Yogarajah, Meera

7053 Background: The revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) aids in prognosticating MDS. The percentage (%) of blasts in the bone marrow is one of the major determinants of the scoring system. The aspirate blast % is utilized as the standard of care, but there could be discrepancies in the blast % reported by the aspirate and the biopsy. We aim to study the possible use of bone marrow biopsy blasts in MDS-EB in calculating IPSS-R. Methods: The MDS database was reviewed for cases of MDS-EB after due IRB approval. We calculated IPSS-R scores based on the aspirate blast % (IPSS-RAsp) and biopsy blast % (IPSS-RBx). The biopsy blast % was reported morphologically or by the CD34 stain. Whenever a range was reported the highest value was utilized as the blast %. Suboptimal aspirates were excluded from the study. The overall survival (OS) was determined by IPSS-RAsp, IPSS-RBx and IPSS-R highest blast (IPSS-RHi). OS estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing using JMP v.13. Uno’s concordance statistic was used to compare all 3 risk scoring systems. Results: Of 1322 patients, 431 (33%) cases were identified with MDS-EB; out of which 173 cases had both blasts reported in the biopsy and the aspirate. Out of 173 cases, 35 (20%) had MDS-EB1, and 61 (35%) had MDS EB-2 based on both biopsy and aspirate (concordant cases). Seventy seven (45%) patients changed from EB-1 to EB2 or vice versa based on the biopsy blast (44/77 (57%) cases were upstaged). The OS outcomes based on the IPSS-RBx biopsy showed a clear and meaningful separation with median OS decreasing with increased risk but IPSS-RAsp and IPSS-RHi did not (Table). We compared the 3 models for observed OS differences using the Uno model and there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: IPSS-RBx (but not IPSS-RAsp and IPSS-RHi) identified prognostic groups for OS with median OS decreasing with increased risk. The small sample size may have led to an insignificant effect on model power by Uno model. This finding needs to be validated by other centers. [Table: see text]

Objective : Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a known phenomenon of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However little is known about the incidence of CNS involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as routine lumbar punctures are not done if patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis. Our practice has been to obtain lumbar puncture (LP) at or after complete remission (CR) for patients that present with any one of the following high risk features;hyperleukocytosis with WBC >10,000 or blastic crisis, extramedullary disease,monocytic differentiation. Methods: We reviewed our leukemia database at Mayo Clinic to determine the incidence of CNS involvement in patients with high risk features after due IRB approval. We also compared baseline demographic characteristics, blood counts, cytogenetic risk groups, presence of extramedullary disease, relapse rate ,transplant rate and overall survival (OS) among patients with and without CNS involvement. OS estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing using JMP v.13. Results: 298 patients with AML were identified with presence of at least 1 risk factor for CNS involvement. The results of LP were only available for 126 (42%) patients. The overall incidence of CNS involvement was 12% (15/126, figure 1). Among the patients with positive disease 3 had CSF examination at diagnosis prior to CR due to the presence of CNS myeloid sarcoma (n=2) and ambiguous lineage myeloid leukemia and were excluded from further evaluation. The incidence of CSF involvement at CR1 was 9.7% (12/123). All patient with CNS positive disease received intrathecal chemotherapy with alternating cytarabine and methotrexate until they cleared their blast and additional 2-4 treatments as per treating physician's discretion .The CNS positive and negative patients were compared and did not show any statistical difference in age, gender, presence of extramedullary disease ,cytogenetic risk group, relapse rate and transplant rate as shown in table1. Molecular data was not available in most of the patients and hence was not included for analysis. The median OS was significantly lower among patients with CNS involvement compared to absence of CNS involvement but was not statistically significant likely due to small sample size (3.9 vs12.8 years (p=0.2), figure 2). The overall CNS relapse rate in patients who did not have a LP done at CR was 5.8%(10/172). Conclusions : CNS evaluation should be done in AML patients with high risk features before declaring CR. CNS disease portends overall a poor prognosis with impaired overall survival and high relapse rate. However the sample size was small and true incidence of CNS disease will need routine diagnostic LP in all high risk patients. Disclosures Patnaik: Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

Background MDS is a heterogeneous disease and the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) is utilized in prognostication. The percentage (%) of blasts in the bone marrow is determined in the aspirate morphologically. Though the former is the standard of care the blast percentage is also reported by flow cytometry and biopsy which can many times be inconsistent. We previously presented the utilization of biopsy based blast percentage which showed meaningful prognostic groups compared to aspirate. In this study we compare the blasts as reported by the aspirate and flow cytometry in MDS-EB in calculating IPSS-R. Methods The MDS database was reviewed for cases of MDS-EB after due IRB approval at the Mayo clinic. We calculated IPSS-R scores based on the aspirate blast % (IPSS-RAsp) and flow blast% (IPSS-Rfl). The aspirate blast percentage was reported morphologically. Suboptimal aspirates were excluded from the study. The flow blast percentage was determined by immunophenotyping. The overall survival (OS) was determined by IPSS-RAsp and IPSS-RFl. OS estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing using JMP v.13. Uno's concordance statistic was used to compare the 2 risk scoring systems. Results Of 1322 patients, 431 (33%) cases were identified with MDS-EB out of which 120 (29%) cases had blasts reported in the aspirate and flow. Based on aspirate MDS EB1: 54% (n=65), MDS EB2 46% (n=55). The hematological, cytogenetic and R-IPSS categories were compared between MDS-EB1 and MDS- EB 2. The blast percentage and hemoglobin levels was significantly different between MDS-EB1 and EB2 as seen in table 1, however the IPSS-R risk groups were not significantly different. The flow cytometry was concordant with aspirate in 66/120 (55%) cases. Out of the dis-concordant cases only 20% (11/54) was upstaged by flow cytometry with most of the patients being down staged as expected by the techniques used in processing the blood and hence not reliable when reported low (Figure 1). The OS outcomes based on the IPSS- R asp, IPSS-Rfl areshown in figure 2A,2B .The p value with aspirate based R-IPSS was more significant than flow cytometry based R-IPSS (p= 0.0007 vs 0.0174). We compared the two models for observed OS differences using the Uno model which was not statistically significant. (p= 0.6) Conclusions Both models did not show a difference which is likely due to the very small sample size. However flow cytometry did down stage more patients when disconcordant and may have less value in that setting. It would be ideal to compare all 3 models aspirate, biopsy and flow cytometry however we did not have enough number of patients to do the comparison. Disclosures Patnaik: Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.