Day, Courtney N.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Surgical management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is often mastectomy. No guidelines specifically address contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for this population. We assessed factors associated with CPM at the time of IBTR mastectomy. Methods Patients undergoing mastectomy for IBTR (10/2008‐5/2024) were identified. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details were assessed. Results Of the 381 eligible IBTR patients, 221 (58.0%) had a unilateral therapeutic mastectomy and 160 (42.0%) underwent mastectomy with CPM. CPM patients were younger ( p < 0.0001), with lower clinical T category tumors ( p < 0.001) and less HR + HER2‐ invasive disease ( p = 0.004). CPM patients were more likely to undergo germline genetic testing (63.1% vs 41.6%, p < 0.0001) and were twice as likely to have immediate breast reconstruction ( p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, younger age, HR‐HER2 + IBTR subtype, pathogenic variants known at the time of surgery (relative to negative testing and/or no genetic testing), immediate breast reconstruction, and prior radiation for index cancer were each associated with CPM (all p < 0.05). Conclusion In our series of 381 patients treated with mastectomy for IBTR, 42% also had a CPM. Multiple factors, including age, tumor stage and biology, immediate breast reconstruction, and genetic testing may impact CPM choice.

10043 Background: Tumor resection is a cornerstone of therapy for neuroblastoma (NB) and Wilms tumor (WT). Minimally invasive surgical approaches such as laparoscopic or robotic tumor resection hold promise to reduce surgical morbidity while maintaining excellent oncologic outcomes. This study aims to determine the utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic resection of NB and WT among children in a national cohort, hypothesizing that utilization is increasing over time and outcomes are not inferior to open resection. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients <18 years old in the 2020-2023 National Cancer Database who underwent resection of NB or WT was performed. Surgical approach trends were assessed via Cochran-Armitage tests. Conversions to open surgery, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions were compared between approaches using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Among 1,262 children who underwent resection of NB (n=581) or WT (n=681), open procedures were most common (83.4%), followed by laparoscopic (13.9%), and robotic (2.7%). Utilization of each approach was stable over time aside from increased robotic resection of NB from 0% to 4% (p=.024). Approach did not vary by patient age (Table 1). Median WT size and lymph node yield were similar between approaches (both p>.05). In NB, laparoscopic procedures were performed on smaller tumors than open or robotic (p<.001). There were no robotic conversions to open; 11.4% of laparoscopic procedures were converted without change over time or difference between NB and WT (both p>.05). Median LOS was greater for open procedures than laparoscopic or robotic (p<.001). Readmission rates (p=.64) and margin status (p=.63) were similar between approaches. Outcomes did not vary by diagnosis. Conclusions: Utilization of minimally invasive approaches for NB or WT resection remains low despite noninferior or improved outcomes. Efforts to safely increase utilization are needed, especially for robotics, so that survivorship can be improved through reduced surgical morbidity. Differences in patient characteristics and outcomes by surgical approach. Characteristic or Outcome Open Laparoscopic Robotic p value Age in years (median, IQR) 3 (1, 4) 3 (1, 5) 3 (1, 7) 0.08 % female 53% 53% 44% 0.59 NB tumor size in mm (median, IQR) 72 (50, 101) 47 (35, 71) 70 (51, 86) <0.001 WT tumor size in mm (median, IQR) 110 (75, 140) 115 (93, 150) 93 (54, 125) 0.10 % metastatic disease 33% 30% 15% 0.07 % neoadjuvant therapy 35% 27% 22% 0.014 % conversion to open n/a 11% 0% 0.05 Negative margins 86% 83% 96% 0.63 # Lymph nodes assessed in WT (median, IQR) 5 (3, 8) 6 (3, 10) 4 (3, 9) 0.62 LOS in days (median, IQR) 5 (4, 7) 4 (2, 6) 4 (1, 5) <0.001 % readmission 15% 14% 9% 0.64

Abstract Objectives Society guidelines discourage biopsy of thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) due to the perceived risk of local seeding or pleural dissemination. However, few studies have evaluated this concern, and the true risk of preoperative biopsy remains unknown. Methods We queried the United States’ National Cancer Database for adults with localized TETs who underwent upfront R0 thymectomy 2004-2015. Use of preoperative biopsy over time was assessed with the Cochran-Armitage test. Postoperative outcomes were compared with chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Overall survival (OS) was analysed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Results We identified 1056 patients. The median age was 61 years; 47% (492) were male. Use of preoperative percutaneous biopsy increased 2006-2015 from 18% to 33% (P &lt; .001). Patients who underwent biopsy had larger tumours [median 6.6 vs 5.0 cm], more open operations [72% (150) vs 62% (331)] and regional lymphadenectomies [44% (118) vs 33% (250)], and a longer length of hospitalization (median 4 vs 3 days). Thirty-day mortality was similar between the groups. There was no difference in 10-year OS between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups [75% (95% CI 69%-82%) vs 76% (95% CI 73%-80%), P = .8]. After adjusting for age, sex, primary payor, histology, and tumour size, OS was similar between the biopsy and no-biopsy groups [AHR 0.97 (95% CI 0.72-1.29), P = .9]. Conclusions In this analysis of patients with localized TETs undergoing upfront R0 thymectomy, preoperative biopsy is not associated with worse OS. More study is needed to further explore whether biopsy increases risk of recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Children continue to undergo right hemicolectomy (RHC) for neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the appendix based on adult guidelines. Appendectomy alone is recommended for the pediatric population; however, there are no data on safety of this approach in the setting of positive margins. This study aimed to determine the association between tumor characteristics and survival in a national cohort, hypothesizing that survival would be excellent despite high-risk features including positive margins on appendectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Patients 18 years of age or younger with NET of the appendix were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2022 using ICD-O-3 codes. Characteristics of patients who underwent definitive appendectomy vs RHC were compared using chi-square tests. Five-year survival was determined for appendectomy patients with and without high-risk size, margin, and lymph node (LN) features. RESULTS: Of 1,339 patients, 1,156 (86%) underwent appendectomy and 183 (14%) RHC. Median age in both groups was 15 (13 to 17) years. Patients who underwent RHC had larger tumors (24% vs 4%, greater than 2 cm, p < 0.001), more lymphovascular invasion (31% vs 10%, p < 0.001), and were more likely to undergo LN assessment (82% vs 10%, p < 0.001) with a higher LN positivity rate (31% vs 16%, p = 0.006). There was no difference in margins status (p = 0.76). The 5- and 10-year survival was excellent regardless of tumor characteristics for patients overall (99.9% and 99.4%, respectively) and for those who underwent definitive appendectomy (99.9% and 99.2%). CONCLUSIONS: These data further support appendectomy as definitive management for children with appendiceal NET. Additional resection does not confer a survival benefit even in the setting of positive margins.

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) collects data from approximately 1,500 Commission on Cancer (CoC) facilities and represent 73.7% of newly diagnosed cancers nationwide. The American College of Surgeons Cancer Program developed it first annual report from the NCDB 2021 participant user file reporting new observations and recent trends of cancer diagnoses, patient demographics, and treatments as well as an in-depth report on treatment and outcomes in breast, pancreas, and colon cancers. Of the 1,328,131 cancers diagnosed in 2021 at 1,281 reporting CoC hospitals, one-fifth continue to be female breast cancer. In 2021, the NCDB’s 5 most common adult cancers were breast, prostate, lung, colon, and melanoma and varied by patient sex. Use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy increased in recent years in pancreas, breast, and urinary bladder cancer, although a slight decrease in pancreas and breast cancer was observed in 2021. Breast cancer has high survival rates, especially in lower-stage disease and estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative disease. There is increase in neoadjuvant systemic therapy use, especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease and estrogen receptor-negative disease. Colon cancer presents most commonly as stage III or II with a primary in the cecum or ascending colon in 38.9%. The majority are microsatellite instability stable, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue normal, and CEA positive. Survival is most dependent on stage but also associated with microsatellite instability stability, abnormal Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue, and positive CEA. Pancreatic cancer presents with stage IV disease in nearly half, although an increase in stage I disease is seen. The most common location is pancreatic head. Survival is relatively low and most dependent on stage.

AbstractBackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) negatively impact fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer. This study assessed PPI impact on major pathologic response (mPR) rates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy.MethodsAn institutional retrospective review of resected PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy (98% FOLFIRINOX) from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Outcomes were stratified by use or nonuse of PPIs within 6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy initiation. Primary outcome was mPR defined as complete or near complete response.ResultsAmong 540 patients included, the median age was 64 (IQR: 60–70) years, 297 (55%) were male, and 202 (37%) were PPI users. 170 (31%) patients had mPR with similar rates among PPI users and nonusers (29% vs. 33%, p = 0.38). No difference in mPR was seen between PPI users and nonusers receiving chemoradiation (35% vs. 36%, p = 0.89) or ≥8 cycles of NAC (33% vs. 36%, p = 0.55). Median OS for PPI users was 30.9 versus 31.7 months for nonusers (p = 0.62). On multivariable analysis, PPI therapy was not associated with decreased survival.ConclusionPPI usage did not significantly influence mPR or OS following neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients. Further analysis of all patients, not just those who underwent resection, is required.

ABSTRACT Background Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer has a profound impact on patients' lives. However, the long‐term financial implications are poorly understood. Objective Assess the financial burden of long‐term survivors who underwent PD. Methods Patients who underwent PD between January 2011 and June 2019 were identified. To evaluate the long‐term financial burden, patients surviving ≥ 3 years post‐resection were prospectively surveyed using the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST‐FACIT) and a customized institutionally developed questionnaire. A logistic regression model predicting high financial toxicity was used to identify predictive factors. Results Among 238 eligible patients, 137 (57.6%) responded. Responders had a median age of 66 (59–73) years, with 86.7% identifying as financial prosperous or comfortable. However, 33.3% experienced financial distress due to treatment costs, 27.3% demonstrated high financial toxicity on the COST‐FACIT survey, and 37.2% made sacrifices to afford treatment. Only 8.9% stated that the treatment costs influenced their decisions, and the majority (85.9%) did not discuss financial implications with healthcare providers. Multivariable analysis identified younger age as a risk factor for high financial toxicity. Conclusion One in three long‐term survivors experienced high financial toxicity, with younger age being a predictor. This emphasizes the need for efforts to provide comprehensive support and guidance to patients to navigate their oncological journey.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected healthcare systems globally, resulting in significant delays and challenges in various medical treatments, particularly in cancer care. This study aims to investigate the repercussions of the pandemic on surgical interventions for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the US, using data from the National Cancer Database. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database, encompassing adult patients who underwent surgical procedures for colon and rectal cancer in 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (COVID). We examined various demographic and clinical variables, including patient characteristics, tumor staging, surgical approaches, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: The analysis included 105,517 patients, revealing a 17.3% reduction in surgical cases during the initial year of the pandemic. Patients who underwent surgery in 2020 displayed more advanced clinical and pathological tumor stages compared to those treated in 2019. After diagnosis, no delay was reported in the treatment. Patients operated during the pandemic, Black patients, uninsured, and Medicaid beneficiaries had worse stage colon and rectal cancer, and individuals with lower incomes bore the burden of advanced colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CRC surgery transcends a mere decline in case numbers, resulting in a higher prevalence of patients with advanced disease. This study underscores the exacerbated disparities in cancer care, particularly affecting vulnerable populations. The COVID-19 pandemic has left a significant and enduring imprint on CRC surgery, intensifying the challenges faced by patients and healthcare systems. Comprehensive studies are imperative to comprehend the long-term consequences of delayed screenings, diagnoses, and treatments as healthcare planning for the future must consider the unintended repercussions of pandemic-related disruptions.