectable in the acquired group only (0 versus 55%, p<0.0001). Similarly, acquired group had a shorter (<3 months) onset of cytopenias preceding diagnosis (P<0.0001), with no significant differences in MCV (p=0.2), marrow dysplasia (p=0.09) or atypia (p=0.6), & splenomegaly (p=0.9). At median follow-up of 7 years, Kaplan-Meier estimate of transplant-censored median OS was lower in inherited versus acquired group (16 years versus median not reached, p=0.02). Elevated HbF did not significantly predict adverse OS in either group. Conclusions: Fetal hemoglobin is elevated in both patients with inherited & acquired (aplastic anemia) BMFS. When compared to established variables, elevated HbF has neither diagnostic utility nor prognostic relevance in predicting adverse outcomes. On the other hand, onset of cytopenias and presence of a minor PNH clone are both useful clinical variables in differentiating patients with inherited from acquired BMFS. Our data offers practical clinical utility in making early treatment decisions for patients with BMFS.

SummaryRuxolitinib for steroid‐refractory acute graft‐versus‐host disease (SR‐aGVHD) results in resistance or intolerance in 1/5 of patients. Outcomes of such patients are undefined. We identified these patients in a multicentre review and reported outcomes. Ruxolitinib‐resistant aGVHD was identified in 48/307 patients. Among patients receiving additional therapy, the overall response rate to next therapy was 36%. Median survival was 21 days. Ruxolitinib intolerance led to treatment discontinuation in 16/307 patients. Ten intolerant patients received additional therapy with 50% experiencing continued improvement of aGVHD. Median survival was 50 days in these patients. These data serve as a baseline for future SR‐aGVHD studies.

AbstractVenetoclax and hypomethylating agent (HMA) combination therapy is FDA‐approved for elderly or unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unable to withstand intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of the current study was to impart our institutional experience with the above regimen, outlining response, survival outcomes, and its determinants amongst 86 treatment‐ naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients. A total of 44 treatment‐naïve AML patients, median age 73.5 years, enriched with secondary, therapy related and ELN adverse risk disease (n = 27) were studied. The CR/CRi rates of 50% (22 of 44 patients) were superior to 23% in a matched AML cohort treated with HMA alone (P = .005). Response rates were similar with TP53, FLT3, NPM1 and IDH mutations (P = .31). Moreover, CEPBA mutations (P = .03) and neutropenia (P = .05) emerged as predictors of complete response. Survivalwas prolonged in patients achieving CR/CRi (17 vs 3 months without CR/CRi, P < .001; conversely adverse ELN risk portended inferior survival. Amongst 42 relapsed/refractory AML patients, half received ≥2 prior therapies excluding transplant, and 15 (35.7%) had received HMA. A group of 14 patients (33.3%) attained CR/CRi; age > 65 years, AML with myelodysplasia, JAK2, DNMT3A, and BCOR mutations predicted complete response. Survival distinctions were based on CR/CRi (median survival 15 vs 3 months with/without CR/CRi; P < .001), and TP53 mutation status (P = .04). In summary, we corroborate existing reports demonstrating superior response and prolonged survival with venetoclax and HMA in treatment ‐naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients regardless of genotype. Additionally, we identify unique predictors of response to therapy which require validation.

Abstract Purpose: To develop a prognostic model and cytogenetic risk classification for previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) undergoing reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Experimental Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes of 606 patients with CLL who underwent RIC allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2014 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Results: On the basis of multivariable models, disease status, comorbidity index, lymphocyte count, and white blood cell count at HCT were selected for the development of prognostic model. Using the prognostic score, we stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk [4-year progression-free survival (PFS) 58%, 42%, 33%, and 25%, respectively, P &lt; 0.0001; 4-year overall survival (OS) 70%, 57%, 54%, and 38%, respectively, P &lt; 0.0001]. We also evaluated karyotypic abnormalities together with del(17p) and found that del(17p) or ≥5 abnormalities showed inferior PFS. Using a multivariable model, we classified cytogenetic risk into low, intermediate, and high (P &lt; 0.0001). When the prognostic score and cytogenetic risk were combined, patients with low prognostic score and low cytogenetic risk had prolonged PFS (61% at 4 years) and OS (75% at 4 years). Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with previously treated CLL who underwent RIC HCT, we developed a robust prognostic scoring system of HCT outcomes and a novel cytogenetic-based risk stratification system. These prognostic models can be used for counseling patients, comparing data across studies, and providing a benchmark for future interventions. For future study, we will further validate these models for patients receiving targeted therapies prior to HCT.